Jump to content

Talk:Spam blacklist: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 10 hours ago by Count Count in topic Proposed removals
Content deleted Content added
Imz (talk | contribs)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Dynamite|title=Spam blacklist header|t=yes}}{{Autoarchive resolved section | show = no | age = 3 | archive = ((FULLPAGENAME))/Archives/((year))-((month:##)) | level = 3 | timeout = 7 }}
{{process header
| title = Spam blacklist
| section =
| previous = ←[[WM:IRP|Requests and proposals]]
| next = [[/Archives|Archives]] ([[/Archives/{{CURRENTYEAR}}/{{CURRENTMONTH}}|current]])→
| shortcut = [[WM:SPAM]]
| notes = The associated page is used by the Mediawiki [[SpamBlacklist extension]], and lists strings of text that may not be used in URLs in any page in Wikimedia Foundation projects (as well as many external wikis). Any meta [[administrator]] can edit the spam blacklist. There is also a more aggressive way to block spamming through direct use of [[Anti-spam features#.24wgSpamRegex|$wgSpamRegex]]. Only [[developers]] can make changes to $wgSpamRegex, and its use is to be avoided whenever possible.

For more information on what the spam blacklist is for, and the processes used here, please see [[Spam blacklist/About]].

Please post comments to the appropriate section below: ''[[#Proposed_additions|Proposed additions]]'', '''[[#Proposed_removals|Proposed removals]]''', or ''[[#Troubleshooting_and_problems|Troubleshooting and problems]]'', read the messageboxes at the top of each section for an explanation. Also, please check back some time after submitting, there could be questions regarding your request. Per-project whitelists are discussed at [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist]]. In addition to that, please '''sign your posts''' with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> after your comment. Other discussions related to this last, but that are not a problem with a particular link please see, [[Spam blacklist policy discussion]].

Completed requests are [[/Archives|archived]], additions and removal are [[Spam blacklist/Log|logged]].
}}
{{Projects}}
<small style="color:gray;" id="oldid">snippet for [[Spam blacklist/Log|logging]]: <nowiki>{{/request|</nowiki>{{REVISIONID}}<nowiki>#section_name}}</nowiki></small>

If you cannot find your remark below, please do a search for the url (link) in question with [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~eagle/spamArchiveSearch.php this Archive Search tool].

Spam that is only affecting a single project should go to that project's local blacklist, if available: [[:en:Wikipedia:Spam blacklist|ENWP]]


==Proposed additions==
==Proposed additions==
<!-- {{LinkSummary}} {{BLRequestRegex}} {{BLRequestLink}} -->
{{messagebox
{{messagebox
|text=This section is for proposing that a website be blacklisted; add new entries at the ''bottom'' of the section, using the basic URL so that there is no link (example.com, not http://www.example.com). '''Provide links demonstrating widespread spamming by multiple users.''' Completed requests will be marked as done or denied and [[/Archives|archived]].
|text=This section is for proposing that a website be blacklisted; add new entries at the ''bottom'' of the section, using the basic URL so that there is no link (example.com, not http://www.example.com). '''Provide links demonstrating widespread spamming by multiple users on multiple wikis.''' Completed requests will be marked as {{tl|added}} or {{tl|declined}} and archived.
}}
}}


=== t.me/antipglazbog_bot ===
===biologicalworld.com===
* {{BLRequestLink|t.me/antipglazbog_bot}}
{{UserSummary|Achgere}}
{{UserSummary|Ilya Wolf2005}}
{{UserSummary|45.137.113.245}}
{{UserSummary|91.197.106.51}}
{{UserSummary|91.197.106.16}}
{{UserSummary|185.211.159.194}}
{{UserSummary|185.211.159.226}}
{{UserSummary|212.58.121.32}}
Automated spamming/revert warring on Wikidata and cross-wiki spam. see [https://hy.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D4%B1%D5%BD%D5%BF%D5%AE%D5%B8_%D5%A1%D5%B9%D6%84&action=history], [https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%93%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B7_%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B0&action=history] [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q109352798&action=history]. - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 19:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|XXBlackburnXx}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 19:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
He is a site of only a few pages and a LOT of adsense. Not much information is given except for "protocols" which are not referenced, and cannot be trusted from a site of that quality.
:: Might need to blacklist the entire t.me domain, i dont really see any good use. - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 19:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)


=== uk88 ===
check: [http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/advsearch?p=http%3A%2F%2Fbiologicalworld.com&bwm=i&bwmo=d&bwmf=s Links from Wikipedia]
{{LinkSummary|uk88pro.club}}
{{BLRequestRegex|\buk88}} - gambling spam - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 21:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|XXBlackburnXx}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 21:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
{{spamlink|biologicalworld.com}} --[[Special:Contributions/82.169.41.246|82.169.41.246]] 12:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


=== connectvending.co.uk ===
::Already blacklisted this month on en.wikipedia:
{{LinkSummary|connectvending.co.uk}} Crosswiki-Refspam. --[[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 06:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
::*[[:en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2006 Archive Nov#Endlex.com]]
::*[[:en:MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/January 2008#biologicalworld.com]]


:{{rto|Count Count}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 06:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
::I suspect the links on other Wikipedias may be due to article translations from en.wikipedia versions; that was the case, for instance, when I spot-checked the fr. and zh.wikipedias. --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 13:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


===pugliarooms.com===
=== istanbulevdenevenakliyet.com ===
{{LinkSummary|istanbulevdenevenakliyet.com}}
{{closed|added to blacklist}}
Cross-wiki spam. Main IPv6 got blocked, but continued with VPN. see spamcheck. - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 16:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Cross wiki.


:{{rto|XXBlackburnXx}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 16:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
{{spamlink|pugliarooms.com}}


=== ifuplayer.com ===
IP's/users adding the link:
{{LinkSummary|ifuplayer.com}}
*[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=151.33.134.158&lang= 151.33.134.158]:
Just your standard crosswiki casino-spam. [[User:Estrellato|Estrellato]] ([[User talk:Estrellato|talk]]) 22:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
::[http://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/Специални:Приноси/151.33.134.158 bg.w], [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Beiträge/151.33.134.158 de.w], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/151.33.134.158 en.w], [http://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciala:Contributions/151.33.134.158 eo.w], [http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/151.33.134.158 fr.w], [http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciális:Szerkesztő_közreműködései/151.33.134.158 hu.w], [http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istimewa:Kontribusi_pengguna/151.33.134.158 id.w], [http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciaal:Bijdragen/151.33.134.158 nl.w], [http://nn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spesial:Contributions/151.33.134.158 nn.w], [http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specjalna:Wkład/151.33.134.158 pl.w], [http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Contribuições/151.33.134.158 pt.w], [http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/151.33.134.158 simple.w], [http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Посебно:Contributions/151.33.134.158 sr.w], [http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Özel:Contributions/151.33.134.158 tr.w], [http://ur.wikipedia.org/wiki/خاص:Contributions/151.33.134.158 ur.w]


:{{rto|Estrellato}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. Long-term spammer confirmed. --[[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 01:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
*[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=151.33.133.240&lang= 151.33.133.240]:
::Thanks @[[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] [[User:Estrellato|Estrellato]] ([[User talk:Estrellato|talk]]) 01:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
::[http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciální:Contributions/151.33.133.240 cs.w], [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Beiträge/151.33.133.240 de.w], [http://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eri:Contributions/151.33.133.240 et.w], [http://io.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specala:Contributions/151.33.133.240 io.w], [http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specialus:Contributions/151.33.133.240 lt.w], [http://nn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spesial:Contributions/151.33.133.240 nn.w], [http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/151.33.133.240 ro.w], [http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Посебно:Contributions/151.33.133.240 sr.w], [http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Bidrag/151.33.133.240 sv.w]


