Jump to content

Talk:Steward requests/Global: Difference between revisions

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
ArchiverBot (talk | contribs)
Bots
46,613 edits
m Bot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 15 days) to Talk:Steward requests/Global/Archives/2024
 
(998 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tmbox|type=notice|text=Due to excessive vandalism of this page and the associated project page, please submit global block and lock appeals to {{nospam|stewards|wikimedia.org}}.
This is not the place to ask for an unblock to a local block at any wiki, this page is only for global blocks and locks. Local unblock requests should be made at the local wiki where you are blocked, in your local user talk page or the local request page.}}
{{talk}}
{{talk}}
{{archive box non-auto|[[/Archives|Archive index]]}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archive = Talk:Steward requests/Global/Archives/%(year)d
|algo = old(15d)
|counter = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadsleft = 1
|archiveheader = {{archive header}}
}}
{{Autoarchive resolved section
|age=0
|archive='((FULLPAGENAME))/Archives/((year))'
|show=no
|timecompare = resolved
}}


== Semi-protected edit request on 27 May 2024 ==
== Archiving? ==


{{edit semi-protected|Steward requests/Global|answered=yes}}
I don't know if Grawp's [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests%2FGlobal&diff=1144741&oldid=1144695 request] should be archived] (perhaps to at least acknowledge the fella that inspired global blocking?) but shouldn't we have an archiving method for housekeeping/record tracking in place? <font color="#156917">[[User:Rootology|rootology]]</font> (<font color="#156917">[[User talk:Rootology|T]]</font>) 14:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
<!-- Begin request -->
:{{done}} already. &nbsp;'''&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Mike.lifeguard|<b style="color:#309;">Mike</b>]].[[User talk:Mike.lifeguard|<b style="color:#309;">lifeguard</b>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;<sup>[[b:User talk:Mike.lifeguard|<span style="color:#309;">@en.wb</span>]]</sup> 01:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
=== Global lock request ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
* {{LockHide|FateHags89}}
Continuation of crosswiki abuse from globally locked socks from {{user|FateHags99}} range. Apparently my wiki accounts are not valid on MetaWiki, so making this request instead. --[[User:Supreme Bananas|Supreme Bananas]] ([[User talk:Supreme Bananas|talk]]) 18:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
<!-- End request -->
[[User:Supreme Bananas|Supreme Bananas]] ([[User talk:Supreme Bananas|talk]]) 18:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
: {{done}} - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 20:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


== Requests for global IP block exemption ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2024 ==


{{edit semi-protected|Steward requests/Global|answered=yes}}
We need to discuss this a bit to get the process well understood, I think. (This was raised on stewards-l but talking about it here may make sense?) ... this exemption is quite helpful to someone that wanted to do some serious harm. So I think handing it out probably should take the standard "3 stewards and a short waiting period" process, at least at first. Thoughts? ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 18:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
=== Global lock request ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
* {{LockHide|FateHags88}}
Continuation of crosswiki abuse from globally locked socks from {{user|FateHags99}} range. [[User:Supreme Bananas|Supreme Bananas]] ([[User talk:Supreme Bananas|talk]])
:Listed.--[[User:A09|A09]] ([[User talk:A09|talk]]) 15:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 2 June 2024 ==
:I think we can have same policy as Global rollbacker .3 steward in favor and it least 3 days.and user should not be blocked in any project .--[[User:Mardetanha|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Mardetanha</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Mardetanha|talk]]</span></sup> 18:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


{{edit semi-protected|Steward requests/Global|answered=yes}}
:: Agreed, and it's much simpler than having a different policy for each group. —<small>[[User talk:Pathoschild/s|Pathoschild]] 19:39:08, 04 May 2009 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Begin request -->
Please request a global lock for [[Special:Contributions/Pureloveg|Pureloveg]] - all crosswiki contributions have been spam. &ndash;
<!-- End request -->
[[Special:Contributions/2804:F14:80BE:B501:4013:AA93:E6BD:4D|2804:F14:80BE:B501:4013:AA93:E6BD:4D]] 23:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
:{{Done|Listed to SRG by me}}. [[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] 🤔 [[User talk:Codename Noreste| <span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0A16A5">''La Suma''</span>]] 00:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


