Wikimedia principles: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Reverted changes by 183.171.67.103 (talk) to last version by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh Tag: Rollback |
||
| (69 intermediate revisions by 50 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Wikimedia principles''' emerged from many debates about [[wiki ideology]]. [[Growing Wikimedia]] was eventually written to summarize some of the principles elaborated as below: |
|||
== Neutral point of view == |
== Neutral point of view == |
||
:[[Neutral point of view--draft]] |
:[[Neutral point of view--draft]] |
||
| Line 4: | Line 6: | ||
:[[NPOV as description not prescription]] |
:[[NPOV as description not prescription]] |
||
:[[Systemic Bias of Wikipedia]] |
:[[Systemic Bias of Wikipedia]] |
||
:[[Early Muslim view of history]] - "all records are liable to error..." |
|||
:[[Natural point of view]] |
:[[Natural point of view]] |
||
:[[NPOV is an ideal]] |
:[[NPOV is an ideal]] |
||
:[[Consensus editing]] |
:[[Consensus editing]] |
||
:[http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?NeutralPointOfView Meatball Wiki take on NPOV and Wikipedia] |
|||
:[[South Slavic NPOV page]] |
|||
:[[If NPOV is science, how do I deal with cases where the US 'science' is at odds with at least 80% of the world?]] |
|||
== Core issues: etiquette, consensus, permission, vandals, ethics, morals == |
== Core issues: etiquette, consensus, permission, vandals, ethics, morals == |
||
| Line 18: | Line 21: | ||
:[[Should talk pages be used for debating?]] |
:[[Should talk pages be used for debating?]] |
||
:[[Should Wikipedia Use Profanity]]? ([[Stephen Gilbert]] and others) |
:[[Should Wikipedia Use Profanity]]? ([[Stephen Gilbert]] and others) |
||
:[[Wikimedia mission statement]] |
|||
:[[Freedom of choosing a username debate]] |
|||
:[[Uploads being abused]] |
|||
:[[Standard email texts]] for asking permission to use texts or images |
|||
:[[Wikistress|Stress]] |
|||
:[[Vandalbot]] |
|||
:[[Don't vote on everything]] |
|||
:[[Protected pages considered harmful|Does locking a page indicate a lack of trust?]] |
|||
:[[Verifiability]] |
|||
==Power structure== |
|||
:[[Governance]] |
|||
:[[Power structure]] |
|||
:[[Status]] (the different status existing in the [[power structure]]) |
|||
:[[Stewards]] (see also [[steward policies]]) |
|||
== Copyright == |
== Copyright == |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
:[[Avoid Copyright Paranoia]]! |
:[[Avoid Copyright Paranoia]]! |
||
:[[Do fair use images violate the GFDL?]] |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
:[[Copyright bot]] |
:[[Copyright bot]] |
||
:[[American non-acceptance of the rule of the shorter term]] |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
== Wikipedia building == |
|||
:[[Nine leverage points]] |
|||
:[[Starting a new language community]] |
|||
== English usage == |
|||
:[[Vocabulary]] - an educational and an ethical issue |
|||
:[[Defining vocabulary]] - the core glossary, should coordinate with [http://wiktionary.org] |
|||
:[[Use of the present tense]], and overuse of the past tense |
|||
:[[Wikipedia is not Wiki]] - a little bit of wiki nomenclature |
|||
[[Category:Community]] |
|||
== What might damage it (hazards, things that must be done right) == |
|||
[[Category:Meta-Wiki organisation|*en_Wikimedia_principles]] |
|||
:[[How to Destroy Wikipedia]] ([[The Cunctator]]) - an open challenge |
|||
[[Category:Wikimedia projects]] |
|||
:[[Threats]] that wikipedia might face, in your most paranoid nightmare |
|||
[[Category:Collaboration]] |
|||
:[[Worst cases]] of what could happen to wikipedia (realistically) |
|||
:[[Responding to the Critics]] ([[Stephen Gilbert]]) |
|||
:[[Wikipedia drop-outs]] |
|||
:[[talk:SunirShah|Discussion about FOLDOC fork]] |
|||
:[[Wikipedia's first press release--draft for comment]] |
|||
:[[Advertising on Wikipedia]] (Jimbo Wales, with comments by others)] |
|||
:[[Wikipedia Governance]] - Jimbo Wales ([[Response to 24]]'s [[governance]]) |
|||
Latest revision as of 05:42, 19 January 2024
The Wikimedia principles emerged from many debates about wiki ideology. Growing Wikimedia was eventually written to summarize some of the principles elaborated as below:
Neutral point of view[edit]
- Neutral point of view--draft
- Proposed revision of the NPOV policy
- NPOV as description not prescription
- Systemic Bias of Wikipedia
- Natural point of view
- NPOV is an ideal
- Consensus editing
- Meatball Wiki take on NPOV and Wikipedia
- South Slavic NPOV page
- If NPOV is science, how do I deal with cases where the US 'science' is at odds with at least 80% of the world?
Core issues: etiquette, consensus, permission, vandals, ethics, morals[edit]
- Etiquette
- Wikipedia vandalism
- Consensus and implications of its definition for all of the core issues
- Simple View of Ethics and Morals
- Be bold in updating pages
- Should talk pages be used for debating?
- Should Wikipedia Use Profanity? (Stephen Gilbert and others)
- Wikimedia mission statement
- Uploads being abused
- Standard email texts for asking permission to use texts or images
- Stress
- Vandalbot
- Don't vote on everything
- Does locking a page indicate a lack of trust?
- Verifiability
Power structure[edit]
- Governance
- Power structure
- Status (the different status existing in the power structure)
- Stewards (see also steward policies)
Copyright[edit]
- Wikipedia and copyright issues
- Wikipedia Designated Agent
- Copyright - what is fair use in quotation and what violates laws? whose law applies? what problems are we actually trying to solve here?
- Avoid Copyright Paranoia!
- Do fair use images violate the GFDL?
- Copyright bot
- American non-acceptance of the rule of the shorter term
English usage[edit]
- Vocabulary - an educational and an ethical issue
- Defining vocabulary - the core glossary, should coordinate with [1]
- Use of the present tense, and overuse of the past tense
- Wikipedia is not Wiki - a little bit of wiki nomenclature