=== jivankishuddhta.in ===
*[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=Diegolas79&lang= Diegolas79]:
{{LinkSummary|jivankishuddhta.in}}
::[http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Contributions/Diegolas79 es.w]
Cross-posting from enwiki: see original request: [[:en:Special:Permalink/1226987767#jivankishuddhta.in]]. - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 01:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|XXBlackburnXx}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 01:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
--[[User:Jorunn|Jorunn]] 16:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


=== duarentacar.pk ===
:Thanks Jorunn - {{done}} --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 12:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
{{LinkSummary|duarentacar.pk}}
Cross-wiki spam - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 05:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|XXBlackburnXx}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 05:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Jorunn, Herby, I can't understand why PugliaRooms was banned. It's a useful resource to find touristic services for all the terms (regions and cities) it was associated to (Apulia, Salento, Lecce, Brindisi). Other links even less relevant are still working in the same page pugliarooms' link was deleted. Even more, This site was born in 2007 from a project funded and powered by institution such as UE Regione Puglia, Chamber of Commerce and the Municipality of Lecce (POR Puglia 2000 - 2006 misura 5.3). Look at the site to check it out. Thanks in advance! <small>&mdash;''The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:151.33.131.26|151.33.131.26]] ([[User talk:151.33.131.26|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/151.33.131.26|contribs]]) 16:50, 21 Jan 2008 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned2-->


=== arasyab.com ===
:However Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and not a travel guide - thanks --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 16:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
{{LinkSummary|arasyab.com}} Extensive crosswiki-spam. --[[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 09:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|Count Count}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 09:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Herby, I understand this. I just added pugliarooms' link where external links of other similar resources were. Just where external link section had been created. I can't understand why only this link was removed. Please really consider to remove this site from blacklist and unblock my ip...if i did a mistake it was made against my will, believe me! Thanks for your time, Herby!
{{unsigned|151.33.131.26|2=[http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spam_blacklist&diff=844947&oldid=844936 diff], --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:> )=|</sub>]] [[commons:User:Spacebirdy/Myndir|<small>∇</small>]] 00:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)}}


=== Gambling spam 20240604 ===
:"other similar resources" should be blacklisted too. PS your IP is not blocked--[[User:Nick1915|Nick1915]] -<sup><small> [[User_talk:Nick1915|all you want]]</small></sup> 17:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
{{LinkSummary|55bmw.net.ph}}
{{LinkSummary|55bmwcasino.pro}}
{{LinkSummary|bj88lol.com}}
{{LinkSummary|caphao1.com}}
{{LinkSummary|caphao1.tv}}
{{LinkSummary|debet39.to}}
{{LinkSummary|debet66.to}}
{{LinkSummary|onbet1.me}}
{{LinkSummary|ta777.ceo}}
{{LinkSummary|tinhdauloian.com}}
{{LinkSummary|udbet.link}}
{{LinkSummary|vsports.id}}
{{LinkSummary|w500.net.ph}}
- [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 00:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|XXBlackburnXx}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 00:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank for your answer, nick! I did a mistake, now I know it, but i don't want the owner of the site to be blacklisted. I just wanted to help him! That's all! I hope the community understand this! Thank you!
{{unsigned|151.33.131.26|2=[http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spam_blacklist&diff=844970&oldid=844963 diff], --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:> )=|</sub>]] [[commons:User:Spacebirdy/Myndir|<small>∇</small>]] 00:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)}}


=== grifilm.net ===
Spamlinks were added also under [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=151.33.131.26+&lang= 151.33.131.26]. Best regards, --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:> )=|</sub>]] [[commons:User:Spacebirdy/Myndir|<small>∇</small>]] 00:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
{{LinkSummary|grifilm.net}}
Cross-wiki spam, see sc. [[User:Wutsje|Wutsje]] ([[User talk:Wutsje|talk]]) 04:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|Wutsje}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]] — [[User:Elton|<b style="color:#666699">Elton</b>]] <small>[[User_talk:Elton|<span style="color:#3d3d5c">(talk)</span>]]</small> 04:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm really afraid for my mistake. I'm not a spammer, at all. And it' s the first time it happens.


=== homes247.in ===
:::Typically, we do not remove domains from the spam blacklist in response to requests from site-owners or others that have spammed them. Instead, we de-blacklist sites when trusted, high-volume editors request the use of blacklisted links because of their ''encyclopedic'' value in support of our ''encyclopedia'' pages. If such an editor asks to use your links, I'm sure the request will be carefully considered and your links may well be removed.
{{LinkSummary|homes247.in}} Cross-wiki spam. --[[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 06:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|Count Count}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 06:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
:::This blacklist is used by more than just our [[Complete list of Wikimedia projects|700]]+ [[:en:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] wikis (Wikipedias, Wiktionaries, etc.). All 3000+ [[:en:Wikia|Wikia]] wikis plus a substantial percentage of the [http://s23.org/wikistats/largest_html.php?sort=good_desc,total_desc&th=100&lines=2500 25,000+ unrelated wikis] that run on our [[:en:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] software have chosen to incorporate this blacklist in their own spam filtering. Each wiki has a local "whitelist" which overrides the global blacklist for that project only. Some of these non-Wikimedia sites may be interested in your links; by all means feel free to request local whitelisting on those.


=== neejacs.com ===
:::Unlike Wikipedia, [[:en:Open Directory Project|DMOZ]] is a web directory specifically designed to categorize and list all Internet sites; if you've not already gotten your sites listed there, I encourage you to do so -- it's a more appropriate venue for your links than our wikis. Their web address: http://www.dmoz.org/. --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 14:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
{{LinkSummary|neejacs.com}} Cross-wiki spam. --[[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 07:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|Count Count}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 07:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
::::;Related domain:
::::*{{spamlink|teamtouring.com}}
::::--<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 14:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


=== bwindiforestgorillatours.com ===
Sorry but everybody should be equal before the law, so you should blacklist also the other commercial sites still in the wiki pages you removed this link. I have a great consideration of your job, but i think that everybody should have a second chance. Have you never been wrong? ^_^ Thank you!
{{LinkSummary|bwindiforestgorillatours.com}} Cross-wiki spam. --[[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 08:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|Count Count}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 08:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::Well, I'd say I'm wrong about 30% of the time. Fortunately, Jorunn, Herby, Nick, and Spacebirdy are smarter than me. <small> ''(... even if they weren't, 30% X 30% X 30% X 30% X 30% << 1% error rate)''</small>


=== eximtradedata.com ===
::::::There's a clear consensus your links should stay on the blacklist.
{{LinkSummary|eximtradedata.com}}
Cross-wiki spam, see sc (see also [[User:COIBot/LinkReports/eximtradedata.com]]). [[User:Wutsje|Wutsje]] ([[User talk:Wutsje|talk]]) 15:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|COIBot/LinkReports/eximtradedata.com}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:AramilFeraxa|<strong><span style="color:sienna; font-weight:bold">AramilFeraxa</span></strong>]] ([[User talk:AramilFeraxa|<span style="color:#BB0FFF"><small>Talk</small></span>]]) 16:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::Just on the English Wikipedia alone, there were over 3 million links a year ago and I'd estimate a million were inappropriate. Most were added in good faith by regular editors, but probably several hundred thousand were spammed by site-owners. I put in a lot of volunteer hours trying to fix this but I just haven't gotten around to your competitors -- feel free to pitch in and help. --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 18:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