== Requests unblock ==
:::I agree. The current rollback policy fits this well. [[User:Angela|Angela]] 01:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
::::Let's do it that way then. I cribbed the stuff from the Global Rollback about needing a global account etc. and the wording about 3 days. Take a look at [[Steward_requests/Global#Request_for_global_IP_block_exempt]] and see what you think. However I wasn't quite sure if we have an explanation of what this exemption IS, so [[Global IP block exemption]] (which is analogous to how the rollback section links to [[Global rollback]]) remains a redlink. thoughts? ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 16:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


{{edit semi-protected|Steward requests/Global|answered=yes}}
There has been discussion elsewhere as well, [[Wikimedia_Forum#Global_IP_Block_Exempt_Group]] for example. I don't see a strong consensus to implement this, so I don't see why we are rushing this forward. I'd suggest that we return to discussion of whether to implement the proposal ''at all'' rather than talking about specific aspects of implementation. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;<b style="color:#309;">[[User:Mike.lifeguard|Mike]].[[User talk:Mike.lifeguard|lifeguard]]</b>&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;<sup>[[:b:en:User talk:Mike.lifeguard|<span style="color:#309;">@en.wb</span>]]</sup> 16:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Begin request -->
:We're getting requests. We need to either handle them, or state we are not going to grant this pending discussion. Right now I tagged every request with a "we're not doing this yet". Smithing on the header doesn't mean we are doing it, it means smithing on the header. The discussion you refer to is one I was not aware of when I borught discussion here (after it was raised on stewards-l, I think maybe Thogo wasn't aware of that discussion either). We have a bit of a mess here, this has been moving in fits and starts for a while... maybe meta needs a centralised discussion box or something, because I suspect maybe some of us miss some of the discussion. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 17:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
My Wikimedia Common has been auto blocked by [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AutoblockList IP issue]. I already requested to unblock by an email.
:As far as I can tell, there's no consensus to do it at this point; the outstanding requests should be marked {{tlx|not done}} until there is discussion and consensus. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;<b style="color:#309;">[[User:Mike.lifeguard|Mike]].[[User talk:Mike.lifeguard|lifeguard]]</b>&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;<sup>[[:b:en:User talk:Mike.lifeguard|<span style="color:#309;">@en.wb</span>]]</sup> 19:46, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
::Which isn't happening. Why exactly is it a bad idea to grant this? What I've read so far is confusing and seems like there is more to say. Please explain further. Thanks! ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 22:58, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
:::Please note I am not saying it is or isn't a bad idea. (although it looked like we did consensus, rightly or wrongly, at one point)... I am asking why. I think more explanation is needed. Maybe it is. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 23:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


Also I asked for Global and English Wikipedia IP block exemption with secret reasons by other emails, but still didn't receive reply.
Upshot? Note [[Steward requests/Global#Requests_for_global_IP_block_exemption]] exists. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 15:55, 11 July 2009 (UTC)


Please check. Thank you.
== Opt-out global sysop ==
<!-- End request -->
Hello. Comments are welcome on the draft policy for an opt-out version of global administrators at [[Global sysops|Global sysops/opt-out proposal]]. Further details are available at that page. Comments, concerns, and anything you care to mention would be appreciated at the [[Talk:Global sysops|talk page]]. Thank you, [[User:NuclearWarfare|NuclearWarfare]] 15:30, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
[[User:Claggy|Claggy]] ([[User talk:Claggy|talk]]) 10:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
:{{not done}} (nothing to edit request). Do you have a ticket number? If you were replied to, it is likely pending your response. Do not open multiple requests from multiple systems on the same issue please. Also, no one here can do anything about local groups on the English Wikipedia. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 15:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


=== Global unblock for 198.13.46.50 ===
== Yes template ==
{{Status|not done}} <!-- Do not remove this template -->
* {{Luxotool|198.13.46.50}}
お世話になってます。普段はWikipedia日本語版を編集しているユーザー、[[利用者:小石川人晃]]です。
{{Quote|
あなたには「このページの編集」を行う権限がありません。理由は以下の通りです:


あなたのIPアドレスは、すべてのウィキメディア財団のウィキで投稿ブロックされているIPアドレス範囲に入っています。
Twice I've been reverted for using {{yes|this template}}. Where does it say that only stewards can use this? [[User:NonvocalScream|NonvocalScream]] 03:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
:It is long-standing practice for only stewards to use {{tl|yes}} or {{tl|no}}, so I've clarified this in the page header. &ndash;<strong>[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]</strong>&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 03:19, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
::I don't think so. I would posit that it is permissable for any editor to use those colouring for comments. It is just silly to say only a steward can add a red or green background to comments. Best, [[User:NonvocalScream|NonvocalScream]] 03:20, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


