Wikipedia:Sandbox: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: 55°40′34″N 12°34′06″E / 55.67611°N 12.56833°E / 55.67611; 12.56833
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎Subpage: test edit 1
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Disambiguation links added
 
Line 2: Line 2:
* Welcome to the sandbox! *
* Welcome to the sandbox! *
* Please leave this part alone *
* Please leave this part alone *
* The page is cleared regularly *
* Feel free to try your editing skills below *
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■-->{{Please leave this line alone (sandbox heading)}}<!--
* Welcome to the sandbox! *
* Please lWikipedia
Privacy policy Terms of UseDesktopeave this part alone *
* The page is cleared regularly *
* The page is cleared regularly *
* Feel free to try your editing skills below *
* Feel free to try your editing skills below *
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■-->
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■-->
{{Short description|American actress}}
== [[Wikipedia:Sandbox/Subpage|Subpage]] ==
{{Infobox person
Foo.
| name = Shari Eubank (teacher)
| image = <!-- just the filename, without the File: or Image: prefix or enclosing [[brackets]] -->
| alt =
| caption =
| birth_name = Shari Eubank
| birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1947|06|12}}
| birth_place = [[Albuquerque, New Mexico]], U.S.<br />
| death_date = <!-- {{Death date and age |YYYY|MM|DD|YYYY|MM|DD}} or {{Death-date and age|Month DD, YYYY|Month DD, YYYY}} (death date then birth date) -->
| death_place =
| nationality = American
| other_names =
| yearsactive = 1975–1976
| occupation = Actress
| known_for = [[Supervixens]]
}}


'''Shari Eubank''' (born June 12, 1947) is a retired American actress, best known for her starring role in the [[Russ Meyer]] film ''[[Supervixens]]''.<ref name="McDonough2006">{{cite book |last=McDonough |first=Jimmy |authorlink=Jimmy McDonough |title=Big Bosoms and Square Jaws: The Biography of Russ Meyer, King of the Sex Film |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iJoQi-OXBM4C&pg=PA294|year=2006 |publisher=[[Three Rivers Press]] |isbn=978-0307338440|pages=294–295}}</ref>
== [[/Subpage/]] ==

Bar
[[User:Sheikbaba36524|Sheikbaba36524]] ([[User talk:Sheikbaba36524|talk]]) 06:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

{{Short description|Intense physical sensation of sexual release}}
{{Other uses}}
{{pp-semi-indef}}
{{pp-move}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2018}}
[[File:Vixen poster 01.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|''[[Vixen!]]'' (1968) by directed by [[Russ Meyer]] and starring [[Erica Gavin]].]]

'''Orgasm''' (from [[Greek language|Greek]] {{lang|el|ὀργασμός}}, {{transliteration|el|orgasmos}}; "excitement, swelling") or '''sexual climax''' (or simply '''climax''') is the sudden discharge of accumulated sexual excitement during the [[Human sexual response cycle|sexual response cycle]], resulting in rhythmic, involuntary [[Muscle contraction|muscular contractions]] in the [[human pelvis|pelvic]] region characterized by sexual pleasure.<ref name=dictbiopsych>{{cite book |last1 = Winn |first1 = Philip |title = Dictionary of Biological Psychology |date = 2003 |publisher = Routledge |isbn = 9781134778157 |page = 1189 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=OEMSWCeeSPYC&pg=PA1189 |language = en |access-date = November 15, 2019 |archive-date = February 27, 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230227065023/https://books.google.com/books?id=OEMSWCeeSPYC&pg=PA1189 |url-status = live }}</ref><ref name="Rosenthal">See [https://books.google.com/books?id=d58z5hgQ2gsC&pg=PT153 133–135] {{webarchive|url=http://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/20160402152531/https://books.google.com/books?id=d58z5hgQ2gsC&pg=PT153 |date=April 2, 2016 }} for orgasm information, and [https://books.google.com/books?id=d58z5hgQ2gsC&pg=PT96 page 76] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230227065024/https://books.google.com/books?id=d58z5hgQ2gsC&pg=PT96 |date=February 27, 2023 }} for G-spot and vaginal nerve ending information. {{cite book |first = Martha |last = Rosenthal |title = Human Sexuality: From Cells to Society |publisher = [[Cengage]] |date = 2012 |isbn = 978-0618755714 }}</ref> Experienced by males and females, orgasms are controlled by the involuntary or [[autonomic nervous system]]. They are usually associated with involuntary actions, including muscular [[spasm]]s in multiple areas of the body, a general [[euphoria|euphoric]] sensation, and, frequently, body movements and vocalizations.<ref name="Rosenthal" /> The period after orgasm (known as the [[refractory period (sex)|resolution]] phase) is typically a relaxing experience, attributed to the release of the [[neurohormone]]s [[oxytocin]] and [[prolactin]] as well as [[endorphins]] (or "endogenous [[morphine]]").<ref>{{Cite journal |vauthors = Exton MS, Krüger TH, Koch M |title = Coitus-induced orgasm stimulates prolactin secretion in healthy subjects |journal = Psychoneuroendocrinology |volume = 26 |issue = 3 |pages = 287–94 |date = April 2001 |pmid = 11166491 |doi = 10.1016/S0306-4530(00)00053-6 |s2cid = 21416299 |display-authors = etal }}</ref>

Human orgasms usually result from physical [[sexual stimulation]] of the [[Human penis|penis]] in males (typically accompanied by [[ejaculation]]) and of the [[clitoris]] in females.<ref name="Rosenthal" /><ref name="Weiten">{{cite book |title = Psychology Applied to Modern Life: Adjustment in the 21st Century |isbn = 978-1-111-18663-0 |publisher = Cengage |date = 2011 |page = 386 |access-date = January 5, 2012 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=CGu96TeAZo0C&pg=PT423 |author1 = Wayne Weiten |author2 = Dana S. Dunn |author3 = Elizabeth Yost Hammer |archive-date = February 26, 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230226053001/https://books.google.com/books?id=CGu96TeAZo0C&pg=PT423 |url-status = live }}</ref><ref name="O'Connell">{{br}}{{bull}}{{Cite journal |vauthors = O'Connell HE, Sanjeevan KV, Hutson JM |title = Anatomy of the clitoris |journal = The Journal of Urology |volume = 174 |issue = 4 Pt 1 |pages = 1189–95 |date = October 2005 |pmid = 16145367 |doi = 10.1097/01.ju.0000173639.38898.cd |s2cid = 26109805 }}{{br}}{{bull}}{{cite news |author = Sharon Mascall |date = June 11, 2006 |title = Time for rethink on the clitoris |work = [[BBC News]] |url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5013866.stm |access-date = October 31, 2009 |archive-date = September 9, 2019 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190909192820/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5013866.stm |url-status = live }}</ref> Sexual stimulation can be by self-practice ([[masturbation]]) or with a [[sex partner]] ([[Sexual penetration|penetrative sex]], [[non-penetrative sex]], or other [[Human sexual activity|sexual activity]]). It is not requisite though as possibilities exist to reach orgasm without physical stimulation through psychological means.<ref>{{Cite web|url= https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023237/ |title=A Case Of Female Orgasm Without Genital Stimulation - PMC|website=[[National Library of Medicine]]|date=24 February 2022|accessdate=3 February 2023}}</ref>

The health effects surrounding the human orgasm are diverse. There are many physiological responses during sexual activity, including a relaxed state created by prolactin, as well as changes in the [[central nervous system]] such as a temporary decrease in the [[Metabolism|metabolic]] activity of large parts of the [[cerebral cortex]] while there is no change or increased metabolic activity in the [[Limbic system|limbic]] (i.e., "bordering") areas of the brain.<ref name="Georgiadis">{{Cite journal |vauthors = Georgiadis JR, Reinders AA, Paans AM, Renken R, Kortekaas R |title = Men versus women on sexual brain function: prominent differences during tactile genital stimulation, but not during orgasm |journal = Human Brain Mapping |volume = 30 |issue = 10 |pages = 3089–101 |date = October 2009 |pmid = 19219848 |doi = 10.1002/hbm.20733 |pmc = 6871190 }}</ref> There are also a wide range of [[sexual dysfunction]]s, such as [[anorgasmia]]. These effects affect cultural views of orgasm, such as the beliefs that orgasm and the frequency or consistency of it are either important or irrelevant for satisfaction in a sexual relationship,<ref name="Kinsey Institute">{{cite web |title = Frequently Asked Sexuality Questions to the Kinsey Institute: Orgasm |publisher = iub.edu/~kinsey/resources |access-date = January 3, 2012 |url = http://www.iub.edu/~kinsey/resources/FAQ.html#orgasm |url-status = live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120105131500/http://iub.edu/~kinsey/resources/FAQ.html#orgasm |archive-date = January 5, 2012 }}</ref> and theories about the biological and evolutionary functions of orgasm.<ref name="Geoffrey Miller">{{cite book |author = Geoffrey Miller |title = The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature |publisher = [[Random House|Random House Digital]] |date = 2011 |pages = 238–239 |access-date = August 27, 2012 |isbn = 978-0307813749 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=QG-8PbZb4csC&q=The+human+clitoris+shows+no+apparent+signs+of+having+evolved+directly+through+male+mate+choice.&pg=PA238 |author-link = Geoffrey Miller (psychologist) |archive-date = February 27, 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230227065036/https://books.google.com/books?id=QG-8PbZb4csC&q=The+human+clitoris+shows+no+apparent+signs+of+having+evolved+directly+through+male+mate+choice.&pg=PA238 |url-status = live }}</ref><ref name="Wallen K, Lloyd EA">{{cite journal |title = Female sexual arousal: genital anatomy and orgasm in intercourse |journal = Hormones and Behavior |date = May 2011 |pmid = 21195073 |pmc = 3894744 |doi = 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.12.004 |volume = 59 |issue = 5 |pages = 780–92 |author = Wallen K, Lloyd EA. |last2 = Lloyd |url = https://philpapers.org/rec/WALFSA-2 |access-date = August 31, 2018 |archive-date = November 5, 2021 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20211105043848/https://philpapers.org/rec/WALFSA-2 |url-status = live }}</ref>
{{Short description|none}}
[[File:Portrait of Pope Paul III Farnese (by Titian) - National Museum of Capodimonte.jpg|thumb|Pope [[Pope Paul III|Paul III Farnese]] had 4 illegitimate children and made his illegitimate son [[Pier Luigi Farnese]] the first [[duke of Parma]].]]
This is a '''list of sexually active popes''', [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] [[Priesthood in the Catholic Church|priests]] who were not celibate before they became pope, and those who were legally married before becoming pope. Some candidates were allegedly [[human sexual behavior|sexually active]] before their election as [[pope]], and others were accused of being sexually active during their papacies. A number of them had offspring.

There are various classifications for those who were sexually active during their lives. Allegations of sexual activities are of varying levels of reliability, with several having been made by political opponents and being contested by modern historians.
[[File:StationaryStatesAnimation.gif|300px|thumb|right|Each of these three rows is a wave function which satisfies the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for a [[quantum harmonic oscillator|harmonic oscillator]]. Left: The real part (blue) and imaginary part (red) of the wave function. Right: The [[probability distribution]] of finding the particle with this wave function at a given position. The top two rows are examples of '''[[stationary state]]s''', which correspond to [[standing wave]]s. The bottom row is an example of a state which is ''not'' a stationary state. The right column illustrates why stationary states are called "stationary".]]

The term "Schrödinger equation" can refer to both the general equation, or the specific nonrelativistic version. The general equation is indeed quite general, used throughout quantum mechanics, for everything from the [[Dirac equation]] to [[quantum field theory]], by plugging in diverse expressions for the Hamiltonian. The specific nonrelativistic version is an approximation that yields accurate results in many situations, but only to a certain extent (see [[relativistic quantum mechanics]] and [[relativistic quantum field theory]]).

To apply the Schrödinger equation, write down the [[Hamiltonian (quantum mechanics)|Hamiltonian]] for the system, accounting for the [[Kinetic energy|kinetic]] and [[Potential energy|potential]] energies of the particles constituting the system, then insert it into the Schrödinger equation. The resulting partial [[differential equation]] is solved for the wave function, which contains information about the system. In practice, the square of the absolute value of the wave function at each point is taken to define a [[probability density function]].<ref name="Zwiebach2022"/>{{rp|78}} For example, given a wave function in position space <math>\Psi(x,t)</math> as above, we have
<math display="block">\Pr(x,t) = |\Psi(x,t)|^2.</math>


{{Please leave this line alone (sandbox heading)}}<!--
* Welcome to the sandbox! *
* Please leave this part alone *
* The page is cleared regularly *
* Feel free to try your editing skills below *
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■-->
{{Short description|Atlantic tropical depression in 1992}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2021}}
{{Infobox weather event
| name = Tropical Depression One
| image = Tropical Depression One 25 june 1992 1329Z.jpg
| caption = Tropical Depression in the eastern [[Gulf of Mexico]]
| formed = June 25, 1992
| dissipated = June 26, 1992
}}{{Infobox weather event/NWS
| winds = 30
| pressure = 1007
}}{{Infobox weather event/Effects
| year = 1992
| fatalities = 4 direct, 1 indirect, 1 missing
| damage = 2600000
| areas = [[Cuba]], [[Florida]]
| refs =
}}{{Infobox weather event/Footer
| season = [[1992 Atlantic hurricane season]]
}}
'''Tropical Depression One''' was a tropical depression that in June 1992, produced [[100-year flood]]s in portions of southwestern [[Florida]]. The first tropical depression and second [[tropical cyclone]] of the [[1992 Atlantic hurricane season]], the depression developed on June 25 from a [[tropical wave]]. Located in an environment of strong [[wind shear]], much of the [[convection]] in the system was located well to the southeast of the poorly defined center of circulation. The depression moved northeastward and made [[Landfall (meteorology)|landfall]] near [[Tampa, Florida]] on June 26 shortly before dissipating over land.
The depression, in combination with an upper-level [[trough (meteorology)|trough]] to its west, produced heavy rainfall to the east of its path, peaking at {{convert|33.43|inch}} in [[Cuba]] and {{convert|25|inch}} in Florida. In Cuba, the rainfall destroyed hundreds of homes and caused two fatalities. In Florida, particularly in [[Sarasota County, Florida|Sarasota]] and [[Manatee County, Florida|Manatee]] counties, the rainfall caused severe flooding. 4,000&nbsp;houses were affected, forcing thousands to evacuate. The flooding killed two in the state and was indirectly responsible for a traffic casualty. Damage in Florida totaled over $2.6&nbsp;million (1992&nbsp;USD, $4&nbsp;million 2009&nbsp;USD).
{{Short description|British single-seat WWII fighter aircraft}}
{{Redirect|Spitfire}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2016}}
{{Use British English|date=February 2018}}
{|{{Infobox aircraft begin
|name= Spitfire
|image= File:Spitfire - Season Premiere Airshow 2018 (cropped).jpg
|caption= Spitfire LF Mk IX, ''MH434'' in 2018 in the markings of its original unit [[No. 222 Squadron RAF]].
}}{{Infobox aircraft type
|type= [[Fighter aircraft|Fighter]] / [[Interceptor aircraft|Interceptor]] aircraft
|national origin= United Kingdom
|manufacturer= [[Supermarine]]
|designer= [[R. J. Mitchell]]
|first flight= 5 March 1936<ref name="Ethell p. 12" />
|introduction= 4 August 1938<ref name="Ethell p. 12" />
|retired= 1961 ([[Irish Air Corps]])<ref>[http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/waf/ireland/af/irl-af-all-time.htm "Ireland Air Force"]; {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101201103000/http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/waf/ireland/af/irl-af-all-time.htm |date=1 December 2010 }}. aeroflight.co. Retrieved 27 September 2009.</ref>
|status=
|primary user= [[Royal Air Force]]<!-- List only one user; for military aircraft, this is a nation or a service arm. Please DON'T add flag templates, as they limit horizontal space. -->
|more users= {{plain list|
* [[Royal Canadian Air Force]]
* [[Free French Air Force]]
* [[United States Army Air Forces]]}}<!-- Limited to THREE (3) "more users" here (4 total users). -->
|produced= 1938–1948
|number built= 20,351<ref name="Ethell p. 117" />
|variants with their own articles= [[Supermarine Seafire]]
|developed into= [[Supermarine Spiteful]]
}}
|}
[[File:Spitfire fly past at RAF Halton.ogg|thumb|Audio recording of Spitfire fly-past at the 2011 family day at [[RAF Halton]], Buckinghamshire]]
The '''Supermarine Spitfire''' is a British single-seat [[fighter aircraft]] used by the [[Royal Air Force]] and other [[Allies of World War II|Allied]] countries before, during, and after [[World War II]]. Many variants of the Spitfire were built, from the Mk 1 to the Rolls-Royce Griffon-engined Mk 24 using several wing configurations and guns. It was the only British fighter produced continuously throughout the war. The Spitfire remains popular among enthusiasts; around [[List of surviving Supermarine Spitfires|70 remain airworthy]], and many more are static exhibits in aviation museums throughout the world.
The Spitfire was designed as a short-range, high-performance [[interceptor aircraft]] by [[R. J. Mitchell]], chief designer at [[Supermarine]] Aviation Works, which operated as a subsidiary of [[Vickers-Armstrong]] from 1928. Mitchell developed the Spitfire's distinctive [[elliptical wing]] (designed by [[Beverley Shenstone]]) with innovative sunken rivets to have the thinnest possible cross-section, achieving a potential top speed greater than that of several contemporary fighter aircraft, including the [[Hawker Hurricane]]. Mitchell continued to refine the design until his death in 1937, whereupon his colleague [[Joseph Smith (aircraft designer)|Joseph Smith]] took over as chief designer, overseeing the Spitfire's development through [[Supermarine Spitfire variants: specifications, performance and armament|many variants]].
During the [[Battle of Britain]] (July–October 1940), the public perceived the Spitfire to be the main RAF fighter; however, the more numerous Hurricane shouldered more of the burden of resisting the [[Luftwaffe]]. Nevertheless, the Spitfire was generally a better fighter aircraft than the Hurricane. Spitfire units had a lower attrition rate and a higher victory-to-loss ratio than Hurricanes, most likely due to the Spitfire's higher performance. During the battle, Spitfires generally engaged Luftwaffe fighters—mainly [[Messerschmitt Bf 109 variants#Bf 109E|Messerschmitt Bf 109E]]–series aircraft, which were a close match for them.
After the Battle of Britain, the Spitfire superseded the Hurricane as the principal aircraft of [[RAF Fighter Command]], and it was used in the [[European Theatre of World War II|European]], [[Mediterranean, Middle East and African theatres of World War II|Mediterranean]], [[Asiatic-Pacific Theater|Pacific]], and [[South-East Asian theatre of World War II|South-East Asian]] theatres. Much loved by its pilots, the Spitfire operated in several roles, including interceptor, photo-reconnaissance, fighter-bomber, and trainer, and it continued to do so until the 1950s. The [[Supermarine Seafire|Seafire]] was an aircraft carrier–based adaptation of the Spitfire, used in the [[Fleet Air Arm]] from 1942 until the mid-1950s. The original [[airframe]] was designed to be powered by a [[Rolls-Royce Merlin]] engine producing 1,030&nbsp;[[horsepower|hp]] (768&nbsp;kW). It was strong enough and adaptable enough to use increasingly powerful Merlins, and in later marks, [[Rolls-Royce Griffon]] engines producing up to 2,340&nbsp;hp (1,745&nbsp;kW). As a result, the Spitfire's performance and capabilities improved over the course of its service life.
In the literary traditions of the [[Upanishads]], [[Brahma Sutras]] and the [[Bhagavad Gita]], conscience is the label given to attributes composing knowledge about good and evil, that a [[Soul (spirit)|soul]] acquires from the completion of acts and consequent accretion of [[karma]] over many lifetimes.<ref>Ninian Smart. ''The World's Religions: Old Traditions and Modern Transformations''. Cambridge University Press. 1989. p. 382</ref> According to [[Adi Shankara]] in his ''[[Vivekachudamani]]'' morally right action (characterised as humbly and compassionately performing the primary duty of good to others without expectation of material or spiritual reward), helps "purify the heart" and provide mental tranquility but it alone does not give us "direct perception of the Reality".<ref>Shankara. ''Crest-Jewel of Discrimination'' (''[[Vivekachudamani|Veka-Chudamani]]'') (trans Prabhavananda S and Isherwood C). Vedanta Press, Hollywood. 1978. pp. 34–36, 136–37.</ref> This knowledge requires discrimination between the eternal and non-eternal and eventually a realization in [[contemplation]] that the true self merges in a universe of pure consciousness.<ref>Shankara. ''Crest-Jewel of Discrimination'' (''[[Vivekachudamani|Veka-Chudamani]]'') (trans Prabhavananda S and Isherwood C). Vedanta Press, Hollywood. 1978. p. 119.</ref>
In the [[Zoroastrian]] faith, after death a soul must face judgment at the ''Bridge of the Separator''; there, [[evil]] people are tormented by prior denial of their own higher nature, or conscience, and "to all time will they be guests for the ''House of the Lie''."<ref>John B Noss. ''Man's Religions''. Macmillan. New York. 1968. p. 477.</ref> The [[China|Chinese]] concept of [[Ren (Confucianism)|Ren]], indicates that conscience, along with social etiquette and correct relationships, assist humans to follow ''The Way'' ([[Tao]]) a mode of life reflecting the implicit human capacity for goodness and harmony.<ref>AS Cua. ''Moral Vision and Tradition: Essays in Chinese Ethics''. Catholic University of America Press. Washington. 1998.</ref>
[[File:Bronze Marcus Aurelius Louvre.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Marcus Aurelius]] bronze fragment, Louvre, Paris: "To move from one unselfish action to another with God in mind. Only there, delight and stillness."]]
Conscience also features prominently in [[Buddhism]].<ref>Jayne Hoose (ed) ''Conscience in World Religions''. University of Notre Dame Press. 1990.</ref> In the [[Pali]] scriptures, for example, [[Buddha]] links the positive aspect of ''conscience'' to a pure heart and a calm, well-directed mind. It is regarded as a spiritual power, and one of the "Guardians of the World". The Buddha also associated conscience with compassion for those who must endure cravings and suffering in the world until right conduct culminates in right mindfulness and right [[contemplation]].<ref>Ninian Smart. ''The Religious Experience of Mankind''. Fontana. 1971 p. 118.</ref> [[Santideva]] (685–763 CE) wrote in the [[Bodhicaryavatara]] (which he composed and delivered in the great northern Indian Buddhist university of [[Nalanda]]) of the spiritual importance of perfecting virtues such as [[generosity]], [[forbearance]] and training the awareness to be like a "block of wood" when attracted by vices such as [[pride]] or [[lust]]; so one can continue advancing towards right understanding in meditative absorption.<ref>Santideva. ''The Bodhicaryavatara''. trans Crosby K and Skilton A. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1995. pp. 38, 98</ref> ''Conscience'' thus manifests in Buddhism as unselfish love for all living beings which gradually intensifies and awakens to a purer awareness<ref>Lama Anagarika Govinda in Jeffery Paine (ed) ''Adventures with the Buddha: A Buddhism Reader''. WW Norton. London. pp. 92–93.</ref> where the mind withdraws from sensory interests and becomes aware of itself as a single whole.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Steps Along the Path |url=https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/thai/thate/stepsalong.html |access-date=2022-12-13 |website=www.accesstoinsight.org}}</ref>
The [[Roman Emperor]] [[Marcus Aurelius]] wrote in his ''[[Meditations]]'' that conscience was the human capacity to live by rational principles that were congruent with the true, tranquil and harmonious nature of our mind and thereby that of the Universe: "To move from one unselfish action to another with God in mind. Only there, delight and stillness&nbsp;... the only rewards of our existence here are an unstained character and unselfish acts."<ref>Marcus Aurelius. ''Meditations''. Gregory Hays (trans). Weidenfeld and & Nicolson. London. 2003 pp. 70, 75.</ref>
[[File:Munqidh min al-dalal (last page).jpg|thumb|upright|Last page of [[Al-Ghazali|Ghazali]]'s autobiography in MS Istanbul, Shehid Ali Pasha 1712, dated [[Anno Hegirae|A.H.]] 509 = 1115–1116. Ghazali's crisis of epistemological skepticism was resolved by "a light which God Most High cast into my breast&nbsp;... the key to most knowledge."]]
The [[Islamic]] concept of ''[[Taqwa]]'' is closely related to conscience. In the [[Qur’ān]] verses 2:197 & 22:37 Taqwa refers to "right conduct" or "[[piety]]", "guarding of oneself" or "guarding against evil".<ref>Sachiko Murata and William C. Chittick. ''The Vision of Islam''. I. B. Tauris. 2000. {{ISBN|1-86064-022-2}} pp. 282–85</ref> [[Qur’ān]] verse 47:17 says that God is the ultimate source of the believer's taqwā which is not simply the product of individual will but requires inspiration from God.<ref>Ames Ambros and Stephan Procházka. ''A Concise Dictionary of Koranic Arabic''. Reichert Verlag 2004. {{ISBN|3-89500-400-6}} p. 294.</ref> In [[Qur’ān]] verses 91:7–8, God the Almighty talks about how He has perfected the soul, the conscience and has taught it the wrong (fujūr) and right (taqwā). Hence, the awareness of vice and virtue is inherent in the soul, allowing it to be tested fairly in the life of this world and tried, held accountable on the day of judgment for responsibilities to God and all humans.<ref>Azim Nanji. 'Islamic Ethics' in Singer P (ed). ''A Companion to Ethics''. Blackwell, Oxford 1995. p. 108.</ref>
[[File:Sura49.pdf|left|thumb|upright|[[Qur’ān]] Sura 49. Surah al-Hujurat, 49:13 declares: "come to know each other, the noblest of you, in the sight of God, are the ones possessing taqwá".]]
[[Qur’ān]] verse 49:13 states: "O humankind! We have created you out of male and female and constituted you into different groups and societies, so that you may come to know each other-the noblest of you, in the sight of God, are the ones possessing taqwā." In [[Islam]], according to eminent theologians such as [[Al-Ghazali]], although events are ordained (and written by God in al-Lawh al-Mahfūz, the ''Preserved Tablet''), humans possess free will to choose between wrong and right, and are thus responsible for their actions; the conscience being a dynamic personal connection to God enhanced by knowledge and practise of the [[Five Pillars of Islam]], deeds of piety, repentance, self-discipline and prayer; and disintegrated and metaphorically covered in blackness through sinful acts.<ref>John B Noss. ''Man's Religions''. The Macmillan Company, New York. 1968 Ch. 16 pp. 758–59</ref> [[Marshall Hodgson]] wrote the three-volume work: ''The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization''.<ref>Marshall G. S. Hodgson. ''The Venture of Islam, Volume 1: The Classical Age of Islam''. University of Chicago Press. 1975 {{ISBN|978-0-226-34686-1}}. Winner of [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]] Prize.</ref>
[[File:William Holman Hunt - The Awakening Conscience - Google Art Project.jpg|thumb|upright|[[The Awakening Conscience]], [[William Holman Hunt|Holman Hunt]], 1853]]
In the Protestant Christian tradition, [[Martin Luther]] insisted in the [[Diet of Worms]] that his conscience was captive to the Word of God, and it was neither safe nor right to go against conscience. To Luther, conscience falls within the ethical, rather than the religious, sphere.<ref name=Tillich>{{cite book|last1=Tillich|first1=Paul|title=Morality and Beyond|url=https://archive.org/details/moralitybeyond00till|url-access=registration|date=1963|publisher=Harper & Row, Publishers|location=New York|page=[https://archive.org/details/moralitybeyond00till/page/69 69]}}</ref> [[John Calvin]] saw conscience as a battleground: "the enemies who rise up in our conscience against his Kingdom and hinder his decrees prove that God's throne is not firmly established therein".<ref>Calvin, ''Institutes of the Christian religion'', Book 2, chapter 8, quoted in:{{cite book |last= Wogaman |first= J. Pilip |author-link= J. Philip Wogaman |title= Christian ethics: a historical introduction |year= 1993 |publisher= Westminster/John Knox Press |location= Louisville, Kentucky |isbn= 978-0-664-25163-5 |pages= [https://archive.org/details/christianethicsh0000woga/page/119 119, 340] |quote=the enemies who rise up in our conscience against his Kingdom and hinder his decrees prove that God's throne is not firmly established therein. |url= https://archive.org/details/christianethicsh0000woga/page/119 }}</ref> Many [[Christians]] regard following one's conscience as important as, or even more important than, obeying human [[authority]].<ref>Ninian Smart. ''The World's Religions: Old Traditions and Modern Transformations''. Cambridge University Press. 1989. p. 376</ref> According to the bible, written in Romans 2:15, conscience is the one bearing witness, accusing or excusing one another, so we would know when we break the law written in our hearts; the guilt we feel when we do something wrong tells us that we need to repent."<ref>Ninian Smart. ''The World's Religions: Old Traditions and Modern Transformations''. Cambridge University Press. 1989. p. 364</ref> This can sometimes (as with the conflict between [[William Tyndale]] and [[Thomas More]] over the translation of the Bible into English) lead to moral quandaries: "Do I unreservedly obey my Church/priest/military/political leader or do I follow my own inner feeling of right and wrong as instructed by prayer and a personal reading of scripture?"<ref>Brian Moynahan. ''William Tyndale: If God Spare My Life''. Abacus. London. 2003 pp. 249–50</ref> Some contemporary Christian churches and religious groups hold the moral teachings of the [[Ten Commandments]] or of [[Jesus]] as the highest authority in any situation, regardless of the extent to which it involves responsibilities in law.<ref>Ninian Smart. ''The World's Religions: Old Traditions and Modern Transformations''. Cambridge University Press. 1989. p. 353</ref> In the [[Gospel of John]] (7:53–8:11) (King James Version) Jesus challenges those accusing a woman of adultery stating: "'He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.' And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground. And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one" [However the word 'conscience' is not in the original New Testament Greek, and is not in the vast majority of Bible versions.] (see [[Jesus and the woman taken in adultery]]). In the [[Gospel of Luke]] (10: 25–37) Jesus tells the story of how a despised and heretical [[Samaritan]] (see [[Parable of the Good Samaritan]]) who (out of compassion/pity - the word 'conscience' is not used) helps an injured stranger beside a road, qualifies better for eternal life by loving his neighbor, than a priest who passes by on the other side.<ref>Guthrie D, Motyer JA, Stibbs AM, Wiseman DLJ (eds). ''New Bible Commentary'' 3rd ed. Inter-Varsity Press, Leicester. 1989. p. 905.</ref>
[[File:Lytras nikiforos antigone polynices.jpeg|left|thumb|[[Nikiforos Lytras]], ''Antigone in front of the dead Polynices'' (1865), oil on canvas, National Gallery of Greece-Alexandros Soutzos Museum.]]
This dilemma of obedience in conscience to divine or state law, was demonstrated dramatically in [[Antigone]]'s defiance of [[Creon of Thebes|King Creon]]'s order against burying her brother an alleged traitor, appealing to the "[[natural law|unwritten law]]" and to a "longer allegiance to the dead than to the living".<ref>Robert Graves. ''The Greek Myths: 2'' (London: Penguin, 1960). p. 380</ref>
{{anchor|ConscienceInCatholicTheology}}[[Catholic]] [[theology]] sees conscience as the last practical "judgment of reason which at the appropriate moment enjoins [a person] to do good and to avoid evil".<ref>{{anchor|CCC}}''[[Catechism of the Catholic Church]]'' – English translation (U.S., 2nd edition) (English translation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church: Modifications from the Editio Typica, copyright 1997, United States Catholic Conference, Inc. – Libreria Editrice Vaticana) (Glossary and Index Analyticus, copyright 2000, U.S. Catholic Conference, Inc.). {{ISBN|1-57455-110-8}} paragraph 1778</ref> The [[Second Vatican Council]] (1962–65) describes: "Deep within his conscience man discovers a law which he has not laid upon himself but which he must obey. Its voice, ever calling him to love and to do what is good and to avoid evil, tells him inwardly at the right movement: do this, shun that. For man has in his heart a law inscribed by God. His dignity lies in observing this law, and by it he will be judged. His conscience is man’s most secret core, and his sanctuary. There he is alone with God whose voice echoes in his depths."<ref>Vatican Council II: The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents. Collegeville: The Liturgical Press 1992. ''Gaudium and Spes'' 16. Cfr. Joseph Ratzinger, ''On Conscience'', San Francisco: Ignatius Press 2007</ref> Thus, conscience is not like the will, nor a habit like prudence, but "the interior space in which we can listen to and hear the truth, the good, the voice of God. It is the inner place of our relationship with Him, who speaks to our heart and helps us to discern, to understand the path we ought to take, and once the decision is made, to move forward, to remain faithful"<ref>{{Cite web |title=Whispers in the Loggia: "Jesus Always Invites Us. He Does Not Impose." |url=http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/2013/06/jesus-always-invites-us-he-does-not.html |access-date=2022-12-13 |language=en}}</ref> In terms of logic, conscience can be viewed as the practical conclusion of a moral syllogism whose major premise is an objective norm and whose minor premise is a particular case or situation to which the norm is applied. Thus, Catholics are taught to carefully educate themselves as to revealed norms and norms derived therefrom, so as to form a correct conscience. Catholics are also to examine their conscience daily and with special care before [[Confession (religion)|confession]]. Catholic teaching holds that, "Man has the right to act according to his conscience and in freedom so as personally to make moral decisions. He must not be forced to act contrary to his conscience. Nor must he be prevented from acting according to his conscience, especially in religious matters".<ref>''[[#CCC|Catechism of the Catholic Church]]'', paragraph 1782</ref> This right of conscience does not allow one to arbitrarily disagree with Church teaching and claim that one is acting in accordance with conscience. A sincere conscience presumes one is diligently seeking moral truth from authentic sources, that is, seeking to conform oneself to that moral truth by listening to the authority established by Christ to teach it. Nevertheless, despite one's best effort, "[i]t can happen that moral conscience remains in ignorance and makes erroneous judgments about acts to be performed or already committed&nbsp;... This ignorance can often be imputed to personal responsibility&nbsp;... In such cases, the person is culpable for the [[evil|wrong]] he commits."<ref>''[[#CCC|Catechism of the Catholic Church]]'', paragraph 1790–91</ref> {{Citation needed span|text=Thus, if one realizes one may have made a mistaken judgment, one's conscience is said to be vincibly erroneous and it is not a valid norm for action. One must first remove the source of error and do one's best to achieve a correct judgment. If, however, one is not aware of one's error or if, despite an honest and diligent effort one cannot remove the error by study or seeking advice, then one's conscience may be said to be invincibly erroneous. It binds since one has subjective certainty that one is correct. The act resulting from acting on the invincibly erroneous conscience is not good in itself, yet this deformed act or material sin against God's right order and the objective norm is not imputed to the person. The formal obedience given to such a judgment of conscience is good. Some Catholics appeal to conscience in order to justify dissent, not on the level of conscience properly understood, but on the level of the principles and norms which are supposed to inform conscience. For example, some priests make on the use of the so-called [[Internal and external forum (Catholic canon law)#"Internal forum solution"|internal forum solution]] (which is not sanctioned by the [[Magisterium]]) to justify actions or lifestyles incompatible with Church teaching, such as Christ's prohibition of remarriage after divorce or sexual activity outside marriage.|date=March 2021}} The [[Catholic Church]] has warned that "rejection of the Church's authority and her teaching&nbsp;... can be at the source of errors in judgment in [[moral]] conduct".<ref>''[[#CCC|Catechism of the Catholic Church]]'', paragraph 1792</ref> An example of someone following his conscience to the point of accepting the consequence of being condemned to death is Sir [[Thomas More]] (1478-1535).<ref>Samuel Willard Crompton, "Thomas More: And His Struggles of Conscience" (Chelsea House Publications, 2006); Marc D. Guerra, 'Thomas More's Correspondence on Conscience', in: ''Religion & Liberty'' 10(2010)6 <https://acton.org/thomas-mores-correspondence-conscience>; Prof. Gerald Wegemer, "Integrity and Conscience in the Life and Thought of Thomas More" [21 aug. 2006]<http://thomasmoreinstitute.org.uk/papers/integrity-and-conscience-in-the-life-and-thought-of-thomas-more/>; http://sacredheartmercy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/A-Reflection-on-Conscience.pdf {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170911120158/http://sacredheartmercy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/A-Reflection-on-Conscience.pdf |date=11 September 2017 }}</ref> A theologian who wrote on the distinction between the 'sense of duty' and the 'moral sense', as two aspects of conscience, and who saw the former as some feeling that can only be explained by a divine Lawgiver, was [[John Henry Cardinal Newman]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Newman |first=John Henry |url=http://archive.org/details/a599830700newmuoft |title=An essay in aid of a grammar of assent |date=1887 |publisher=London : Longmans, Green |others=Saint Mary's College of California}}</ref> A well known saying of him is that he would first toast on his conscience and only then on the pope, since his conscience brought him to acknowledge the authority of the pope.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Newman Reader - Letter to the Duke of Norfolk - Section 5 |url=https://www.newmanreader.org/works/anglicans/volume2/gladstone/section5.html |access-date=2022-12-13 |website=www.newmanreader.org}}</ref>
[[Judaism]] arguably does not require uncompromising obedience to religious authority; the case has been made that throughout [[Jewish history]], [[rabbis]] have circumvented laws they found unconscionable, such as capital punishment.<ref>Harold H Schulweis. ''Conscience: The Duty to Obey and the Duty to Disobey''. Jewish Lights Publishing. 2008.</ref> Similarly, although an occupation with national destiny has been central to the Jewish faith (see [[Zionism]]) many scholars (including [[Moses Mendelssohn]]) stated that conscience as a personal revelation of scriptural truth was an important adjunct to the [[Talmudic]] tradition.<ref>Ninian Smart. ''The Religious Experience of Mankind''. Collins. NY. 1969 pp. 395–400.</ref><ref>Levi Meier (Ed.) ''Conscience and Autonomy within Judaism: A Special Issue of the Journal of Psychology and Judaism''. Springer-Verlag. New York {{ISBN|978-0-89885-364-3}}.</ref> The concept of [[inner light]] in the [[Religious Society of Friends]] or [[Quaker]]s is associated with conscience.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> [[Freemasonry]] describes itself as providing an adjunct to religion and key symbols found in a [[Freemason]] Lodge are the ''[[steel square|square]]'' and ''[[compass (drafting)|compasses]]'' explained as providing lessons that Masons should "square their actions by the square of conscience", learn to "circumscribe their desires and keep their passions within due bounds toward all mankind."<ref name="spoilt">{{cite journal
| last = Gilkes
| first = Peter
|date=July 2004
| title = Masonic ritual: Spoilt for choice
| journal = Masonic Quarterly Magazine
| issue = 10
| url = http://www.mqmagazine.co.uk/issue-10/p-61.php
| access-date =7 May 2007}}</ref> The historian [[Manning Clark]] viewed ''conscience'' as one of the comforters that religion placed between man and death but also a crucial part of the quest for grace encouraged by the [[Book of Job]] and the [[Book of Ecclesiastes]], leading us to be paradoxically closest to the truth when we suspect that what matters most in life ("being there when everyone suddenly understands what it has all been for") can never happen.<ref>Manning Clark. ''The Quest for Grace''. Penguin Books, Ringwood. 1991 p. 220.</ref> [[Leo Tolstoy]], after a decade studying the issue (1877–1887), held that the only power capable of resisting the evil associated with materialism and the drive for social power of religious institutions, was the capacity of humans to reach an individual spiritual truth through reason and conscience.<ref>Aylmer Maude. ''Introduction to Leo Tolstoy. On Life and Essays on Religion'' (A Maude trans) Oxford University Press. London. 1950 (repr) pxv.</ref> Many prominent [[religious]] works about conscience also have a significant philosophical component: examples are the works of [[Al-Ghazali]],<ref name="autogenerated1966">{{cite journal | last1 = Najm | first1 = Sami M. | year = 1966 | title = The Place and Function of Doubt in the Philosophies of Descartes and Al-Ghazali | journal = Philosophy East and West | volume = 16 | issue = 3–4| pages = 133–41 | doi = 10.2307/1397536 | jstor = 1397536 }}</ref> [[Avicenna]],<ref name="autogenerated67">Nader El-Bizri. "Avicenna's De Anima between Aristotle and Husserl" in Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka (ed) ''The Passions of the Soul in the Metamorphosis of Becoming''. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht 2003 pp. 67–89.</ref> [[Aquinas]],<ref name="autogenerated145">Henry Sidgwick. ''Outlines of the History of Ethics''. Macmillan. London. 1960 pp. 145, 150.</ref> [[Joseph Butler]]<ref name="autogenerated365">Rurak, James (1980). "Butler's Analogy: A Still Interesting Synthesis of Reason and Revelation", ''Anglican Theological Review'' 62 (October) pp. 365–81</ref> and [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]]<ref name="autogenerated24">Dietrich Bonhoeffer. ''Ethics''. Eberhard Bethge (ed.) Neville Horton Smith (trans.) Collins. London 1963 p. 24</ref> (all discussed in the philosophical views section).
[[Baruch Spinoza|Benedict de Spinoza]] in his [[Ethics (Spinoza)|''Ethics'']], published after his death in 1677, argued that most people, even those that consider themselves to exercise [[free will]], make moral decisions on the basis of imperfect sensory information, inadequate understanding of their mind and will, as well as emotions which are both outcomes of their contingent physical existence and forms of thought defective from being chiefly impelled by self-preservation.<ref>Spinoza. ''Ethics''. Everyman's Library JM Dent, London. 1948. Part 2 proposition 35. Part 3 proposition 11.</ref> The solution, according to Spinoza, was to gradually increase the capacity of our reason to change the forms of thought produced by emotions and to fall in love with viewing problems requiring moral decision from the perspective of eternity.<ref>Spinoza. ''Ethics''. Everyman's Library JM Dent, London. 1948. Part 4 proposition 59, Part 5 proposition 30</ref> Thus, living a life of peaceful conscience means to Spinoza that reason is used to generate adequate ideas where the mind increasingly sees the world and its conflicts, our desires and passions ''sub specie aeternitatis'', that is without reference to time.<ref>Roger Scruton. "Spinoza" in Raphael F and Monk R (eds). ''The Great Philosophers''. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. London. 2000. p. 141.</ref> [[Hegel]]'s obscure and [[mystical]] [[Philosophy of Mind]] held that the absolute right of ''freedom of conscience'' facilitates human understanding of an all-embracing unity, an absolute which was rational, real and true.<ref>Richard L Gregory. ''The Oxford Companion to the Mind''. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 1987 p. 308.</ref> Nevertheless, Hegel thought that a functioning State would always be tempted not to recognize conscience in its form of subjective knowledge, just as similar non-objective opinions are generally rejected in science.<ref>Georg Hegel. ''Philosophy of Right''. Knox TM trans, Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1942. para 137.</ref> A similar idealist notion was expressed in the writings of [[Joseph Butler]] who argued that conscience is [[God]]-given, should always be obeyed, is intuitive, and should be considered the "constitutional monarch" and the "universal moral faculty": "conscience does not only offer itself to show us the way we should walk in, but it likewise carries its own authority with it."<ref>Joseph Butler "Sermons" in ''The Works of Joseph Butler''. (Gladstone WE ed), Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1896, Vol II p. 71.</ref> Butler advanced ethical speculation by referring to a duality of regulative principles in human nature: first, "self-love" (seeking individual happiness) and second, "benevolence" (compassion and seeking good for another) in ''conscience'' (also linked to the [[agape]] of [[situational ethics]]).<ref name="autogenerated365"/> Conscience tended to be more authoritative in questions of moral judgment, thought Butler, because it was more likely to be clear and certain (whereas calculations of self-interest tended to probable and changing conclusions).<ref>Henry Sidgwick. ''Outlines of the History of Ethics''. Macmillan, London. 1960 pp. 196–97.</ref> [[John Selden]] in his ''Table Talk'' expressed the view that an awake but excessively scrupulous or ill-trained ''conscience'' could hinder resolve and practical action; it being "like a horse that is not well wayed, he starts at every bird that flies out of the hedge".<ref>John Selden. ''Table Talk''. Garnett R, Valee L and Brandl A (eds) The Book of Literature: A Comprehensive Anthology. The Grolier Society. Toronto. 1923. Vol 14. p. 67.</ref>
As the sacred texts of ancient [[Hindu]] and [[Buddhist]] philosophy became available in German translations in the 18th and 19th centuries, they influenced philosophers such as [[Schopenhauer]] to hold that in a healthy mind only deeds oppress our ''conscience'', not wishes and thoughts; "for it is only our deeds that hold us up to the mirror of our will"; the ''good conscience'', thought Schopenhauer, we experience after every disinterested deed arises from direct recognition of our own inner being in the phenomenon of another, it affords us the verification "that our true self exists not only in our own person, this particular manifestation, but in everything that lives. By this the heart feels itself enlarged, as by egotism it is contracted."<ref>Arthur Schopenhauer. ''The World as Will and Idea''. Vol 1. Routledge and Kegan Paul. London. 1948. pp. 387, 482. "I believe that the influence of the Sanskrit literature will penetrate not less deeply than did the revival of Greek literature in the 15th century." p xiii.</ref>
[[Immanuel Kant]], a central figure of the [[Age of Enlightenment]], likewise claimed that two things filled his mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe, the oftener and more steadily they were reflected on: "the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me&nbsp;... the latter begins from my invisible self, my personality, and exhibits me in a world which has true infinity but which I recognise myself as existing in a universal and necessary (and not only, as in the first case, contingent) connection."<ref>Kant I. "The Noble Descent of Duty" in P Singer (ed). ''Ethics''. Oxford University Press. NY 1994 p. 41.</ref> The 'universal connection' referred to here is Kant's [[categorical imperative]]: "act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."<ref>Kant I. "The Categorical Imperative" in P Singer (ed). ''Ethics''. Oxford University Press. NY 1994 p. 274.</ref> Kant considered ''critical conscience'' to be an internal court in which our thoughts accuse or excuse one another; he acknowledged that morally mature people do often describe contentment or peace in the [[Soul (spirit)|soul]] after following conscience to perform a duty, but argued that for such acts to produce virtue their primary motivation should simply be duty, not expectation of any such bliss.<ref>Kant I. "The Doctrine of Virtue" in ''Metaphyics and Morals''. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 1991. pp. 183 and 233–34.</ref> Rousseau expressed a similar view that conscience somehow connected man to a greater [[metaphysics|metaphysical]] unity. [[John Plamenatz]] in his critical examination of [[Rousseau]]'s work considered that ''conscience'' was there defined as the feeling that urges us, in spite of contrary passions, towards two harmonies: the one within our minds and between our passions, and the other within society and between its members; "the weakest can appeal to it in the strongest, and the appeal, though often unsuccessful, is always disturbing. However, corrupted by power or wealth we may be, either as possessors of them or as victims, there is something in us serving to remind us that this corruption is against nature."<ref>John Plamenatz. ''Man and Society''. Vol 1. Longmans. London. 1963 p. 383.</ref>
[[File:JohnLocke.png|thumb|upright|[[John Locke]] viewed the widespread social fact of conscience as a justification for natural rights.]]
[[File:AdamSmith1790b.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Adam Smith]]: conscience shows what relates to ourselves in its proper shape and dimensions]]
[[File:Samuel Johnson by John Opie.jpg|left|thumb|upright|[[Samuel Johnson]] (1775) stated that "No man's conscience can tell him the right of another man."]]
Other philosophers expressed a more sceptical and pragmatic view of the operation of "conscience" in society.<ref>Hill T Jr "Four Conceptions of Conscience" in Shapiro I and Adams R. ''Integrity and Conscience''. New York University Press, New York 1998 p. 31.</ref>
[[John Locke]] in his ''Essays on the Law of Nature'' argued that the widespread fact of human conscience allowed a philosopher to infer the necessary existence of objective moral laws that occasionally might contradict those of the state.<ref>[[Roger Woolhouse]]. ''Locke: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2007. p. 53.</ref> Locke highlighted the [[metaethics]] problem of whether accepting a statement like "follow your ''conscience''" supports [[subject (philosophy)|subjectivist]] or [[objectivity (philosophy)|objectivist]] conceptions of conscience as a guide in concrete morality, or as a spontaneous revelation of eternal and immutable principles to the individual: "if conscience be a proof of innate principles, contraries may be innate principles; since some men with the same bent of conscience prosecute what others avoid."<ref>John Locke. ''An Essay Concerning Human Understanding''. Dover Publications. New York. 1959. {{ISBN|0-486-20530-4}}. Vol 1. ch II. pp. 71-72fn1.</ref> [[Thomas Hobbes]] likewise pragmatically noted that opinions formed on the basis of ''conscience'' with full and honest conviction, nevertheless should always be accepted with humility as potentially erroneous and not necessarily indicating absolute knowledge or truth.<ref>Thomas Hobbes. ''Leviathan'' (Molesworth W ed) J Bohn. London, 1837 Pt 2. Ch 29 p. 311.</ref> [[William Godwin]] expressed the view that ''conscience'' was a memorable consequence of the "perception by men of every creed when the descend into the scene of busy life" that they possess [[free will]].<ref>William Godwin. ''Enquiry Concerning Political Justice''. Codell Carter K (ed), Clarendon Press. Oxford. 1971 Appendix III 'Thoughts on Man' Essay XI 'Of Self Love and Benevolence' p. 338.</ref> [[Adam Smith]] considered that it was only by developing a ''critical conscience'' that we can ever see what relates to ourselves in its proper shape and dimensions; or that we can ever make any proper comparison between our own interests and those of other people.<ref>Adam Smith. ''The Theory of Moral Sentiments''. Part III, section ii, Ch III in Rogers K (ed) Self Interest: An Anthology of Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge. London. 1997 p. 151.</ref> [[John Stuart Mill]] believed that idealism about the role of ''conscience'' in government should be tempered with a practical realisation that few men in society are capable of directing their minds or purposes towards distant or unobvious interests, of disinterested regard for others, and especially for what comes after them, for the idea of posterity, of their country, or of humanity, whether grounded on sympathy or on a conscientious feeling.<ref name="Mill193-194">John Stuart Mill. "Considerations on Representative Government". Ch VI. In Rogers K (ed) ''Self Interest: An Anthology of Philosophical Perspectives''. Routledge. London. 1997 pp. 193–94</ref> Mill held that certain amount of ''conscience'', and of disinterested public spirit, may fairly be calculated on in the citizens of any community ripe for [[representative government]], but that "it would be ridiculous to expect such a degree of it, combined with such intellectual discernment, as would be proof against any plausible fallacy tending to make that which was for their class interest appear the dictate of justice and of the general good."<ref name="Mill193-194"/>
[[Josiah Royce]] (1855–1916) built on the [[transcendental idealism]] view of conscience, viewing it as the ideal of life which constitutes our moral personality, our plan of being ourself, of making common sense ethical decisions. But, he thought, this was only true insofar as our ''conscience'' also required loyalty to "a mysterious higher or deeper self".<ref>John K Roth (ed). ''The Philosophy of Josiah Royce''. Thomas Y Crowell Co. New York. 1971 pp. 302–15.</ref>
In the modern Christian tradition this approach achieved expression with [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]] who stated during his imprisonment by the [[Nazis]] in [[World War II]] that ''conscience'' for him was more than practical reason, indeed it came from a "depth which lies beyond a man's own will and his own reason and it makes itself heard as the call of human existence to unity with itself."<ref>Dietrich Bonhoeffer. ''Ethics''. (Eberhard Bethge (ed) Neville Horton Smith (trans) Collins. London 1963 p. 242</ref> For Bonhoeffer a ''guilty conscience'' arose as an indictment of the loss of this unity and as a warning against the loss of one's self; primarily, he thought, it is directed not towards a particular kind of doing but towards a particular mode of being. It protests against a doing which imperils the unity of this being with itself.<ref name="autogenerated24"/> ''Conscience'' for Bonhoeffer did not, like shame, embrace or pass judgment on the morality of the whole of its owner's life; it reacted only to certain definite actions: "it recalls what is long past and represents this disunion as something which is already accomplished and irreparable".<ref name="Bonhoffer66">Dietrich Bonhoeffer. ''Ethics''. (Eberhard Bethge (ed) Neville Horton Smith (trans) Collins. London 1963 p. 66</ref> The man with a ''conscience'', he believed, fights a lonely battle against the "overwhelming forces of inescapable situations" which demand moral decisions despite the likelihood of adverse consequences.<ref name="Bonhoffer66"/> [[Simon Soloveychik]] has similarly claimed that the ''truth'' distributed in the world, as the statement about human [[dignity]], as the affirmation of the line between [[good and evil]], lives in people as conscience.<ref>[[Simon Soloveychik]]. ''Parenting For Everyone''. Ch 12 [http://www.parentingforeveryone.com/book2part2ch12 "A Chapter on Conscience"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070516020813/http://www.parentingforeveryone.com/book2part2ch12 |date=16 May 2007 }}. 1986. Retrieved 23 October 2009.</ref>
<div style="clear:left;float:left;">
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R0211-316, Dietrich Bonhoeffer mit Schülern.jpg|thumb|left|[[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]] (1932)]]
</div>
As [[Hannah Arendt]] pointed out, however, (following the utilitarian [[John Stuart Mill]] on this point): a bad conscience does not necessarily signify a bad character; in fact only those who affirm a commitment to applying moral standards will be troubled with remorse, guilt or shame by a bad ''conscience'' and their need to regain integrity and wholeness of the self.<ref>Hannah Arendt. ''Crises of the Republic''. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. New York. 1972 p. 62.</ref><ref>John Stuart Mill. "Utilitarianism" and "On Liberty" in ''Collected Works''. University of Toronto Press. Toronto. 1969 Vols 10 and 18. Ch 3. pp. 228–29 and 263.</ref> Representing our soul or true self by analogy as our house, Arendt wrote that "conscience is the anticipation of the fellow who awaits you if and when you come home."<ref name="autogenerated191">Hannah Arendt. ''The Life of the Mind''. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. 1978. p. 191.</ref> Arendt believed that people who are unfamiliar with the process of silent critical reflection about what they say and do will not mind contradicting themselves by an immoral act or crime, since they can "count on its being forgotten the next moment;" bad people are not full of regrets.<ref name="autogenerated191"/> Arendt also wrote eloquently on the problem of languages distinguishing the word [[consciousness]] from ''conscience''. One reason, she held, was that ''conscience'', as we understand it in moral or legal matters, is supposedly always present within us, just like ''consciousness'': "and this conscience is also supposed to tell us what to do and what to repent; before it became the ''lumen naturale'' or [[Immanuel Kant|Kant]]'s practical reason, it was the voice of God."<ref>Hannah Arendt. ''The Life of the Mind''. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. 1978. p. 190.</ref>
[[File:Albert Einstein Head Cleaned N Cropped.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Albert Einstein]] associated conscience with suprapersonal thoughts, feelings and aspirations.]]
[[Albert Einstein]], as a self-professed adherent of [[humanism]] and [[rationalism]], likewise viewed an enlightened religious person as one whose ''conscience'' reflects that he "has, to the best of his ability, liberated himself from the fetters of his selfish desires and is preoccupied with thoughts, feelings and aspirations to which he clings because of their super-personal value."<ref>{{cite journal|last=Einstein|first=A.|year=1940|title=Science and religion |journal= [[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=146 |pages=605–07|doi=10.1038/146605a0 |issue=3706 |bibcode=1940Natur.146..605E|s2cid=9421843|doi-access=free}}</ref>
Einstein often referred to the "inner voice" as a source of both moral and physical knowledge: "[[Quantum mechanics]] is very impressive. But an inner voice tells me that it is not the real thing. The theory produces a good deal but hardly brings one closer to the secrets of the Old One. I am at all events convinced that He does not play dice."<ref>Quoted in Gino Segre. ''Faust in Copenhagen: A Struggle for the Soul of Physics and the Birth of the Nuclear Age''. Pimlico. London 2007. p. 144.</ref>
[[Simone Weil]] who fought for the French resistance (the [[Maquis (World War II)|Maquis]]) argued in her final book ''[[The Need for Roots]]: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties Towards Mankind'' that for society to become more just and protective of liberty, obligations should take precedence over rights in moral and political philosophy and a spiritual awakening should occur in the ''conscience'' of most citizens, so that social obligations are viewed as fundamentally having a transcendent origin and a beneficent impact on human character when fulfilled.<ref>Simone Weil. ''The Need For Roots: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties Towards Mankind''. Routledge & Kegan Paul. London. 1952 (repr 2003). {{ISBN|0-415-27101-0}} pp. 13 et seq.</ref><ref>Hellman, John. ''Simone Weil: An Introduction to Her Thought''. Wilfrid Laurier, University Press, Waterloo, Ontario. 1982.</ref> [[Simone Weil]] also in that work provided a psychological explanation for the mental peace associated with a ''good conscience'': "the liberty of men of goodwill, though limited in the sphere of action, is complete in that of conscience. For, having incorporated the rules into their own being, the prohibited possibilities no longer present themselves to the mind, and have not to be rejected."<ref>Simone Weil. ''The Need For Roots: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties Towards Mankind''. Routledge & Kegan Paul. London. 1952 (repr 2003). {{ISBN|0-415-27101-0}} p. 13.</ref>
Alternatives to such [[metaphysics|metaphysical]] and [[idealism|idealist]] opinions about conscience arose from [[philosophical realism|realist]] and [[materialism|materialist]] perspectives such as those of [[Charles Darwin]]. Darwin suggested that "any [[animal]] whatever, endowed with well-marked social instincts, the parental and filial affections being here included, would inevitably acquire a moral sense or conscience, as soon as its intellectual powers had become as well, or as nearly as well developed, as in man."<ref>Charles Darwin. "The Origin of the Moral Sense" in P Singer (ed). ''Ethics''. Oxford University Press. NY 1994 p. 44.</ref> [[Émile Durkheim]] held that the [[Soul (spirit)|soul]] and conscience were particular forms of an impersonal principle diffused in the relevant group and communicated by [[totemic]] ceremonies.<ref>Émile Durkheim. ''The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life''. The Free Press. New York. 1965 p. 299.</ref> [[AJ Ayer]] was a more recent realist who held that the existence of ''conscience'' was an empirical question to be answered by sociological research into the moral habits of a given person or group of people, and what causes them to have precisely those habits and feelings. Such an inquiry, he believed, fell wholly within the scope of the existing [[social sciences]].<ref>AJ Ayer. "Ethics for Logical Positivists" in P Singer (ed). ''Ethics''. Oxford University Press. NY 1994 p. 151.</ref> [[George Edward Moore]] bridged the idealistic and sociological views of 'critical' and 'traditional' conscience in stating that the idea of abstract 'rightness' and the various degrees of the specific emotion excited by it are what constitute, for many persons, the specifically 'moral sentiment' or ''conscience''. For others, however, an action seems to be properly termed 'internally right', merely because they have previously regarded it as right, the idea of 'rightness' being present in some way to his or her mind, but not necessarily among his or her deliberately constructed motives.<ref>GE Moore. ''Principia Ethica''. Cambridge University Press. London. 1968 pp. 178–79.</ref>
The French philosopher [[Simone de Beauvoir]] in ''A Very Easy Death'' (''Une mort très douce'', 1964) reflects within her own ''conscience'' about her mother's attempts to develop such a moral sympathy and understanding of others.<ref>Simone de Beauvoir. ''A Very Easy Death''. Penguin Books. London. 1982. {{ISBN|0-14-002967-2}}. p. 60</ref>
{{Quote box
| width = 30em
| bgcolor = #c6dbf7
| align = right
| quote = "The sight of her tears grieved me; but I soon realised that she was weeping over her failure, without caring about what was happening inside me&nbsp;... We might still have come to an understanding if, instead of asking everybody to pray for my soul, she had given me a little confidence and sympathy. I know now what prevented her from doing so: she had too much to pay back, too many wounds to salve, to put herself in another's place. In actual doing she made every sacrifice, but her feelings did not take her out of herself. Besides, how could she have tried to understand me since she avoided looking into her own heart? As for discovering an attitude that would not have set us apart, nothing in her life had ever prepared her for such a thing: the unexpected sent her into a panic, because she had been taught never to think, act or feel except in a ready-made framework."
| source = — Simone de Beauvoir. ''A Very Easy Death''. Penguin Books. London. 1982. p. 60.
}}
[[Michael Walzer]] claimed that the growth of religious toleration in Western nations arose amongst other things, from the general recognition that private conscience signified some inner divine presence regardless of the religious faith professed and from the general respectability, piety, self-limitation, and sectarian discipline which marked most of the men who claimed the rights of conscience.<ref>Michael Walzer. ''Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War and Citizenship''. Clarion-Simon and Schuster. New York. 1970. p. 124.</ref> Walzer also argued that attempts by courts to define conscience as a merely personal moral code or as sincere belief, risked encouraging an anarchy of moral egotisms, unless such a code and motive was necessarily tempered with shared moral knowledge: derived either from the connection of the individual to a universal spiritual order, or from the common principles and mutual engagements of unselfish people.<ref>Michael Walzer. ''Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War and Citizenship''. Clarion-Simon and Schuster. New York. 1970. p. 131</ref> [[Ronald Dworkin]] maintains that constitutional protection of [[freedom of conscience]] is central to democracy but creates personal duties to live up to it: "Freedom of conscience presupposes a personal responsibility of reflection, and it loses much of its meaning when that responsibility is ignored. A good life need not be an especially reflective one; most of the best lives are just lived rather than studied. But there are moments that cry out for self-assertion, when a passive bowing to fate or a mechanical decision out of deference or convenience is treachery, because it forfeits dignity for ease."<ref>Ronald Dworkin. ''Life's Dominion''. Harper Collins, London 1995. pp. 239–40</ref> [[Edward Conze]] stated it is important for individual and collective moral growth that we recognise the illusion of our conscience being wholly located in our body; indeed both our conscience and wisdom expand when we act in an unselfish way and conversely "repressed compassion results in an unconscious sense of guilt."<ref>Edward Conze. ''Buddhism: Its Essence and development''. Harper Torchbooks. New York. 1959. pp. 20 and 46</ref>
[[File:Peter Singer - Effective Altruism -Melb Australia Aug 2015.jpg|left|thumb|[[Peter Singer]]: distinguished between immature "traditional" and highly reasoned "critical" conscience]]
The philosopher [[Peter Singer]] considers that usually when we describe an action as conscientious in the critical sense we do so in order to deny either that the relevant agent was motivated by selfish desires, like greed or ambition, or that he acted on whim or impulse.<ref>Peter Singer. ''Democracy and Disobedience''. Clarendon Press. Oxford. 1973. p. 94.</ref>
Moral anti-realists debate whether the moral facts necessary to activate conscience [[supervenience|supervene]] on natural facts with ''[[Empirical evidence|a posteriori]]'' necessity; or arise ''a priori'' because moral facts have a primary intension and naturally identical worlds may be presumed morally identical.<ref>David Chalmers. ''The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory''. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 1996 pp. 83–84</ref> It has also been argued that there is a measure of [[moral luck]] in how circumstances create the obstacles which ''conscience'' must overcome to apply moral principles or human rights and that with the benefit of enforceable property rights and the [[rule of law]], access to [[universal health care]] plus the absence of high adult and [[infant mortality]] from conditions such as [[malaria]], [[tuberculosis]], [[HIV/AIDS]] and [[famine]], people in relatively prosperous developed countries have been spared pangs of ''conscience'' associated with the physical necessity to steal scraps of food, bribe tax inspectors or police officers, and commit murder in [[guerrilla]] wars against corrupt government forces or rebel armies.<ref>Nicholas Fearn. ''Philosophy: The Latest Answers to the Oldest Questions''. Atlantic Books. London. 2005. pp. 176–177.</ref> [[Roger Scruton]] has claimed that true understanding of ''conscience'' and its relationship with ''morality'' has been hampered by an "impetuous" belief that philosophical questions are solved through the analysis of language in an area where clarity threatens vested interests.<ref>Roger Scruton. ''Modern Philosophy: An Introduction and Survey''. Mandarin. London. 1994. p. 271</ref> [[Susan Sontag]] similarly argued that it was a symptom of [[psychological]] immaturity not to recognise that many morally immature people willingly experience a form of delight, in some an erotic breaking of [[taboo]], when witnessing violence, suffering and pain being inflicted on others.<ref>Susan Sontag. ''Regarding the Pain of Others''. Hamish Hamilton, London. 2003. {{ISBN|0-241-14207-5}} pp. 87 and 102.</ref> [[Jonathan Glover]] wrote that most of us "do not spend our lives on endless landscape gardening of our self" and our ''conscience'' is likely shaped not so much by heroic struggles, as by choice of partner, friends and job, as well as where we choose to live.<ref>Jonathan Glover. ''I: The Philosophy and Psychology of Personal Identity''. Penguin Books, London. 1988. p. 132.</ref> [[Garrett Hardin]], in a famous article called "[[The Tragedy of the Commons]]", argues that any instance in which society appeals to an individual exploiting a commons to restrain himself or herself for the general good—by means of his or her ''conscience''—merely sets up a system which, by selectively diverting societal power and physical resources to those lacking in ''conscience'', while fostering guilt (including anxiety about his or her individual contribution to over-population) in people acting upon it, actually works toward the elimination of conscience from the race.<ref name="hardin68">Garrett Hardin, [http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/162/3859/1243 "The Tragedy of the Commons"], ''Science'', Vol. 162, No. 3859 (13 December 1968), pp.&nbsp;1243–48. Also available here [http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/162/3859/1243.pdf] and [http://www.garretthardinsociety.org/articles/art_tragedy_of_the_commons.html here.]
</ref><ref>Scott James Shackelford. 2008. [https://ssrn.com/abstract=1407332 "The Tragedy of the Common Heritage of Mankind"]. Retrieved 30 October 2009.</ref>
[[File:John Ralston Saul.jpg|left|thumb|upright|[[John Ralston Saul]]: consumers risk turning over their conscience to technical experts and to the ideology of free markets]]
[[John Ralston Saul]] expressed the view in ''The Unconscious Civilization'' that in contemporary developed nations many people have acquiesced in turning over their sense of right and wrong, their ''critical conscience'', to technical experts; willingly restricting their moral freedom of choice to limited consumer actions ruled by the ideology of the free market, while citizen participation in public affairs is limited to the isolated act of voting and private-interest lobbying turns even elected representatives against the public interest.<ref>John Ralston Saul. ''The Unconscious Civilisation''. Massey Lectures Series. Anansi Pres, Toronto. 1995. {{ISBN|0-88784-586-X}} pp. 17, 81 and 172.</ref>
Some argue on religious or philosophical grounds that it is blameworthy to act against ''conscience'', even if the judgement of ''conscience'' is likely to be erroneous (say because it is inadequately informed about the facts, or prevailing moral (humanist or religious), professional ethical, legal and human rights norms).<ref>Alan Donagan. ''The Theory of Morality''. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1977. pp. 131–38.</ref> Failure to acknowledge and accept that conscientious judgements can be seriously mistaken, may only promote situations where one's conscience is manipulated by others to provide unwarranted justifications for non-virtuous and selfish acts; indeed, insofar as it is appealed to as glorifying ideological content, and an associated extreme level of devotion, without adequate constraint of external, altruistic, normative justification, '''conscience''' may be considered morally blind and dangerous both to the individual concerned and humanity as a whole.<ref>Beauchamp TL and Childress JF. ''Principles of Biomedical Ethics''. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, New York. 1994 pp. 478–79.</ref> Langston argues that philosophers of [[virtue ethics]] have unnecessarily neglected ''conscience'' for, once conscience is trained so that the principles and rules it applies are those one would want all others to live by, its practise cultivates and sustains the virtues; indeed, amongst people in what each society considers to be the highest state of moral development there is little disagreement about how to act.<ref name="autogenerated176"/> [[Emmanuel Levinas]] viewed conscience as a revelatory encountering of resistance to our selfish powers, developing morality by calling into question our naive sense of [[freedom of will]] to use such powers arbitrarily, or with [[violence]], this process being more severe the more rigorously the goal of our self was to obtain control.<ref name="Levinas">Emmanuel Levinas. ''Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority''. Lingis A (trans) Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA 1998. pp. 84, 100–01</ref>
In other words, the welcoming of the ''Other'', to Levinas, was the very essence of ''conscience'' properly conceived; it encouraged our ego to accept the fallibility of assuming things about other people, that selfish [[freedom of will]] "does not have the last word" and that realising this has a transcendent purpose: "I am not alone&nbsp;... in conscience I
'''Ethics''' or '''moral philosophy''' is the philosophical study of [[Morality|moral]] phenomena. It investigates [[Normativity|normative]] questions about what people ought to do or which behavior is morally right. It is usually divided into three major fields: [[normative ethics]], [[applied ethics]], and [[metaethics]].
Normative ethics tries to discover and [[Justification (epistemology)|justify]] universal principles that govern how people should act in any situation. According to [[Consequentialism|consequentialists]], an act is right if it leads to the best consequences. [[Deontology|Deontologists]] hold that morality consists in fulfilling [[Duty|duties]], like telling the truth and keeping promises. [[Virtue theory|Virtue theorists]] see the manifestation of [[virtue]]s, like [[courage]] and [[compassion]], as the fundamental principle of morality. Applied ethics examines concrete ethical problems in real-life situations, for example, by exploring the moral implications of the universal principles discovered in normative ethics within a specific domain. [[Bioethics]] studies moral issues associated with [[Life|living organisms]] including humans, animals, and plants. [[Business ethics]] investigates how ethical principles apply to corporations, while [[professional ethics]] focuses on what is morally required of members of different [[profession]]s. Metaethics is a [[metatheory]] that examines the underlying assumptions and concepts of ethics. It asks whether moral facts have [[Subjectivity and objectivity (philosophy)|mind-independent]] existence, whether moral statements can be true, how it is possible to acquire moral knowledge, and how moral judgments motivate people.
Ethics is closely connected to [[value theory]], which studies what [[Value (ethics and social sciences)|value]] is and what types of value there are. Two related empirical fields are [[moral psychology]], which investigates psychological moral processes, and [[descriptive ethics]], which provides [[value-neutral]] descriptions of the dominant moral codes and beliefs in different societies.
The [[history of ethics]] started in the [[ancient period]] with the development of ethical principles and theories in [[ancient Egypt]], [[Ancient India|India]], [[Ancient China|China]], and [[Ancient Greece|Greece]]. During the [[medieval period]], ethical thought was strongly influenced by religious teachings. In the [[modern period]], this focus shifted to a more [[Secular ethics|secular approach]] concerned with moral experience, [[practical reason]], and the consequences of actions. An influential development in the 20th century was the emergence of metaethics.
{{Short description|Moral philosophy or values of an individual}}
{{hatnote group|
{{other uses}}{{redirect|Scruples}}{{distinguish|Consciousness|Conscientiousness}}
}}
[[File:Vincent Willem van Gogh 022.jpg|thumb|[[Vincent van Gogh]], 1890. [[Kröller-Müller Museum]]. ''The Good Samaritan'' (after Delacroix).]]
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2020}}
'''Conscience''' is a cognitive process that elicits [[emotion]] and rational associations based on an individual's [[ethics|moral philosophy]] or value system. Conscience stands in contrast to elicited emotion or thought due to associations based on immediate sensory perceptions and reflexive responses, as in sympathetic [[central nervous system]] responses. In common terms, conscience is often described as leading to feelings of [[remorse]] when a person commits an act that conflicts with their [[moral value]]s. The extent to which conscience informs moral judgment before an action and whether such [[moral judgment]]s are or should be based on [[reason]] has occasioned debate through much of modern history between theories of basics in ethic of human life in juxtaposition to the theories of [[romanticism]] and other reactionary movements after the end of the [[Middle Ages]].
Religious views of conscience usually see it as linked to a morality inherent in all humans, to a beneficent universe and/or to [[divinity]]. The diverse ritualistic, mythical, doctrinal, legal, institutional and material features of religion may not necessarily cohere with experiential, emotive, [[spirituality|spiritual]] or [[contemplative]] considerations about the origin and operation of conscience.<ref>Ninian Smart. ''The World's Religions: Old Traditions and Modern Transformations''. Cambridge University Press. 1989. pp. 10–21.</ref> Common [[secular]] or [[scientific]] views regard the capacity for conscience as probably [[genetics|genetically determined]], with its subject probably learned or [[imprinting (psychology)|imprinted]] as part of a [[culture]].<ref>Peter Winch. ''Moral Integrity''. Basil Blackwell. Oxford. 1968</ref>
Commonly used metaphors for conscience include the "voice within", the "inner light",<ref name="autogenerated2000">Rosemary Moore. ''The Light in Their Consciences: The Early Quakers in Britain 1646–1666''. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA. 2000. {{ISBN|978-0-271-01988-8}},</ref> or even Socrates' reliance on what the Greeks called his "[[Daemon (classical mythology)#Socrates|daimōnic]] sign", an averting (ἀποτρεπτικός ''apotreptikos'') inner voice heard only when he was about to make a mistake. Conscience, as is detailed in sections below, is a concept in national and international law,<ref name="autogenerated1948">{{Cite web |last= |first= |title=Universal Declaration of Human Rights |url=https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights |access-date=2022-12-13 |website=United Nations |language=en}}</ref> is increasingly conceived of as applying to the world as a whole,<ref name="autogenerated2001">Booth K, Dunne T and Cox M (eds). ''How Might We Live? Global Ethics in the New Century''. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 2001 p. 1.</ref> has motivated numerous notable acts for the public good<ref name="artforamnesty1">[https://www.amnesty.org/en/blog/art-for-amnesty/ambassador-of-conscience Amnesty International. Ambassador of Conscience Award]. Retrieved 31 December 2013.</ref> and been the subject of many prominent examples of literature, music and film.<ref>Wayne C Booth. ''The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction''. University of California Press. Berkeley. 1988. p. 11 and Ch. 2.</ref>
Pages in category "Wikipedia fully protected redirects"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 1,652 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)
Template:R fully protected
Template:–
'
Template:'
Template:'"
0–9
Wikipedia:1m-PR-en
2girls1cup
100 Players Who Shook The Kop
Template:1911
Template:2000s-punk-album-stub
Template:2000s-rock-single-stub
Template:2002 NBA Draft
2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict
2012 Nirbhaya case
2014 Israel–Gaza conflict
2015 Semenyih helicopter crash
2017 Formula One Season
2018 George Tooke Shield
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic
Talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic/Current consensus
2022 FIBA U18 Women's Asian Championship
2023 Israel–Hamas war
A
A.C.M.
Aaron carter
Abhilasha Jeyarajah
Help:About
Wikipedia:About the Sandbox
Wikipedia:Abuse filter
Wikipedia:ACC
Wikipedia:ACCOUNT
ACE Flight 22
Template:Ad
Wikipedia:ADMIN
Template:Adminhelp
Template:Administrators' noticeboard navbox all
Wikipedia:Admins willing to make difficult blocks
Template:Adminublock
Adobe Photoshop Elements
Adrianna
Aelita Schaeffer
Template:Aero specs missing
Wikipedia:AES
Template:Afc a
Template:AFC comment
Template:Afc r
Template:AFC status/level
Template:AFC submission/pending
Template:AFC submission/tools
Wikipedia:AFD
Aggrotech
Agnostic
Ahwaz
User:Akmal Hashim Kapat
Akshay Kharodia
Al Gore III
Al-Ahli Arab Hospital bombing
Alien (popular culture)
Janet Allison
User talk:Althordacron
Aluminum
American Sniper (film) controversies
Template:American-English
Wikipedia talk:AN
Wikipedia:AN
Wikipedia:AN/I
Anal stretching
Andrade (wrestler)
Andrade Cien Almas
Andreas Lubitz
Andrew Speaker
Angela Starling
Angelika Kluk
Anglo-Spanish War (1779-83)
Anglo-Spanish War (1779–83)
Wikipedia:ANI
Template:Anime voice
Annoying Orange (character)
Anthony Bologna
Anti flag
Anti-Semitism
Anti-Soviet Resistance by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army
Apollo Justice
Aquadon
Arab
Aramean-Syriac people
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Clerks/Noticeboard
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Notice
Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence/Summary
Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Preliminary statements
User:Arccosecant
User talk:Arccosecant
Template:Arctiidae-stub
Are You Ready (Hannah Montana song)
Template:Are you sure?
Areolae
Aría
Armando (blogger)
Armando (Blogger)
Armando Llorens
Aroha Robinson
Article merge
Article wizard
Article Wizard
Wikipedia talk:Article wizard/Referencing
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Corey Delaney
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNAA
Portal:Arts
Arushi
Arvanit
Template:Asia in topic
Assassination threats against Donald Trump
Assyrians in Sweden
Astrid Menks
Template:Astronomy
Template:Au-lang-stub
Author-date system
Autism
Template:Auto archiving notice
Template:AutoArchivingNotice
Wikipedia:AUTOCONFIRM
Automobile
Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia
Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage
Avraham Grant
Wikipedia:AWB/T
Awsten Knight
Azerbaidzhan
B
Baca Ranch
Bacterium
Wikipedia:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
Wikipedia:Bad title
Balls
Barack obama
Barrack Obama
Barry Hinckley
Basementalism
Battle For The Sun (song)
BB Guns
Bearded Tit
Jon Beavers
Bedn
Bedroom Boom
Beef Tar Tar
Template:Belgaum-geo-stub
Ben Ownby
Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI
Wikipedia:BENEFITS
Bengaluru
Beth Houlbrooke
Betrayer
Beware of Dog (Farscape episode)
Template:Big
Big bang
User:BiggestSataniaFanboy89
User:BiggestSataniaFangirl89
Bihar (India)
Template:BIhills
Bilal Ali (Vocalist)
Draft:Bio
Wikipedia:BIO
Bitchy Bitch
Black man
Black person
Black woman
Black Yoshi
Blackout (Britney Spears Album)
Blah blah
Blinky Bill's Extraordinary Excursion
Blinky Bill’s Extraordinary Balloon Adventure
Blue Whale
Bob Dobbs
BOCTAOE
Bollywood
Bollywood and plagiarism
Bollywood films and plagiarism
Talk:Bombay
Bombay
Template:Bookyr
Boom Pictures
Boris F.
Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest
Boston marathon bombings
Boston, Massachusetts
Template:BotTrialComplete
Template:Botublock
Bount
Bozcaada
Bozcaada (district)
Template:Br list
Bradford Patrick
Bradley Manning
Template:Braşov-geo-stub
Bristol 1st
Template:BritishColumbia-park-stub
Brotherhood 2.0
Bryan Domani
Bubble hash
Bulgarian (ethnic) minority in Greece
Talk:Bulgarian (ethnic) minority in Greece
Bulgarian denied minority of Greece
Bulgarian ethnic minority of Greece
(previous page) (next page)
Bryan Domani
Bubble hash
Bulgarian (ethnic) minority in Greece
Talk:Bulgarian (ethnic) minority in Greece
Bulgarian denied minority of Greece
Bulgarian ethnic minority of Greece
(previous page) (next page)
{{annual_readership | expanded=true}}
{{polluted category}}
{{Redirect category|from=pages that are [[WP:FULL|fully protected]] from editing for any of several possible reasons. When the ''Rcat shell'' template is used, this category will be populated automatically|template=Rcat shell|parameters=(any appropriate rcats)}}
{{Category see also|Wikipedia semi-protected redirects|Wikipedia extended-protected redirects|Wikipedia template-protected redirects}}
This category contains [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirects]] that have been [[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Full protection|fully protected]]. Fully protected redirects are constructed for the purpose of preventing [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] or [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]], or in cases where the page title is unsuitable for an article, but may be a plausible search term, as an alternative to [[Wikipedia:Protected deleted pages|deleting the page]]. Full protection prevents a page from being edited except by [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]].
Populating this category does not in and of itself protect the page. Actual page protection is engaged by administrators.
{{CatAutoTOC}}
[[Category:Wikipedia fully protected pages|Redirects, fully protected]]
[[Category:Wikipedia protected redirects|Full]]
[[Category:All redirect categories]]
{{Short description|Species of hominid in the genus Homo}}
{{Redirect-several|Human|Mankind|Humankind|Human Race|Human Being|Homo sapiens}}
{{pp-move}}
{{Speciesbox
| name = Human<ref name=msw3>{{MSW3 Groves |pages= |id=12100795 |name-list-style=vanc }}</ref>
| fossil_range = {{Fossil range|0.300|0}} <small>[[Chibanian]] – [[Holocene|present]]</small>
| image = Akha cropped hires.JPG <!--The choice of image has been discussed at length. Please don't change it without first obtaining consensus. Also used at Akha people (section Dress)-->
| image_caption = [[Adult]] humans, [[Thailand]], 2007
<!--T| status = LC
| status_system = IUCN3.1-->| taxon = Homo sapiens
| authority = [[Carl Linnaeus|Linnaeus]], 1758
| subdivision_ranks = Subspecies
| range_map = World human population density map.png
| range_map_caption = ''Homo sapiens'' population density (2005)
| synonyms =
}}
'''Humans''' ('''''Homo sapiens''''') or '''modern humans''' are the most common and widespread [[species]] of [[primate]], and the last surviving species of the genus ''[[Homo]]''. They are [[Hominidae|great apes]] characterized by their [[Prehistory_of_nakedness_and_clothing#Evolution_of_hairlessness|hairlessness]], [[bipedality|bipedalism]], and high [[Human intelligence|intelligence]]. Humans have large [[Human brain|brains]], enabling more advanced [[cognitive]] skills that enable them to thrive and adapt in varied environments, develop highly complex [[Tool|tools]], and form complex [[social structures]] and [[civilization]]s. Humans are [[Sociality|highly social]], with individual humans tending to belong to a [[Level of analysis|multi-layered]] network of cooperating, distinct, or even competing [[social groups]] – from [[families]] and [[peer groups]] to [[corporations]] and [[State (polity)|political states]]. As such, [[social interaction]]s between humans have established a wide variety of values, [[norm (sociology)|social norms]], [[language]]s, and [[traditions]] (collectively termed [[institutions]]), each of which bolsters human [[society]]. Humans are also highly [[curious]]: the desire to understand and influence [[Phenomenon|phenomena]] has motivated humanity's development of [[science]], [[technology]], [[philosophy]], [[mythology]], [[religion]], and other frameworks of [[knowledge]]; humans also study themselves through such domains as [[anthropology]], [[social science]], [[history]], [[psychology]], and [[medicine]]. As of January 2024, there are estimated to be more than 8 billion humans alive.
Although some scientists equate the term "humans" with all members of the genus ''[[Homo]]'', in common usage it generally refers to ''Homo sapiens'', the only [[Extant taxon|extant]] member. Extinct members of the genus ''Homo'' are known as [[archaic humans]], and the term "modern human" is used to distinguish ''Homo sapiens'' from archaic humans. [[Early modern human|Anatomically modern humans]] emerged around 300,000 years ago in Africa, evolving from ''[[Homo heidelbergensis]]'' or a similar species. Migrating [[Recent African origin of modern humans|out of Africa]], they gradually replaced and [[Hybrid (biology)|interbred]] with local populations of archaic humans. Multiple hypotheses for the extinction of archaic human species [[Neanderthal extinction|such as Neanderthals]] include competition, violence, interbreeding with ''Homo sapiens'', or inability to adapt to climate change.
For most of their history, humans were [[nomadic]] hunter-gatherers. Humans began exhibiting [[behavioral modernity]] about 160,000–60,000 years ago. The [[Neolithic Revolution]], which began in [[Southwest Asia]] around 13,000 years ago (and separately in a few other places), saw the emergence of [[agriculture]] and permanent [[human settlement]]; in turn, this led to the [[Cradle of civilization|development of civilization]] and kickstarted a period of continuous (and ongoing) [[population growth]] and rapid [[technological change]]. Since then, a number of civilizations have risen and fallen, while a number of [[Sociocultural evolution|sociocultural]] and [[History of technology|technological]] developments have resulted in significant changes to the human lifestyle.
[[Gene]]s and the [[Environment (biophysical)|environment]] influence human biological variation in visible characteristics, [[physiology]], disease susceptibility, mental abilities, body size, and life span. Though humans vary in many traits (such as genetic predispositions and physical features), humans are among the least genetically diverse primates. Any two humans are at least 99% genetically similar. Humans are [[sex differences in humans|sexually dimorphic]]: generally, [[man|males]] have greater body strength and [[woman|females]] have a higher [[body fat]] percentage. At [[puberty]], humans develop [[secondary sex characteristic]]s. Females are capable of [[pregnancy]], usually between puberty, at around 12 years old, and [[menopause]], around the age of 50.
Humans are [[omnivorous]], capable of consuming a wide variety of plant and animal material, and have [[Control of fire by early humans|used fire]] and other forms of heat to prepare and [[cooking|cook]] food since the time of ''[[Homo erectus]]''. Humans can survive for up to eight weeks without [[food]] and several days without [[water]]. Humans are generally [[Diurnality|diurnal]], [[Sleep|sleeping]] on average seven to nine hours per day. [[Childbirth]] is dangerous, with a high risk of complications and [[death]]. Often, both the mother and the father provide care for their children, who are [[Altricial|helpless at birth]].
Humans have a large, highly developed, and complex [[prefrontal cortex]], the region of the [[brain]] associated with higher cognition. Humans are highly [[Intelligence|intelligent]] and capable of [[episodic memory#In animals|episodic memory]]; they have flexible facial expressions, [[self-awareness]], and a [[theory of mind]]. The human mind is capable of [[introspection]], private [[thought]], [[imagination]], [[Volition (psychology)|volition]], and forming views on [[existence]]. This has allowed [[History of technology|great technological advancements]] and complex tool development through complex [[reasoning]] and the transmission of knowledge to subsequent generations through [[language]].
Humans' advanced technology has enabled them to spread to all the [[continents]] of the globe as well as to [[outer space]], and to command [[Human impact on the environment|profound influence on the biosphere and environment]]. The latter has prompted some [[geologists]] to demarcate the time from the emergence of human civilization till present as a separate [[geological epoch]]: the [[Anthropocene]] (with ''[[wikt:anthropo-|anthropo]]-'' deriving from the [[Ancient Greek]] word for "human", ''ἄνθρωπος).''
{{short description|Selective breeding of plants and animals to serve humans}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2020}}
[[File:Murgjo Sharr Mountain Dog Nedi Limani.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|[[Dog]]s and [[sheep]] were among the first animals to be domesticated, at least 15,000 and 11,000 years ago respectively.<ref name="MacHugh Larson Orlando 2017" />]]
[[File:1962-05 1962年 海南岛乐东县 黎族民众插秧.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|[[Rice]] was domesticated in China, some 13,500 to 8,200 years ago.<ref name="Normile" />]]
'''Domestication''' is a multi-generational [[Mutualism (biology)|mutualistic]] relationship between [[human]]s and other [[organism]]s, in which humans took over control and care to obtain a steady supply of resources including food. The process was gradual and geographically diffuse, based on trial and error.
The first [[Domestication of animals|animal to be domesticated]] was the [[domestication of the dog|dog]], as a [[Commensalism|commensal]], at least 15,000 years ago. Other animals including [[goat]], [[sheep]], and [[cow]] were domesticated starting around 11,000 years ago. Among birds, the [[chicken]] was domesticated in East Asia, seemingly for cockfighting, some 7,000 years ago. The horse came under domestication around 5,500 years ago in central Asia as a working animal. Among [[invertebrate]]s, the [[silkworm]] and the [[western honey bee]] were domesticated over 5,000 years ago for [[silk]] and [[honey]], respectively.
The domestication of plants began around 13,000–11,000 years ago with [[cereal]]s such as [[wheat]] and [[barley]] in the [[Middle East]], alongside crops such as [[lentil]], [[pea]], [[chickpea]], and [[flax]]. [[Rice]] was first cultivated in China some 13,500 to 8,200 years ago. Beginning around 10,000 years ago, Indigenous peoples in the Americas began to cultivate [[peanut]]s, [[Squash (plant)|squash]], [[maize]], [[Potato|potatoe]]s, [[cotton]], and [[cassava]]. In Africa, crops such as [[sorghum]] were domesticated. [[History of agriculture|Agriculture developed]] in some 13 centres around the world, domesticating different crops and animals.
Domestication affected genes for behavior in animals, making them less aggressive. In plants, domestication affected genes for morphology, such as increasing seed size and stopping the [[Shattering (agriculture)|shattering]] of seed-heads such as in wheat. Such changes both make domesticated organisms easier to handle, and reduce their ability to survive in the wild.
{{Short description|Domesticated canid species}}
{{Redirect2|Doggy|Pooch|other uses|Dog (disambiguation)|and|Doggy (disambiguation)|and|Pooch (disambiguation)}}
{{pp-move}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2022}}
{{Speciesbox
| name = Dog
| fossil_range = {{fossil range|0.0142|0}} [[Late Pleistocene]] to present<ref name=Thalmann2018 />
| image = <!-- Please do not change lead image without discussion -->
{{multiple image |perrow=3 |total_width=300 |align=center |image_style=border:none;
| image1 = Blue merle koolie short coat heading sheep.jpg
| image2 = Dog - നായ-6.JPG
| image3 = Chin posing.jpg
| image4 = Retriever in water.jpg
| image5 = Black Labrador Retriever - Male IMG 3323.jpg
| image6 =
| image7 = Brooks Chase Ranger of Jolly Dogs Jack Russell.jpg
| image8 = Huskiesatrest.jpg
| image9 = Wilde huendin am stillen.jpg
}}
| status = DOM
| genus = Canis
| species = familiaris
| authority = [[Carl Linnaeus|Linnaeus]], 1758<ref name=linnaeus1758 />
| synonyms_ref = <ref name=wozencraft2005 />
| synonyms = {{collapsible list|bullets=true|
|''C. aegyptius'' {{small|Linnaeus, 1758}}
|''C. alco'' {{small|[[Charles Hamilton Smith|C. E. H. Smith]], 1839,}}
|''C. americanus'' {{small|[[Johann Friedrich Gmelin|Gmelin]], 1792}}
|''C. anglicus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. antarcticus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. aprinus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. aquaticus'' {{small|Linnaeus, 1758}}
|''C. aquatilis'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. avicularis'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. borealis'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. brevipilis'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. cursorius'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. domesticus'' {{small|Linnaeus, 1758}}
|''C. extrarius'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. ferus'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. fricator'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. fricatrix'' {{small|Linnaeus, 1758}}