=== linebetafrica.com ===
Sorry, but I just wanted to point out that pugliarooms.com is NOT a spamming site! The links in wiki pages were put just where other people could find useful (and even more, in the right place - external links - and for the right terms: apulia, salento, lecce, brindisi). Sorry but this is NOT spam. I think users should have judged about it, not a spambot (even human)... Anyway, thank for your time, I really appreciate your consideration about my objections and I have a great consideration for the service you give to the community. Bye! :)
{{LinkSummary|linebetafrica.com}}
:{{unsigned|151.33.134.125|2=[http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spam_blacklist&diff=846496&oldid=846467 diff], --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:> )=|</sub>]] [[commons:User:Spacebirdy/Myndir|<small>∇</small>]] 14:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)}}
Cross-wiki gambling spam (m.o.: first add some legit link suggestions, then dump the payload). See sc. [[User:Wutsje|Wutsje]] ([[User talk:Wutsje|talk]]) 03:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
* {{BLRequestRegex|\blinebet(?!\.com)}} - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 04:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|Wutsje}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 04:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
:By proposing to add your link to this blacklist I did not mean to deem the website as spam. My only opinion is that the link was added excessively, it was added cross wiki, and that the website wasn't obvioulsy useful to the Wikimedia projects. The combination of those three factors made me propose the addition of your link.
::I've changed this to just <code>\blinebet</code> because the official domain appears to have been spammed as well. - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 15:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
:The link was readded twice to the article [[en:Apulia]] after it had been removed. In [[en:Salento]] it was readded once after removal. Even though you didn't seem to get a warning on any talk page of your IPs, you probably noticed that the link was repeatedly removed by other users? The link was also readded after removal in [[hu:Salento]] and [[bs:Apulija]].
:You are right that there are lots of other links that shouldn't be in Wikipedia either. -[[User:Jorunn|Jorunn]] 22:02, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


=== modapk ===
::I found a warning given to you on [[nl:Overleg_gebruiker:151.33.134.158]]] while trying to find information about another spammed link. --[[User:Jorunn|Jorunn]] 22:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
{{LinkSummary|mmlivemodapk.com}}
{{LinkSummary|rizvifiremodapk.com}}
{{LinkSummary|modapkpure.in}}
{{LinkSummary|editorsmodapk.com}}
{{LinkSummary|dragoncitymodapk.net}}
{{LinkSummary|promodapk.com}}
{{LinkSummary|simontokmodapk.com}}
{{LinkSummary|editorsmodapk.com}}
{{LinkSummary|promodapk.com}}
{{LinkSummary|carparkingmultiplayermodapk.online}}
{{LinkSummary|teraboxmodapks.com}}
{{LinkSummary|latestmodapks.com}}
{{LinkSummary|fs14modapk.com}}
* {{BLRequestRegex|modapk}} - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 15:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|XXBlackburnXx}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --[[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 15:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Jorunn, since i'm a newbie on wikipedia (it was the first time i put something in), i clearly admitted more than on time i mede a great mistake. I just wanted to be useful for all these users looking for resouces about apulia and salento. I'm REALLY afraid for that and it wasn't my will to cause damage to the community. I saw the warnings but i inserted the link again because i really didn't understand why only pugliarooms' link was deleted while the other commercial sites could stay there. I thought that pugliarooms' competitors had deleted it so it seems to me an unfair behaviour. I hope you can understand my reasons. Thanks again! diegolas
:{{unsigned|151.33.133.34|2=[http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spam_blacklist&diff=847548&oldid=847488 diff], --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:> )=|</sub>]] [[commons:User:Spacebirdy/Myndir|<small>∇</small>]] 14:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)}}


=== gitscodes.com ===
:Yes, it is a problem that some persons are removing other links to better expose their own links, and it is a problem that some people constantly put their own link at the top of the list of links.That is part of the reason we can't keep links to for instance every tourist guide.
{{linkSummary|gitscodes.com}}
:I understand your reasons. But I still don't think the website is useful to Wikipedia. If an established user asks for the link to be removed it will be considered. Thank you. --[[User:Jorunn|Jorunn]] 12:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
spam &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 06:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|billinghurst}} {{Added}} to [[Spam blacklist]]. --&nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 06:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
{{done}} already, consensus to keep it on bl, the discussion is therefore closed. Thanks for Your understanding. --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:> )=|</sub>]] [[commons:User:Spacebirdy/Myndir|<small>∇</small>]] 14:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Jorunn, i just would like pugliarooms was unblacklist for a reason of evident good faith. It's a matter of corporate image. Please, i'm asking you just that. In google search you can find this site as "blacklisted". pugliarooms has institutionals partners and this starts to be seen in a wrong way. Please... You can say the website is not useful (i disagree cause the website gives also info about cultural and traditional events, but i respect your opinion) but punishing an entire corporation for an error of a newbie probably is too much.... Thank you guys for your answers.

===thelolicon.com===
Spamlinks added per spambot (index.php and other pages):
*[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=216.255.179.34&blocks=true&lang= 216.255.179.34]
*[http://wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Wikisource_talk:Copyright_policy&diff=next&oldid=224491 example diff]
Please note that a lot of the spambot-created pages with these links were already deleted.<br>
Thanks, --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:> )=|</sub>]] [[commons:User:Spacebirdy/Myndir|<small>∇</small>]] 19:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

:{{done}} & thanks for the work --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 19:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

::Thanks a lot Herby, the links he added so far will not be blocked though (because the syntax http:/... lacks a / ), but he will fix this maybe and try to spam the working link.
::Best regards, --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:> )=|</sub>]] [[commons:User:Spacebirdy/Myndir|<small>∇</small>]] 19:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


===musicserver.us===
See also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam&oldid=186208110#musicserver.us WikiProject_Spam case]

Cross Wiki spamming.<br>

*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.95.79.112
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/87.68.25.8
*http://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/87.68.25.8
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.95.76.155
*http://he.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.95.76.155
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.95.84.190
*http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.95.84.190
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.94.108.10
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.94.20.98
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.83.221.212
*http://he.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.94.61.157
*http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.94.61.157
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/87.68.41.13
*http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/87.68.41.13
*http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.95.79.174
*http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.94.73.120
*http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.94.135.230
*http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.95.114.174
*http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/84.94.5.240

Thanks,--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] 22:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

:Agreed, thanks {{done}} --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 10:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

===gallipolibedbreakfast.it===

Cross wiki.

{{spamlink|gallipolibedbreakfast.it}}

Users adding the link:
*http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Beiträge/Biohelix
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Biohelix
*http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciale:Contributi/Biohelix
*http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciaal:Bijdragen/Biohelix
*http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Посебно:Contributions/Biohelix

--[[User:Jorunn|Jorunn]] 22:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

:{{done}}--[[User:Nick1915|Nick1915]] -<sup><small> [[User_talk:Nick1915|all you want]]</small></sup> 22:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

=== SEM Expertise spam on Wikipedia ===

;Domains:
*{{spamlink|canadaliving.org}}
*{{spamlink|douggilmour.com}}
*{{spamlink|semexpertise.com}}
*{{spamlink|tax-services.ca}}
*{{spamlink|localsearchcanada.com}}
Google Adsense: 9924757078166935

;Account:
*[[:en:Special:Contributions/99.243.58.191]]
*[[:en:Special:Contributions/66.46.19.2]]
*[[:li:Speciaal:Bijdragen/99.243.58.191]]
*[[:ko:특수기능:Contributions/99.243.58.191]]

Limburgian, English and Korean -- an interesting mix.