ブロックは‪Jon Kolbert‬により行われました。 ブロックの理由はOpen proxy/Webhost: Visit the FAQ if you are affected です。
:::I have limited time. I concede to your points. [[User:NonvocalScream|NonvocalScream]] 03:28, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
*There is purpose to distinguishing stewards from others, given that they are the arbitrators of the process. Just use {{support}}, or nothing. &mdash;<strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkSlateGray">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 03:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
**Per above, I've withdrawn my objection to the process. [[User:NonvocalScream|NonvocalScream]] 03:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


ブロック開始日時: 2021年9月29日 (水) 03:46
== Global Sysops ==
ブロック解除予定: 2024年6月29日 (土) 03:46
あなたの現在のIPアドレスは198.13.46.50です。 ブロックされている範囲は198.13.32.0/19です。


お問い合わせの際は、上記の詳細情報をすべて含めてください。 もし、この投稿ブロックが錯誤によるものだと考えているのであれば、グローバル方針のNo open proxies（公開プロキシの規制）で詳細情報などが入手できます。あるいは、投稿ブロックに関して議論したい場合は、メタウィキでブロックの見直しを依頼してください。 スチュワード用 VRT キューにメールを送信する (宛先: stewards@wikimedia.org) こともできます。
Hello everyone. In the first place I would like to know how to put my "resume" to be a candidate of a global sysop. Also I would like this comment to be respected please (not offending anyone). Thank you [[User:Melara...|Melara...]] 23:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
}}
:As you're asking about it here, you already know that the vote is ongoing, I assume. If (and that's a fairly big if) the vote passes, we'll probably set up a page for global permissions alongside this page or as a subpage of it. At the moment, considering the measure is not passed, we're not accepting any applications for the permission at all. Thank you for your interest. [[User:Kylu|Kylu]] 23:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
という表示がされています。ブロックされた理由はわかりませんが、突然編集できなくなりました。私は技術的な理由はわかりませんが、これは巻き込まれブロックだと思います。解除をお願いしたいので、どうかご検討くださいますようよろしくお願いいたします。 --[[User:小石川人晃|小石川人晃]] ([[User talk:小石川人晃|talk]]) 22:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
:Thank you Mr. Kylu.
::Sorry for not being able to answer in the correct language. You appear to be editing from an open proxy; these are normally not unblocked without very good reason. What would be your best option is instead to apply for a [[global IP block exemption]] by contacting us at {{nospam|stewards|wikimedia.org}} with the relevant information. <b>[[User:EPIC|<span style="color:blue">EPIC</span>]] ([[User talk:EPIC|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]])</b> 02:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
P.S. if ur a miss or mrs im sorry lol
:どうやらマカフィー (McAfee) でVPN ONになっている状態ですと、上記のメッセージが出てきて編集ができなくなってしまうようです。面倒でも、その都度VPNをOFFにすれば、編集できるようですので、しばらく様子を見てみます。--[[User:小石川人晃|小石川人晃]] ([[User talk:小石川人晃|talk]]) 12:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm honoured to be asked to vote, but I don't believe I've done 150 edits on one subject (?) I want wikipedia to be the best it can be, and I'm not so good at referencing my entries. This disqualifies me as a good editor. I'd better get more familiar with cut and paste and having different pages open etc.Thanks,& Good luck with ongoing efforts.I'll work harder at learning the rules.[[Special:Contributions/58.167.205.169|58.167.205.169]] 14:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[[Special:Contributions/58.167.205.169|58.167.205.169]] 14:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


== Global permissions ==
== Lock requested ==
I'm thinking we should spawn a new page for "Global permissions" due to the large number of new requests and categories of permissions, and change this one to ... "Global restrictions" maybe? Any comments/ideas? [[User:Kylu|Kylu]] 17:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
:Yea, but I suggest [[Steward requests/Global sysop]] (Link [[SRGS]]),[[Steward requests/Global rollback]] (Link [[SRGR]]), [[Steward requests/Global block]] (Link [[SRGB]]) ecc :-) It's my opinion :-))) --[[User:.snoopy.|.snoopy.]] [[User talk:.snoopy.|✉]] 18:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
::I think a separate page for global permissions would be a good idea, but I doubt we need pages for each permission. &ndash;<strong>[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]</strong>&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 18:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
::Echoing Juliancolton -- as well, we should start using transcluded subpages, I think. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Mike.lifeguard|<b style="color:#309;">Mike</b>]].[[User talk:Mike.lifeguard|<b style="color:#309;">lifeguard</b>]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;<sup>[[:b:en:User talk:Mike.lifeguard|<span style="color:#309;">@en.wb</span>]]</sup> 18:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
:::Agree completely. Having discussion subpages for adminship requests and not global sysop requests is just bizarre. &ndash;<strong>[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]</strong>&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 18:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
::::That's only true for Meta adminship requests. SRP adminship requests are still all on one page. But yes, having subpages is a good idea. [[User talk:Sukida|Sukida]] 18:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
: An alternative is to hold elections on a separate page, then leave a request on this page when there's an actual request. This mirrors the way we handle local permissions, and would let people watch elections or requests separately. —<small>[[User talk:Pathoschild/s|Pathoschild]] 18:31:53, 08 March 2010 (UTC)</small>
::<small>(edit conflict)</small> Actually I think that we need them for the "global sysops" ones. I do not see a need to create a subpage to request a gblock/lock, that's a bit impractical IMHO. Perhaps we should use [[Global sysops/Requests/USER]] as it happens on [[commons:Commons:Administrators/Requests]]? Once the discussion is finished if successful, the user post a request as it happens on [[Requests for permissions]]. Just my two cents.
:: &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Dferg|Dferg]] <small>([[User talk:Dferg|talk]])</small> 18:43, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
:::Subpages for each rights request sound very much like unneeded bureaucracy to me. And if you have a request on a non-transcluded subpage first, probably many people just won't notice it. --<small>[[User:MF-Warburg|MF-W]]</small> 18:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
:Either way, I've split global permissions to [[Steward requests/Global permissions]], since this page was getting too long to navigate easily and there seem to be no objections. &ndash;<strong>[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]</strong>&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 18:45, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
::Well, I wonder whether that will keep up when global sysop isn't all that new anymore. I'm not saying that I disagree here, but in general I think we should keep the number of different request pages to a minimum. For what it's worth, I like Pathos' idea of having separate election pages and using [[SRG]] to close elections. --[[User:Erwin|Erwin]] 22:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
:::Wow... at this rate, I might start thinking people take my suggestions seriously or something! o.o;; [[User:Kylu|Kylu]] 00:45, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


{{edit semi-protected|Steward requests/Global|answered=yes}}
== Blocking named accounts ==
*{{vandal|Power Hacks}}
*{{vandal|Dtlong96}} (sock)


Cross-wiki abuse, [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nguyentrongphu&diff=prev&oldid=26806340&title=User_talk%3ANguyentrongphu&diffonly=1 harassing] other editor with sock {{u|Dtlong96}}. [[Special:Contributions/103.197.185.5|103.197.185.5]] 15:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The instructions say ''"Only IP addresses can be globally blocked at this moment"'' [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Global&oldid=1907023], however this venue seems to now accept named accounts for blocking (where stewards apparently use their local rights to individually block accounts on other wikis).
:{{done}} --[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000#top|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|c]])</small> 21:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2024 ==
One recent request led to an erroneous block on en.wiki [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=351567022#Keepscases_erroneously_blocked_indefinitely] contrary to [[en:Wikipedia:Global_rights_policy#Stewards|en.wiki global rights policy]]. It is probably a good idea to add a reminder to review the local global rights policy before taking action on named accounts. Respectfully, –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xeno|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Xeno|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 14:35, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

{{edit semi-protected|Steward requests/Global|answered=yes}}
<!-- Begin request -->
Please lock {{u|Gprieur}} : this user has decased (see [[d:Q116697684|Q116697684]] and [[c:Category:Photographs by Guy Prieur|Category:Photographs by Guy Prieur]] for more details)
<!-- End request -->
[[Special:Contributions/2A04:CEC0:11DD:534B:85B4:329:84B9:E6A9|2A04:CEC0:11DD:534B:85B4:329:84B9:E6A9]] 18:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}} Enlisted.--'''[[User:A09|<span style="color:#004d99">A09</span>]]'''<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[User talk:A09|<span style="color:#004d99">(pogovor)</span>]] 21:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:56, 7 June 2024

