Jump to content

Machine-friendly wiki interface: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
What's needed here?
 
m Reverted changes by 37.154.217.246 (talk) to last version by Anonymous Dissident
Tags: Replaced Rollback
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{MovedToMediaWiki}}
For a [[Dedicated Wikipedia editor|client-side reader/editor]] and [[w:Wikipedia:Bots|legitimate bots]], it would be useful to be able to bypass some of the variableness of the for-humans web interface.
35 revisions exported. &mdash;<strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkSlateGray">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 23:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

* Retrieve raw wikicode source of a page without parsing the edit page
**ex http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foobar?action=raw
**Should we be able to get some meta-data along with that -- revision date, name, etc? Or all separate...
**How best to deal with old revisions? The 'oldid' as at present, or something potentially more robust; revision timestamp ''should'' be unique, but may not always be (only second resolution; some old timestamps wiped out by a bug in February '02 leaving multiple revisions at the same time)
**At some future point, preferred URLs may change and UTF-8 may be used more widely; a client should be able to handle 301 & 302 redirects, and the charset specified in the Content-type header. If your bot won't handle UTF-8, it should explicitly say so in an Accept-charset header so the server can treat you like a broken web browser and work around it.
* Fuller [[RDF spool|RDF-based Recentchanges]]
** Also page history and incoming/outgoing links lists? Watchlist?
* A cleaner save interface and login?

Comments, suggestions?

Latest revision as of 01:08, 21 May 2020

35 revisions exported. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]