|''C. fuillus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. gallicus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. glaucus'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. graius'' {{small|Linnaeus, 1758}}
|''C. grajus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. hagenbecki'' {{small|Krumbiegel, 1950}}
|''C. haitensis'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. hibernicus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. hirsutus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. hybridus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. islandicus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. italicus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. laniarius'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. leoninus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. leporarius'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. lupus familiaris'' {{small|Linnaeus,1758}}
|''C. major'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. mastinus'' {{small|Linnaeus, 1758}}
|''C. melitacus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. melitaeus'' {{small|Linnaeus, 1758}}
|''C. minor'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. molossus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. mustelinus'' {{small|Linnaeus, 1758}}
|''C. obesus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. orientalis'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. pacificus'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. plancus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. pomeranus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. sagaces'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. sanguinarius'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. sagax'' {{small|Linnaeus, 1758}}
|''C. scoticus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. sibiricus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. suillus'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. terraenovae'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. terrarius'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. turcicus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. urcani'' {{small|C. E. H. Smith, 1839}}
|''C. variegatus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. venaticus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
|''C. vertegus'' {{small|Gmelin, 1792}}
}}
}}
The '''dog''' ('''''Canis familiaris'''''<ref name=Alvares2019 />{{sfn|Wang|Tedford|2008|p=1}} or '''''Canis lupus familiaris'''''{{sfn|Wang|Tedford|2008|p=1}}) is a [[domesticated]] descendant of the [[wolf]]. Also called the '''domestic dog''', it is [[Domestication of the dog|derived]] from [[Pleistocene wolf|extinct gray wolves]],<ref name="Bergström2020" /><ref name=Frantz2020 /> and the gray wolf is the dog's closest living relative.<ref name=freedman2017 /> The dog was the first [[species]] to be domesticated<ref name=larson2014 /><ref name=freedman2017 /> by [[human]]s. [[Hunter-gatherer]]s did this over 15,000 years ago in [[Oberkassel, Bonn]],<ref name=Frantz2020 /> which was before the [[History of agriculture|development of agriculture]].<ref name=Thalmann2018 /> Due to their long association with humans, dogs have expanded to a large number of domestic individuals<ref name="Ostrander2019" /> and gained the ability to thrive on a [[starch]]-rich diet that would be inadequate for other [[Canidae|canids]].<ref name="axelssonetal2013">{{Cite journal|last1=Axelsson|first1=E.|last2=Ratnakumar|first2=A.|last3=Arendt|first3=M.L.|last4=Maqbool|first4=K.|last5=Webster|first5=M.T.|last6=Perloski|first6=M.|last7=Liberg|first7=O.|last8=Arnemo|first8=J.M.|last9=Hedhammar|first9=Å.|last10=Lindblad-Toh|first10=K.|year=2013|title=The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet|journal=Nature|volume=495|issue=#7441|pages=360–364|bibcode=2013Natur.495..360A|doi=10.1038/nature11837|pmid=23354050|s2cid=4415412}}</ref>
The dog has been [[selectively bred]] over millennia for various behaviors, sensory capabilities, and physical attributes.<ref name="ADW" /> [[Dog breed]]s vary widely in shape, size, and color. They perform many roles for humans, such as [[Hunting dog|hunting]], [[Herding dog|herding]], [[Sled dog|pulling loads]], [[Guard dog|protection]], [[Police dog|assisting police]] and the [[Dogs in warfare|military]], [[Pet|companionship]], [[Therapy dog|therapy]], and [[Service dog|aiding disabled people]]. Over the millennia, dogs became uniquely adapted to human behavior, and the [[human–canine bond]] has been a topic of frequent study.<ref name="berns2012" /> This influence on human society has given them the [[sobriquet]] of "[[man's best friend]]".<ref name="Derr" />
{{Short description|Basic unit of many life forms}}
{{About|the basic unit of lifeforms|the branch of biology that studies them|Cell biology}}
{{pp-move-indef}}
{{Infobox anatomy
|Name =Cell
|Image =Wilson1900Fig2.jpg
|Caption =[[Onion]] (''[[Allium cepa]]'') root cells in different phases of the [[cell cycle]] (drawn by [[Edmund Beecher Wilson|E.&nbsp;B. Wilson]], 1900)
|Image2 =celltypes.svg
|Caption2 =A [[eukaryotic]] cell (left) and [[prokaryotic]] cell (right)
}}
The '''cell''' is the basic structural and functional unit of all [[life|forms of life]]. Every cell consists of [[cytoplasm]] enclosed within a [[Cell membrane|membrane]], and contains many [[macromolecule]]s such as [[protein]]s, [[DNA]] and [[RNA]], as well as many [[small molecule]]s of nutrients and [[metabolite]]s.<ref name="Alberts20022">[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26863/ Cell Movements and the Shaping of the Vertebrate Body] {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200122055346/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26863/ |date=2020-01-22 }} in Chapter 21 of ''[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21054/ Molecular Biology of the Cell] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170927035510/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21054/ |date=2017-09-27 }}'' fourth edition, edited by Bruce Alberts (2002) published by Garland Science. The Alberts text discusses how the "cellular building blocks" move to shape developing [[embryo]]s. It is also common to describe small molecules such as [[amino acid]]s as "[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Search&db=books&doptcmdl=GenBookHL&term=%22all+cells%22+AND+mboc4%5Bbook%5D+AND+372023%5Buid%5D&rid=mboc4.section.4#23 molecular building blocks] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200122055404/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books?cmd=Search&doptcmdl=GenBookHL&term=%22all%2Bcells%22%2BAND%2Bmboc4%5Bbook%5D%2BAND%2B372023%5Buid%5D&rid=mboc4.section.4#23 |date=2020-01-22 }}".</ref> The term comes from the [[Latin]] word {{lang|la|cellula}} meaning 'small room'.<ref name="npr12">{{Multiref|{{Cite web |date=September 17, 2010 |title=The Origins Of The Word 'Cell' |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129934828&t=1628175572746 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210805150111/https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129934828&t=1628175572746 |archive-date=2021-08-05 |access-date=2021-08-05 |website=[[National Public Radio]] }}|{{cite encyclopedia |title=cellŭla |encyclopedia=[[A Latin Dictionary]] |year=1879 |publisher=Charlton T. Lewis and Charles Short |url= http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=cellula|access-date= 5 August 2021|isbn= 978-1999855789 |archive-date=7 August 2021|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210807122358/http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059%3Aentry%3Dcellula |url-status= live}} }}</ref>
Cells can acquire specified function and carry out various tasks within the cell such as replication, [[DNA repair]], protein synthesis, and motility. Cells are capable of specialization and mobility within the cell.
Most plant and animal cells are only visible under a [[light microscope]], with dimensions between 1 and 100&nbsp;[[micrometre]]s.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Campbell |first1=Neil A. |url=http://www.phschool.com/el_marketing.html |title=Biology: Exploring Life |last2=Williamson |first2=Brad |last3=Heyden |first3=Robin J. |publisher=Pearson Prentice Hall |year=2006 |isbn=978-0132508827 |location=Boston, Massachusetts |access-date=2009-02-16 |archive-date=2014-11-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141102041816/http://www.phschool.com/el_marketing.html |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Electron microscopy]] gives a much higher resolution showing greatly detailed cell structure. Organisms can be classified as [[unicellular]] (consisting of a single cell such as [[bacteria]]) or [[multicellular]] (including plants and animals).<ref name="NCBI">{{NCBI-scienceprimer|article=What Is a Cell?|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130503014839/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/About/primer/genetics_cell.html|access-date=3 May 2013|date=30 March 2004}}</ref> Most [[unicellular organism]]s are classed as [[microorganism]]s.
The study of cells and how they work has led to many other studies in related areas of biology, including: [[discovery of DNA]], [[cancer systems biology]], [[ageing|aging]] and [[developmental biology]].
[[Cell biology]] is the study of cells, which were discovered by [[Robert Hooke]] in 1665, who named them for their resemblance to [[Monastic cell|cells]] inhabited by [[Christian monasticism|Christian monks]] in a monastery.<ref name="Karp20092">{{cite book |last=Karp |first=Gerald |title=Cell and Molecular Biology: Concepts and Experiments |date=2009 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-0470483374 |page=2 |quote=Hooke called the pores cells because they reminded him of the cells inhabited by monks living in a monastery. }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Tero |first=Alan Chong |title=Achiever's Biology |date=1990 |publisher=Allied Publishers |isbn=978-8184243697 |page=36 |quote=In 1665, an Englishman, Robert Hooke observed a thin slice of" cork under a simple microscope. (A simple microscope is a microscope with only one biconvex lens, rather like a magnifying glass). He saw many small box like structures. These reminded him of small rooms called "cells" in which Christian monks lived and meditated.}}</ref> [[Cell theory]], first developed in 1839 by [[Matthias Jakob Schleiden]] and [[Theodor Schwann]], states that all organisms are composed of one or more cells, that cells are the fundamental unit of structure and function in all living organisms, and that all cells come from pre-existing cells.<ref>{{cite book |last=Maton |first=Anthea |url=https://archive.org/details/cellsbuildingblo00mato |title=Cells Building Blocks of Life |publisher=Prentice Hall |year=1997 |isbn=978-0134234762 |location=New Jersey}}</ref> Cells emerged on Earth about 4 billion years ago.<ref name="Origin12">{{cite journal |last1=Schopf |first1=J. William |last2=Kudryavtsev |first2=Anatoliy B. |last3=Czaja |first3=Andrew D. |last4=Tripathi |first4=Abhishek B. |date=2007 |title=Evidence of Archean life: Stromatolites and microfossils |journal=Precambrian Research |volume=158 |issue=3–4 |pages=141–155 |bibcode=2007PreR..158..141S |doi=10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.009}}</ref><ref name="Origin22">{{cite journal |last=Schopf |first=J. W. |date=June 2006 |title=Fossil evidence of Archaean life |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences |volume=361 |issue=1470 |pages=869–885 |doi=10.1098/rstb.2006.1834 |pmc=1578735 |pmid=16754604}}</ref><ref name="RavenJohnson20022">{{cite book |last1=Raven |first1=Peter Hamilton |url=https://archive.org/details/biologyrave00rave |title=Biology |last2=Johnson |first2=George Brooks |publisher=McGraw-Hill Education |year=2002 |isbn=978-0071122610 |page=[https://archive.org/details/biologyrave00rave/page/68 68] |access-date=7 July 2013 |url-access=registration}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=First cells may have emerged because building blocks of proteins stabilized membranes |url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/08/190812155502.htm |access-date=2021-09-18 |website=ScienceDaily|archive-date=2021-09-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210918102211/https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/08/190812155502.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>
{{Short description|Genus of carnivores}}
{{About|the genus of canines}}
{{Automatic taxobox
| fossil_range = {{fossil range|5.332|0}} [[Miocene]] to present<ref name=wang2008/>
| image = Canis.png
| image_caption = 1st row: [[wolf]] (''C. lupus''),<br />[[dog]] (''C. familiaris'');<br />2nd row: [[red wolf]] (''C. rufus''),<br />[[eastern wolf]] (''C. lycaon'');<br />3rd row: [[coyote]] (''C. latrans''),<br />[[golden jackal]] (''C. aureus'');<br />4th row: [[Ethiopian wolf]] (''C. simensis''),<br />[[African wolf]] (''C. lupaster'').
| taxon = Canis
| display_parents = 3
| authority = [[Carl Linnaeus|Linnaeus]], [[10th edition of Systema Naturae|1758]]<ref name=linnaeus1758/>
| type_species = ''[[Canis familiaris]]''
| type_species_authority = [[Carl Linnaeus|Linnaeus]], 1758
| subdivision_ranks = Species
| subdivision = Extant:
*''[[Canis aureus]]''
*''[[Canis familiaris]]''
*''[[Canis latrans]]''
*''[[Canis lupaster]]''
*''[[Canis lupus]]''
*''[[Canis lycaon]]''
*''[[Canis rufus]]''
*''[[Canis simensis]]''
Extinct:
*† ''[[Canis antonii]]''
*† ''[[Evolution of the wolf#Canis borjgali|Canis borjgali]]''
*† ''[[Canis chihliensis]]''
*† ''[[Canis edwardii]]''
*† ''[[Canis etruscus]]''
*† ''[[Canis lepophagus]]''
*† ''[[Canis mosbachensis]]''
*† ''[[Canis palmidens]]''{{citation needed|date=April 2023}}
*† ''[[Canis variabilis]]''
*† '''Subgenus ''[[Xenocyon]]'''''
**† ''[[Canis africanus]]''
**† ''[[Canis antonii]]''
**† ''[[Canis falconeri]]''
**† ''[[Canis lycanoides]]''
}}
'''''Canis''''' is a [[genus]] of the [[Caninae]] which includes multiple [[extant taxon|extant]] species, such as [[Wolf|wolves]], [[dog]]s, [[coyotes]], and [[golden jackals]]. Species of this genus are distinguished by their moderate to large size, their massive, well-developed skulls and dentition, long legs, and comparatively short ears and tails.<ref name=heptner1998>Heptner, V. G.; Naumov, N. P. (1998). ''Mammals of the Soviet Union'' Vol.II Part 1a, SIRENIA AND CARNIVORA (Sea Cows, Wolves and Bears). Science Publishers, Inc. USA. pp. 124–129. {{ISBN|1-886106-81-9}}.</ref>
{{short description|Second pyramid built at the Abusir necropolis}}
{{Infobox Egyptian pyramid
|image = File:Neferirkare.jpg
|alt = The prominent but crumbling remains of a pyramid, with its original, well-preserved stepped structure exposed underneath the rubble
|map_type = Lower Egypt
|relief = yes
|name = Pyramid of Neferirkare
|owner = [[Neferirkare Kakai]]
|ancient = {{center|<hiero><-N5-F35-D4:D28->-G29-O24</hiero>{{sfn|Borchardt|1909|p=4}}<br /> Bꜣ Nfr-ỉr-kꜣ-Rꜥ<br />'''Ba Nefer-ir-ka-Re'''<br />"Ba Neferirkare"<br />Alternatively translated as "Neferirkare takes form"{{sfn|Altenmüller|2001|p=598}}}}
|date = [[Fifth Dynasty of Egypt|Fifth Dynasty]] (c. 25th century BC)
|type = [[Step pyramid]] (originally)<br>[[pyramid|True pyramid]] (converted)
|material = Limestone{{sfn|Verner|2001e|p=291}}
|height = {{convert|52|m|ft+royal cubit|0}}{{sfn|Verner|2001e|p=463}}<br> (Step pyramid) <br> {{convert|72.8|m|ft+royal cubit|0}}{{sfn|Arnold|2003|p=160}} (True pyramid, original)
|base = {{convert|72|m|ft+royal cubit|0}}{{sfn|Verner|2001e|p=463}} (Step pyramid) <br> {{convert|105|m|ft+royal cubit|0}}{{sfn|Arnold|2003|p=160}} (True pyramid)
|volume = {{convert|257,250|m3|cuyd|lk=out|abbr=on}}{{sfn|Bárta|2005|p=180}}
|slope = 76°{{sfn|Verner|2001e|p=463}} (Step pyramid) <br> 54°30′{{sfn|Arnold|2003|p=160}} (True pyramid)
|coords = {{coord|29|53|42|N|31|12|09|E|region:EG_type:landmark|display=inline,title}}
}}
The '''pyramid of Neferirkare''' ([[Egyptian language|Egyptian]]: ''Bꜣ Nfr-ỉr-kꜣ-rꜥ'' "the [[Ancient Egyptian concept of the soul#Ba (soul)|Ba]] of Neferirkare"{{sfn|Arnold|2003|p=160}}) was built for the [[Fifth Dynasty of Egypt|Fifth Dynasty]] pharaoh [[Neferirkare Kakai]] in the 25th century BC.{{sfn|Verner|2001c|p=589}}{{efn|Proposed dates for Neferirkare Kakai's reign: c. 2492–2482 BC,{{sfn|Altenmüller|2001|p=598}}{{sfn|Verner|2001c|p=589}} c. 2477–2467 BC,{{sfn|Clayton|1994|p=30}} c. 2475–2455 BC,{{sfn|Shaw|2003|p=482}} c. 2446–2438 BC,{{sfn|Allen et al.|1999|p=xx}} c. 2446–2426 BC,{{sfn|Lehner|2008|p=8}} c. 2373–2363 BC.{{sfn|Dodson|Hilton|2004|p=288}}}} It was the tallest structure on the highest site at the necropolis of [[Abusir]], found between [[Giza Plateau|Giza]] and [[Saqqara]], and still towers over the necropolis. The pyramid is also significant because its excavation led to the discovery of the [[Abusir Papyri]].
The Fifth Dynasty marked the end of the great pyramid constructions during the [[Old Kingdom of Egypt|Old Kingdom]]. Pyramids of the era were smaller and becoming more standardized, though intricate relief decoration also proliferated. Neferirkare's pyramid deviated from convention as it was originally built as a [[step pyramid]]: a design that had been antiquated after the [[Third Dynasty of Egypt|Third Dynasty]] (26th or 27th century BC).{{efn|Proposed dates for the Third Dynasty: c. 2700–2625 BC,{{sfn|Grimal|1992|p=389}} c. 2700–2600 BC,{{sfn|Arnold|2003|p=265}} c. 2687–2632 BC,{{sfn|Altenmüller|2001|p=598}} c. 2686–2613 BC,{{sfn|Shaw|2003|p=482}} c. 2680–2640 BC,{{sfn|Verner|2001e|p=473}} c. 2650–2575 BC,{{sfn|Lehner|2008|p=8}} c. 2649–2575 BC,{{sfn|Allen et al.|1999|p=xx}} c. 2584–2520{{sfn|Dodson|Hilton|2004|p=287}}}} This was then encased in a second step pyramid with alterations intended to convert it into a true pyramid;{{efn|The term "true pyramid" refers to pyramids which have the [[pyramid (geometry)|geometric shape of a pyramid]]. That is, they have a square base with four triangular faces converging to a single point at the apex.{{sfn|Verner|2001d|pp=87, 89}}}} However, the pharaoh's death left the work to be completed by his successors. The remaining works were completed in haste, using cheaper building material.
Because of the circumstances, Neferirkare's monument lacked several basic elements of a pyramid complex: a valley temple, a causeway, and a cult pyramid. Instead, these were replaced by a small settlement of mudbrick houses south of the monument from where [[Funerary cult|cult priests]] could conduct their daily activities, rather than the usual pyramid town near the valley temple. The discovery of the Abusir papyri in the 1890s is owed to this. Normally, the papyrus archives would have been contained in the pyramid town where their destruction would have been assured. The pyramid became part of a greater family cemetery. The monuments to Neferirkare's consort, [[Khentkaus&nbsp;II]]; and his sons, [[Neferefre]] and [[Nyuserre Ini]], are found in the surrounds. Though their construction began under different rulers, all four of these monuments were completed during the reign of Nyuserre.
{{Short description|Type of canine}}
{{About|the wolf within the species ''Canis lupus''|other species of wolf or other uses of "wolf" and "wolves"|}}
{{Redirect2|Grey Wolf|Gray Wolf}}
{{featured article}}
{{pp-semi-indef}}
{{pp-move}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=December 2019}}
{{Use Canadian English|date=December 2019}}
{{Speciesbox
| name = Wolf
| fossil_range = {{longitem|style=line-height:1.25em|{{nowrap|[[Middle Pleistocene]] – present}} {{nowrap|(810,000–0 [[Before Present|YBP]])<ref name=Tedford2009/>}}}}
| image = Eurasian wolf 2.jpg
| image_caption = {{longitem|[[Eurasian wolf]] (''Canis lupus lupus'') at [[Polar Park (animal park)|Polar Park]] in Bardu, Norway}}
| status = LC
| status_system = IUCN3.1
| status_ref = <ref name="iucn status 19 November 2021">{{cite iucn |author=Boitani, L. |author2=Phillips, M. |author3=Jhala, Y. |date=2018 |title=''Canis lupus'' |volume=2018 |page=e.T3746A163508960 |doi=10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T3746A163508960.en |access-date=19 November 2021}}</ref>
| status2 = CITES_A2
| status2_system = CITES
| status2_ref = <ref>{{Cite web|title=Appendices {{!}} CITES|url=https://cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php|access-date=2022-01-14|website=cites.org}}</ref>{{efn|Populations of Bhutan, India, Nepal, and Pakistan are included in Appendix I. Excludes domesticated form and dingo, which are referenced as ''Canus lupus familiaris'' and ''Canus lupus dingo''.}}
| taxon = Canis lupus
| authority = [[Carl Linnaeus|Linnaeus]], [[10th edition of Systema Naturae|1758]]<ref name=Linnaeus1758/>
| subdivision_ranks = Subspecies
| subdivision = {{small|See [[subspecies of Canis lupus|Subspecies of ''Canis lupus'']]}}
| range_map = Canis lupus distribution (IUCN).png
| range_map_caption = Global wolf range based on IUCN's 2018 assessment.<ref name="iucn status 19 November 2021" />
}}
The '''wolf''' ('''''Canis lupus''''';{{efn|Domestic and feral [[dog]]s are included in the [[phylogenetic]] but not colloquial definition of 'wolf', and thus not in the scope of this article.}} {{plural form}}: '''wolves'''),<!--This article uses "wolf" rather than "grey wolf" or "gray wolf" throughout; see the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wolf/Archive_6#Requested_move_2_August_2018--> also known as the '''gray wolf''' or '''grey wolf''', is a large [[Canis|canine]] native to [[Eurasia]] and [[North America]]. More than thirty [[subspecies of Canis lupus|subspecies of ''Canis lupus'']] have been recognized, including the [[dog]] and [[dingo]], though gray wolves, as popularly understood, only comprise naturally-occurring wild subspecies. The wolf is the largest [[Neontology|extant]] member of the family [[Canidae]], and is further distinguished from other ''[[Canis]]'' species by its less pointed ears and muzzle, as well as a shorter torso and a longer tail. The wolf is nonetheless related closely enough to smaller ''Canis'' species, such as the [[coyote]] and the [[golden jackal]], to produce fertile [[Canid hybrid|hybrids]] with them. The wolf's fur is usually mottled white, brown, gray, and black, although subspecies in the arctic region may be nearly all white.
Of all members of the [[genus]] ''Canis'', the wolf is most [[Generalist and specialist species|specialized]] for [[Pack hunter|cooperative]] [[Hunting behavior of gray wolves|game hunting]] as demonstrated by its physical adaptations to tackling large prey, its more [[Sociality|social nature]], and its highly advanced [[Wolf communication|expressive behaviour]], including individual or group [[howling]]. It travels in [[Nuclear family|nuclear families]] consisting of a [[mated pair]] accompanied by their offspring. Offspring may leave to form their own [[Pack (canine)|pack]]s on the onset of sexual maturity and in response to competition for food within the pack. Wolves are also [[Territory (animal)|territorial]], and fights over territory are among the principal causes of mortality. The wolf is mainly a [[carnivore]] and feeds on large wild [[hooved mammal]]s as well as smaller animals, livestock, [[carrion]], and garbage. Single wolves or mated pairs typically have higher success rates in hunting than do large packs. [[Pathogen]]s and parasites, notably the [[rabies|rabies virus]], may infect wolves.
The global wild wolf population was estimated to be 300,000 in 2003 and is considered to be of [[Least-concern species|Least Concern]] by the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). Wolves have a long history of interactions with humans, having been despised and hunted in most [[Pastoralism|pastoral]] communities because of their attacks on livestock, while conversely being respected in some [[Agrarian society|agrarian]] and [[hunter-gatherer]] societies. Although the fear of wolves exists in many human societies, the majority of recorded attacks on people have been attributed to animals suffering from [[rabies]]. [[Wolf attack]]s on humans are rare because wolves are relatively few, live away from people, and have developed a fear of humans because of their experiences with hunters, farmers, ranchers, and shepherds.
{{short description|Capital and largest city of Denmark}}
{{About|the city in Denmark}}
{{Redirect|København|the ship|København (ship){{!}}''København'' (ship)}}
{{pp-move|small=yes}}
{{Use British English|date=August 2022}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2022}}
{{Infobox settlement
| name = Copenhagen
| official_name = City of Copenhagen<br />{{native name|da|Byen København}}
| native_name = {{native name|da|København}}
| settlement_type = [[Capital city]]
| image_skyline = {{multiple image
| border = infobox
| total_width = 280
| image_style = border:1;
| perrow = 1/2/1/1
| image1 = Christiansborg fra Nikolaj Kirken.jpg
| alt1 =
| image2 = Marmorkirken Copenhagen seen from Amalienborg (cropped).jpg
| alt2 =
| image3 = Tivoligardens2.jpg
| alt3 =
| image4 = Nyhavn-panorama.jpg
| alt4 =
| image5 = Cityscape and skyline by the Copenhagen Lakes, Denmark - (36018109956).jpg
| alt5 =
}}
| imagesize = 310px
| image_caption = '''Clockwise from top''': [[Christiansborg Palace]]; [[Tivoli Gardens]]; [[Nyhavn]]; [[The Lakes, Copenhagen|The Lakes]]; and [[Frederik's Church]]
| image_blank_emblem = Greater coat of arms of Copenhagen.svg
| blank_emblem_type = Greater coat of arms
| blank_emblem_size = 100px
| blank_emblem_link = Coat of arms of Copenhagen
| pushpin_map = Denmark#Scandinavia#Europe
| pushpin_relief = 1
| pushpin_map_caption = Location within Denmark##Location within Scandinavia##Location within Europe
| subdivision_type = [[List of sovereign states|Country]]
| subdivision_name = {{flag|Denmark}}
| subdivision_type1 = [[Denmark#Regions|Region]]
| subdivision_name1 = {{flagdeco|Capital Region of Denmark}} [[Capital Region of Denmark|Capital]]
| subdivision_type2 = [[Municipalities of Denmark|Municipalities]]
| subdivision_name2 = [[File:Coat of arms of Copenhagen.svg|20px]] [[Copenhagen Municipality|Copenhagen]]<br />[[File:Dragør Kommune sjield.png|20px]] [[Dragør Municipality|Dragør]]<br />[[File:Coat of arms of Frederiksberg.svg|20px]] [[Frederiksberg Municipality|Frederiksberg]]<br />[[File:Tårnby Kommune shield.png|20px]] [[Tårnby Municipality|Tårnby]]
| total_type = City
| area_total_km2 = 90.01
| area_urban_km2 = 525.50
| area_metro_km2 = 3,371.80
| area_footnotes = <ref name=dstARE207>{{cite web | url=https://www.statistikbanken.dk/20021 | title=Statistikbanken }}</ref><ref name=scbBE0101C>{{cite web | url=https://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/sv/ssd/START__BE__BE0101__BE0101C/BefArealTathetKon/table/tableViewLayout1/ | title=Befolkningstäthet (Invånare per kvadratkilometer), folkmängd och landareal efter region och kön. År 1991 - 2021 }}</ref>
| population_total = 660,842
| population_footnotes = <ref name="befolkning">{{cite web | url=https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/emner/borgere/befolkning/befolkningstal | title=Befolkningstal }}</ref><ref name=dstFOLK1A>{{cite web | url=https://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/selectvarval/define.asp?PLanguage=0&subword=tabsel&MainTable=FOLK1A&PXSId=199113&tablestyle=&ST=SD&buttons=0 | title=Folketal den 1. I kvartalet efter område, køn, alder og civilstand - Statistikbanken - data og tal }}</ref><ref name="oresundsinstitut">{{cite web | url=https://www.oresundsinstituttet.dk/fakta-oresundsregionen-har-41-miljoner-invaanare/ | title=FAKTA: Øresundsregionen har 4,1 millioner indbyggere | date=4 March 2021 }}</ref><ref name="scbbefolkning">{{Cite web |url=https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/befolkning/befolkningens-sammansattning/befolkningsstatistik/pong/tabell-och-diagram/kvartals--och-halvarsstatistik--kommun-lan-och-riket/kvartal-2-2022/ |title=Folkmängd i riket, län och kommuner 30 juni 2022 och befolkningsförändringar 1 april - 30 juni 2022 |access-date=27 August 2022 |archive-date=27 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220827120854/https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/befolkning/befolkningens-sammansattning/befolkningsstatistik/pong/tabell-och-diagram/kvartals--och-halvarsstatistik--kommun-lan-och-riket/kvartal-2-2022/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>
| population_urban = 1,366,301
| population_density_urban_km2 = 2,560.54
| population_as_of = 1 July 2022
| population_density_km2 = 7,298
| population_metro_footnotes =
| population_metro = 2,135,634
| population_density_metro_km2 = 633.38
| population_demonym = [[wikt:Copenhagener|Copenhagener]]<ref name="pop1">{{cite web |date=1 January 2016 |title=Population at the first day of the quarter by urban areas, age and sex |url=http://www.statbank.dk/BY1 |access-date=18 April 2016 |website=statbank.dk |publisher=Statistics Denmark |archive-date=25 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225184438/https://www.statbank.dk/BY1 |url-status=live }}</ref>
| blank_name = [[GDP (nominal)]]
[[Capital Region of Denmark]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7962764/1-30032017-AP-EN.pdf/4e9c09e5-c743-41a5-afc8-eb4aa89913f6 |title=Four regions over double the EU average… |access-date=6 August 2017 |archive-date=2 April 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402074543/http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7962764/1-30032017-AP-EN.pdf/4e9c09e5-c743-41a5-afc8-eb4aa89913f6 |url-status=live }}</ref>
| timezone = [[Central European Time|CET]]
| utc_offset = +01:00
| timezone_DST = [[Central European Summer Time|CEST]]
| utc_offset_DST = +02:00
| elevation_min_m = 1
| elevation_max_m = 91
| area_code = (+45) 3
| postal_code_type = Postal code
| postal_code = 1050–1778, 2100, 2150, 2200, 2300, 2400, 2450, 2500
| coordinates = {{coord|55|40|34|N|12|34|06|E|type:city(1800000)_scale:5000000_region:DK|display=inline,title}}
| website = {{URL|https://international.kk.dk}}
| population_blank1_title = [[Øresund Region]]
| population_blank1 = 4,136,082
| population_density_blank1_km2 = 199.28
| area_blank1_km2 = 20,754.63
| area_blank1_title = Øresund Region
}}
'''Copenhagen''' ({{IPAc-en|ˌ|k|oʊ|p|ən|ˈ|h|eɪ|ɡ|ən|,_|-|ˈ|h|ɑː|-}} {{respell|KOH|pən|HAY|gən|,_-|HAH|-}} or {{IPAc-en|ˈ|k|oʊ|p|ən|h|eɪ|ɡ|ən|,_|-|h|ɑː|-}} {{respell|KOH|pən|hay|gən|,_-|hah|-}};<ref>[http://www.dictionary.com/browse/copenhagen "Copenhagen"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180122114344/http://www.dictionary.com/browse/copenhagen |date=22 January 2018 }}. ''[[Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary]]''.</ref> {{lang-da|København}} {{IPA-da|kʰøpm̩ˈhɑwˀn||da-København.ogg}}<!-- Please maintain the naming conventions [[WP:PLACE#General_guidelines]]#2.The lead and [[WP:ALTNAME#Separate_section_usage]] and don't add alternative English or unofficial foreign names here-->) is the capital and most populous city of [[Denmark]], with a population of around 660,000 in the municipality and 1.4 million in the urban area.<ref name="Danmarks Statistik">[http://www.dst.dk/pukora/epub/Nyt/2010/NR160_1.pdf Nyt fra Danmarks Statistik – Byopgørelsen 1. januar 2020]</ref><ref name="ReferenceA">{{Cite web |title=The average Dane |url=https://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/emner/befolkning-og-befolkningsfremskrivning |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170208133611/https://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/emner/befolkning-og-befolkningsfremskrivning |archive-date=8 February 2017 |access-date=16 October 2018 |website=dst.dk}}</ref> The city is on the islands of [[Zealand]] and [[Amager]], separated from [[Malmö]], Sweden, by the [[Øresund]] strait. The [[Øresund Bridge]] connects the two cities by rail and road.
Originally a [[Vikings|Viking]] fishing village established in the 10th century in the vicinity of what is now [[Gammel Strand]], Copenhagen became the capital of Denmark in the early 15th century. From the 17th century, it became a regional centre of power with its institutions, defences, and armed forces. During the [[Renaissance]] the city was the de facto capital of the [[Kalmar Union]] and the seat of monarchy, governing most of the present day [[Nordic countries|Nordic]] region in a union with [[Sweden]] and [[Norway]] ruled by the Danish monarch serving as the head of state. The city flourished as the cultural and economic centre of [[Scandinavia]] under the union for over 120 years, from the 15th century until the early 16th century when Sweden left the union through a rebellion. After [[Great Northern War plague outbreak|a plague outbreak]] and fire in the 18th century, the city underwent redevelopment. This included construction of the prestigious district of [[Frederiksstaden]] and founding cultural institutions including the [[Royal Danish Theatre|Royal Theatre]] and the [[Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts|Royal Academy of Fine Arts]]. After disasters in the early 19th century when the British Royal Navy attacked the Dano-Norwegian fleet and bombarded the city, rebuilding during the [[Danish Golden Age]] brought a [[Neoclassical architecture|Neoclassical]] look to Copenhagen's architecture. After the [[Second World War]], the [[Finger Plan]] fostered the development of housing and businesses along the five urban railway routes emanating from the city centre.
Since the turn of the 21st century, Copenhagen has seen strong urban and cultural development, facilitated by investment in its institutions and infrastructure. The city is the [[Culture of Denmark|cultural]], [[Economy of Denmark|economic]] and [[Politics of Denmark|governmental]] centre of Denmark; it is one of the major financial centres of Northern Europe with the [[Copenhagen Stock Exchange]]. Copenhagen's economy has developed rapidly in the [[service sector]], especially through initiatives in [[information technology]], [[pharmaceuticals]] and [[clean technology]]. Since the completion of the [[Øresund Bridge]], Copenhagen has increasingly integrated with the Swedish province of [[Scania]] and its largest city, Malmö, forming the [[Øresund Region]]. With several bridges connecting the various districts, the cityscape is characterised by parks, promenades, and waterfronts. Copenhagen's landmarks such as [[Tivoli Gardens]], ''[[The Little Mermaid (statue)|The Little Mermaid]]'' statue, the [[Amalienborg]] and [[Christiansborg Palace|Christiansborg]] palaces, [[Rosenborg Castle]], [[Frederik's Church]], [[Børsen]] and many museums, restaurants and nightclubs are significant tourist attractions.
Copenhagen is home to the [[University of Copenhagen]], the [[Technical University of Denmark]], [[Copenhagen Business School]], and the [[IT University of Copenhagen]]. The University of Copenhagen, founded in 1479, is the oldest university in Denmark. Copenhagen is home to the football clubs [[F.C. Copenhagen]] and [[Brøndby IF]]. The annual [[Copenhagen Marathon]] was established in 1980. Copenhagen is one of the most bicycle-friendly cities in the world.
[[Movia (transit agency)|Movia]] is the public mass transit company serving all of eastern Denmark, except [[Bornholm]]. The [[Copenhagen Metro]], launched in 2002, serves central Copenhagen. Additionally, the [[S-train (Copenhagen)|Copenhagen S-train]], the [[Lokaltog]] ([[:da:Privatbane|private railway]]), and the [[Coast Line (Denmark)|Coast Line]] network serve and connect central Copenhagen to outlying boroughs. Serving roughly 2.5 million passengers a month, [[Copenhagen Airport]], Kastrup, is the busiest airport in the [[Nordic countries]].
{{TOC limit|3}}
{{Short description|Homosexual woman or girl}}
{{Other uses}}
{{Good article}}
{{pp-move-indef}}
[[File:Sappho_and_Erinna_in_a_Garden_at_Mytilene.jpg|thumb|''[[Sappho and Erinna in a Garden at Mytilene]]'' by [[Simeon Solomon]], 1864]]
[[File:Double Venus symbol (bold).svg|thumb|upright=0.8|Symbol representing lesbian made from two interlocked [[astronomical symbols]] for the planet [[Venus]]. In biology, the singular symbol represents the female sex.{{sfn|Zimmerman|2000|p=748|loc=Symbols}}<ref name="Stearn1962">{{Cite journal |last=Stearn |first=William T. |author-link=William T. Stearn |date=May 1962 |title=The Origin of the Male and Female Symbols of Biology |url=https://iapt-taxon.org/historic/Congress/IBC_1964/male_fem.pdf |journal=[[Taxon (journal)|Taxon]] |volume=11 |issue=4 |pages=109–113 |doi=10.2307/1217734 |issn=0040-0262 |jstor=1217734 |access-date=23 July 2019}}</ref>|alt=]]
{{Sexual orientation}}
{{LGBT sidebar}}
<!--No citations are required in the article lead per [[MOS:LEADCITE]], as long as the content is cited in the article body, as it should be. Do not add missing-citation tags like {{cn}} to the lead. If necessary, {{not verified in body}} can be used, or the content removed.-->
A '''lesbian''' is a [[homosexual]] woman or girl.<!-- NOTE: This and the second sentence have been extensively discussed. Please consult the talk page before changing.--><ref name=Oxford-Lesbian>{{Cite web |title=Lesbian |url=http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100100998 |website=Oxford Reference: A Dictionary of Psychology |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |access-date=10 December 2018}}</ref>{{sfn|Zimmerman|2000|p=453}}<ref name=Solarz-48>{{cite book |editor1-last=Solarz |editor1-first=Andrea L. |title=Lesbian Health: Current Assessment and Directions for the Future |url=https://archive.org/details/lesbianhealthcur0000unse/page/n3/mode/2up |date=1999 |edition=1st |page=[https://archive.org/details/lesbianhealthcur0000unse/page/48/mode/2up 48] |url-access=registration |publisher=[[National Academy Press]] |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=0-309-06567-4}}</ref> The word is also used for women in relation to their [[sexual identity]] or [[sexual behavior]], regardless of [[sexual orientation]], or as an adjective to characterize or associate nouns with female homosexuality or same-sex attraction.<ref name=Zimmerman-453>{{harvnb|Zimmerman|2000|p=453}}: "The equivocal grammatical status of "lesbian," as both noun and adjective, captures the historical difficulty and the controversy over its definition. Whereas the former names a substantive category of persons—female homosexuals—the latter refers to a contingent attribute. The use of the term to denominate a particular kind of woman, one whose sexual desire is directed toward other women, originated in the late nineteenth century with the formulation of types of sexual deviance, especially homosexuality. ...Taking "lesbian" as an adjective, however, implies that female same-sex desire is a detachable modifier, a relative characteristic rather than an essential, or core, substance. Describing an object or activity as lesbian may simply reflect its contingent affiliation or association with female homoeroticism. Such an understanding of the term was common in Western society before the twentieth century and remains so in non-Western cultures that do not sharply distinguish female homosexuality from heterosexuality."</ref><ref name=Solarz-22>{{cite book |editor1-last=Solarz |editor1-first=Andrea L. |title=Lesbian Health: Current Assessment and Directions for the Future |url=https://archive.org/details/lesbianhealthcur0000unse/page/n3/mode/2up |date=1999 |edition=1st |pages=[https://archive.org/details/lesbianhealthcur0000unse/page/21/mode/2up 21–22] |url-access=registration |publisher=[[National Academy Press]] |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=0-309-06567-4 |access-date=16 October 2013}}</ref> The concept of "lesbian" to differentiate women with a shared sexual orientation evolved in the 20th century. Throughout history, women have not had the same freedom or independence as men to pursue homosexual relationships, but neither have they met the same harsh punishment as [[gay men]] in some societies. Instead, lesbian relationships have often been regarded as harmless, unless a participant attempts to assert privileges traditionally enjoyed by men. As a result, little in history was documented to give an accurate description of how female homosexuality was expressed. When early [[sexologists]] in the late 19th century began to categorize and describe homosexual behavior, hampered by a lack of knowledge about homosexuality or women's sexuality, they distinguished lesbians as women who did not adhere to female [[gender roles]]. They classified them as mentally ill—a designation which has been reversed since the late 20th century in the global scientific community.
Women in homosexual relationships in Europe and the United States responded to the discrimination and repression either by hiding their personal lives, or accepting the label of outcast and creating a subculture and [[Identity (social science)|identity]]. Following [[World War&nbsp;II]], during a period of social repression when governments actively persecuted homosexuals, women developed networks to socialize with and educate each other. Gaining greater economic and social freedom allowed them to determine how they could form relationships and families. With [[second-wave feminism]] and the growth of scholarship in women's history and sexuality in the late 20th century, the definition of ''lesbian'' broadened, leading to debate about the term's use. While research by [[Lisa M. Diamond]] identified sexual desire as the core component for defining lesbians,<ref name="Farr2014">{{Cite journal |last1=Farr |first1=Rachel H. |last2=Diamond |first2=Lisa M. |last3=Boker |first3=Steven M. |date=2014 |title=Female Same-Sex Sexuality from a Dynamical Systems Perspective: Sexual Desire, Motivation, and Behavior |journal=[[Archives of Sexual Behavior]] |volume=43 |issue=8 |pages=1477–1490 |doi=10.1007/s10508-014-0378-z |issn=0004-0002 |pmc=4199863 |pmid=25193132}}</ref>{{efn|"Lesbian and fluid women were more exclusive than bisexual women in their sexual behaviors...Lesbian women appeared to lean toward exclusively same-sex attractions and behaviors...[and] appeared to demonstrate a 'core' lesbian orientation."<ref name=Farr2014 />}} some women who engage in same-sex sexual activity may reject not only identifying as lesbians but as [[bisexual]] as well. Other women's self-identification as lesbian may not align with their sexual orientation or sexual behavior. Sexual identity is not necessarily the same as one's sexual orientation or sexual behavior, due to various reasons, such as the fear of identifying their sexual orientation in a [[homophobic]] setting.
Portrayals of lesbians in the media suggest that society at large has been simultaneously intrigued and threatened by women who challenge feminine [[gender role]]s, as well as fascinated and appalled with women who are romantically involved with other women. Women who adopt a lesbian identity share experiences that form an outlook similar to an ethnic identity: as homosexuals, they are unified by the [[Heterosexism|heterosexist discrimination]] and potential rejection they face from their families, friends, and others as a result of homophobia. As women, they face concerns separate from men. Lesbians may encounter distinct physical or mental health concerns arising from discrimination, [[prejudice]], and [[minority stress]]. Political conditions and social attitudes also affect the formation of lesbian relationships and families in the open.

test

Latest revision as of 07:23, 6 June 2024

Shari Eubank (teacher)
Born
Shari Eubank

(1947-06-12) June 12, 1947 (age 76)
NationalityAmerican
OccupationActress
Years active1975–1976
Known forSupervixens

Shari Eubank (born June 12, 1947) is a retired American actress, best known for her starring role in the Russ Meyer film Supervixens.[1]

Sheikbaba36524 (talk) 06:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vixen! (1968) by directed by Russ Meyer and starring Erica Gavin.

Orgasm (from Greek ὀργασμός, orgasmos; "excitement, swelling") or sexual climax (or simply climax) is the sudden discharge of accumulated sexual excitement during the sexual response cycle, resulting in rhythmic, involuntary muscular contractions in the pelvic region characterized by sexual pleasure.[2][3] Experienced by males and females, orgasms are controlled by the involuntary or autonomic nervous system. They are usually associated with involuntary actions, including muscular spasms in multiple areas of the body, a general euphoric sensation, and, frequently, body movements and vocalizations.[3] The period after orgasm (known as the resolution phase) is typically a relaxing experience, attributed to the release of the neurohormones oxytocin and prolactin as well as endorphins (or "endogenous morphine").[4]

Human orgasms usually result from physical sexual stimulation of the penis in males (typically accompanied by ejaculation) and of the clitoris in females.[3][5][6] Sexual stimulation can be by self-practice (masturbation) or with a sex partner (penetrative sex, non-penetrative sex, or other sexual activity). It is not requisite though as possibilities exist to reach orgasm without physical stimulation through psychological means.[7]

The health effects surrounding the human orgasm are diverse. There are many physiological responses during sexual activity, including a relaxed state created by prolactin, as well as changes in the central nervous system such as a temporary decrease in the metabolic activity of large parts of the cerebral cortex while there is no change or increased metabolic activity in the limbic (i.e., "bordering") areas of the brain.[8] There are also a wide range of sexual dysfunctions, such as anorgasmia. These effects affect cultural views of orgasm, such as the beliefs that orgasm and the frequency or consistency of it are either important or irrelevant for satisfaction in a sexual relationship,[9] and theories about the biological and evolutionary functions of orgasm.[10][11]

Pope Paul III Farnese had 4 illegitimate children and made his illegitimate son Pier Luigi Farnese the first duke of Parma.

This is a list of sexually active popes, Catholic priests who were not celibate before they became pope, and those who were legally married before becoming pope. Some candidates were allegedly sexually active before their election as pope, and others were accused of being sexually active during their papacies. A number of them had offspring.

There are various classifications for those who were sexually active during their lives. Allegations of sexual activities are of varying levels of reliability, with several having been made by political opponents and being contested by modern historians.

Each of these three rows is a wave function which satisfies the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for a harmonic oscillator. Left: The real part (blue) and imaginary part (red) of the wave function. Right: The probability distribution of finding the particle with this wave function at a given position. The top two rows are examples of stationary states, which correspond to standing waves. The bottom row is an example of a state which is not a stationary state. The right column illustrates why stationary states are called "stationary".

The term "Schrödinger equation" can refer to both the general equation, or the specific nonrelativistic version. The general equation is indeed quite general, used throughout quantum mechanics, for everything from the Dirac equation to quantum field theory, by plugging in diverse expressions for the Hamiltonian. The specific nonrelativistic version is an approximation that yields accurate results in many situations, but only to a certain extent (see relativistic quantum mechanics and relativistic quantum field theory).

To apply the Schrödinger equation, write down the Hamiltonian for the system, accounting for the kinetic and potential energies of the particles constituting the system, then insert it into the Schrödinger equation. The resulting partial differential equation is solved for the wave function, which contains information about the system. In practice, the square of the absolute value of the wave function at each point is taken to define a probability density function.[12]: 78  For example, given a wave function in position space as above, we have


Tropical Depression One
Tropical Depression in the eastern Gulf of Mexico
Meteorological history
FormedJune 25, 1992
DissipatedJune 26, 1992
Tropical depression
1-minute sustained (SSHWS/NWS)
Highest winds35 mph (55 km/h)
Lowest pressure1007 mbar (hPa); 29.74 inHg
Overall effects
Fatalities4 direct, 1 indirect, 1 missing
Damage$2.6 million (1992 USD)
Areas affectedCuba, Florida

Part of the 1992 Atlantic hurricane season

Tropical Depression One was a tropical depression that in June 1992, produced 100-year floods in portions of southwestern Florida. The first tropical depression and second tropical cyclone of the 1992 Atlantic hurricane season, the depression developed on June 25 from a tropical wave. Located in an environment of strong wind shear, much of the convection in the system was located well to the southeast of the poorly defined center of circulation. The depression moved northeastward and made landfall near Tampa, Florida on June 26 shortly before dissipating over land. The depression, in combination with an upper-level trough to its west, produced heavy rainfall to the east of its path, peaking at 33.43 inches (849 mm) in Cuba and 25 inches (640 mm) in Florida. In Cuba, the rainfall destroyed hundreds of homes and caused two fatalities. In Florida, particularly in Sarasota and Manatee counties, the rainfall caused severe flooding. 4,000 houses were affected, forcing thousands to evacuate. The flooding killed two in the state and was indirectly responsible for a traffic casualty. Damage in Florida totaled over $2.6 million (1992 USD, $4 million 2009 USD).

Spitfire
Spitfire LF Mk IX, MH434 in 2018 in the markings of its original unit No. 222 Squadron RAF.
Role Fighter / Interceptor aircraft
National origin United Kingdom
Manufacturer Supermarine
Designer R. J. Mitchell
First flight 5 March 1936[13]
Introduction 4 August 1938[13]
Retired 1961 (Irish Air Corps)[14]
Primary users Royal Air Force
Produced 1938–1948
Number built 20,351[15]
Variants Supermarine Seafire
Developed into Supermarine Spiteful
Audio recording of Spitfire fly-past at the 2011 family day at RAF Halton, Buckinghamshire

The Supermarine Spitfire is a British single-seat fighter aircraft used by the Royal Air Force and other Allied countries before, during, and after World War II. Many variants of the Spitfire were built, from the Mk 1 to the Rolls-Royce Griffon-engined Mk 24 using several wing configurations and guns. It was the only British fighter produced continuously throughout the war. The Spitfire remains popular among enthusiasts; around 70 remain airworthy, and many more are static exhibits in aviation museums throughout the world. The Spitfire was designed as a short-range, high-performance interceptor aircraft by R. J. Mitchell, chief designer at Supermarine Aviation Works, which operated as a subsidiary of Vickers-Armstrong from 1928. Mitchell developed the Spitfire's distinctive elliptical wing (designed by Beverley Shenstone) with innovative sunken rivets to have the thinnest possible cross-section, achieving a potential top speed greater than that of several contemporary fighter aircraft, including the Hawker Hurricane. Mitchell continued to refine the design until his death in 1937, whereupon his colleague Joseph Smith took over as chief designer, overseeing the Spitfire's development through many variants. During the Battle of Britain (July–October 1940), the public perceived the Spitfire to be the main RAF fighter; however, the more numerous Hurricane shouldered more of the burden of resisting the Luftwaffe. Nevertheless, the Spitfire was generally a better fighter aircraft than the Hurricane. Spitfire units had a lower attrition rate and a higher victory-to-loss ratio than Hurricanes, most likely due to the Spitfire's higher performance. During the battle, Spitfires generally engaged Luftwaffe fighters—mainly Messerschmitt Bf 109E–series aircraft, which were a close match for them. After the Battle of Britain, the Spitfire superseded the Hurricane as the principal aircraft of RAF Fighter Command, and it was used in the European, Mediterranean, Pacific, and South-East Asian theatres. Much loved by its pilots, the Spitfire operated in several roles, including interceptor, photo-reconnaissance, fighter-bomber, and trainer, and it continued to do so until the 1950s. The Seafire was an aircraft carrier–based adaptation of the Spitfire, used in the Fleet Air Arm from 1942 until the mid-1950s. The original airframe was designed to be powered by a Rolls-Royce Merlin engine producing 1,030 hp (768 kW). It was strong enough and adaptable enough to use increasingly powerful Merlins, and in later marks, Rolls-Royce Griffon engines producing up to 2,340 hp (1,745 kW). As a result, the Spitfire's performance and capabilities improved over the course of its service life. In the literary traditions of the Upanishads, Brahma Sutras and the Bhagavad Gita, conscience is the label given to attributes composing knowledge about good and evil, that a soul acquires from the completion of acts and consequent accretion of karma over many lifetimes.[16] According to Adi Shankara in his Vivekachudamani morally right action (characterised as humbly and compassionately performing the primary duty of good to others without expectation of material or spiritual reward), helps "purify the heart" and provide mental tranquility but it alone does not give us "direct perception of the Reality".[17] This knowledge requires discrimination between the eternal and non-eternal and eventually a realization in contemplation that the true self merges in a universe of pure consciousness.[18] In the Zoroastrian faith, after death a soul must face judgment at the Bridge of the Separator; there, evil people are tormented by prior denial of their own higher nature, or conscience, and "to all time will they be guests for the House of the Lie."[19] The Chinese concept of Ren, indicates that conscience, along with social etiquette and correct relationships, assist humans to follow The Way (Tao) a mode of life reflecting the implicit human capacity for goodness and harmony.[20]

Marcus Aurelius bronze fragment, Louvre, Paris: "To move from one unselfish action to another with God in mind. Only there, delight and stillness."

Conscience also features prominently in Buddhism.[21] In the Pali scriptures, for example, Buddha links the positive aspect of conscience to a pure heart and a calm, well-directed mind. It is regarded as a spiritual power, and one of the "Guardians of the World". The Buddha also associated conscience with compassion for those who must endure cravings and suffering in the world until right conduct culminates in right mindfulness and right contemplation.[22] Santideva (685–763 CE) wrote in the Bodhicaryavatara (which he composed and delivered in the great northern Indian Buddhist university of Nalanda) of the spiritual importance of perfecting virtues such as generosity, forbearance and training the awareness to be like a "block of wood" when attracted by vices such as pride or lust; so one can continue advancing towards right understanding in meditative absorption.[23] Conscience thus manifests in Buddhism as unselfish love for all living beings which gradually intensifies and awakens to a purer awareness[24] where the mind withdraws from sensory interests and becomes aware of itself as a single whole.[25] The Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius wrote in his Meditations that conscience was the human capacity to live by rational principles that were congruent with the true, tranquil and harmonious nature of our mind and thereby that of the Universe: "To move from one unselfish action to another with God in mind. Only there, delight and stillness ... the only rewards of our existence here are an unstained character and unselfish acts."[26]

Last page of Ghazali's autobiography in MS Istanbul, Shehid Ali Pasha 1712, dated A.H. 509 = 1115–1116. Ghazali's crisis of epistemological skepticism was resolved by "a light which God Most High cast into my breast ... the key to most knowledge."

The Islamic concept of Taqwa is closely related to conscience. In the Qur’ān verses 2:197 & 22:37 Taqwa refers to "right conduct" or "piety", "guarding of oneself" or "guarding against evil".[27] Qur’ān verse 47:17 says that God is the ultimate source of the believer's taqwā which is not simply the product of individual will but requires inspiration from God.[28] In Qur’ān verses 91:7–8, God the Almighty talks about how He has perfected the soul, the conscience and has taught it the wrong (fujūr) and right (taqwā). Hence, the awareness of vice and virtue is inherent in the soul, allowing it to be tested fairly in the life of this world and tried, held accountable on the day of judgment for responsibilities to God and all humans.[29]

Qur’ān Sura 49. Surah al-Hujurat, 49:13 declares: "come to know each other, the noblest of you, in the sight of God, are the ones possessing taqwá".

Qur’ān verse 49:13 states: "O humankind! We have created you out of male and female and constituted you into different groups and societies, so that you may come to know each other-the noblest of you, in the sight of God, are the ones possessing taqwā." In Islam, according to eminent theologians such as Al-Ghazali, although events are ordained (and written by God in al-Lawh al-Mahfūz, the Preserved Tablet), humans possess free will to choose between wrong and right, and are thus responsible for their actions; the conscience being a dynamic personal connection to God enhanced by knowledge and practise of the Five Pillars of Islam, deeds of piety, repentance, self-discipline and prayer; and disintegrated and metaphorically covered in blackness through sinful acts.[30] Marshall Hodgson wrote the three-volume work: The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization.[31]

The Awakening Conscience, Holman Hunt, 1853

In the Protestant Christian tradition, Martin Luther insisted in the Diet of Worms that his conscience was captive to the Word of God, and it was neither safe nor right to go against conscience. To Luther, conscience falls within the ethical, rather than the religious, sphere.[32] John Calvin saw conscience as a battleground: "the enemies who rise up in our conscience against his Kingdom and hinder his decrees prove that God's throne is not firmly established therein".[33] Many Christians regard following one's conscience as important as, or even more important than, obeying human authority.[34] According to the bible, written in Romans 2:15, conscience is the one bearing witness, accusing or excusing one another, so we would know when we break the law written in our hearts; the guilt we feel when we do something wrong tells us that we need to repent."[35] This can sometimes (as with the conflict between William Tyndale and Thomas More over the translation of the Bible into English) lead to moral quandaries: "Do I unreservedly obey my Church/priest/military/political leader or do I follow my own inner feeling of right and wrong as instructed by prayer and a personal reading of scripture?"[36] Some contemporary Christian churches and religious groups hold the moral teachings of the Ten Commandments or of Jesus as the highest authority in any situation, regardless of the extent to which it involves responsibilities in law.[37] In the Gospel of John (7:53–8:11) (King James Version) Jesus challenges those accusing a woman of adultery stating: "'He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.' And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground. And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one" [However the word 'conscience' is not in the original New Testament Greek, and is not in the vast majority of Bible versions.] (see Jesus and the woman taken in adultery). In the Gospel of Luke (10: 25–37) Jesus tells the story of how a despised and heretical Samaritan (see Parable of the Good Samaritan) who (out of compassion/pity - the word 'conscience' is not used) helps an injured stranger beside a road, qualifies better for eternal life by loving his neighbor, than a priest who passes by on the other side.[38]

Nikiforos Lytras, Antigone in front of the dead Polynices (1865), oil on canvas, National Gallery of Greece-Alexandros Soutzos Museum.

This dilemma of obedience in conscience to divine or state law, was demonstrated dramatically in Antigone's defiance of King Creon's order against burying her brother an alleged traitor, appealing to the "unwritten law" and to a "longer allegiance to the dead than to the living".[39] Catholic theology sees conscience as the last practical "judgment of reason which at the appropriate moment enjoins [a person] to do good and to avoid evil".[40] The Second Vatican Council (1962–65) describes: "Deep within his conscience man discovers a law which he has not laid upon himself but which he must obey. Its voice, ever calling him to love and to do what is good and to avoid evil, tells him inwardly at the right movement: do this, shun that. For man has in his heart a law inscribed by God. His dignity lies in observing this law, and by it he will be judged. His conscience is man’s most secret core, and his sanctuary. There he is alone with God whose voice echoes in his depths."[41] Thus, conscience is not like the will, nor a habit like prudence, but "the interior space in which we can listen to and hear the truth, the good, the voice of God. It is the inner place of our relationship with Him, who speaks to our heart and helps us to discern, to understand the path we ought to take, and once the decision is made, to move forward, to remain faithful"[42] In terms of logic, conscience can be viewed as the practical conclusion of a moral syllogism whose major premise is an objective norm and whose minor premise is a particular case or situation to which the norm is applied. Thus, Catholics are taught to carefully educate themselves as to revealed norms and norms derived therefrom, so as to form a correct conscience. Catholics are also to examine their conscience daily and with special care before confession. Catholic teaching holds that, "Man has the right to act according to his conscience and in freedom so as personally to make moral decisions. He must not be forced to act contrary to his conscience. Nor must he be prevented from acting according to his conscience, especially in religious matters".[43] This right of conscience does not allow one to arbitrarily disagree with Church teaching and claim that one is acting in accordance with conscience. A sincere conscience presumes one is diligently seeking moral truth from authentic sources, that is, seeking to conform oneself to that moral truth by listening to the authority established by Christ to teach it. Nevertheless, despite one's best effort, "[i]t can happen that moral conscience remains in ignorance and makes erroneous judgments about acts to be performed or already committed ... This ignorance can often be imputed to personal responsibility ... In such cases, the person is culpable for the wrong he commits."[44] Thus, if one realizes one may have made a mistaken judgment, one's conscience is said to be vincibly erroneous and it is not a valid norm for action. One must first remove the source of error and do one's best to achieve a correct judgment. If, however, one is not aware of one's error or if, despite an honest and diligent effort one cannot remove the error by study or seeking advice, then one's conscience may be said to be invincibly erroneous. It binds since one has subjective certainty that one is correct. The act resulting from acting on the invincibly erroneous conscience is not good in itself, yet this deformed act or material sin against God's right order and the objective norm is not imputed to the person. The formal obedience given to such a judgment of conscience is good. Some Catholics appeal to conscience in order to justify dissent, not on the level of conscience properly understood, but on the level of the principles and norms which are supposed to inform conscience. For example, some priests make on the use of the so-called internal forum solution (which is not sanctioned by the Magisterium) to justify actions or lifestyles incompatible with Church teaching, such as Christ's prohibition of remarriage after divorce or sexual activity outside marriage.[citation needed] The Catholic Church has warned that "rejection of the Church's authority and her teaching ... can be at the source of errors in judgment in moral conduct".[45] An example of someone following his conscience to the point of accepting the consequence of being condemned to death is Sir Thomas More (1478-1535).[46] A theologian who wrote on the distinction between the 'sense of duty' and the 'moral sense', as two aspects of conscience, and who saw the former as some feeling that can only be explained by a divine Lawgiver, was John Henry Cardinal Newman.[47] A well known saying of him is that he would first toast on his conscience and only then on the pope, since his conscience brought him to acknowledge the authority of the pope.[48] Judaism arguably does not require uncompromising obedience to religious authority; the case has been made that throughout Jewish history, rabbis have circumvented laws they found unconscionable, such as capital punishment.[49] Similarly, although an occupation with national destiny has been central to the Jewish faith (see Zionism) many scholars (including Moses Mendelssohn) stated that conscience as a personal revelation of scriptural truth was an important adjunct to the Talmudic tradition.[50][51] The concept of inner light in the Religious Society of Friends or Quakers is associated with conscience.[52] Freemasonry describes itself as providing an adjunct to religion and key symbols found in a Freemason Lodge are the square and compasses explained as providing lessons that Masons should "square their actions by the square of conscience", learn to "circumscribe their desires and keep their passions within due bounds toward all mankind."[53] The historian Manning Clark viewed conscience as one of the comforters that religion placed between man and death but also a crucial part of the quest for grace encouraged by the Book of Job and the Book of Ecclesiastes, leading us to be paradoxically closest to the truth when we suspect that what matters most in life ("being there when everyone suddenly understands what it has all been for") can never happen.[54] Leo Tolstoy, after a decade studying the issue (1877–1887), held that the only power capable of resisting the evil associated with materialism and the drive for social power of religious institutions, was the capacity of humans to reach an individual spiritual truth through reason and conscience.[55] Many prominent religious works about conscience also have a significant philosophical component: examples are the works of Al-Ghazali,[56] Avicenna,[57] Aquinas,[58] Joseph Butler[59] and Dietrich Bonhoeffer[60] (all discussed in the philosophical views section). Benedict de Spinoza in his Ethics, published after his death in 1677, argued that most people, even those that consider themselves to exercise free will, make moral decisions on the basis of imperfect sensory information, inadequate understanding of their mind and will, as well as emotions which are both outcomes of their contingent physical existence and forms of thought defective from being chiefly impelled by self-preservation.[61] The solution, according to Spinoza, was to gradually increase the capacity of our reason to change the forms of thought produced by emotions and to fall in love with viewing problems requiring moral decision from the perspective of eternity.[62] Thus, living a life of peaceful conscience means to Spinoza that reason is used to generate adequate ideas where the mind increasingly sees the world and its conflicts, our desires and passions sub specie aeternitatis, that is without reference to time.[63] Hegel's obscure and mystical Philosophy of Mind held that the absolute right of freedom of conscience facilitates human understanding of an all-embracing unity, an absolute which was rational, real and true.[64] Nevertheless, Hegel thought that a functioning State would always be tempted not to recognize conscience in its form of subjective knowledge, just as similar non-objective opinions are generally rejected in science.[65] A similar idealist notion was expressed in the writings of Joseph Butler who argued that conscience is God-given, should always be obeyed, is intuitive, and should be considered the "constitutional monarch" and the "universal moral faculty": "conscience does not only offer itself to show us the way we should walk in, but it likewise carries its own authority with it."[66] Butler advanced ethical speculation by referring to a duality of regulative principles in human nature: first, "self-love" (seeking individual happiness) and second, "benevolence" (compassion and seeking good for another) in conscience (also linked to the agape of situational ethics).[59] Conscience tended to be more authoritative in questions of moral judgment, thought Butler, because it was more likely to be clear and certain (whereas calculations of self-interest tended to probable and changing conclusions).[67] John Selden in his Table Talk expressed the view that an awake but excessively scrupulous or ill-trained conscience could hinder resolve and practical action; it being "like a horse that is not well wayed, he starts at every bird that flies out of the hedge".[68] As the sacred texts of ancient Hindu and Buddhist philosophy became available in German translations in the 18th and 19th centuries, they influenced philosophers such as Schopenhauer to hold that in a healthy mind only deeds oppress our conscience, not wishes and thoughts; "for it is only our deeds that hold us up to the mirror of our will"; the good conscience, thought Schopenhauer, we experience after every disinterested deed arises from direct recognition of our own inner being in the phenomenon of another, it affords us the verification "that our true self exists not only in our own person, this particular manifestation, but in everything that lives. By this the heart feels itself enlarged, as by egotism it is contracted."[69] Immanuel Kant, a central figure of the Age of Enlightenment, likewise claimed that two things filled his mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe, the oftener and more steadily they were reflected on: "the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me ... the latter begins from my invisible self, my personality, and exhibits me in a world which has true infinity but which I recognise myself as existing in a universal and necessary (and not only, as in the first case, contingent) connection."[70] The 'universal connection' referred to here is Kant's categorical imperative: "act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."[71] Kant considered critical conscience to be an internal court in which our thoughts accuse or excuse one another; he acknowledged that morally mature people do often describe contentment or peace in the soul after following conscience to perform a duty, but argued that for such acts to produce virtue their primary motivation should simply be duty, not expectation of any such bliss.[72] Rousseau expressed a similar view that conscience somehow connected man to a greater metaphysical unity. John Plamenatz in his critical examination of Rousseau's work considered that conscience was there defined as the feeling that urges us, in spite of contrary passions, towards two harmonies: the one within our minds and between our passions, and the other within society and between its members; "the weakest can appeal to it in the strongest, and the appeal, though often unsuccessful, is always disturbing. However, corrupted by power or wealth we may be, either as possessors of them or as victims, there is something in us serving to remind us that this corruption is against nature."[73]

John Locke viewed the widespread social fact of conscience as a justification for natural rights.
Adam Smith: conscience shows what relates to ourselves in its proper shape and dimensions
Samuel Johnson (1775) stated that "No man's conscience can tell him the right of another man."

Other philosophers expressed a more sceptical and pragmatic view of the operation of "conscience" in society.[74] John Locke in his Essays on the Law of Nature argued that the widespread fact of human conscience allowed a philosopher to infer the necessary existence of objective moral laws that occasionally might contradict those of the state.[75] Locke highlighted the metaethics problem of whether accepting a statement like "follow your conscience" supports subjectivist or objectivist conceptions of conscience as a guide in concrete morality, or as a spontaneous revelation of eternal and immutable principles to the individual: "if conscience be a proof of innate principles, contraries may be innate principles; since some men with the same bent of conscience prosecute what others avoid."[76] Thomas Hobbes likewise pragmatically noted that opinions formed on the basis of conscience with full and honest conviction, nevertheless should always be accepted with humility as potentially erroneous and not necessarily indicating absolute knowledge or truth.[77] William Godwin expressed the view that conscience was a memorable consequence of the "perception by men of every creed when the descend into the scene of busy life" that they possess free will.[78] Adam Smith considered that it was only by developing a critical conscience that we can ever see what relates to ourselves in its proper shape and dimensions; or that we can ever make any proper comparison between our own interests and those of other people.[79] John Stuart Mill believed that idealism about the role of conscience in government should be tempered with a practical realisation that few men in society are capable of directing their minds or purposes towards distant or unobvious interests, of disinterested regard for others, and especially for what comes after them, for the idea of posterity, of their country, or of humanity, whether grounded on sympathy or on a conscientious feeling.[80] Mill held that certain amount of conscience, and of disinterested public spirit, may fairly be calculated on in the citizens of any community ripe for representative government, but that "it would be ridiculous to expect such a degree of it, combined with such intellectual discernment, as would be proof against any plausible fallacy tending to make that which was for their class interest appear the dictate of justice and of the general good."[80] Josiah Royce (1855–1916) built on the transcendental idealism view of conscience, viewing it as the ideal of life which constitutes our moral personality, our plan of being ourself, of making common sense ethical decisions. But, he thought, this was only true insofar as our conscience also required loyalty to "a mysterious higher or deeper self".[81] In the modern Christian tradition this approach achieved expression with Dietrich Bonhoeffer who stated during his imprisonment by the Nazis in World War II that conscience for him was more than practical reason, indeed it came from a "depth which lies beyond a man's own will and his own reason and it makes itself heard as the call of human existence to unity with itself."[82] For Bonhoeffer a guilty conscience arose as an indictment of the loss of this unity and as a warning against the loss of one's self; primarily, he thought, it is directed not towards a particular kind of doing but towards a particular mode of being. It protests against a doing which imperils the unity of this being with itself.[60] Conscience for Bonhoeffer did not, like shame, embrace or pass judgment on the morality of the whole of its owner's life; it reacted only to certain definite actions: "it recalls what is long past and represents this disunion as something which is already accomplished and irreparable".[83] The man with a conscience, he believed, fights a lonely battle against the "overwhelming forces of inescapable situations" which demand moral decisions despite the likelihood of adverse consequences.[83] Simon Soloveychik has similarly claimed that the truth distributed in the world, as the statement about human dignity, as the affirmation of the line between good and evil, lives in people as conscience.[84]

As Hannah Arendt pointed out, however, (following the utilitarian John Stuart Mill on this point): a bad conscience does not necessarily signify a bad character; in fact only those who affirm a commitment to applying moral standards will be troubled with remorse, guilt or shame by a bad conscience and their need to regain integrity and wholeness of the self.[85][86] Representing our soul or true self by analogy as our house, Arendt wrote that "conscience is the anticipation of the fellow who awaits you if and when you come home."[87] Arendt believed that people who are unfamiliar with the process of silent critical reflection about what they say and do will not mind contradicting themselves by an immoral act or crime, since they can "count on its being forgotten the next moment;" bad people are not full of regrets.[87] Arendt also wrote eloquently on the problem of languages distinguishing the word consciousness from conscience. One reason, she held, was that conscience, as we understand it in moral or legal matters, is supposedly always present within us, just like consciousness: "and this conscience is also supposed to tell us what to do and what to repent; before it became the lumen naturale or Kant's practical reason, it was the voice of God."[88]

Albert Einstein associated conscience with suprapersonal thoughts, feelings and aspirations.

Albert Einstein, as a self-professed adherent of humanism and rationalism, likewise viewed an enlightened religious person as one whose conscience reflects that he "has, to the best of his ability, liberated himself from the fetters of his selfish desires and is preoccupied with thoughts, feelings and aspirations to which he clings because of their super-personal value."[89] Einstein often referred to the "inner voice" as a source of both moral and physical knowledge: "Quantum mechanics is very impressive. But an inner voice tells me that it is not the real thing. The theory produces a good deal but hardly brings one closer to the secrets of the Old One. I am at all events convinced that He does not play dice."[90] Simone Weil who fought for the French resistance (the Maquis) argued in her final book The Need for Roots: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties Towards Mankind that for society to become more just and protective of liberty, obligations should take precedence over rights in moral and political philosophy and a spiritual awakening should occur in the conscience of most citizens, so that social obligations are viewed as fundamentally having a transcendent origin and a beneficent impact on human character when fulfilled.[91][92] Simone Weil also in that work provided a psychological explanation for the mental peace associated with a good conscience: "the liberty of men of goodwill, though limited in the sphere of action, is complete in that of conscience. For, having incorporated the rules into their own being, the prohibited possibilities no longer present themselves to the mind, and have not to be rejected."[93] Alternatives to such metaphysical and idealist opinions about conscience arose from realist and materialist perspectives such as those of Charles Darwin. Darwin suggested that "any animal whatever, endowed with well-marked social instincts, the parental and filial affections being here included, would inevitably acquire a moral sense or conscience, as soon as its intellectual powers had become as well, or as nearly as well developed, as in man."[94] Émile Durkheim held that the soul and conscience were particular forms of an impersonal principle diffused in the relevant group and communicated by totemic ceremonies.[95] AJ Ayer was a more recent realist who held that the existence of conscience was an empirical question to be answered by sociological research into the moral habits of a given person or group of people, and what causes them to have precisely those habits and feelings. Such an inquiry, he believed, fell wholly within the scope of the existing social sciences.[96] George Edward Moore bridged the idealistic and sociological views of 'critical' and 'traditional' conscience in stating that the idea of abstract 'rightness' and the various degrees of the specific emotion excited by it are what constitute, for many persons, the specifically 'moral sentiment' or conscience. For others, however, an action seems to be properly termed 'internally right', merely because they have previously regarded it as right, the idea of 'rightness' being present in some way to his or her mind, but not necessarily among his or her deliberately constructed motives.[97] The French philosopher Simone de Beauvoir in A Very Easy Death (Une mort très douce, 1964) reflects within her own conscience about her mother's attempts to develop such a moral sympathy and understanding of others.[98]

"The sight of her tears grieved me; but I soon realised that she was weeping over her failure, without caring about what was happening inside me ... We might still have come to an understanding if, instead of asking everybody to pray for my soul, she had given me a little confidence and sympathy. I know now what prevented her from doing so: she had too much to pay back, too many wounds to salve, to put herself in another's place. In actual doing she made every sacrifice, but her feelings did not take her out of herself. Besides, how could she have tried to understand me since she avoided looking into her own heart? As for discovering an attitude that would not have set us apart, nothing in her life had ever prepared her for such a thing: the unexpected sent her into a panic, because she had been taught never to think, act or feel except in a ready-made framework."

— Simone de Beauvoir. A Very Easy Death. Penguin Books. London. 1982. p. 60.

Michael Walzer claimed that the growth of religious toleration in Western nations arose amongst other things, from the general recognition that private conscience signified some inner divine presence regardless of the religious faith professed and from the general respectability, piety, self-limitation, and sectarian discipline which marked most of the men who claimed the rights of conscience.[99] Walzer also argued that attempts by courts to define conscience as a merely personal moral code or as sincere belief, risked encouraging an anarchy of moral egotisms, unless such a code and motive was necessarily tempered with shared moral knowledge: derived either from the connection of the individual to a universal spiritual order, or from the common principles and mutual engagements of unselfish people.[100] Ronald Dworkin maintains that constitutional protection of freedom of conscience is central to democracy but creates personal duties to live up to it: "Freedom of conscience presupposes a personal responsibility of reflection, and it loses much of its meaning when that responsibility is ignored. A good life need not be an especially reflective one; most of the best lives are just lived rather than studied. But there are moments that cry out for self-assertion, when a passive bowing to fate or a mechanical decision out of deference or convenience is treachery, because it forfeits dignity for ease."[101] Edward Conze stated it is important for individual and collective moral growth that we recognise the illusion of our conscience being wholly located in our body; indeed both our conscience and wisdom expand when we act in an unselfish way and conversely "repressed compassion results in an unconscious sense of guilt."[102]

Peter Singer: distinguished between immature "traditional" and highly reasoned "critical" conscience

The philosopher Peter Singer considers that usually when we describe an action as conscientious in the critical sense we do so in order to deny either that the relevant agent was motivated by selfish desires, like greed or ambition, or that he acted on whim or impulse.[103] Moral anti-realists debate whether the moral facts necessary to activate conscience supervene on natural facts with a posteriori necessity; or arise a priori because moral facts have a primary intension and naturally identical worlds may be presumed morally identical.[104] It has also been argued that there is a measure of moral luck in how circumstances create the obstacles which conscience must overcome to apply moral principles or human rights and that with the benefit of enforceable property rights and the rule of law, access to universal health care plus the absence of high adult and infant mortality from conditions such as malaria, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and famine, people in relatively prosperous developed countries have been spared pangs of conscience associated with the physical necessity to steal scraps of food, bribe tax inspectors or police officers, and commit murder in guerrilla wars against corrupt government forces or rebel armies.[105] Roger Scruton has claimed that true understanding of conscience and its relationship with morality has been hampered by an "impetuous" belief that philosophical questions are solved through the analysis of language in an area where clarity threatens vested interests.[106] Susan Sontag similarly argued that it was a symptom of psychological immaturity not to recognise that many morally immature people willingly experience a form of delight, in some an erotic breaking of taboo, when witnessing violence, suffering and pain being inflicted on others.[107] Jonathan Glover wrote that most of us "do not spend our lives on endless landscape gardening of our self" and our conscience is likely shaped not so much by heroic struggles, as by choice of partner, friends and job, as well as where we choose to live.[108] Garrett Hardin, in a famous article called "The Tragedy of the Commons", argues that any instance in which society appeals to an individual exploiting a commons to restrain himself or herself for the general good—by means of his or her conscience—merely sets up a system which, by selectively diverting societal power and physical resources to those lacking in conscience, while fostering guilt (including anxiety about his or her individual contribution to over-population) in people acting upon it, actually works toward the elimination of conscience from the race.[109][110]

John Ralston Saul: consumers risk turning over their conscience to technical experts and to the ideology of free markets

John Ralston Saul expressed the view in The Unconscious Civilization that in contemporary developed nations many people have acquiesced in turning over their sense of right and wrong, their critical conscience, to technical experts; willingly restricting their moral freedom of choice to limited consumer actions ruled by the ideology of the free market, while citizen participation in public affairs is limited to the isolated act of voting and private-interest lobbying turns even elected representatives against the public interest.[111] Some argue on religious or philosophical grounds that it is blameworthy to act against conscience, even if the judgement of conscience is likely to be erroneous (say because it is inadequately informed about the facts, or prevailing moral (humanist or religious), professional ethical, legal and human rights norms).[112] Failure to acknowledge and accept that conscientious judgements can be seriously mistaken, may only promote situations where one's conscience is manipulated by others to provide unwarranted justifications for non-virtuous and selfish acts; indeed, insofar as it is appealed to as glorifying ideological content, and an associated extreme level of devotion, without adequate constraint of external, altruistic, normative justification, conscience may be considered morally blind and dangerous both to the individual concerned and humanity as a whole.[113] Langston argues that philosophers of virtue ethics have unnecessarily neglected conscience for, once conscience is trained so that the principles and rules it applies are those one would want all others to live by, its practise cultivates and sustains the virtues; indeed, amongst people in what each society considers to be the highest state of moral development there is little disagreement about how to act.[114] Emmanuel Levinas viewed conscience as a revelatory encountering of resistance to our selfish powers, developing morality by calling into question our naive sense of freedom of will to use such powers arbitrarily, or with violence, this process being more severe the more rigorously the goal of our self was to obtain control.[115] In other words, the welcoming of the Other, to Levinas, was the very essence of conscience properly conceived; it encouraged our ego to accept the fallibility of assuming things about other people, that selfish freedom of will "does not have the last word" and that realising this has a transcendent purpose: "I am not alone ... in conscience I Ethics or moral philosophy is the philosophical study of moral phenomena. It investigates normative questions about what people ought to do or which behavior is morally right. It is usually divided into three major fields: normative ethics, applied ethics, and metaethics. Normative ethics tries to discover and justify universal principles that govern how people should act in any situation. According to consequentialists, an act is right if it leads to the best consequences. Deontologists hold that morality consists in fulfilling duties, like telling the truth and keeping promises. Virtue theorists see the manifestation of virtues, like courage and compassion, as the fundamental principle of morality. Applied ethics examines concrete ethical problems in real-life situations, for example, by exploring the moral implications of the universal principles discovered in normative ethics within a specific domain. Bioethics studies moral issues associated with living organisms including humans, animals, and plants. Business ethics investigates how ethical principles apply to corporations, while professional ethics focuses on what is morally required of members of different professions. Metaethics is a metatheory that examines the underlying assumptions and concepts of ethics. It asks whether moral facts have mind-independent existence, whether moral statements can be true, how it is possible to acquire moral knowledge, and how moral judgments motivate people. Ethics is closely connected to value theory, which studies what value is and what types of value there are. Two related empirical fields are moral psychology, which investigates psychological moral processes, and descriptive ethics, which provides value-neutral descriptions of the dominant moral codes and beliefs in different societies. The history of ethics started in the ancient period with the development of ethical principles and theories in ancient Egypt, India, China, and Greece. During the medieval period, ethical thought was strongly influenced by religious teachings. In the modern period, this focus shifted to a more secular approach concerned with moral experience, practical reason, and the consequences of actions. An influential development in the 20th century was the emergence of metaethics.

Vincent van Gogh, 1890. Kröller-Müller Museum. The Good Samaritan (after Delacroix).

Conscience is a cognitive process that elicits emotion and rational associations based on an individual's moral philosophy or value system. Conscience stands in contrast to elicited emotion or thought due to associations based on immediate sensory perceptions and reflexive responses, as in sympathetic central nervous system responses. In common terms, conscience is often described as leading to feelings of remorse when a person commits an act that conflicts with their moral values. The extent to which conscience informs moral judgment before an action and whether such moral judgments are or should be based on reason has occasioned debate through much of modern history between theories of basics in ethic of human life in juxtaposition to the theories of romanticism and other reactionary movements after the end of the Middle Ages. Religious views of conscience usually see it as linked to a morality inherent in all humans, to a beneficent universe and/or to divinity. The diverse ritualistic, mythical, doctrinal, legal, institutional and material features of religion may not necessarily cohere with experiential, emotive, spiritual or contemplative considerations about the origin and operation of conscience.[116] Common secular or scientific views regard the capacity for conscience as probably genetically determined, with its subject probably learned or imprinted as part of a culture.[117] Commonly used metaphors for conscience include the "voice within", the "inner light",[52] or even Socrates' reliance on what the Greeks called his "daimōnic sign", an averting (ἀποτρεπτικός apotreptikos) inner voice heard only when he was about to make a mistake. Conscience, as is detailed in sections below, is a concept in national and international law,[118] is increasingly conceived of as applying to the world as a whole,[119] has motivated numerous notable acts for the public good[120] and been the subject of many prominent examples of literature, music and film.[121] Pages in category "Wikipedia fully protected redirects" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 1,652 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. (previous page) (next page)

Template:R fully protected – Template:– ' Template:' Template:'" 0–9 Wikipedia:1m-PR-en 2girls1cup 100 Players Who Shook The Kop Template:1911 Template:2000s-punk-album-stub Template:2000s-rock-single-stub Template:2002 NBA Draft 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict 2012 Nirbhaya case 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict 2015 Semenyih helicopter crash 2017 Formula One Season 2018 George Tooke Shield Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic Talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic/Current consensus 2022 FIBA U18 Women's Asian Championship 2023 Israel–Hamas war A A.C.M. Aaron carter Abhilasha Jeyarajah Help:About Wikipedia:About the Sandbox Wikipedia:Abuse filter Wikipedia:ACC Wikipedia:ACCOUNT ACE Flight 22 Template:Ad Wikipedia:ADMIN Template:Adminhelp Template:Administrators' noticeboard navbox all Wikipedia:Admins willing to make difficult blocks Template:Adminublock Adobe Photoshop Elements Adrianna Aelita Schaeffer Template:Aero specs missing Wikipedia:AES Template:Afc a Template:AFC comment Template:Afc r Template:AFC status/level Template:AFC submission/pending Template:AFC submission/tools Wikipedia:AFD Aggrotech Agnostic Ahwaz User:Akmal Hashim Kapat Akshay Kharodia Al Gore III Al-Ahli Arab Hospital bombing Alien (popular culture) Janet Allison User talk:Althordacron Aluminum American Sniper (film) controversies Template:American-English Wikipedia talk:AN Wikipedia:AN Wikipedia:AN/I Anal stretching Andrade (wrestler) Andrade Cien Almas Andreas Lubitz Andrew Speaker Angela Starling Angelika Kluk Anglo-Spanish War (1779-83) Anglo-Spanish War (1779–83) Wikipedia:ANI Template:Anime voice Annoying Orange (character) Anthony Bologna Anti flag Anti-Semitism Anti-Soviet Resistance by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army Apollo Justice Aquadon Arab Aramean-Syriac people Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Clerks/Noticeboard Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Notice Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence/Summary Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Preliminary statements User:Arccosecant User talk:Arccosecant Template:Arctiidae-stub Are You Ready (Hannah Montana song) Template:Are you sure? Areolae Aría Armando (blogger) Armando (Blogger) Armando Llorens Aroha Robinson Article merge Article wizard Article Wizard Wikipedia talk:Article wizard/Referencing Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Corey Delaney Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNAA Portal:Arts Arushi Arvanit Template:Asia in topic Assassination threats against Donald Trump Assyrians in Sweden Astrid Menks Template:Astronomy Template:Au-lang-stub Author-date system Autism Template:Auto archiving notice Template:AutoArchivingNotice Wikipedia:AUTOCONFIRM Automobile Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage Avraham Grant Wikipedia:AWB/T Awsten Knight Azerbaidzhan B Baca Ranch Bacterium Wikipedia:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense Wikipedia:Bad title Balls Barack obama Barrack Obama Barry Hinckley Basementalism Battle For The Sun (song) BB Guns Bearded Tit Jon Beavers Bedn Bedroom Boom Beef Tar Tar Template:Belgaum-geo-stub Ben Ownby Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI Wikipedia:BENEFITS Bengaluru Beth Houlbrooke Betrayer Beware of Dog (Farscape episode) Template:Big Big bang User:BiggestSataniaFanboy89 User:BiggestSataniaFangirl89 Bihar (India) Template:BIhills Bilal Ali (Vocalist) Draft:Bio Wikipedia:BIO Bitchy Bitch Black man Black person Black woman Black Yoshi Blackout (Britney Spears Album) Blah blah Blinky Bill's Extraordinary Excursion Blinky Bill’s Extraordinary Balloon Adventure Blue Whale Bob Dobbs BOCTAOE Bollywood Bollywood and plagiarism Bollywood films and plagiarism Talk:Bombay Bombay Template:Bookyr Boom Pictures Boris F. Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest Boston marathon bombings Boston, Massachusetts Template:BotTrialComplete Template:Botublock Bount Bozcaada Bozcaada (district) Template:Br list Bradford Patrick Bradley Manning Template:Braşov-geo-stub Bristol 1st Template:BritishColumbia-park-stub Brotherhood 2.0 Bryan Domani Bubble hash Bulgarian (ethnic) minority in Greece Talk:Bulgarian (ethnic) minority in Greece Bulgarian denied minority of Greece Bulgarian ethnic minority of Greece (previous page) (next page) Bryan Domani Bubble hash Bulgarian (ethnic) minority in Greece Talk:Bulgarian (ethnic) minority in Greece Bulgarian denied minority of Greece Bulgarian ethnic minority of Greece (previous page) (next page)

This category contains redirects that have been fully protected. Fully protected redirects are constructed for the purpose of preventing vandalism or edit warring, or in cases where the page title is unsuitable for an article, but may be a plausible search term, as an alternative to deleting the page. Full protection prevents a page from being edited except by administrators. Populating this category does not in and of itself protect the page. Actual page protection is engaged by administrators.

Human[122]
Temporal range: 0.300–0 Ma
Chibanianpresent
Adult humans, Thailand, 2007
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Suborder: Haplorhini
Infraorder: Simiiformes
Family: Hominidae
Subfamily: Homininae
Tribe: Hominini
Genus: Homo
Species:
H. sapiens
Binomial name
Homo sapiens
Linnaeus, 1758
Homo sapiens population density (2005)

Humans (Homo sapiens) or modern humans are the most common and widespread species of primate, and the last surviving species of the genus Homo. They are great apes characterized by their hairlessness, bipedalism, and high intelligence. Humans have large brains, enabling more advanced cognitive skills that enable them to thrive and adapt in varied environments, develop highly complex tools, and form complex social structures and civilizations. Humans are highly social, with individual humans tending to belong to a multi-layered network of cooperating, distinct, or even competing social groups – from families and peer groups to corporations and political states. As such, social interactions between humans have established a wide variety of values, social norms, languages, and traditions (collectively termed institutions), each of which bolsters human society. Humans are also highly curious: the desire to understand and influence phenomena has motivated humanity's development of science, technology, philosophy, mythology, religion, and other frameworks of knowledge; humans also study themselves through such domains as anthropology, social science, history, psychology, and medicine. As of January 2024, there are estimated to be more than 8 billion humans alive. Although some scientists equate the term "humans" with all members of the genus Homo, in common usage it generally refers to Homo sapiens, the only extant member. Extinct members of the genus Homo are known as archaic humans, and the term "modern human" is used to distinguish Homo sapiens from archaic humans. Anatomically modern humans emerged around 300,000 years ago in Africa, evolving from Homo heidelbergensis or a similar species. Migrating out of Africa, they gradually replaced and interbred with local populations of archaic humans. Multiple hypotheses for the extinction of archaic human species such as Neanderthals include competition, violence, interbreeding with Homo sapiens, or inability to adapt to climate change. For most of their history, humans were nomadic hunter-gatherers. Humans began exhibiting behavioral modernity about 160,000–60,000 years ago. The Neolithic Revolution, which began in Southwest Asia around 13,000 years ago (and separately in a few other places), saw the emergence of agriculture and permanent human settlement; in turn, this led to the development of civilization and kickstarted a period of continuous (and ongoing) population growth and rapid technological change. Since then, a number of civilizations have risen and fallen, while a number of sociocultural and technological developments have resulted in significant changes to the human lifestyle. Genes and the environment influence human biological variation in visible characteristics, physiology, disease susceptibility, mental abilities, body size, and life span. Though humans vary in many traits (such as genetic predispositions and physical features), humans are among the least genetically diverse primates. Any two humans are at least 99% genetically similar. Humans are sexually dimorphic: generally, males have greater body strength and females have a higher body fat percentage. At puberty, humans develop secondary sex characteristics. Females are capable of pregnancy, usually between puberty, at around 12 years old, and menopause, around the age of 50. Humans are omnivorous, capable of consuming a wide variety of plant and animal material, and have used fire and other forms of heat to prepare and cook food since the time of Homo erectus. Humans can survive for up to eight weeks without food and several days without water. Humans are generally diurnal, sleeping on average seven to nine hours per day. Childbirth is dangerous, with a high risk of complications and death. Often, both the mother and the father provide care for their children, who are helpless at birth. Humans have a large, highly developed, and complex prefrontal cortex, the region of the brain associated with higher cognition. Humans are highly intelligent and capable of episodic memory; they have flexible facial expressions, self-awareness, and a theory of mind. The human mind is capable of introspection, private thought, imagination, volition, and forming views on existence. This has allowed great technological advancements and complex tool development through complex reasoning and the transmission of knowledge to subsequent generations through language. Humans' advanced technology has enabled them to spread to all the continents of the globe as well as to outer space, and to command profound influence on the biosphere and environment. The latter has prompted some geologists to demarcate the time from the emergence of human civilization till present as a separate geological epoch: the Anthropocene (with anthropo- deriving from the Ancient Greek word for "human", ἄνθρωπος).

Dogs and sheep were among the first animals to be domesticated, at least 15,000 and 11,000 years ago respectively.[123]
Rice was domesticated in China, some 13,500 to 8,200 years ago.[124]

Domestication is a multi-generational mutualistic relationship between humans and other organisms, in which humans took over control and care to obtain a steady supply of resources including food. The process was gradual and geographically diffuse, based on trial and error. The first animal to be domesticated was the dog, as a commensal, at least 15,000 years ago. Other animals including goat, sheep, and cow were domesticated starting around 11,000 years ago. Among birds, the chicken was domesticated in East Asia, seemingly for cockfighting, some 7,000 years ago. The horse came under domestication around 5,500 years ago in central Asia as a working animal. Among invertebrates, the silkworm and the western honey bee were domesticated over 5,000 years ago for silk and honey, respectively. The domestication of plants began around 13,000–11,000 years ago with cereals such as wheat and barley in the Middle East, alongside crops such as lentil, pea, chickpea, and flax. Rice was first cultivated in China some 13,500 to 8,200 years ago. Beginning around 10,000 years ago, Indigenous peoples in the Americas began to cultivate peanuts, squash, maize, potatoes, cotton, and cassava. In Africa, crops such as sorghum were domesticated. Agriculture developed in some 13 centres around the world, domesticating different crops and animals. Domestication affected genes for behavior in animals, making them less aggressive. In plants, domestication affected genes for morphology, such as increasing seed size and stopping the shattering of seed-heads such as in wheat. Such changes both make domesticated organisms easier to handle, and reduce their ability to survive in the wild.

Dog
Temporal range: 0.0142–0 Ma
Late Pleistocene to present[125]
Domesticated
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Family: Canidae
Genus: Canis
Species:
C. familiaris
Binomial name
Canis familiaris
Synonyms[127]
List
  • C. aegyptius Linnaeus, 1758
  • C. alco C. E. H. Smith, 1839,
  • C. americanus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. anglicus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. antarcticus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. aprinus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. aquaticus Linnaeus, 1758
  • C. aquatilis Gmelin, 1792
  • C. avicularis Gmelin, 1792
  • C. borealis C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. brevipilis Gmelin, 1792
  • C. cursorius Gmelin, 1792
  • C. domesticus Linnaeus, 1758
  • C. extrarius Gmelin, 1792
  • C. ferus C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. fricator Gmelin, 1792
  • C. fricatrix Linnaeus, 1758
  • C. fuillus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. gallicus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. glaucus C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. graius Linnaeus, 1758
  • C. grajus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. hagenbecki Krumbiegel, 1950
  • C. haitensis C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. hibernicus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. hirsutus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. hybridus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. islandicus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. italicus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. laniarius Gmelin, 1792
  • C. leoninus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. leporarius C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. lupus familiaris Linnaeus,1758
  • C. major Gmelin, 1792
  • C. mastinus Linnaeus, 1758
  • C. melitacus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. melitaeus Linnaeus, 1758
  • C. minor Gmelin, 1792
  • C. molossus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. mustelinus Linnaeus, 1758
  • C. obesus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. orientalis Gmelin, 1792
  • C. pacificus C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. plancus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. pomeranus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. sagaces C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. sanguinarius C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. sagax Linnaeus, 1758
  • C. scoticus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. sibiricus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. suillus C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. terraenovae C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. terrarius C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. turcicus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. urcani C. E. H. Smith, 1839
  • C. variegatus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. venaticus Gmelin, 1792
  • C. vertegus Gmelin, 1792

The dog (Canis familiaris[128][129] or Canis lupus familiaris[129]) is a domesticated descendant of the wolf. Also called the domestic dog, it is derived from extinct gray wolves,[130][131] and the gray wolf is the dog's closest living relative.[132] The dog was the first species to be domesticated[133][132] by humans. Hunter-gatherers did this over 15,000 years ago in Oberkassel, Bonn,[131] which was before the development of agriculture.[125] Due to their long association with humans, dogs have expanded to a large number of domestic individuals[134] and gained the ability to thrive on a starch-rich diet that would be inadequate for other canids.[135] The dog has been selectively bred over millennia for various behaviors, sensory capabilities, and physical attributes.[136] Dog breeds vary widely in shape, size, and color. They perform many roles for humans, such as hunting, herding, pulling loads, protection, assisting police and the military, companionship, therapy, and aiding disabled people. Over the millennia, dogs became uniquely adapted to human behavior, and the human–canine bond has been a topic of frequent study.[137] This influence on human society has given them the sobriquet of "man's best friend".[138]

Cell
Onion (Allium cepa) root cells in different phases of the cell cycle (drawn by E. B. Wilson, 1900)
A eukaryotic cell (left) and prokaryotic cell (right)
Anatomical terminology

The cell is the basic structural and functional unit of all forms of life. Every cell consists of cytoplasm enclosed within a membrane, and contains many macromolecules such as proteins, DNA and RNA, as well as many small molecules of nutrients and metabolites.[139] The term comes from the Latin word cellula meaning 'small room'.[140] Cells can acquire specified function and carry out various tasks within the cell such as replication, DNA repair, protein synthesis, and motility. Cells are capable of specialization and mobility within the cell. Most plant and animal cells are only visible under a light microscope, with dimensions between 1 and 100 micrometres.[141] Electron microscopy gives a much higher resolution showing greatly detailed cell structure. Organisms can be classified as unicellular (consisting of a single cell such as bacteria) or multicellular (including plants and animals).[142] Most unicellular organisms are classed as microorganisms. The study of cells and how they work has led to many other studies in related areas of biology, including: discovery of DNA, cancer systems biology, aging and developmental biology. Cell biology is the study of cells, which were discovered by Robert Hooke in 1665, who named them for their resemblance to cells inhabited by Christian monks in a monastery.[143][144] Cell theory, first developed in 1839 by Matthias Jakob Schleiden and Theodor Schwann, states that all organisms are composed of one or more cells, that cells are the fundamental unit of structure and function in all living organisms, and that all cells come from pre-existing cells.[145] Cells emerged on Earth about 4 billion years ago.[146][147][148][149]

Sandbox
Temporal range: 5.332–0 Ma Miocene to present[150]
1st row: wolf (C. lupus),
dog (C. familiaris);
2nd row: red wolf (C. rufus),
eastern wolf (C. lycaon);
3rd row: coyote (C. latrans),
golden jackal (C. aureus);
4th row: Ethiopian wolf (C. simensis),
African wolf (C. lupaster).
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Family: Canidae
Subfamily: Caninae
Tribe: Canini
Subtribe: Canina
Genus: Canis
Linnaeus, 1758[126]
Type species
Canis familiaris
Linnaeus, 1758
Species

Extant:

Extinct:

Canis is a genus of the Caninae which includes multiple extant species, such as wolves, dogs, coyotes, and golden jackals. Species of this genus are distinguished by their moderate to large size, their massive, well-developed skulls and dentition, long legs, and comparatively short ears and tails.[151]

Pyramid of Neferirkare
The prominent but crumbling remains of a pyramid, with its original, well-preserved stepped structure exposed underneath the rubble
Neferirkare Kakai
Coordinates29°53′42″N 31°12′09″E / 29.89500°N 31.20250°E / 29.89500; 31.20250
Ancient name
<
N5F35D4
D28
>G29O24
[152]
Bꜣ Nfr-ỉr-kꜣ-Rꜥ
Ba Nefer-ir-ka-Re
"Ba Neferirkare"
Alternatively translated as "Neferirkare takes form"[153]
ConstructedFifth Dynasty (c. 25th century BC)
TypeStep pyramid (originally)
True pyramid (converted)
MaterialLimestone[154]
Height52 metres (171 ft; 99 cu)[155]
(Step pyramid)
72.8 metres (239 ft; 139 cu)[156] (True pyramid, original)
Base72 metres (236 ft; 137 cu)[155] (Step pyramid)
105 metres (344 ft; 200 cu)[156] (True pyramid)
Volume257,250 m3 (336,470 cu yd)[157]
Slope76°[155] (Step pyramid)
54°30′[156] (True pyramid)
Sandbox is located in Lower Egypt
Sandbox
Location within Lower Egypt

The pyramid of Neferirkare (Egyptian: Bꜣ Nfr-ỉr-kꜣ-rꜥ "the Ba of Neferirkare"[156]) was built for the Fifth Dynasty pharaoh Neferirkare Kakai in the 25th century BC.[158][a] It was the tallest structure on the highest site at the necropolis of Abusir, found between Giza and Saqqara, and still towers over the necropolis. The pyramid is also significant because its excavation led to the discovery of the Abusir Papyri. The Fifth Dynasty marked the end of the great pyramid constructions during the Old Kingdom. Pyramids of the era were smaller and becoming more standardized, though intricate relief decoration also proliferated. Neferirkare's pyramid deviated from convention as it was originally built as a step pyramid: a design that had been antiquated after the Third Dynasty (26th or 27th century BC).[b] This was then encased in a second step pyramid with alterations intended to convert it into a true pyramid;[c] However, the pharaoh's death left the work to be completed by his successors. The remaining works were completed in haste, using cheaper building material. Because of the circumstances, Neferirkare's monument lacked several basic elements of a pyramid complex: a valley temple, a causeway, and a cult pyramid. Instead, these were replaced by a small settlement of mudbrick houses south of the monument from where cult priests could conduct their daily activities, rather than the usual pyramid town near the valley temple. The discovery of the Abusir papyri in the 1890s is owed to this. Normally, the papyrus archives would have been contained in the pyramid town where their destruction would have been assured. The pyramid became part of a greater family cemetery. The monuments to Neferirkare's consort, Khentkaus II; and his sons, Neferefre and Nyuserre Ini, are found in the surrounds. Though their construction began under different rulers, all four of these monuments were completed during the reign of Nyuserre.

Template:Featured article is only for Wikipedia:Featured articles.

Wolf
Temporal range:
Middle Pleistocene – present (810,000–0 YBP)[169]
Eurasian wolf (Canis lupus lupus) at Polar Park in Bardu, Norway
CITES Appendix II (CITES)[171][d]
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Family: Canidae
Genus: Canis
Species:
C. lupus
Binomial name
Canis lupus
Subspecies

See Subspecies of Canis lupus

Global wolf range based on IUCN's 2018 assessment.[170]

The wolf (Canis lupus;[e] pl.: wolves), also known as the gray wolf or grey wolf, is a large canine native to Eurasia and North America. More than thirty subspecies of Canis lupus have been recognized, including the dog and dingo, though gray wolves, as popularly understood, only comprise naturally-occurring wild subspecies. The wolf is the largest extant member of the family Canidae, and is further distinguished from other Canis species by its less pointed ears and muzzle, as well as a shorter torso and a longer tail. The wolf is nonetheless related closely enough to smaller Canis species, such as the coyote and the golden jackal, to produce fertile hybrids with them. The wolf's fur is usually mottled white, brown, gray, and black, although subspecies in the arctic region may be nearly all white. Of all members of the genus Canis, the wolf is most specialized for cooperative game hunting as demonstrated by its physical adaptations to tackling large prey, its more social nature, and its highly advanced expressive behaviour, including individual or group howling. It travels in nuclear families consisting of a mated pair accompanied by their offspring. Offspring may leave to form their own packs on the onset of sexual maturity and in response to competition for food within the pack. Wolves are also territorial, and fights over territory are among the principal causes of mortality. The wolf is mainly a carnivore and feeds on large wild hooved mammals as well as smaller animals, livestock, carrion, and garbage. Single wolves or mated pairs typically have higher success rates in hunting than do large packs. Pathogens and parasites, notably the rabies virus, may infect wolves. The global wild wolf population was estimated to be 300,000 in 2003 and is considered to be of Least Concern by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Wolves have a long history of interactions with humans, having been despised and hunted in most pastoral communities because of their attacks on livestock, while conversely being respected in some agrarian and hunter-gatherer societies. Although the fear of wolves exists in many human societies, the majority of recorded attacks on people have been attributed to animals suffering from rabies. Wolf attacks on humans are rare because wolves are relatively few, live away from people, and have developed a fear of humans because of their experiences with hunters, farmers, ranchers, and shepherds.

Copenhagen
København (Danish)
City of Copenhagen
Byen København (Danish)
Copenhagen is located in Denmark
Copenhagen
Copenhagen
Location within Denmark
Copenhagen is located in Scandinavia
Copenhagen
Copenhagen
Location within Scandinavia
Copenhagen is located in Europe
Copenhagen
Copenhagen
Location within Europe
Coordinates: 55°40′34″N 12°34′06″E / 55.67611°N 12.56833°E / 55.67611; 12.56833{{#coordinates:}}: cannot have more than one primary tag per page
Country Denmark
Region Capital
Municipalities Copenhagen
Dragør
Frederiksberg
Tårnby
Area
 • City90.01 km2 (34.75 sq mi)
 • Urban
525.50 km2 (202.90 sq mi)
 • Metro
3,371.80 km2 (1,301.86 sq mi)
 • Øresund Region20,754.63 km2 (8,013.41 sq mi)
Highest elevation
91 m (299 ft)
Lowest elevation
1 m (3 ft)
Population
 (1 July 2022)[175][176][177][178]
 • City660,842
 • Density7,298/km2 (18,900/sq mi)
 • Urban
1,366,301
 • Urban density2,560.54/km2 (6,631.8/sq mi)
 • Metro
2,135,634
 • Metro density633.38/km2 (1,640.4/sq mi)
 • Øresund Region
4,136,082
 • Øresund Region density199.28/km2 (516.1/sq mi)
DemonymCopenhagener[179]
Time zoneUTC+01:00 (CET)
 • Summer (DST)UTC+02:00 (CEST)
Postal code
1050–1778, 2100, 2150, 2200, 2300, 2400, 2450, 2500
Area code(+45) 3
Websiteinternational.kk.dk

Copenhagen (/ˌkpənˈhɡən, -ˈhɑː-/ KOH-pən-HAY-gən, -⁠HAH- or /ˈkpənhɡən, -hɑː-/ KOH-pən-hay-gən, -⁠hah-;[181] Danish: København [kʰøpm̩ˈhɑwˀn] ) is the capital and most populous city of Denmark, with a population of around 660,000 in the municipality and 1.4 million in the urban area.[182][183] The city is on the islands of Zealand and Amager, separated from Malmö, Sweden, by the Øresund strait. The Øresund Bridge connects the two cities by rail and road. Originally a Viking fishing village established in the 10th century in the vicinity of what is now Gammel Strand, Copenhagen became the capital of Denmark in the early 15th century. From the 17th century, it became a regional centre of power with its institutions, defences, and armed forces. During the Renaissance the city was the de facto capital of the Kalmar Union and the seat of monarchy, governing most of the present day Nordic region in a union with Sweden and Norway ruled by the Danish monarch serving as the head of state. The city flourished as the cultural and economic centre of Scandinavia under the union for over 120 years, from the 15th century until the early 16th century when Sweden left the union through a rebellion. After a plague outbreak and fire in the 18th century, the city underwent redevelopment. This included construction of the prestigious district of Frederiksstaden and founding cultural institutions including the Royal Theatre and the Royal Academy of Fine Arts. After disasters in the early 19th century when the British Royal Navy attacked the Dano-Norwegian fleet and bombarded the city, rebuilding during the Danish Golden Age brought a Neoclassical look to Copenhagen's architecture. After the Second World War, the Finger Plan fostered the development of housing and businesses along the five urban railway routes emanating from the city centre. Since the turn of the 21st century, Copenhagen has seen strong urban and cultural development, facilitated by investment in its institutions and infrastructure. The city is the cultural, economic and governmental centre of Denmark; it is one of the major financial centres of Northern Europe with the Copenhagen Stock Exchange. Copenhagen's economy has developed rapidly in the service sector, especially through initiatives in information technology, pharmaceuticals and clean technology. Since the completion of the Øresund Bridge, Copenhagen has increasingly integrated with the Swedish province of Scania and its largest city, Malmö, forming the Øresund Region. With several bridges connecting the various districts, the cityscape is characterised by parks, promenades, and waterfronts. Copenhagen's landmarks such as Tivoli Gardens, The Little Mermaid statue, the Amalienborg and Christiansborg palaces, Rosenborg Castle, Frederik's Church, Børsen and many museums, restaurants and nightclubs are significant tourist attractions. Copenhagen is home to the University of Copenhagen, the Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen Business School, and the IT University of Copenhagen. The University of Copenhagen, founded in 1479, is the oldest university in Denmark. Copenhagen is home to the football clubs F.C. Copenhagen and Brøndby IF. The annual Copenhagen Marathon was established in 1980. Copenhagen is one of the most bicycle-friendly cities in the world. Movia is the public mass transit company serving all of eastern Denmark, except Bornholm. The Copenhagen Metro, launched in 2002, serves central Copenhagen. Additionally, the Copenhagen S-train, the Lokaltog (private railway), and the Coast Line network serve and connect central Copenhagen to outlying boroughs. Serving roughly 2.5 million passengers a month, Copenhagen Airport, Kastrup, is the busiest airport in the Nordic countries.

Template:Good article is only for Wikipedia:Good articles.

