Commons:Valued image candidates/Langur monkey, Orchha, Madhya Pradesh, India.jpg

Langur monkey, Orchha, Madhya Pradesh, India.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Yann (talk) on 2012-01-17 07:39 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Semnopithecus dussumieri (Southern plains gray langur)
Used in	Global usage
Reason	The best image (complete with the tail) with geocoding. -- Yann (talk)
Review (criteria)	Support good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 17 January 2012 (UTC)  Oppose needs a gallery. พ.s. 06:53, 18 January 2012 (UTC) Has a gallery now (Merci Yann). พ.s. 20:55, 18 January 2012 (UTC) A gallery is not a requisitive for a valued image. However you are free to make one. Please do not change the nomination, and please remove your opposition. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:46, 18 January 2012 (UTC) You are not listening, aren't you? Shall I translate it in french? พ.s. 08:53, 18 January 2012 (UTC) Please read Commons:Valued image criteria. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC) Une galerie assure l'indication automatique d'un VI (VI icône est mis là par le BOT), une catégorie n'a pas cet avantage. Création d'une galerie—comme sont tous les autres préparatifs pour une candidature—sont la responsabilité du nominateur. OK now? พ.s. 09:05, 18 January 2012 (UTC) This is NOT in the criterias. See my link above. Yann (talk) 09:08, 18 January 2012 (UTC) It is common sense. Anything against common sense? พ.s. 09:11, 18 January 2012 (UTC)  Comment A gallery is very useful. It is strongly advised to do so. We are all volunteers. we will not create a movement-friendly Gallery, if we sanction their absence. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:21, 18 January 2012 (UTC)  Comment An inital message to W.S., which matches the rudeness in his opposing vote and provocing translation to French. Your oppose reason is invalid and RTFM! That said : Making a gallery makes life easier for User:VICbot in case of promotion as when there is not a gallery of a name matching the scope it ends up in Commons:Valued image candidates/tag galleries, which needs human attention and that page is terribly backlogged. If criteria should be adjusted (and maybe they should), please bring it to the talk page for discussion and do not target a specific nomination to make a point. --Slaunger (talk) 10:52, 18 January 2012 (UTC) You should get your facts straight before lambasting! I first added the english name to the nom, italicizing the scientific name, not opposing and requesting a gallery [1]. In my book that is being constructive. This was rudely reverted. Then the only way to get through to Yann was opposing. That's my prerogative. I even took the trouble to translate my reasons in french, which apparently is not appreciated neither :-((. พ.s. 11:22, 18 January 2012 (UTC) Sorry, I was not aware of that page history and the revert. Thanks for pointing that out. But regarding the translation to French, you and I both know Yann is good at understanding English and that it was unneeded. --Slaunger (talk) 11:38, 18 January 2012 (UTC) This is at least a good reason for the gallery to exist before the promotion. So I created one. And this should be mentioned in the criterias. Yann (talk) 11:31, 18 January 2012 (UTC)  Support--Jebulon (talk) 18:06, 18 January 2012 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Yann (talk) 12:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)