Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 14) (bot
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Adjusting links to archived content
 
(83 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 9:
}}
 
== Conflict of interest VRT queue and call for volunteers ==
== Proposed motion to create Reliable source consensus-required restriction procedures and add the restriction to the Lithuania topic area ==
 
Pursuant to [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management#New VRT queue established|remedy 1]] of the ''Conflict of interest management'' case, the Arbitration Committee is pleased to announce that the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Conflict of interest reports|VRT queue for reporting conflict-of-interest or paid editing]] ([[WP:COIVRT]]) is fully operational, while the former queue remains accessible to members of the CheckUser team. Reports should be sent to {{nospam|paid-en-wp|wikipedia.org}} when doing so on-wiki would conflict with the [[WP:OUTING|harassment policy]]. The VRT administrators' work on the queue's creation is appreciated.
The Arbitration Committee is considering '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Motion: Reliable source consensus-required restriction|a motion]]''' to amend the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Procedures#Modification_of_procedures|procedures]] and to extend reliable source requirements to Lithuania as a topic area. Comments are welcome at the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_Antisemitism_in_Poland|relevant request for clarification]].
 
The Arbitration Committee encourages members of the CheckUser and Oversight teams to patrol the queue. Administrators interested in [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Conflict of interest reports#Appointments|applying for VRT queue access]] and users interested in [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight#Current process|applying for CheckUser and Oversight]] are invited to email {{nospam|arbcom-en-c|wikimedia.org}}.
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 18:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Proposed motion to create Reliable source consensus-required restriction procedures and add the restriction to the Lithuania topic area}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 18:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
 
Finally, the clerks team is in need of new members. Users who wish to [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Clerks#Appointments|become a clerk]] are asked to email {{nospam|clerks-l|lists.wikimedia.org}}.
== Arbitration motion regarding reliable source consensus-required restrictions ==
 
On behalf of the Committee, [[User:Sdrqaz|Sdrqaz]] ([[User talk:Sdrqaz|talk]]) 11:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1193639157#Motion: Reliable source consensus-required restriction|motion]] that:
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|ProposedConflict motionsof oninterest emailVRT canvassingqueue and call for volunteers}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 2111:5725, 424 JanuaryMay 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
{{ivmbox|1=Clerks are instructed to add a new section, entitled "Reliable source consensus-required restriction" to the Enforcement section of the [[WP:ARBPROC|Arbitration Procedures]] with the following text:
<blockquote>The Committee may apply the "Reliable source consensus-required restriction" to specified topic areas. For topic areas with this restriction, when a source that is not an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution is removed from an article, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard|Reliable Sources Noticeboard]]. Administrators may enforce this restriction with page protections, topic bans, or blocks; enforcement decisions should consider not merely the severity of the violation but the general disciplinary record of the editor in violation.</blockquote>
[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism_in_Poland#Article_sourcing_expectations|Remedy 5 of ''Antisemitism in Poland'']] is superseded by the following restriction:
<blockquote>All articles and edits in the topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland are subject to a "reliable source consensus-required restriction".</blockquote>
[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe]] is amended to include the following restriction:
<blockquote>All articles and edits in the topic area of Lithuania history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Lithuania are subject to a "reliable source consensus-required restriction."</blockquote>
Clerks are instructed to link to the Arbitration Procedures in the two restrictions above and are empowered to make other changes necessary to implement this new enforcement procedure.}}
For the Arbitration Committee,<br /> &#8211;<span style="font-family:CG Times, times">[[User:MJL|<span style="color:black">MJL</span>]]&thinsp;[[User talk:MJL|‐'''Talk'''‐]]<sup>[[User:MJL/P|☖]]</sup></span> 21:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Arbitration motion regarding reliable source consensus-required restrictions}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 21:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
 
== ''Venezuelan politics'' case closed ==
== Proposed motions on email canvassing ==
 
