Talk:Licensing update/License comparison: Difference between revisions
Add topic comment |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I'm ''fairly'' sure that the comparison is completed. May as well begin translating; thanks for any help. —<strong>[[user:Anonymous Dissident|<font face="Script MT Bold"><font color="#344D69">Anonymous Dissident</font></font>]]</strong>[[user talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC) |
:I'm ''fairly'' sure that the comparison is completed. May as well begin translating; thanks for any help. —<strong>[[user:Anonymous Dissident|<font face="Script MT Bold"><font color="#344D69">Anonymous Dissident</font></font>]]</strong>[[user talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
::[http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AOther_languages%2FLicensing_update%2FLicense_comparison&diff=1434120&oldid=1432823 Then again]. I'll try and check with Cbrown. —<strong>[[user:Anonymous Dissident|<font face="Script MT Bold"><font color="#344D69">Anonymous Dissident</font></font>]]</strong>[[user talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC) |
::[http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AOther_languages%2FLicensing_update%2FLicense_comparison&diff=1434120&oldid=1432823 Then again]. I'll try and check with Cbrown. —<strong>[[user:Anonymous Dissident|<font face="Script MT Bold"><font color="#344D69">Anonymous Dissident</font></font>]]</strong>[[user talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
*I've received confirmation that would suggest that the page is not finalised. —<strong>[[user:Anonymous Dissident|<font face="Script MT Bold"><font color="#344D69">Anonymous Dissident</font></font>]]</strong>[[user talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 12:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Is this page ready for translations or not?--[[User:Seha|Seha]] 20:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
It's ready to go :-) --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 20:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Danke Erik :-) --[[User:Seha|Seha]] 20:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Open file formats query == |
|||
See [[Talk:Licensing update#Open file formats query]] - courtesy link to a question about this page's table. [[user:FT2|FT2]] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]])</span></sup> 23:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
101這名怎麼來的,先說我只是想讓人知道,這臺灣響魊國際的地上建築物,真正的功能應該怎麼啟動,讓當初與會人員知道,我舉個例 兵器乃兇器一樣都是傷人的,差別在那?使用者嗎?,一者存私心用一者公器不帶個人情緒波動,地表上聳立者誰也不能私藏,相信很多人都去試過,這傳賢不傳子,有本事就是你的,"江山待有人才出" |
|||
國之重器,翻成白 話,黯夜版 大陸也一套,這是同一個時間點交辦出去的,上海市那"霸企大樓"也就國際商戰時分左右手各持一把,一主攻一主守,平時就擺者,可它的權限很恐怖!部會首長以下,可先打了再找理由,包含部長,這五院院長有決策過,并認可之人,所以當確定一人後,就開始找下一個十年,"十年一大運 誰主浮沉" |
|||
今天中華民國107,03,14發表,我會讓它發展到一個極致,有機會的話,先交辦兩件事,{立院得在下個會期,將委員,議員以及國家發包工程暫定公務人員一律納入財物申報法裡, |
|||
再來臺灣海域將對外開放,歡迎國際經商旅遊背包客或航海家到臺灣運補,將採落地簽證。前提是有委員擬草...我就是要知道能不能用! 工欲善其事,必先利其器 |
|||
[[User:A85608955|A85608955]] ([[User talk:A85608955|talk]]) 13:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:11, 14 March 2018
Translations possible?[edit]
Is this ready for translation or is it not planned for translation? --Nux (talk) 07:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm fairly sure that the comparison is completed. May as well begin translating; thanks for any help. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Then again. I'll try and check with Cbrown. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've received confirmation that would suggest that the page is not finalised. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Is this page ready for translations or not?--Seha 20:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
It's ready to go :-) --Eloquence 20:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- Danke Erik :-) --Seha 20:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Open file formats query[edit]
See Talk:Licensing update#Open file formats query - courtesy link to a question about this page's table. FT2 (Talk | email) 23:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
101這名怎麼來的,先說我只是想讓人知道,這臺灣響魊國際的地上建築物,真正的功能應該怎麼啟動,讓當初與會人員知道,我舉個例 兵器乃兇器一樣都是傷人的,差別在那?使用者嗎?,一者存私心用一者公器不帶個人情緒波動,地表上聳立者誰也不能私藏,相信很多人都去試過,這傳賢不傳子,有本事就是你的,"江山待有人才出" 國之重器,翻成白 話,黯夜版 大陸也一套,這是同一個時間點交辦出去的,上海市那"霸企大樓"也就國際商戰時分左右手各持一把,一主攻一主守,平時就擺者,可它的權限很恐怖!部會首長以下,可先打了再找理由,包含部長,這五院院長有決策過,并認可之人,所以當確定一人後,就開始找下一個十年,"十年一大運 誰主浮沉" 今天中華民國107,03,14發表,我會讓它發展到一個極致,有機會的話,先交辦兩件事,{立院得在下個會期,將委員,議員以及國家發包工程暫定公務人員一律納入財物申報法裡, 再來臺灣海域將對外開放,歡迎國際經商旅遊背包客或航海家到臺灣運補,將採落地簽證。前提是有委員擬草...我就是要知道能不能用! 工欲善其事,必先利其器
A85608955 (talk) 13:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)