After 18 months of spam cleanup, I have yet to see an en.wikipedia spammer from Canada spam fr.wikipedia. Somehow, that's a little depressing if you're not a separatist. --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 02:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

:Not of encyclopaedic value & {{done}} thanks --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 10:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

===J. MICHAEL HEYNEN (HEYNEN ASSOCIATES)===
*\biccco\.org\b
*\bpeace-diplomacy\.org\b
*\bsynpolis\.org\b
*\beufpc\.org\b
*\bdiplomacy-advisory\.org\b

See also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam&oldid=186295565#J._MICHAEL_HEYNEN_.28HEYNEN_ASSOCIATES.29_spam WikiProject_Spam case]

:'''Cross Wiki spamming'''<br>
*http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/195.144.84.130
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/195.144.84.130
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/195.144.84.138
*http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/195.144.84.138
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/195.144.84.136
*http://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/195.144.84.136
*http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/195.144.84.136
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/195.144.84.132
*http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/195.144.84.132


lots on de. which are cleaned. Thanks,--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] 06:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

:Again not encyclopaedic & {{done}} --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 10:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

===electojets.com and related===
electojets.com, elect.awardspace.com/stepper/, 1lo.info/stepping
Links to numerous examples are listed at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Electric_motor#Spam] with more discussion at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Stepper_motor#Spam]
[[Special:Contributions/67.95.148.68|67.95.148.68]] 17:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
:www.electojects.com/motors/ electojects.com/motors/ Is very relevant and useful website for related Wikipedia articles. I hope admins will take the right decision. Thank you.--[[User:Motos|Motos]] 19:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is solely an en wp issue please take the request to the [[w:MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist|local list]] thanks --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 20:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

===lyrikline.org===
{{spamlink|lyrikline.org}}

Cross-wiki spam, see [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=62.96.74.70&lang= contribs for 62.96.74.70], [[w:User:MER-C/lyrikline.org|spamsearch results]] and [[w:WT:WPSPAM#spam.lyrikline.org]]. [[Special:Contributions/124.178.51.181|124.178.51.181]] 03:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
:'''lyrikline.com''' and '''lyrikline.net''' redirect to lyrikline.org. best to add those also.--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] 04:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

{{done}} thanks --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 12:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


===myrize.org spam===
;Domains:
*\bmyrize\.org\b
*\brizebilisim\.com\b
*\brizeresimleri\.blogcu\.com\b
*\brize-resimleri\.blogspot\.com\b
*\brize\.fukuku\.com\b
*\bcay\.fukuku\.com\b
*\byoutube-seo\.blogspot\.com\b

;Supporting data
*{{spamlink|myrize.org}}
*{{spamlink|rizebilisim.com}}
*{{spamlink|rizeresimleri.blogcu.com}}
*{{spamlink|rize-resimleri.blogspot.com}}
*{{spamlink|rize.fukuku.com}}
*{{spamlink|cay.fukuku.com}}
*{{spamlink|youtube-seo.blogspot.com}}

;Accounts:
*[[:cs:Speciální:Contributions/88.232.111.58]]
*[[:de:Spezial:Beiträge/88.232.111.58]]
*[[:en:Special:Contributions/88.227.96.61]]
*[[:en:Special:Contributions/88.232.110.172]]
*[[:en:Special:Contributions/88.232.111.58]]
*[[:eu:Aparteko:Contributions/88.232.111.58]]
*[[:ja:特別:Contributions/88.232.111.58]]
*[[:ku:Taybet:Contributions/88.232.111.58]]
*[[:tk:Special:Contributions/88.232.111.58]]
*[[:tr:Özel:Contributions/85.104.54.157]]
*[[:tr:Özel:Contributions/88.227.96.61]]
**[[:tr:Özel:Kullanıcı mesaj:88.227.96.61]]

;Reference:
*[[:en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#Spam myrize.org]] <small>(permanent [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam&oldid=186668807#Spam_myrize.org link])</small>
--<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 21:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
:{{done}} thanks --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 08:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

===Two unrelated URL redirect domains===
Two URL redirect domains that were recently added as links to [[:en:TinyURL]]:
*tapp.it<sup>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TinyURL&diff=prev&oldid=187088265]</sup>
*sillyurl.com<sup>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TinyURL&diff=187147569&oldid=187091270]</sup>
--<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 20:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

::{{Done}} --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 21:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


== Proposed removals ==
== Proposed removals ==
{{messagebox
{{messagebox
|text=This section is for proposing that a website be ''un''listed; '''please add new entries at the ''bottom'' of the section'''. Remember to provide the specific URL blacklisted, links to the articles they are used in or useful to, and arguments in favour of unlisting. Completed requests will be marked as done or denied and [[/Archives|archived]]. See also [[Spam blacklist/recurring requests|/recurring requests]] for repeatedly proposed (and refused) removals. The addition or removal of a link is '''not a vote''', please do not bold the first words in statements.
|text=This section is for proposing that a website be ''un''listed; '''please add new entries at the ''bottom'' of the section'''. Use a suitable 3rd level heading and display the domain name as per this example {{tlx|LinkSummary|targetdomain.com}}. Please do not add the protocol part of domain name, eg. <kbd>http</kbd>
}}


Remember to provide the specific domain blacklisted, links to the articles they are used in or useful to, and arguments in favour of unlisting. Completed requests will be marked as {{tlx|removed}} or {{tlx|declined}} and archived.
===hungarybudapestguide.com + touristguide.gyuli.com===
{{closed}}
The hungarybudapestguide.com + touristguide.gyuli.com has been blacklisted, and I understand the blacklisting. The reason why the addresses were changed to hungarybudapestguide.com was that a new domain name was bought, and therefore I changed the old ones to the new address(there were no more links to touristguide.gyuli.com as the address was banned - if I remember correctly). I agree that I spammed Wikipedia with to many links, in the [[en:Hungary]] and [[en:Budapest]] category (in different languages), but it can also be seen that I have used it as a reference as well, and not for the purpose of spamming at all (see: [[en:Budapest#shopping]], [[en:Saint Stephen's Basilica]], [[no:Budapest]] and some others). I would ask for the blacklisting of hungarybudapestguide.com to be removed (the touristguide.gyuli.com can remain, anyway not using it), and I will not add the page any more as an external link, but it can be used as a reference when needed (that will only be in English and Norwegian, as they are the languages which I know how to use).