The arbitration case [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics]] has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedies have been enacted:
The Arbitration Committee is considering a '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Motions:_PIA_Canvassing|series of proposed motions]]''' related to allegations of inappropriate email canvassing within the Israel-Palestine topic area in violation of Wikipedia policy. Community statements and evidence submissions are welcome at the above link, or by email to {{arbcom-en}} if information cannot be posted publicly. For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 21:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Proposed motions on email canvassing}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 21:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
 
*{{user|WMrapids}} is indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
== Arbitration motion regarding ''GiantSnowman'' ==
*{{user|WMrapids}} is topic banned from Venezuelan politics, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1194194627#Motion:_GiantSnowman_restrictions_amended_(January_2024)|motion]] that:
*{{user|NoonIcarus}} and {{user|WMrapids}} are [[WP:IBAN|prohibited from interacting with or commenting on each other]] anywhere on Wikipedia, subject to the ordinary exceptions. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
{{ivmbox|1=Remedy 1.2 of the ''GiantSnowman'' case ("GiantSnowman admonished and placed under review") is amended to read as follows:
<blockquote>
1.2) GiantSnowman is admonished for overuse of the rollback and blocking functions, and reminded to [[w:WP:ADMINCOND|"lead by example" and "strive to model appropriate standards of courtesy"]]; to [[w:WP:ADMINACCT|"respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrative actions and to justify them when needed"]]; to not use admin tools in [[w:WP:INVOLVED|"cases in which they have been involved" including "conflicts with an editor" and "disputes on topics"]]; to [[w:WP:BITE|"treat newcomers with kindness and patience"]]; and to apply these principles in all interactions with all editors.
 
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:FireflyDreamy Jazz|Dreamy <spani style="color:#850808;d00">firefly'''Jazz'''</spani>]] <smallsup>( ''[[User talk:FireflyDreamy Jazz|ttalk to me]]'' ·&#124; ''[[Special:ContributionsContribs/FireflyDreamy Jazz|cmy contributions]] )''</smallsup> 1912:0506, 725 JanuaryMay 2024 (UTC)
With the exception of obvious vandalism or obvious violations of the policy on biographies of living persons:
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|ProposedVenezuelan motionpolitics tocase create Reliable source consensus-required restriction procedures and add the restriction to the Lithuania topic areaclosed}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 1812:3607, 3125 DecemberMay 20232024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
* GiantSnowman is prohibited from reverting another editor's contribution without providing an explanation in the edit summary. Default edit summaries provided by MediaWiki or user scripts are not sufficient for the purpose of this restriction. For the avoidance of doubt, use of MediaWiki rollback with an edit summary via a user script such as [[w:User:DannyS712/AjaxRollbackSummary|this one]], or via massRollback.js, is permitted.
* GiantSnowman is prohibited from blocking an editor who has not been recently warned for the conduct in question. For the purposes of this restriction, "recently" is assumed to be within 7 days.
 
== HouseBlaster appointed trainee clerk ==
Violations may be reported by any editor to [[w:WP:AE|the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard]]. GiantSnowman may [[w:WP:ARCA|appeal these restrictions directly to the Arbitration Committee]] at any time.
</blockquote>}}
 
The arbitration clerks are pleased to welcome {{user|HouseBlaster}} to the clerk team as a trainee!
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Firefly|<span style="color:#850808;">firefly</span>]] <small>( [[User talk:Firefly|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Firefly|c]] )</small> 19:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding GiantSnowman}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 19:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
The arbitration clerk team is in need of new members, and any editor who would like to join the clerk team is welcome to apply by email to {{email|clerks-l|lists.wikimedia.org}}.
 
