User talk:Count Iblis: Difference between revisions
Add topicOttava Rima (talk | contribs) welcome! |
Tag: |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
:) - [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[user talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 03:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC) |
:) - [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[user talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 03:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
==Global bans policy discussion== |
|||
At [[Requests for comment/Global bans]], where you have commented in support of Option 2, a third option has recently been implemented. The first two options did not prove a way for respondents to indicate that they oppose global bans entirely, i.e., that it is not possible to write a meaningful global bans policy that would attract their support. [[Requests for comment/Global bans#Option 3|Option 3]] is intended to provide that opportunity, and to aid in distinguishing between people who oppose the proposed policy because it requires improvements and those who oppose the proposed policy because no policy permitting global bans should be adopted. |
|||
Because the third section was added late by a respondent, it is possible that some people who responded early in the RFC have commented at option 2, but would really prefer to support option 3, or support both. If so, you may voluntarily choose to move your original comment or to or strikethrough your original comment and add new comments. This is a courtesy notice of the change, and there is no requirement that you take any action. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 15:54, 13 July 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you for this very cogent remark about our duties![//meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_comment/Global_bans&diff=prev&oldid=3907113] :-D [[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 09:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Survey on Inspire Campaign for addressing harassment == |
|||
[[File:NounProject_Leaves.png|right|100px|link=https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_bpwtax5WbOwBf3D]] |
|||
Thanks for your participation during the [[Grants:IdeaLab/Inspire/Archive/Addressing_harassment|Inspire Campaign focused on addressing harassment]] from June 2016. I'm interested in hearing your experience during the campaign, so if you're able, '''[https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_bpwtax5WbOwBf3D I invite you to complete this brief survey]''' to describe how you contributed to the campaign and how you felt about participating. |
|||
Please feel free to let me know on my talk page if you have any questions about the campaign or the survey. Thanks! [[User:I JethroBT (WMF)|I JethroBT (WMF)]] ([[User talk:I JethroBT (WMF)|talk]]) 03:23, 10 September 2016 (UTC) |
|||
<small>''([[Grants:IdeaLab/Inspire/Users/Addressing harassment|Opt-out instructions]])''</small> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:I JethroBT (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grants:IdeaLab/Inspire/Users/Addressing_harassment&oldid=15896218 --> |
Latest revision as of 03:23, 10 September 2016
Welcome to Meta![edit]
Hello, Count Iblis. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!
:) - Ottava Rima (talk) 03:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Global bans policy discussion[edit]
At Requests for comment/Global bans, where you have commented in support of Option 2, a third option has recently been implemented. The first two options did not prove a way for respondents to indicate that they oppose global bans entirely, i.e., that it is not possible to write a meaningful global bans policy that would attract their support. Option 3 is intended to provide that opportunity, and to aid in distinguishing between people who oppose the proposed policy because it requires improvements and those who oppose the proposed policy because no policy permitting global bans should be adopted.
Because the third section was added late by a respondent, it is possible that some people who responded early in the RFC have commented at option 2, but would really prefer to support option 3, or support both. If so, you may voluntarily choose to move your original comment or to or strikethrough your original comment and add new comments. This is a courtesy notice of the change, and there is no requirement that you take any action. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:54, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for this very cogent remark about our duties![1] :-D Nemo 09:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Survey on Inspire Campaign for addressing harassment[edit]
Thanks for your participation during the Inspire Campaign focused on addressing harassment from June 2016. I'm interested in hearing your experience during the campaign, so if you're able, I invite you to complete this brief survey to describe how you contributed to the campaign and how you felt about participating.
Please feel free to let me know on my talk page if you have any questions about the campaign or the survey. Thanks! I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 03:23, 10 September 2016 (UTC)