See also [[Spam blacklist/recurring requests|recurring requests]] for repeatedly proposed (and refused) removals.
Background: [[Talk:Spam_blacklist#hungarybudapestguide.com_.2B_touristguide.gyuli.com]]


Notes:
If this is not possible, I accept that and understand it, but if it could be possible to remove the blacklisting that would be very nice and I would be very grateful. If you should find that I abuse it, blacklist it again at once (but you will not experience that, so do not worry). <small>&mdash;''The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:Siggiboy81|Siggiboy81]] ([[User talk:Siggiboy81|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Siggiboy81|contribs]]) 13:02, 18 Jan 2008 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned2-->
* The addition or removal of a domain from the blacklist is '''not a vote'''; please do not bold the first words in statements.
* This page is for the removal of domains from the global blacklist, not for removal of domains from the blacklists of individual wikis. For those requests please take your discussion to the pertinent wiki, where such requests would be made at '''Mediawiki talk:Spam-blacklist''' at that wiki. [[toollabs:searchsbl|Search spamlists]] {{smaller|— remember to enter any relevant language code}}
}}


<!--NEW REQUESTS FOR REMOVAL GO AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION-->
:I removed the links from ca. 90 articles yesterday. Others had already removed the links from other articles. In many articles there were two of the links. In all there has probably been more than 200 of your links cross wiki. There were still touristguide.gyuli.com links in some wikis, and there still might be some in the smaller Wikipedias even though I have tried to find and remove all.
:Local whitelisting can be sought on the wikis where the link is wanted. A local whitelisting will override this blacklist. For the English Wikipedia it can be done at [[en:MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist]]. no.wikipedia doesn't seem to have a whitelist yet, but they can create one if needed.
:Please read [[en:Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]] before you consider adding more of your links. Thanks. --[[User:Jorunn|Jorunn]] 23:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


=== xeudeportes.mx ===
::I have written to the English whitelist, and I also sent an email to info-no@wikimedia.org about creating a Whitelist for the Norwegian Wikipedia. I thank you for the help and hope that my application for being whitelistened will be approved. Thanks for all the help! --[[User:Siggiboy81|Siggiboy81]] 16:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
{{LinkSummary|xeudeportes.mx}}
{{not done}} as whitelisting is being sought --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 16:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
{{tracked|T366985}}


I wanted to use [https://www.xeudeportes.mx/mas-deporte/1209298/fin-de-la-guerra-entre-rocky-marvin-y-exorcista-jr this article] from this newspaper for sourcing an article but was met with resistance. Why is this news publication blacklisted? Seems reliable to me, saw nothing fishy on the city and the article I wanted to refer to was well written, had no copyvio and a clear author. [[User:Estrellato|Estrellato]] ([[User talk:Estrellato|talk]]) 00:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
===szlemberk.xf.cz/===
: You were able to link the site in your removal request (referring to "this article"), so it is not globally blacklisted. Please direct your request to the wiki you are having issues with. - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 01:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Completely legitimate site that I need to use as a reference and external link, I don't see why it is blacklisted.--[[Special:Contributions/24.64.124.27|24.64.124.27]] 16:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
::It's not in our local blacklist either (svwiki), but I couldn't link it. So I have no idea what the issue might be. I had to use it as a bookref instead (see [[:sv:Ferrarito]])[[User:Estrellato|Estrellato]] ([[User talk:Estrellato|talk]]) 07:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
:::There is nothing in the local sbl and abuse filter logs either and I could [https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndare:Count_Count/sandbox add the link in my sandbox there]. I suggest asking the local svwiki administrators about this with the exact error message. There is nothing we can do for you here. [[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 10:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


:{{rto|Estrellato}} <nowiki>{{Declined}}</nowiki> [[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 10:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
:Found that [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2006/06#sweb.cz.2C_mujweb.cz.2C_wz.cz.2C_xf.cz], [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2007/01#ravenholm.wz.cz.2Fenglish.html] in the archives, --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:> )=|</sub>]] [[commons:User:Spacebirdy/Myndir|<small>∇</small>]] 16:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
::I tried to add it on svwiki using the visual editor, it said "This source is considered unreliable by our community, and therefore is not allowed. Please choose a different reliable source.". This could be the reason Estrellato couldn't save their edit. Though I don't know what is causing this. - [[User:XXBlackburnXx|XXBlackburnXx]] ([[User talk:XXBlackburnXx|talk]]) 22:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
::That doesn't really explain anything, the site has very little advertising and contains useful information.--[[Special:Contributions/24.64.124.27|24.64.124.27]] 17:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
:::Apparently it comes from the [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Edit_check#8_March_2024 "Reference Reliability check" from the Edit check project]. It supposedly checks the MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist or MediaWiki:BlockedExternalDomains.json but obviously something is wrong with it. [[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 05:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


I filed a bug report on Phabricator: [[phab:T366985|T366985]]. Marking as {{Declined}}, as there is nothing further for us to do here. --[[User:Count Count|Count Count]] ([[User talk:Count Count|talk]]) 06:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
:::It explains why it was added, the domain was often used for spamming links, it was a problem for cs.wiki but since there is now [[w:cs:MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist]] a local whitelist, it is whitelisted there and they can use the links. If any other wiki wants to link they should add it to their local whitelist. Other opinions? Thanks, --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:> )=|</sub>]] [[commons:User:Spacebirdy/Myndir|<small>∇</small>]] 21:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I guess the toss up is whether to remove here & locally blacklist or to look at local whitelisting where needed. Blacklisting here is rather a severe measure if not fully warranted. Any other views? --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 16:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

===studentville.it===
{{closed}}
This is the most visited 100% free web site for italian students. It offers good free contenents in latin, literature, philosopy, math, etc.
Some links according to me could be useful for wiki users.

Many links were added last year by a competitors with the aim to ban studentville.it from wikipedia.

:Typically, we do not remove domains from the spam blacklist in response to site-owners' requests. Instead, we de-blacklist sites when trusted, high-volume editors request the use of blacklisted links because of their ''encyclopedic'' value in support of our ''encyclopedia'' pages. If such an editor asks to use your links, I'm sure the request will be carefully considered and your links may well be removed.

:This blacklist is used by more than just our [[Complete list of Wikimedia projects|700]]+ [[:en:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] wikis (Wikipedias, Wiktionaries, etc.). All 3000+ [[:en:Wikia|Wikia]] wikis plus a substantial percentage of the [http://s23.org/wikistats/largest_html.php?sort=good_desc,total_desc&th=100&lines=2500 25,000+ unrelated wikis] that run on our [[:en:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] software have chosen to incorporate this blacklist in their own spam filtering. Each wiki has a local "whitelist" which overrides the global blacklist for that project only. Some of these non-Wikimedia sites may be interested in your links; by all means feel free to request local whitelisting on those.

:Italian Wikipedia whitelist requests can be made at [[:it:MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist]].

:Unlike Wikipedia, [[:en:Open Directory Project|DMOZ]] is a web directory specifically designed to categorize and list all Internet sites; if you've not already gotten your sites listed there, I encourage you to do so -- it's a more appropriate venue for your links than our wikis. Their web address: http://www.dmoz.org/.
:--<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 18:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

::{{declined}} per A. B.'s comments and the fact that the site is unencyclopaedic --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 13:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

===suite101.com===
{{closed}}
The reasons provided to blacklist this site (blog provider not matching enwiki's reliability standards, enwiki link spam by
one of its writers - [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spam_blacklist&oldid=472752#suite101.com Talk:Spam blacklist discussion], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam/2006_Archive_Dec#Suite101_dot_com WikiProject Spam discussion]) might have been valid when there was only one central blacklist, but now that enwiki has its own blacklist there is no reason to keep it up here, as other projects have different standards for reliability and external links. (Specifically, some of the stuff under psychic-abilities.suite101.com would be useful on huwiki -- and yes i know i could just whitelist it, but moving it to teh en: blacklist seems to be the more correct solution, as the blacklisting is based on enwiki-specific policies, and might hinder any number of other projects.) So please remove and notify the en: admins to readd it there if needed. --[[User:Tgr|Tgr]] 16:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

:My viewpoint:
:#There were many suite101.com links on other projects at the time it was blacklisted. See, for instance, [[:de:Spezial:Beiträge/Orca66]].
:#There was not just one suite101.com writer spamming these links but rather dozens.