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Dreamy Jazz|Dreamy <i style="color:#d00">'''Jazz'''</i>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Dreamy Jazz|talk to me]]'' &#124; ''[[Special:Contribs/Dreamy Jazz|my contributions]]''</sup> 19:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|ArbitrationHouseBlaster motionappointed regardingtrainee GiantSnowmanclerk}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 19:0640, 730 JanuaryMay 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
 
== Arbitration motion regarding reliableConduct sourcein consensusdeletion-requiredrelated restrictionsediting ==
 
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/11936391571227273317#Motion: ReliableTenPoundHammer sourcesuspended consensustopic ban for blank-and-requiredredirecting restriction(BLARing)|motion]] that:
{{ivmbox|1={{userlinks|TenPoundHammer}} is indefinitely topic banned from [[WP:BLAR|removing all content in an article and replacing it with a redirect]] (commonly known as a blank-and-redirect, or BLAR). This topic ban will be suspended for a period of 12 months. This topic ban may be unsuspended and imposed onto TenPoundHammer if disruption by BLARing restarts, as determined by any of: (1) a consensus of administrators on [[WP:AE]], (2) at least two arbitrators indicating "support" to unsuspend at [[WP:ARCA]], with no opposition from other arbitrators indicated up to 48 hours after the second support, or (3) a majority of active arbitrators at [[WP:ARCA]] if there is opposition as indicated in condition 2. After 12 months, if it has not been imposed, the topic ban will be automatically lifted.}}
For the Arbitration Committee, <b>[[User:HouseBlaster|House]][[Special:Contributions/HouseBlaster|<span style="color:#7D066B;">Blaster</span>]]</b>&nbsp;([[User talk:HouseBlaster|talk]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;he/him) 19:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
: ArchivedDiscuss discussionthis at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Arbitration motion regarding reliableConduct sourcein consensusdeletion-requiredrelated restrictionsediting}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 2119:4353, 4 JanuaryJune 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->

Latest revision as of 18:54, 5 June 2024

This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.

Announcement archives:
  • 0 (2008-12 – 2009-01)
  • 1 (to 2009-02)
  • 2 (to 2009-05)
  • 3 (to 2009-06)
  • 4 (to 2009-07)
  • 5 (to 2009-12)
  • 6 (to 2010-12)
  • 7 (to 2011-12)
  • 8 (to 2012-12)
  • 9 (to 2013-12)
  • 10 (to 2015-12)
  • 11 (to 2018-04)
  • 12 (to 2020-08)
  • 13 (to 2023-03)
  • 14 (to present)

Conflict of interest VRT queue and call for volunteers

Pursuant to remedy 1 of the Conflict of interest management case, the Arbitration Committee is pleased to announce that the VRT queue for reporting conflict-of-interest or paid editing (WP:COIVRT) is fully operational, while the former queue remains accessible to members of the CheckUser team. Reports should be sent to paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org when doing so on-wiki would conflict with the harassment policy. The VRT administrators' work on the queue's creation is appreciated.

The Arbitration Committee encourages members of the CheckUser and Oversight teams to patrol the queue. Administrators interested in applying for VRT queue access and users interested in applying for CheckUser and Oversight are invited to email arbcom-en-c@wikimedia.org.

Finally, the clerks team is in need of new members. Users who wish to become a clerk are asked to email clerks-l@lists.wikimedia.org.

On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz (talk) 11:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Conflict of interest VRT queue and call for volunteers

Venezuelan politics case closed

The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedies have been enacted:

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 12:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Venezuelan politics case closed

HouseBlaster appointed trainee clerk

The arbitration clerks are pleased to welcome HouseBlaster (talk · contribs) to the clerk team as a trainee!

The arbitration clerk team is in need of new members, and any editor who would like to join the clerk team is welcome to apply by email to clerks-l@lists.wikimedia.org.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § HouseBlaster appointed trainee clerk

Arbitration motion regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely topic banned from removing all content in an article and replacing it with a redirect (commonly known as a blank-and-redirect, or BLAR). This topic ban will be suspended for a period of 12 months. This topic ban may be unsuspended and imposed onto TenPoundHammer if disruption by BLARing restarts, as determined by any of: (1) a consensus of administrators on WP:AE, (2) at least two arbitrators indicating "support" to unsuspend at WP:ARCA, with no opposition from other arbitrators indicated up to 48 hours after the second support, or (3) a majority of active arbitrators at WP:ARCA if there is opposition as indicated in condition 2. After 12 months, if it has not been imposed, the topic ban will be automatically lifted.

For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing