Jump to content

Grants talk:Programs/Wikimedia Community Fund/Rapid Fund/Wiki Exploration Program 2024-25 (ID: 22598669): Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
 
Line 24: Line 24:
<u>Implementation team</u>
<u>Implementation team</u>


5) For each field visit, could you provide more details on what are the pre, during and post trip preparation that is needed and the amount of time one has to allocate to these activities? Given you have done this multiple times, do yo have standard operating procedures and guidelines around the project management to share as part of knowledge management contribution to the movement?
5) For each field visit, could you provide more details on what are the pre, during and post trip preparation that is needed and the amount of time one has to allocate to these activities? Given you have done this multiple times, do you have standard operating procedures and guidelines around the project management to share as part of knowledge management contribution to the movement?


Thank you.
Thank you.

Revision as of 02:19, 20 May 2024

Follow-up Questions and Observations on your grant application

Hello @Amitabha Gupta,

Thank you for putting in your grant application. Here are the consolidated questions, comments and observations from the reviewers. Would you be able to provide a response to them? Thank you.

--

Feedback on activities proposed:

1) I see that some of these activities are now in their second or third phases but there is no information on the success/failure of the previous phases. Could you elaborate more on this?

Merit of the idea

2) The proposed application looks good and the budget is very comprehensive given the outcomes. The community is active and synchronised.

Recommendations and Comments

3) Overall, it might be worth funding but it would be important to understand why these places are chosen and what is the current state of Wikimedia projects around them and what they are planning to change? Also, I see the focus is to bring a huge amount of contributions to Commons but there is no plan to integrate it with other Wikimedia projects like Wikipedia where this content will probably have the most impact.

4) Given the large amount of media files you are uploading on Wikimedia Commons on a regular basis, what are your pain points in using it and how have you overcome some of these challenges? How do you vet for quality of media content uploaded and net content re-use?


Implementation team

5) For each field visit, could you provide more details on what are the pre, during and post trip preparation that is needed and the amount of time one has to allocate to these activities? Given you have done this multiple times, do you have standard operating procedures and guidelines around the project management to share as part of knowledge management contribution to the movement?

Thank you.

Regards, Jacqueline on behalf of SA Regional Funds Committee and WMF staff who have contributed to the review of your application. JChen (WMF) (talk) 02:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply