Talk:Association of Immoral Wikimedians: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 18 years ago by Canadianism in topic What the......
Content deleted Content added
AngryParsley (talk | contribs) |
kleptopedians unite! |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Immoral wikipedians are so shallow compared to the [[Association of Amoral Wikimedians]]. - [http://journowiki.org/wiki/User:Amgine Amgine] / <sup>[http://journowiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Amgine?action=edit§ion=new talk]</sup> 05:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC) |
Immoral wikipedians are so shallow compared to the [[Association of Amoral Wikimedians]]. - [http://journowiki.org/wiki/User:Amgine Amgine] / <sup>[http://journowiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Amgine?action=edit§ion=new talk]</sup> 05:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
:This is true. [[User:AngryParsley|AngryParsley]] 04:41, 7 November 2005 (UTC) |
:This is true, except replace your lame association with my [[Association of Amoral Wikipedians|kickass association]]. [[User:AngryParsley|AngryParsley]] 04:41, 7 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
:: What? That exclusionist club of "better-project-than-thouers" who would not deign to associate with Wikibookians, let alone Wikiquoters? Okay, it is more kickass. But probably not less shallow! - [http://journowiki.org/wiki/User:Amgine Amgine] / <sup>[http://journowiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Amgine?action=edit§ion=new talk]</sup> 06:31, 7 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:Ah fuck it, I redirected. Let our powers combine and whatnot. [[User:AngryParsley|AngryParsley]] 18:33, 7 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== What the...... == |
|||
Why the he!! would Jimbo join this association? [[User:Canadianism|Canadianism]] 04:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
It's a joke, before Wikipedia he ran an immoral site. |
|||
== kleptopedians unite! == |
|||
Is there an association for Wikipedians who copy text from other web sites? |
Latest revision as of 11:35, 16 January 2007
disdainful sniff[edit]
Immoral wikipedians are so shallow compared to the Association of Amoral Wikimedians. - Amgine / talk 05:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- This is true, except replace your lame association with my kickass association. AngryParsley 04:41, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- What? That exclusionist club of "better-project-than-thouers" who would not deign to associate with Wikibookians, let alone Wikiquoters? Okay, it is more kickass. But probably not less shallow! - Amgine / talk 06:31, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- Ah fuck it, I redirected. Let our powers combine and whatnot. AngryParsley 18:33, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
What the......[edit]
Why the he!! would Jimbo join this association? Canadianism 04:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
It's a joke, before Wikipedia he ran an immoral site.
kleptopedians unite![edit]
Is there an association for Wikipedians who copy text from other web sites?