:Some more background (''partial'' list):
:*May 2006:
:#[[:en:Wikipedia:Requests for investigation/Archives/2006/05#Registered users]]
:*December 2006:
:#[[:en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2006 Archive Dec#Suite101 dot com]]
:#[[:en:Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Suite101.com]]
:#[[Talk:Spam blacklist/Archives/2006/12#suite101.com]]
:*January 2007:
:#[[:en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2007 Archive Jan#Whitelist requests: some of our old friends return for a visit]]
:*February 2007:
:#[[:en:MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist/Archives/2007/02#2 pages from suite101.com]]
:#[[:en:MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist/Archives/2007/02#Grandparent page on wikipedia]]
:#[[:en:MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist/Archives/2007/02#www.suite101.com/article.cfm/anorexia/22297/3 (Status: Declined)]]
:#[[:en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2007 Archive Feb#Suite 101]]
:#[[Talk:Spam blacklist/Archives/2007/02#Suite101.com]]<sup>'''†'''</sup>
:::<sup>'''†'''</sup><small>'''''Note:''' there are 2 sections on this page that share the same name''</small>
:*March 2007:
:#[[:en:MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist/Archives/2007/03#Information on trade of Ryan Smyth]]
:#[[:en:MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist/Archives/2007/03#Frances Isabella Duberly]]
:*April 2007:
:#[[Talk:Spam blacklist/Archives/2007/04/Removals: Not Done#beers.suite101.com]]
:#[[Talk:Spam blacklist/Archives/2007/04#suite101.com]]

:I think some other projects may also not want this domain. Perhaps it would be best to just whitelist it at hu.wikipedia.

:I was very involved with the incident when it broke out, so it would help to have someone more neutral handle this request from here.
:--<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 17:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

::The suggestion of whitelisting where it is needed seems perfectly reasonable to me --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 17:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Closed as {{declined}} --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 10:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


== Troubleshooting and problems ==
== Troubleshooting and problems ==
Line 374: Line 174:
|text=This section is for comments related to problems with the blacklist (such as incorrect syntax or entries not being blocked), or problems saving a page because of a blacklisted link. This is ''not'' the section to request that an entry be unlisted (see '''Proposed removals''' above).
|text=This section is for comments related to problems with the blacklist (such as incorrect syntax or entries not being blocked), or problems saving a page because of a blacklisted link. This is ''not'' the section to request that an entry be unlisted (see '''Proposed removals''' above).
}}
}}
There is apparently a blacklisted link in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_D_Arcade_Stage_4 Initial D Arcade Stage 4], im not sure which one it is and because of that link, I can't save any changes to the page. Can someone have a look? --[[User:DGhstLStRdP|DGhstLStRdP]] 20:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
:{{done}}Someone on en: has already edited out the block, see this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Initial_D_Arcade_Stage_4&diff=180237052&oldid=179126145 (diff)]. [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype">xaosflux</font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup><font color="#888888"></font> 05:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
=== [[w:ru:Калужская область]] ===
I have problems with saving [[w:ru:Калужская область]]:
При попытке сохранить:

Страница, которую вы пытаетесь сохранить, заблокирована спам-фильтром. Вероятнее всего она содержит ссылку на внешний сайт.

См. страницу [[m:Spam blacklist]], содержащую полный список заблокированных сайтов. Если вы полагаете, что спам-фильтр блокирует редактирование ошибочно, пожалуйста, свяжитесь с администратором, либо оставьте запрос на странице обсуждения [[m:Talk:Spam blacklist]].

Ниже показаны адреса, которые блокируются:

Следующее сообщение было получено от спам-фильтра: http://constitution.garant.ru

--[[User:Imz|Imz]] 23:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Same at [[w:ru:Кемеровская область]].--[[User:Imz|Imz]] 23:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

:garant.ru was added to the local [http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist ru.wikipedia blacklist] today, and that entry blocks the constitution.garant.ru links. If you remove the link from the articles you will be able to save your edits. I've removed the link in the two articles you are linking to, but there seems to be [http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A1%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F:Linksearch&target=http%3A%2F%2F%2A.garant.ru&namespace=&limit=500&offset=0 more links in other articles]. --[[User:Jorunn|Jorunn]] 00:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
::Thank you! I'd like to note that the content on the linked pages seems to be very relevant to the subjects. I don't know why it was blocked; perhaps if someone who cares sees this discussion here he will be able to discuss this issue with those who are in control of the blacklist.--[[User:Imz|Imz]] 01:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

==Rule in error==
As COIBot repeatedly crashed upon loading the regexes from the meta blacklist, I found that there was a rule with an error. The regex '\bweb\.archive\.org[^ ]{0,50}obsessedwithwrestling\.com' is incorrect, the first [ should be preceded by a \ (so '\bweb\.archive\.org\[^ ]{0,50}obsessedwithwrestling\.com'. Can someone have a look and (if necessary) repair? Thanks. --[[User:Beetstra|Beetstra]] 17:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
:Think I've fixed it - if not, let me know - cheers --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 18:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Syntax Error:
This is a RegEx Error and produces a error in some regex routines
(?
Better correct it to
(\?

in
\zoofi
the \ is needless

:No, these are perl regex's. "(?" means that the term enclosed in the parentheses is to be matched case insensitively, whereas "(\?" would imply "preceded by a literal '?'". Similarly, "\zoofi" matches "oofi" at the end of a substring being checked, and "zoofi" instead matches the literal "zoofi". [[User:AmiDaniel|AmiDaniel]] 23:24, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

::OK:
::i used the list in a program with "Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions" in VBScript.dll, and this caused a error by "(?". So i thought this is a general RegEx Error. And i thought that the spamwortcheck is principally case insensitive, and you wand finde the literal "?".

::And i thought that you want finde "zoofil..", (it was in once the past like this in the list, without "\", if i remember correctly. "zoofil.." is a word for "se-x with a-nimals" and a typical spamword.)

::thanks for responding <small>&mdash;''The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:88.191.29.92|88.191.29.92]] ([[User talk:88.191.29.92|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/88.191.29.92|contribs]]) 10:08, 1 Dec 2007 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned2-->

:Hmm, check the arguments and entries, some are baby correct. In "/zoofi..." is "/" definitely wrong.


==Discussion==
==Discussion==
{{messagebox
===Local blacklisting vs. global blacklisting?===
|text= This section is for discussion of Spam blacklist issues among other users.
Now that there is a local blacklisting capability, the question arises as to when to blacklist locally and when to blacklist here.
}}

My personal opinion is that Meta should remain the primary venue for blacklisting. It's hard to predict who's going to spam more than one Wikipedia. While we now have a [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~eagle/linksearch tool] to find a given spam domain on the 57 largest Wikipedias, it remains problematic to find it on the 200 smaller Wikipedias or the other 450 to 500 Wikimedia projects (Wikiquote, Wikisource, etc.) There's value to all these other projects in listing stuff here.

I think the local blacklist option is good when one project wants a domain blacklisted and another project wants to use it. This happens occasionally when a given spammer makes himself intolerable on one project while the link is being used appropriately on other projects.

What do others think about this? --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 03:08, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
:Generally speaking, I agree with you. I don't have a big problem with local blacklisting on a particular project as a way to immediately interrupt a spammer in progress, but standard procedure should probably be to follow that action up with a request for meta blacklisting.--[[User:Isotope23|Isotope23]] 20:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
::As a crosswiki admin if I see spam pages created or bunches of links placed I immediately add them to local blacklists that I can access. It's quicker and easier than coming here (where I have not always been helpfully received) and there is at least one or two sites that I've blacklisted that have apparently valid links on en wp for example - just my 0.02 --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 07:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
:See [[Spam blacklist/About]] and use the block with the smallest possible range. Now local blacklists are available it's not worth the work of blocking here and potentially causing side-effects in hundreds of wikis until there is an established pattern of cross-wiki spamming. Perhaps automatic rejection until at least five wikis have been spammed. And not automatic acceptance after five, just eligibility. [[User:JamesDay|Jamesday]] 20:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
::Interesting idea - how would you know a site was blocked by five wikis say? They do not tend to be well used (local blacklists) - I'm about the only one who adds to the 4 I have access to. The principle is fine - the practice? --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 10:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
:::Metric criteria are nice I think. I don't think however we need to say "blocked from five or more wikis". I think that it is just okay "five or more wikis were spammed". Currently, my personal criteria is very low though - spamming to two or more wikis regardless languages (both sets of i. enwiki and enwiktionary and ii. enwiki and dewiki are enough for me, I mean). --[[User:Aphaia|Aphaia]] 10:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
::::I am with AB on this: we should use meta as both the main blocking list and also a forum where people go to see if someone has been causing a wider problem. Otherwise it becomes impossibly complicated to block from here and the argument "it this a nasty spammer who xyz" becomes "who abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz". --[[User:AndrewCates|AndrewCates]] 12:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
*reset
In the past I've not been well received on this page so have tended to avoid it and operate local blacklists where I have the rights. However I am increasingly interested in this as at least a clearing house for queries influenced in part by A.B. I have posted to a couple of Foundation mailing lists & I'm hoping to hear other views. I'm happy to review/discuss possible spam issues here whenever I'm around - cheers --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 13:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

::If we don't blacklist by default here, then there should be a list or some mechanism (perhaps a bot) that tracks all the entries on the local lists so that other projects can check their links against what's been spammed elsewhere.

::Ideally, the bot (or human volunteers) would also run periodic checks using a faster, expanded version of http://tools.wikimedia.de/~eagle/linksearch to see if locally blacklisted links are showing up on any of the 700+ Wikimedia projects. (I say "faster, expanded" since that tool checks up to the 57 largest Wikipedias and may take several minutes when checking 57).

::Also, it's hard to rule out cross-wiki spam when our best tool just checks 57 of our 700 projects.
::--<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 14:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
:::PS, Call me lazy, but maybe it's just easier to just blacklist by default here as opposed to setting up a new coordination system.--<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 14:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
:::: When I was involved into the maintenance of this list, some years ago, I got such complaints by email periodically. It takes a time to reply them courtly but firmly. I think this kind of complaints are better to deal by the local people at first. Also I'm afraid this list affects too much websites. So I don't support "anything on meta and at first" tactics. And as for maintenance, this page is huge and editing is a pain. Single-website affecting spams are better to go to their local list, I think. --[[User:Aphaia|Aphaia]] 07:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
:::::[[User:Aphaia|Aphaia]], right now, it seems like this list is running pretty smoothly without much admin effort. As for its maintenance, that doesn't seem to be much of a problem now. As for e-mails, I'm not an admin, but because I make so many requests here, I get them too. I just refer them back to this talk page, suggesting that they make their case here before a wider audience; I also make sure at least they get answer from me here if not from others. The admins that work on this list seem to have thick skins, are undeterred by complaints and are always willing to do the work. As for this list affecting many websites, you're right and that argument cuts both ways. This list also protects many web sites from known spammers.

:::::In any event, what's the mechanism we're using for coordinating to ensure that spammers locally blacklisted in one place aren't spamming in another? Who's doing this work now? We must have a system in place to track this before we deprecate this list to use for proven cross-wiki spam only.

:::::A useful parallel is the whole open proxy issue. For several years, different projects have battled open proxies separately resulting in a large duplication of effort. An open proxy blocked on fr.wikipedia (perhaps our best OP-fighters) would then be used by other spammers, vandals or POV-pushers to cause problems on nl.wikipedia or ja.wikibooks. Only now is there some convergence on a meta-level solution. Meanwhile, we seem to be moving in the opposite direction with spam. Meta has a critical role to play here, whether it's blacklisting globally or just tracking globally to catch cross-wiki spam. Either way, we must not abdicate our role and our responsibility (especially to the smaller wikis which have proven so vulnerable to spam). --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 17:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Here's another time to blacklist at meta: links to blatant copyright violations. For example, when the domains associated with this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:A._B.&oldid=156307982#Looking_for_advice discussion] all finally get identified, they should probably be blacklisted here even if we only find it on one project. That's because these sites are all blatant violations of different magazines' copyrights; we can't afford to have links to these sites if we can help it. (See the discussion of "contributory infringement" at [[:en:Wikipedia:Copyrights#Linking to copyrighted works]] and [[:en:Intellectual Reserve v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry]]). --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 23:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

:Agree completely - I do think we need to hammer out some approach to Meta blacklisting policy probably by extended/clarifying [[Spam blacklist/About|this]]. For anyone new arriving here (Meta sysop or another project user) this page is frankly unhelpful. My time is under considerable pressure at present but I do see this as a high priority and any help will be appreciated.
:We would be able to clarify cross wiki spamming as a concept, the fact that some site should probably be blocked at a Meta level anyway such as above or sites that may compromise machines etc. We can also make blocking url shorteners a policy for example --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 08:00, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Besides of all ... I eventually found this page: [[Spam blacklist policy discussion]]. Since this discussion is lengthy and it becomes clearer we need to have a global policy of inclusion for maintaining this page, are we better to move the discussion place? Or better to stay here? --[[User:Aphaia|Aphaia]] 22:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm for here, because if it's spam to one wiki odds are it's spam to most of them. Say, you have a marketing company that uses aggressive JavaScript, if each user on en.wiki who has been there complains, odds are it'll still be aggressive to fr.wiki. [[User:Yamakiri|Yamakiri]] 23:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

:Ok - I agree with Yamakiri's point generally. If they spam one wiki they probably aren't useful to another one (& if they are whitelisting is an option).

:However (& thanks Aphaia - I must have found that page in the past because I'd got it on my watchlist) we have [[Spam blacklist policy discussion]] & [[Spam blacklist/About]] and yet still no real clarity about policy or help for those who are not used to these pages be they admins or other users. My postings to both Foundation-l and the list for Meta met with nothing much so I guess it is up to us to hammer out guidelines policy etc. Until early October my time will be limited but I'll do what I can. I think it may well be worth a fresh start rather than trying to make changes to what we already have? --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 11:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

My 2 cents. I'm sysop at 7 wikis. I would always use local blacklist (for instance, a spanish page isn't likely to be spammed on russian wiki), but if I see crosswiki spam as I JUST spot for [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=151.21.212.225], I'd come and global block. Local lists exist for a reason, and it's easier to keep track of. Global list should be used only when global blocking is needed. [[User:Drini|drini]] <sup>[[:es:User:Drini|[es:] ]]</sup><sub>[[:Commons:User:Drini|[commons:] ]]</sub> 14:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

::Beyond the 57 Wikipedias searched by [[User:Eagle 101|Eagle 101's]] [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~eagle/linksearch cross-wiki search tool], this blacklist is also relied on by [[Complete list of Wikimedia projects|650]]+ other [[:en:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] wikis (Wiktionaries, other Wikipedias, etc.). So for Spanish projects, there are these additional targets for Spanish-only spammers for which we don't have much visibility unless someone manually runs a linksearch domain-by-domain, project-by-project:
::*[[:wiktionary:es:Portada|Wikcionario]]
::*[[:wikibooks:es:Portada|Wikilibros]]
::*[[:wikiquote:es:Portada|Wikiquote]]
::*[[:wikisource:es:Portada|Wikisource]]
::*[[:wikiversity:es:Portada|Wikiversidad]]
::*[[:wikinews:es:Portada|Wikinoticias]]

::That or if we're lucky and Luxo's [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php? x-wiki user search tool] finds the spammer using the same IP or user name on other projects. (That tool is sometimes off-line; at other times it misses contributions on some wikis).