Archive index

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} .
Template:Autoarchive resolved section/parameter timecompare set to 'resolved'

Semi-protected edit request on 27 May 2024[edit]

Latest comment: 11 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Global lock request[edit]

Status:    In progress

Continuation of crosswiki abuse from globally locked socks from FateHags99 (talk · contribs) range. Apparently my wiki accounts are not valid on MetaWiki, so making this request instead. --Supreme Bananas (talk) 18:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Supreme Bananas (talk) 18:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 20:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2024[edit]

Latest comment: 9 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Global lock request[edit]

Status:    In progress

Continuation of crosswiki abuse from globally locked socks from FateHags99 (talk · contribs) range. Supreme Bananas (talk)

Listed.--A09 (talk) 15:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 2 June 2024[edit]

Latest comment: 5 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please request a global lock for Pureloveg - all crosswiki contributions have been spam. – 2804:F14:80BE:B501:4013:AA93:E6BD:4D 23:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Listed to SRG by me. Codename Noreste 🤔 La Suma 00:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requests unblock[edit]

Latest comment: 1 day ago5 comments4 people in discussion

My Wikimedia Common has been auto blocked by IP issue. I already requested to unblock by an email.

Also I asked for Global and English Wikipedia IP block exemption with secret reasons by other emails, but still didn't receive reply.

Please check. Thank you. Claggy (talk) 10:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Not done (nothing to edit request). Do you have a ticket number? If you were replied to, it is likely pending your response. Do not open multiple requests from multiple systems on the same issue please. Also, no one here can do anything about local groups on the English Wikipedia. — xaosflux Talk 15:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global unblock for 198.13.46.50[edit]

Status:    Not done

お世話になってます。普段はWikipedia日本語版を編集しているユーザー、利用者:小石川人晃です。

あなたには「このページの編集」を行う権限がありません。理由は以下の通りです:

あなたのIPアドレスは、すべてのウィキメディア財団のウィキで投稿ブロックされているIPアドレス範囲に入っています。

ブロックは‪Jon Kolbert‬により行われました。 ブロックの理由はOpen proxy/Webhost: Visit the FAQ if you are affected です。

ブロック開始日時: 2021年9月29日 (水) 03:46 ブロック解除予定: 2024年6月29日 (土) 03:46 あなたの現在のIPアドレスは198.13.46.50です。 ブロックされている範囲は198.13.32.0/19です。

お問い合わせの際は、上記の詳細情報をすべて含めてください。 もし、この投稿ブロックが錯誤によるものだと考えているのであれば、グローバル方針のNo open proxies（公開プロキシの規制）で詳細情報などが入手できます。あるいは、投稿ブロックに関して議論したい場合は、メタウィキでブロックの見直しを依頼してください。 スチュワード用 VRT キューにメールを送信する (宛先: stewards@wikimedia.org) こともできます。

という表示がされています。ブロックされた理由はわかりませんが、突然編集できなくなりました。私は技術的な理由はわかりませんが、これは巻き込まれブロックだと思います。解除をお願いしたいので、どうかご検討くださいますようよろしくお願いいたします。 --小石川人晃 (talk) 22:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for not being able to answer in the correct language. You appear to be editing from an open proxy; these are normally not unblocked without very good reason. What would be your best option is instead to apply for a global IP block exemption by contacting us at stewards@wikimedia.org with the relevant information. EPIC (talk) 02:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
どうやらマカフィー (McAfee) でVPN ONになっている状態ですと、上記のメッセージが出てきて編集ができなくなってしまうようです。面倒でも、その都度VPNをOFFにすれば、編集できるようですので、しばらく様子を見てみます。--小石川人晃 (talk) 12:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lock requested[edit]

Latest comment: 2 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Cross-wiki abuse, harassing other editor with sock Dtlong96. 103.197.185.5 15:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done --SHB2000 (t • c) 21:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2024[edit]

Latest comment: 1 day ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please lock Gprieur : this user has decased (see Q116697684 and Category:Photographs by Guy Prieur for more details) 2A04:CEC0:11DD:534B:85B4:329:84B9:E6A9 18:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done Enlisted.--A09|(pogovor) 21:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Steward_requests/Global&oldid=26884378"