Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warpath (Transformers): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
||
The result was '''delete'''. Even though this AfD was started by a banned user, the subject simply does not have sufficient coverage in ''reliable secondary'' sources. Three of the "keep" !votes are based on the (inadequate) sourcing, while RAN's was [[WP:WAX]]. [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|< |
The result was '''delete'''. Even though this AfD was started by a banned user, the subject simply does not have sufficient coverage in ''reliable secondary'' sources. Three of the "keep" !votes are based on the (inadequate) sourcing, while RAN's was [[WP:WAX]]. [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|<span style="color:red;">♥</span>]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|<span style="color:red;">♦</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|<span style="color:black;">♣</span>]] ♠ 23:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
===[[Warpath (Transformers)]]=== |
===[[Warpath (Transformers)]]=== |
||
:{{la|Warpath (Transformers)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warpath (Transformers)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 September 16#{{anchorencode:Warpath (Transformers)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warpath (Transformers)}}|2=AfD statistics}}) |
:{{la|Warpath (Transformers)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warpath (Transformers)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 September 16#{{anchorencode:Warpath (Transformers)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warpath (Transformers)}}|2=AfD statistics}}) |
||
:({{Find sources|Warpath (Transformers)}}) |
:({{Find sources|Warpath (Transformers)}}) |
||
Original research, go-bots spamcruft, non notable, fails GNG, fails pretty much all civilised standards. [[User:Donald Schroeder JWH018|Donald Schroeder JWH018]] ([[User talk:Donald Schroeder JWH018|talk]]) 21:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' - This page isn't about a Gobot, and the nominator seems to be going around nominating articles based on some Gobot-hate spree. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 21:27, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - This page isn't about a Gobot, and the nominator seems to be going around nominating articles based on some Gobot-hate spree. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 21:27, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - So anyone has the temerity to nominate an article to delete is must because of pure hatred of fiction. Nothing to with the fact the article, has a severe lack of reliable third person sources. The only source is [[WP:FANSITE]], and questionable notability. Notability isn't inherent. [[User:Dwanyewest|Dwanyewest]] ([[User talk:Dwanyewest|talk]]) 21:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - So anyone has the temerity to nominate an article to delete is must because of pure hatred of fiction. Nothing to with the fact the article, has a severe lack of reliable third person sources. The only source is [[WP:FANSITE]], and questionable notability. Notability isn't inherent. [[User:Dwanyewest|Dwanyewest]] ([[User talk:Dwanyewest|talk]]) 21:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:PS: Who nominated this page is totally irrelevant for the question whether this stuff belongs into an encyclopedia or not. [[User:Hans Adler|Hans]] [[User talk:Hans Adler|Adler]] 09:50, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
:PS: Who nominated this page is totally irrelevant for the question whether this stuff belongs into an encyclopedia or not. [[User:Hans Adler|Hans]] [[User talk:Hans Adler|Adler]] 09:50, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Standard fictional biography, just like any character from Lost or CSI. --[[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] ([[User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|talk]]) 01:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' Standard fictional biography, just like any character from Lost or CSI. --[[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] ([[User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|talk]]) 01:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''- the nominator is a sockpuppet of Torkmann, but this should not detract from the fact that the nomination is accurate. As Hans points out, the sourcing is hopelessly inadequate. [[User:Reyk|< |
*'''Delete'''- the nominator is a sockpuppet of Torkmann, but this should not detract from the fact that the nomination is accurate. As Hans points out, the sourcing is hopelessly inadequate. [[User:Reyk|<span style="color:maroon;">'''Reyk'''</span>]] [[User talk:Reyk|'''<sub style="color:blue;">YO!</sub>''']] 03:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment BANNAD SOCK PUPPET NOMINATION''' - This whole deletion nomination was created by a banned sock puppet, and should be ended based on that, a REAL nomination could then be made if someone legitmate wants to make one. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 08:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Comment BANNAD SOCK PUPPET NOMINATION''' - This whole deletion nomination was created by a banned sock puppet, and should be ended based on that, a REAL nomination could then be made if someone legitmate wants to make one. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 08:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
**I disagree. Nobody knew Donald was a sockpuppet when this AFD was started, and several people have made good-faith comments based on the merits of the article so a procedural close is now out of the question. [[User:Reyk|< |
**I disagree. Nobody knew Donald was a sockpuppet when this AFD was started, and several people have made good-faith comments based on the merits of the article so a procedural close is now out of the question. [[User:Reyk|<span style="color:maroon;">'''Reyk'''</span>]] [[User talk:Reyk|'''<sub style="color:blue;">YO!</sub>''']] 08:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional elements|list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:23, 18 September 2010 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional elements|list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:23, 18 September 2010 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Sources improved''' - I just spent a couple minutes looking online for some sources for Warpath as a notable character and added them. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 19:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Sources improved''' - I just spent a couple minutes looking online for some sources for Warpath as a notable character and added them. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 19:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
''Articles should be based on reliable, third-party (independent), published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy; this avoids [[Wikipedia:plagiarism|plagiarism]], [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|copyright violations]], and unverifiable claims being added to articles. Sources should directly support the material as it is presented in an article, and should be appropriate to the claims made.'' [[User:Dwanyewest|Dwanyewest]] ([[User talk:Dwanyewest|talk]]) 20:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) |
''Articles should be based on reliable, third-party (independent), published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy; this avoids [[Wikipedia:plagiarism|plagiarism]], [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|copyright violations]], and unverifiable claims being added to articles. Sources should directly support the material as it is presented in an article, and should be appropriate to the claims made.'' [[User:Dwanyewest|Dwanyewest]] ([[User talk:Dwanyewest|talk]]) 20:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 07:53, 16 February 2022
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 April 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |