Licensing policy FAQ draft: Revision history

25 January 2016

• curprev 09:2209:22, 25 January 2016‎ Kaganer talk contribs‎ m 5,673 bytes +11‎ removed Category:FAQs; added Category:Historical FAQs using HotCat undo

24 July 2015

• curprev 10:3310:33, 24 July 2015‎ Chrumps talk contribs‎ m 5,662 bytes +19‎ Category:FAQs undo

27 May 2014

• curprev 21:2521:25, 27 May 2014‎ UV talk contribs‎ m 5,643 bytes −14‎ Undo revision 8678603 by 189.71.9.195 (talk) undo
• curprev 18:1718:17, 27 May 2014‎ 189.71.9.195 talk‎ 5,657 bytes +14‎ →‎What does "reasonably replaceable" mean? undo

27 April 2013

• curprev 14:3614:36, 27 April 2013‎ Invadibot talk contribs‎ m 5,643 bytes −5‎ Bot: Fixing links to Wikimedia projects and applying protocol-relative URLs undo

9 April 2012

• curprev 21:4421:44, 9 April 2012‎ Thehelpfulone talk contribs‎ 5,648 bytes −2‎ update undo

23 May 2007

• curprev 22:5522:55, 23 May 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ 5,650 bytes −210‎ →‎Doesn't inclusion of non-free content invalidate the GFDL?: rm section -- this is not a page about the GFDL, and two links don't explain the Resolution in any way whatsoever undo

13 May 2007

• curprev 16:4716:47, 13 May 2007‎ 71.167.65.137 talk‎ 5,860 bytes −302‎ →‎Can our EDP allow content that is non-commercial or used with permission?: fix link, remove back and forth, duplicated content undo
• curprev 16:4216:42, 13 May 2007‎ 71.167.65.137 talk‎ 6,162 bytes +321‎ No edit summary undo

4 May 2007

• curprev 03:3803:38, 4 May 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ 5,841 bytes −210‎ →‎Doesn't inclusion of non-free content invalidate the GFDL?: rm -- not the right place for a discussion of this undo

3 May 2007

• curprev 16:3616:36, 3 May 2007‎ Abu badali~metawiki talk contribs‎ 6,051 bytes +369‎ not so simple undo

22 April 2007

• curprev 23:5523:55, 22 April 2007‎ 71.167.67.66 talk‎ 5,682 bytes +212‎ or content under a different license undo

21 April 2007

• curprev 00:0300:03, 21 April 2007‎ 71.167.67.66 talk‎ 5,470 bytes −13‎ "for doing so" is superfluous undo

14 April 2007

• curprev 21:2721:27, 14 April 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ m 5,483 bytes −131‎ →‎Why this policy?: rm quibble, m tense change undo
• curprev 21:2421:24, 14 April 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ m 5,614 bytes −2‎ →‎Can our EDP allow content that is non-commercial or used with permission?: if it meets the criteria for doing so *set out in that EDP* undo
• curprev 16:2216:22, 14 April 2007‎ 71.167.58.219 talk‎ 5,616 bytes +22‎ →‎Can our EDP allow content that is non-commercial or used with permission? undo
• curprev 16:2116:21, 14 April 2007‎ 71.167.58.219 talk‎ 5,594 bytes −7‎ why in comments? undo
• curprev 16:2116:21, 14 April 2007‎ 71.167.58.219 talk‎ 5,601 bytes +30‎ →‎Why is this a problem? No one is likely to sue over most of them.: free content is not our mission undo
• curprev 16:1816:18, 14 April 2007‎ 71.167.58.219 talk‎ 5,571 bytes +128‎ →‎Why this policy? undo
• curprev 16:0116:01, 14 April 2007‎ 71.167.58.219 talk‎ 5,443 bytes +59‎ good wording undo
• curprev 15:5915:59, 14 April 2007‎ Mindspillage talk contribs‎ 5,384 bytes +292‎ →‎I don't agree with these policy changes. Where do I protest it?: expand a bit undo
• curprev 15:5615:56, 14 April 2007‎ 71.167.58.219 talk‎ 5,092 bytes +5‎ "suck it up" is not a good answer. here's what i meant to ask. undo

7 April 2007

• curprev 17:0317:03, 7 April 2007‎ Mindspillage talk contribs‎ 5,087 bytes +39‎ →‎Can our EDP allow content that is non-commercial or used with permission?: clarification. undo
• curprev 05:2505:25, 7 April 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ 5,048 bytes −102‎ →‎I don't agree with these policy changes. What should I do?: clearly needs rephrasing undo
• curprev 05:1505:15, 7 April 2007‎ Pathoschild talk contribs‎ 5,150 bytes +348‎ + header, category undo
• curprev 05:1105:11, 7 April 2007‎ Pathoschild talk contribs‎ 4,802 bytes −722‎ tweaks, fixed content-type inconsistency, fixed fair-use-only inconsistency (per later responses), merged redundant sections, + categories undo
• curprev 04:4204:42, 7 April 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ m 5,524 bytes +42‎ →‎What does "reasonably replaceable" mean?: +another common replacement undo
• curprev 04:2404:24, 7 April 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ m 5,482 bytes +113‎ →‎Can we include non-reproducible educational images ''with permission'' from the copyright holder?: expand, to incorporate rm'ed question undo
• curprev 04:2204:22, 7 April 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ 5,369 bytes +167‎ rm two questions that are already reasonably answered above, +2 responses undo
• curprev 04:1204:12, 7 April 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ m 5,202 bytes −70‎ →‎Permission?: Trim, respond undo
• curprev 00:1800:18, 7 April 2007‎ 71.167.58.219 talk‎ 5,272 bytes +925‎ i really don't understand this; it's quite self-contradictory and not in keeping with the purpose of the project. here are some of the many questions that need to be answered to satisfy us. undo

30 March 2007

• curprev 01:1301:13, 30 March 2007‎ 71.167.59.179 talk‎ 4,347 bytes +134‎ If non-free content is prohibited, then quotations are prohibited too. You can't have it both ways. Projects without an EDP that allows quotations can't use quotations. undo
• curprev 00:5600:56, 30 March 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ 4,213 bytes +10‎ →‎Does this mean all text quotes should be deleted?: ...but perhaps we should rephrase the original sentence undo
• curprev 00:5300:53, 30 March 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ 4,203 bytes +76‎ rv -- I don't think that we want to say that, at all undo
• curprev 00:0400:04, 30 March 2007‎ 71.167.59.179 talk‎ 4,127 bytes −76‎ →‎Does this mean all text quotes should be deleted?: if our new mission is "to create and encourage free content", the educational merits of copyrighted content are irrelevant undo

27 March 2007

• curprev 07:3807:38, 27 March 2007‎ 4.250.132.201 talk‎ 4,203 bytes +309‎ →‎Does the Foundation have to approve our EDP? undo
• curprev 03:1603:16, 27 March 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ 3,894 bytes +45‎ tweaks undo
• curprev 03:0503:05, 27 March 2007‎ Jkelly~metawiki talk contribs‎ m 3,849 bytes +6‎ →‎My country does not recognize any kind of fair use! How are we supposed to develop an exemption doctrine policy?: clarify undo
• curprev 01:5301:53, 27 March 2007‎ Mindspillage talk contribs‎ 3,843 bytes +346‎ expand undo
• curprev 01:5001:50, 27 March 2007‎ Mindspillage talk contribs‎ 3,497 bytes +6‎ comment out one with no answer written yet undo
• curprev 01:4901:49, 27 March 2007‎ Mindspillage talk contribs‎ 3,491 bytes +344‎ new Q undo
• curprev 01:4001:40, 27 March 2007‎ Mindspillage talk contribs‎ 3,147 bytes +3,147‎ draft