Sappho and Erinna in a Garden at Mytilene by Simeon Solomon, 1864
Symbol representing lesbian made from two interlocked astronomical symbols for the planet Venus. In biology, the singular symbol represents the female sex.[184][185]

A lesbian is a homosexual woman or girl.[186][187][188] The word is also used for women in relation to their sexual identity or sexual behavior, regardless of sexual orientation, or as an adjective to characterize or associate nouns with female homosexuality or same-sex attraction.[189][190] The concept of "lesbian" to differentiate women with a shared sexual orientation evolved in the 20th century. Throughout history, women have not had the same freedom or independence as men to pursue homosexual relationships, but neither have they met the same harsh punishment as gay men in some societies. Instead, lesbian relationships have often been regarded as harmless, unless a participant attempts to assert privileges traditionally enjoyed by men. As a result, little in history was documented to give an accurate description of how female homosexuality was expressed. When early sexologists in the late 19th century began to categorize and describe homosexual behavior, hampered by a lack of knowledge about homosexuality or women's sexuality, they distinguished lesbians as women who did not adhere to female gender roles. They classified them as mentally ill—a designation which has been reversed since the late 20th century in the global scientific community. Women in homosexual relationships in Europe and the United States responded to the discrimination and repression either by hiding their personal lives, or accepting the label of outcast and creating a subculture and identity. Following World War II, during a period of social repression when governments actively persecuted homosexuals, women developed networks to socialize with and educate each other. Gaining greater economic and social freedom allowed them to determine how they could form relationships and families. With second-wave feminism and the growth of scholarship in women's history and sexuality in the late 20th century, the definition of lesbian broadened, leading to debate about the term's use. While research by Lisa M. Diamond identified sexual desire as the core component for defining lesbians,[191][f] some women who engage in same-sex sexual activity may reject not only identifying as lesbians but as bisexual as well. Other women's self-identification as lesbian may not align with their sexual orientation or sexual behavior. Sexual identity is not necessarily the same as one's sexual orientation or sexual behavior, due to various reasons, such as the fear of identifying their sexual orientation in a homophobic setting. Portrayals of lesbians in the media suggest that society at large has been simultaneously intrigued and threatened by women who challenge feminine gender roles, as well as fascinated and appalled with women who are romantically involved with other women. Women who adopt a lesbian identity share experiences that form an outlook similar to an ethnic identity: as homosexuals, they are unified by the heterosexist discrimination and potential rejection they face from their families, friends, and others as a result of homophobia. As women, they face concerns separate from men. Lesbians may encounter distinct physical or mental health concerns arising from discrimination, prejudice, and minority stress. Political conditions and social attitudes also affect the formation of lesbian relationships and families in the open.

test

  1. ^ McDonough, Jimmy (2006). Big Bosoms and Square Jaws: The Biography of Russ Meyer, King of the Sex Film. Three Rivers Press. pp. 294–295. ISBN 978-0307338440.
  2. ^ Winn, Philip (2003). Dictionary of Biological Psychology. Routledge. p. 1189. ISBN 9781134778157. Archived from the original on 27 February 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2019.
  3. ^ a b c See 133–135 Archived April 2, 2016, at Wikiwix for orgasm information, and page 76 Archived February 27, 2023, at the Wayback Machine for G-spot and vaginal nerve ending information. Rosenthal, Martha (2012). Human Sexuality: From Cells to Society. Cengage. ISBN 978-0618755714.
  4. ^ Exton MS, Krüger TH, Koch M, et al. (April 2001). "Coitus-induced orgasm stimulates prolactin secretion in healthy subjects". Psychoneuroendocrinology. 26 (3): 287–94. doi:10.1016/S0306-4530(00)00053-6. PMID 11166491. S2CID 21416299.
  5. ^ Wayne Weiten; Dana S. Dunn; Elizabeth Yost Hammer (2011). Psychology Applied to Modern Life: Adjustment in the 21st Century. Cengage. p. 386. ISBN 978-1-111-18663-0. Archived from the original on 26 February 2023. Retrieved 5 January 2012.
  6. ^
     • O'Connell HE, Sanjeevan KV, Hutson JM (October 2005). "Anatomy of the clitoris". The Journal of Urology. 174 (4 Pt 1): 1189–95. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000173639.38898.cd. PMID 16145367. S2CID 26109805.
     • Sharon Mascall (11 June 2006). "Time for rethink on the clitoris". BBC News. Archived from the original on 9 September 2019. Retrieved 31 October 2009.
  7. ^ "A Case Of Female Orgasm Without Genital Stimulation - PMC". National Library of Medicine. 24 February 2022. Retrieved 3 February 2023.
  8. ^ Georgiadis JR, Reinders AA, Paans AM, Renken R, Kortekaas R (October 2009). "Men versus women on sexual brain function: prominent differences during tactile genital stimulation, but not during orgasm". Human Brain Mapping. 30 (10): 3089–101. doi:10.1002/hbm.20733. PMC 6871190. PMID 19219848.
  9. ^ "Frequently Asked Sexuality Questions to the Kinsey Institute: Orgasm". iub.edu/~kinsey/resources. Archived from the original on 5 January 2012. Retrieved 3 January 2012.
  10. ^ Geoffrey Miller (2011). The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. Random House Digital. pp. 238–239. ISBN 978-0307813749. Archived from the original on 27 February 2023. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
  11. ^ Wallen K, Lloyd EA.; Lloyd (May 2011). "Female sexual arousal: genital anatomy and orgasm in intercourse". Hormones and Behavior. 59 (5): 780–92. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.12.004. PMC 3894744. PMID 21195073. Archived from the original on 5 November 2021. Retrieved 31 August 2018.
  12. ^ Cite error: The named reference Zwiebach2022 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  13. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Ethell p. 12 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  14. ^ "Ireland Air Force"; Archived 1 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine. aeroflight.co. Retrieved 27 September 2009.
  15. ^ Cite error: The named reference Ethell p. 117 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  16. ^ Ninian Smart. The World's Religions: Old Traditions and Modern Transformations. Cambridge University Press. 1989. p. 382
  17. ^ Shankara. Crest-Jewel of Discrimination (Veka-Chudamani) (trans Prabhavananda S and Isherwood C). Vedanta Press, Hollywood. 1978. pp. 34–36, 136–37.
  18. ^ Shankara. Crest-Jewel of Discrimination (Veka-Chudamani) (trans Prabhavananda S and Isherwood C). Vedanta Press, Hollywood. 1978. p. 119.
  19. ^ John B Noss. Man's Religions. Macmillan. New York. 1968. p. 477.
  20. ^ AS Cua. Moral Vision and Tradition: Essays in Chinese Ethics. Catholic University of America Press. Washington. 1998.
  21. ^ Jayne Hoose (ed) Conscience in World Religions. University of Notre Dame Press. 1990.
  22. ^ Ninian Smart. The Religious Experience of Mankind. Fontana. 1971 p. 118.
  23. ^ Santideva. The Bodhicaryavatara. trans Crosby K and Skilton A. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1995. pp. 38, 98
  24. ^ Lama Anagarika Govinda in Jeffery Paine (ed) Adventures with the Buddha: A Buddhism Reader. WW Norton. London. pp. 92–93.
  25. ^ "Steps Along the Path". www.accesstoinsight.org. Retrieved 13 December 2022.
  26. ^ Marcus Aurelius. Meditations. Gregory Hays (trans). Weidenfeld and & Nicolson. London. 2003 pp. 70, 75.
  27. ^ Sachiko Murata and William C. Chittick. The Vision of Islam. I. B. Tauris. 2000. ISBN 1-86064-022-2 pp. 282–85
  28. ^ Ames Ambros and Stephan Procházka. A Concise Dictionary of Koranic Arabic. Reichert Verlag 2004. ISBN 3-89500-400-6 p. 294.
  29. ^ Azim Nanji. 'Islamic Ethics' in Singer P (ed). A Companion to Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford 1995. p. 108.
  30. ^ John B Noss. Man's Religions. The Macmillan Company, New York. 1968 Ch. 16 pp. 758–59
  31. ^ Marshall G. S. Hodgson. The Venture of Islam, Volume 1: The Classical Age of Islam. University of Chicago Press. 1975 ISBN 978-0-226-34686-1. Winner of Ralph Waldo Emerson Prize.
  32. ^ Tillich, Paul (1963). Morality and Beyond. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers. p. 69.
  33. ^ Calvin, Institutes of the Christian religion, Book 2, chapter 8, quoted in:Wogaman, J. Pilip (1993). Christian ethics: a historical introduction. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster/John Knox Press. pp. 119, 340. ISBN 978-0-664-25163-5. the enemies who rise up in our conscience against his Kingdom and hinder his decrees prove that God's throne is not firmly established therein.
  34. ^ Ninian Smart. The World's Religions: Old Traditions and Modern Transformations. Cambridge University Press. 1989. p. 376
  35. ^ Ninian Smart. The World's Religions: Old Traditions and Modern Transformations. Cambridge University Press. 1989. p. 364
  36. ^ Brian Moynahan. William Tyndale: If God Spare My Life. Abacus. London. 2003 pp. 249–50
  37. ^ Ninian Smart. The World's Religions: Old Traditions and Modern Transformations. Cambridge University Press. 1989. p. 353
  38. ^ Guthrie D, Motyer JA, Stibbs AM, Wiseman DLJ (eds). New Bible Commentary 3rd ed. Inter-Varsity Press, Leicester. 1989. p. 905.
  39. ^ Robert Graves. The Greek Myths: 2 (London: Penguin, 1960). p. 380
  40. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church – English translation (U.S., 2nd edition) (English translation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church: Modifications from the Editio Typica, copyright 1997, United States Catholic Conference, Inc. – Libreria Editrice Vaticana) (Glossary and Index Analyticus, copyright 2000, U.S. Catholic Conference, Inc.). ISBN 1-57455-110-8 paragraph 1778
  41. ^ Vatican Council II: The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents. Collegeville: The Liturgical Press 1992. Gaudium and Spes 16. Cfr. Joseph Ratzinger, On Conscience, San Francisco: Ignatius Press 2007
  42. ^ "Whispers in the Loggia: "Jesus Always Invites Us. He Does Not Impose."". Retrieved 13 December 2022.
  43. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph 1782
  44. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph 1790–91
  45. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph 1792
  46. ^ Samuel Willard Crompton, "Thomas More: And His Struggles of Conscience" (Chelsea House Publications, 2006); Marc D. Guerra, 'Thomas More's Correspondence on Conscience', in: Religion & Liberty 10(2010)6 <https://acton.org/thomas-mores-correspondence-conscience>; Prof. Gerald Wegemer, "Integrity and Conscience in the Life and Thought of Thomas More" [21 aug. 2006]<http://thomasmoreinstitute.org.uk/papers/integrity-and-conscience-in-the-life-and-thought-of-thomas-more/>; http://sacredheartmercy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/A-Reflection-on-Conscience.pdf Archived 11 September 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  47. ^ Newman, John Henry (1887). An essay in aid of a grammar of assent. Saint Mary's College of California. London : Longmans, Green.
  48. ^ "Newman Reader - Letter to the Duke of Norfolk - Section 5". www.newmanreader.org. Retrieved 13 December 2022.
  49. ^ Harold H Schulweis. Conscience: The Duty to Obey and the Duty to Disobey. Jewish Lights Publishing. 2008.
  50. ^ Ninian Smart. The Religious Experience of Mankind. Collins. NY. 1969 pp. 395–400.
  51. ^ Levi Meier (Ed.) Conscience and Autonomy within Judaism: A Special Issue of the Journal of Psychology and Judaism. Springer-Verlag. New York ISBN 978-0-89885-364-3.
  52. ^ a b Rosemary Moore. The Light in Their Consciences: The Early Quakers in Britain 1646–1666. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA. 2000. ISBN 978-0-271-01988-8,
  53. ^ Gilkes, Peter (July 2004). "Masonic ritual: Spoilt for choice". Masonic Quarterly Magazine (10). Retrieved 7 May 2007.
  54. ^ Manning Clark. The Quest for Grace. Penguin Books, Ringwood. 1991 p. 220.
  55. ^ Aylmer Maude. Introduction to Leo Tolstoy. On Life and Essays on Religion (A Maude trans) Oxford University Press. London. 1950 (repr) pxv.
  56. ^ Najm, Sami M. (1966). "The Place and Function of Doubt in the Philosophies of Descartes and Al-Ghazali". Philosophy East and West. 16 (3–4): 133–41. doi:10.2307/1397536. JSTOR 1397536.
  57. ^ Nader El-Bizri. "Avicenna's De Anima between Aristotle and Husserl" in Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka (ed) The Passions of the Soul in the Metamorphosis of Becoming. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht 2003 pp. 67–89.
  58. ^ Henry Sidgwick. Outlines of the History of Ethics. Macmillan. London. 1960 pp. 145, 150.
  59. ^ a b Rurak, James (1980). "Butler's Analogy: A Still Interesting Synthesis of Reason and Revelation", Anglican Theological Review 62 (October) pp. 365–81
  60. ^ a b Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Ethics. Eberhard Bethge (ed.) Neville Horton Smith (trans.) Collins. London 1963 p. 24
  61. ^ Spinoza. Ethics. Everyman's Library JM Dent, London. 1948. Part 2 proposition 35. Part 3 proposition 11.
  62. ^ Spinoza. Ethics. Everyman's Library JM Dent, London. 1948. Part 4 proposition 59, Part 5 proposition 30
  63. ^ Roger Scruton. "Spinoza" in Raphael F and Monk R (eds). The Great Philosophers. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. London. 2000. p. 141.
  64. ^ Richard L Gregory. The Oxford Companion to the Mind. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 1987 p. 308.
  65. ^ Georg Hegel. Philosophy of Right. Knox TM trans, Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1942. para 137.
  66. ^ Joseph Butler "Sermons" in The Works of Joseph Butler. (Gladstone WE ed), Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1896, Vol II p. 71.
  67. ^ Henry Sidgwick. Outlines of the History of Ethics. Macmillan, London. 1960 pp. 196–97.
  68. ^ John Selden. Table Talk. Garnett R, Valee L and Brandl A (eds) The Book of Literature: A Comprehensive Anthology. The Grolier Society. Toronto. 1923. Vol 14. p. 67.
  69. ^ Arthur Schopenhauer. The World as Will and Idea. Vol 1. Routledge and Kegan Paul. London. 1948. pp. 387, 482. "I believe that the influence of the Sanskrit literature will penetrate not less deeply than did the revival of Greek literature in the 15th century." p xiii.
  70. ^ Kant I. "The Noble Descent of Duty" in P Singer (ed). Ethics. Oxford University Press. NY 1994 p. 41.
  71. ^ Kant I. "The Categorical Imperative" in P Singer (ed). Ethics. Oxford University Press. NY 1994 p. 274.
  72. ^ Kant I. "The Doctrine of Virtue" in Metaphyics and Morals. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 1991. pp. 183 and 233–34.
  73. ^ John Plamenatz. Man and Society. Vol 1. Longmans. London. 1963 p. 383.
  74. ^ Hill T Jr "Four Conceptions of Conscience" in Shapiro I and Adams R. Integrity and Conscience. New York University Press, New York 1998 p. 31.
  75. ^ Roger Woolhouse. Locke: A Biography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2007. p. 53.
  76. ^ John Locke. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Dover Publications. New York. 1959. ISBN 0-486-20530-4. Vol 1. ch II. pp. 71-72fn1.
  77. ^ Thomas Hobbes. Leviathan (Molesworth W ed) J Bohn. London, 1837 Pt 2. Ch 29 p. 311.
  78. ^ William Godwin. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. Codell Carter K (ed), Clarendon Press. Oxford. 1971 Appendix III 'Thoughts on Man' Essay XI 'Of Self Love and Benevolence' p. 338.
  79. ^ Adam Smith. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Part III, section ii, Ch III in Rogers K (ed) Self Interest: An Anthology of Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge. London. 1997 p. 151.
  80. ^ a b John Stuart Mill. "Considerations on Representative Government". Ch VI. In Rogers K (ed) Self Interest: An Anthology of Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge. London. 1997 pp. 193–94
  81. ^ John K Roth (ed). The Philosophy of Josiah Royce. Thomas Y Crowell Co. New York. 1971 pp. 302–15.
  82. ^ Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Ethics. (Eberhard Bethge (ed) Neville Horton Smith (trans) Collins. London 1963 p. 242
  83. ^ a b Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Ethics. (Eberhard Bethge (ed) Neville Horton Smith (trans) Collins. London 1963 p. 66
  84. ^ Simon Soloveychik. Parenting For Everyone. Ch 12 "A Chapter on Conscience" Archived 16 May 2007 at the Wayback Machine. 1986. Retrieved 23 October 2009.
  85. ^ Hannah Arendt. Crises of the Republic. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. New York. 1972 p. 62.
  86. ^ John Stuart Mill. "Utilitarianism" and "On Liberty" in Collected Works. University of Toronto Press. Toronto. 1969 Vols 10 and 18. Ch 3. pp. 228–29 and 263.
  87. ^ a b Hannah Arendt. The Life of the Mind. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. 1978. p. 191.
  88. ^ Hannah Arendt. The Life of the Mind. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. 1978. p. 190.
  89. ^ Einstein, A. (1940). "Science and religion". Nature. 146 (3706): 605–07. Bibcode:1940Natur.146..605E. doi:10.1038/146605a0. S2CID 9421843.
  90. ^ Quoted in Gino Segre. Faust in Copenhagen: A Struggle for the Soul of Physics and the Birth of the Nuclear Age. Pimlico. London 2007. p. 144.
  91. ^ Simone Weil. The Need For Roots: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties Towards Mankind. Routledge & Kegan Paul. London. 1952 (repr 2003). ISBN 0-415-27101-0 pp. 13 et seq.
  92. ^ Hellman, John. Simone Weil: An Introduction to Her Thought. Wilfrid Laurier, University Press, Waterloo, Ontario. 1982.
  93. ^ Simone Weil. The Need For Roots: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties Towards Mankind. Routledge & Kegan Paul. London. 1952 (repr 2003). ISBN 0-415-27101-0 p. 13.
  94. ^ Charles Darwin. "The Origin of the Moral Sense" in P Singer (ed). Ethics. Oxford University Press. NY 1994 p. 44.
  95. ^ Émile Durkheim. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. The Free Press. New York. 1965 p. 299.
  96. ^ AJ Ayer. "Ethics for Logical Positivists" in P Singer (ed). Ethics. Oxford University Press. NY 1994 p. 151.
  97. ^ GE Moore. Principia Ethica. Cambridge University Press. London. 1968 pp. 178–79.
  98. ^ Simone de Beauvoir. A Very Easy Death. Penguin Books. London. 1982. ISBN 0-14-002967-2. p. 60
  99. ^ Michael Walzer. Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War and Citizenship. Clarion-Simon and Schuster. New York. 1970. p. 124.
  100. ^ Michael Walzer. Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War and Citizenship. Clarion-Simon and Schuster. New York. 1970. p. 131
  101. ^ Ronald Dworkin. Life's Dominion. Harper Collins, London 1995. pp. 239–40
  102. ^ Edward Conze. Buddhism: Its Essence and development. Harper Torchbooks. New York. 1959. pp. 20 and 46
  103. ^ Peter Singer. Democracy and Disobedience. Clarendon Press. Oxford. 1973. p. 94.
  104. ^ David Chalmers. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 1996 pp. 83–84
  105. ^ Nicholas Fearn. Philosophy: The Latest Answers to the Oldest Questions. Atlantic Books. London. 2005. pp. 176–177.
  106. ^ Roger Scruton. Modern Philosophy: An Introduction and Survey. Mandarin. London. 1994. p. 271
  107. ^ Susan Sontag. Regarding the Pain of Others. Hamish Hamilton, London. 2003. ISBN 0-241-14207-5 pp. 87 and 102.
  108. ^ Jonathan Glover. I: The Philosophy and Psychology of Personal Identity. Penguin Books, London. 1988. p. 132.
  109. ^ Garrett Hardin, "The Tragedy of the Commons", Science, Vol. 162, No. 3859 (13 December 1968), pp. 1243–48. Also available here [1] and here.
  110. ^ Scott James Shackelford. 2008. "The Tragedy of the Common Heritage of Mankind". Retrieved 30 October 2009.
  111. ^ John Ralston Saul. The Unconscious Civilisation. Massey Lectures Series. Anansi Pres, Toronto. 1995. ISBN 0-88784-586-X pp. 17, 81 and 172.
  112. ^ Alan Donagan. The Theory of Morality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1977. pp. 131–38.
  113. ^ Beauchamp TL and Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, New York. 1994 pp. 478–79.
  114. ^ Cite error: The named reference autogenerated176 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  115. ^ Emmanuel Levinas. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Lingis A (trans) Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA 1998. pp. 84, 100–01
  116. ^ Ninian Smart. The World's Religions: Old Traditions and Modern Transformations. Cambridge University Press. 1989. pp. 10–21.
  117. ^ Peter Winch. Moral Integrity. Basil Blackwell. Oxford. 1968
  118. ^ "Universal Declaration of Human Rights". United Nations. Retrieved 13 December 2022.
  119. ^ Booth K, Dunne T and Cox M (eds). How Might We Live? Global Ethics in the New Century. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 2001 p. 1.
  120. ^ Amnesty International. Ambassador of Conscience Award. Retrieved 31 December 2013.
  121. ^ Wayne C Booth. The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction. University of California Press. Berkeley. 1988. p. 11 and Ch. 2.
  122. ^ Groves CP (2005). Wilson DE, Reeder DM (eds.). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-801-88221-4. OCLC 62265494.
  123. ^ Cite error: The named reference MacHugh Larson Orlando 2017 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  124. ^ Cite error: The named reference Normile was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  125. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Thalmann2018 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  126. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference linnaeus1758 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  127. ^ Cite error: The named reference wozencraft2005 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  128. ^ Cite error: The named reference Alvares2019 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  129. ^ a b Wang & Tedford 2008, p. 1.
  130. ^ Cite error: The named reference Bergström2020 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  131. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Frantz2020 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  132. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference freedman2017 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  133. ^ Cite error: The named reference larson2014 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  134. ^ Cite error: The named reference Ostrander2019 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  135. ^ Axelsson, E.; Ratnakumar, A.; Arendt, M.L.; Maqbool, K.; Webster, M.T.; Perloski, M.; Liberg, O.; Arnemo, J.M.; Hedhammar, Å.; Lindblad-Toh, K. (2013). "The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet". Nature. 495 (#7441): 360–364. Bibcode:2013Natur.495..360A. doi:10.1038/nature11837. PMID 23354050. S2CID 4415412.
  136. ^ Cite error: The named reference ADW was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  137. ^ Cite error: The named reference berns2012 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  138. ^ Cite error: The named reference Derr was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  139. ^ Cell Movements and the Shaping of the Vertebrate Body Archived 2020-01-22 at the Wayback Machine in Chapter 21 of Molecular Biology of the Cell Archived 2017-09-27 at the Wayback Machine fourth edition, edited by Bruce Alberts (2002) published by Garland Science. The Alberts text discusses how the "cellular building blocks" move to shape developing embryos. It is also common to describe small molecules such as amino acids as "molecular building blocks Archived 2020-01-22 at the Wayback Machine".
  140. ^
  141. ^ Campbell, Neil A.; Williamson, Brad; Heyden, Robin J. (2006). Biology: Exploring Life. Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0132508827. Archived from the original on 2 November 2014. Retrieved 16 February 2009.
  142. ^ Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from "What Is a Cell?". Science Primer. NCBI. 30 March 2004. Archived from the original on 8 December 2009. Retrieved 3 May 2013.
  143. ^ Karp, Gerald (2009). Cell and Molecular Biology: Concepts and Experiments. John Wiley & Sons. p. 2. ISBN 978-0470483374. Hooke called the pores cells because they reminded him of the cells inhabited by monks living in a monastery.
  144. ^ Tero, Alan Chong (1990). Achiever's Biology. Allied Publishers. p. 36. ISBN 978-8184243697. In 1665, an Englishman, Robert Hooke observed a thin slice of" cork under a simple microscope. (A simple microscope is a microscope with only one biconvex lens, rather like a magnifying glass). He saw many small box like structures. These reminded him of small rooms called "cells" in which Christian monks lived and meditated.
  145. ^ Maton, Anthea (1997). Cells Building Blocks of Life. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0134234762.
  146. ^ Schopf, J. William; Kudryavtsev, Anatoliy B.; Czaja, Andrew D.; Tripathi, Abhishek B. (2007). "Evidence of Archean life: Stromatolites and microfossils". Precambrian Research. 158 (3–4): 141–155. Bibcode:2007PreR..158..141S. doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.009.
  147. ^ Schopf, J. W. (June 2006). "Fossil evidence of Archaean life". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 361 (1470): 869–885. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1834. PMC 1578735. PMID 16754604.
  148. ^ Raven, Peter Hamilton; Johnson, George Brooks (2002). Biology. McGraw-Hill Education. p. 68. ISBN 978-0071122610. Retrieved 7 July 2013.
  149. ^ "First cells may have emerged because building blocks of proteins stabilized membranes". ScienceDaily. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
  150. ^ Cite error: The named reference wang2008 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  151. ^ Heptner, V. G.; Naumov, N. P. (1998). Mammals of the Soviet Union Vol.II Part 1a, SIRENIA AND CARNIVORA (Sea Cows, Wolves and Bears). Science Publishers, Inc. USA. pp. 124–129. ISBN 1-886106-81-9.
  152. ^ Borchardt 1909, p. 4.
  153. ^ a b c Altenmüller 2001, p. 598.
  154. ^ Verner 2001e, p. 291.
  155. ^ a b c Verner 2001e, p. 463.
  156. ^ a b c d Arnold 2003, p. 160.
  157. ^ Bárta 2005, p. 180.
  158. ^ a b Verner 2001c, p. 589.
  159. ^ Clayton 1994, p. 30.
  160. ^ a b Shaw 2003, p. 482.
  161. ^ a b Allen et al. 1999, p. xx.
  162. ^ a b Lehner 2008, p. 8.
  163. ^ Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 288.
  164. ^ Grimal 1992, p. 389.
  165. ^ Arnold 2003, p. 265.
  166. ^ Verner 2001e, p. 473.
  167. ^ Dodson & Hilton 2004, p. 287.
  168. ^ Verner 2001d, pp. 87, 89.
  169. ^ Cite error: The named reference Tedford2009 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  170. ^ a b Boitani, L.; Phillips, M.; Jhala, Y. (2018). "Canis lupus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2018: e.T3746A163508960. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T3746A163508960.en. Retrieved 19 November 2021.
  171. ^ "Appendices | CITES". cites.org. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  172. ^ Cite error: The named reference Linnaeus1758 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  173. ^ "Statistikbanken".
  174. ^ "Befolkningstäthet (Invånare per kvadratkilometer), folkmängd och landareal efter region och kön. År 1991 - 2021".
  175. ^ "Befolkningstal".
  176. ^ "Folketal den 1. I kvartalet efter område, køn, alder og civilstand - Statistikbanken - data og tal".
  177. ^ "FAKTA: Øresundsregionen har 4,1 millioner indbyggere". 4 March 2021.
  178. ^ "Folkmängd i riket, län och kommuner 30 juni 2022 och befolkningsförändringar 1 april - 30 juni 2022". Archived from the original on 27 August 2022. Retrieved 27 August 2022.
  179. ^ "Population at the first day of the quarter by urban areas, age and sex". statbank.dk. Statistics Denmark. 1 January 2016. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2016.
  180. ^ "Four regions over double the EU average…". Archived from the original on 2 April 2017. Retrieved 6 August 2017.
  181. ^ "Copenhagen" Archived 22 January 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary.
  182. ^ Nyt fra Danmarks Statistik – Byopgørelsen 1. januar 2020
  183. ^ "The average Dane". dst.dk. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 16 October 2018.
  184. ^ Zimmerman 2000, p. 748, Symbols.
  185. ^ Stearn, William T. (May 1962). "The Origin of the Male and Female Symbols of Biology" (PDF). Taxon. 11 (4): 109–113. doi:10.2307/1217734. ISSN 0040-0262. JSTOR 1217734. Retrieved 23 July 2019.
  186. ^ "Lesbian". Oxford Reference: A Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 10 December 2018.
  187. ^ Zimmerman 2000, p. 453.
  188. ^ Solarz, Andrea L., ed. (1999). Lesbian Health: Current Assessment and Directions for the Future (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. p. 48. ISBN 0-309-06567-4.
  189. ^ Zimmerman 2000, p. 453: "The equivocal grammatical status of "lesbian," as both noun and adjective, captures the historical difficulty and the controversy over its definition. Whereas the former names a substantive category of persons—female homosexuals—the latter refers to a contingent attribute. The use of the term to denominate a particular kind of woman, one whose sexual desire is directed toward other women, originated in the late nineteenth century with the formulation of types of sexual deviance, especially homosexuality. ...Taking "lesbian" as an adjective, however, implies that female same-sex desire is a detachable modifier, a relative characteristic rather than an essential, or core, substance. Describing an object or activity as lesbian may simply reflect its contingent affiliation or association with female homoeroticism. Such an understanding of the term was common in Western society before the twentieth century and remains so in non-Western cultures that do not sharply distinguish female homosexuality from heterosexuality."
  190. ^ Solarz, Andrea L., ed. (1999). Lesbian Health: Current Assessment and Directions for the Future (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. pp. 21–22. ISBN 0-309-06567-4. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  191. ^ a b Farr, Rachel H.; Diamond, Lisa M.; Boker, Steven M. (2014). "Female Same-Sex Sexuality from a Dynamical Systems Perspective: Sexual Desire, Motivation, and Behavior". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 43 (8): 1477–1490. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0378-z. ISSN 0004-0002. PMC 4199863. PMID 25193132.


Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).