::I think another, less important factor to consider is how non-Wikimedia sites might use a domain. All 3000+ [[:en:Wikia|Wikia]] wikis plus a substantial percentage of the [http://s23.org/wikistats/largest_html.php?sort=good_desc,total_desc&th=100&lines=2500 25,000+ unrelated wikis] that run on [[:en:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] software have chosen to incorporate this blacklist in their own spam filtering. A site selling an obviously bogus get-rich-quick scheme or magnetic underpants as a cancer cure has no value to any of our projects nor to any of the 1000s of other wikis our blacklist affects. You might as well do everyone a favor and globally blacklist such a site even if it appears on just one Wikimedia project. --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 15:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

:::Picking up Drini's point, local blacklisting is great. However it is dependent on admins locally being
:::# Aware of it
:::# Understanding regex adequately
:::# Being interested in the prevention of (inappropriate) external links
:::If any of those criteria are absent then so is local blacklisting effectively.
:::Equally on A. B.'s point, there are some sites that just aren't needed by the Foundation (or most other folk) such as the batch of adult sites I just added. In such a case it matters not whether they spammed one or many wikis they should be listed here not locally I think.
:::We do need a sharpening of policy (referred to above) which - when excess time is available! - I certainly aim to take a look at. --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 16:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
::::Coibot's monitor list is quite efficient at spotting crosswiki spam, however it requires that someone actually look at the reports and notice it (as I did with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spam/LinkReports/uarticles.blogspot.com uarticles.blogspot.com], which was recently meta-blacklisted). It has a 'stalk page' feature which picks up domains added to watched pages using the spamlink template.. I imagine it could stalk the local mediawiki blacklist pages as well. I'm a bit reluctant to give it more tasks at this point as it and it's related linkwatchers are resource intensive, consuming about 2/3rds of the resources on a 4proc/4gig Sun Ultra80. --[[User:Versageek|Versageek]] 16:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

===[[MediaWiki:Spamprotectiontext]]===
Hello all, I don't know if it is possible but it would be a nice feature to have 2 'MediaWiki:Spamprotectiontext', one that shows up if the url is on the local MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist on a given wiki and one that is shown if the url is on the global one here at meta. Because as far as I saw many wikis gave a link to meta in the local ''MediaWiki:Spamprotectiontext'' and now people are redirected here even even if the link is not blacklisted here but locally. Best regards, --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:>&nbsp;)=|</sub>]] 20:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
:[[bugzilla:12034]] opened, --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:>&nbsp;)=|</sub>]] 11:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
::We've been getting increased en: wiki reports here that are on their local blacklist. I've updated en:'s text to give more information on checking locally for now, though this would be a much better solution. [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype">xaosflux</font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup><font color="#888888"></font> 01:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
:::Thank You for Your efforts. Though I saw that also other wikis are directing people here, so that it would still be usefull. I would love to see some activity at that bug, best regards, --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:>&nbsp;)=|</sub>]] 01:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

::::In general, I think the Mediawiki:Spamprotectiontext(s) should be more explanatory. Most wikis only provide a rough translation of the default message. Often users dont know what to do when they are prevented from saving a page - after all, ''they'' didn't add the link. And so, if they are only doing a minor edit they will probably just leave it and go on with something else. /[[User:NH|NH]] 01:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

===Edit-summaries===
Hello all, I am curiousif it is possible to have the spamblacklist block also edit summaries.
Currently it does not block edit summaries (see [http://is.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Notandi%3ASpacebirdy%2Ftest&diff=60877&oldid=58962] -> but [http://is.wiktionary.org/wiki/Melding:Spam-blacklist]). This would be really a great feature since the spambots are concentrating on the summaries. Best regards, --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:>&nbsp;)=|</sub>]] 16:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
:Is it necessary? A url appears on an edit summary plainly, not as a link. It is less bothersome than spamming on the actual text. It may even be a convenient spam detector. [[User:Hillgentleman|Hillgentleman]] 06:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
::The bothersome thing about this is not the link itself, which is in fact not clickable, but the fact that spambots are messing up dozens of wikis, thanks, --[[User:Spacebirdy|birdy <small>geimfyglið</small>]] [[User_talk:Spacebirdy|<sub>(:>&nbsp;)=|</sub>]] 08:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
:::Maybe hard to believe but I am not really interested in the tools, only what I can do with them. One I would '''love''' is the ability to block open proxy spambots across all wikis! --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 12:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

:::True. It may stop them for a while until they become more sophisticated. [[User:Hillgentleman|Hillgentleman]] 08:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

==spamlink template==
[[en:User:Shadow1]] and I are working on the linkwatchers. At the moment we are running them on 722 wikis (which is 'all' by the count of about one and a half week ago). [[User:COIBot]] is watching these 722 wikis, and reports when a link is on its monitorlist (and those links are generally there when it is spammed, see the explanation on [[en:User:COIBot]]). On the english wikipedia we use a spamlink template for reporting external links, which directly links to a number of search engines, and to a number of reporting systems, including COIBot. Would the template be of interest here? --[[User:Beetstra|Beetstra]] 09:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
:A link to the template would be useful? Getting reporting a little more consistent on here would make our lives a little easier too - it is not always clear what the extent of the problem is (nor sometimes the exact site name). Thanks --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 10:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
:: I created a version of that template here a few months ago: [[Template:Spamlink]]. It may need to be updated with the latest, greatest features - but it is here. --[[User:Versageek|Versageek]] 11:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

:I have updated the template to a more meta-like form. When you use '<nowiki>* {{spamlink|example.com}}</nowiki>' it displays the next line:

* {{spamlink|example.com}}

In order:
# First what is in the template,
# Linksearch for meta and the 5 big wikis (en, de, fr, en.wiktionary, fr.wiktionary, see [[Table of Wikimedia Projects by Size]]),
# 'LinkReport' is a report generated by an IRC bot by Betacommand, it is a save of a current linksearch on en.wikipedia.
# 'COIBot Linkreport' contains a summary of all use (by not-whitelisted users) on all 722 wikiprojects on [[Table of Wikimedia Projects by Size]], since the moment of blacklisting/monitoring (see [[en:User:COIBot]] for more info).
# Eagle's spam report search searches for reports on en.wikipedia spam archives, and here as well I think.
# interwiki link search: 20 and 57 search in resp. the 20 and 57 biggest wikis.
# LinkWatcher search searches in [[en:User:Shadow1]]'s database (only en at the moment, probably at some time also for more/all wikipedia).
# Wikipedia search searches for the existence of the page with the url name on en, de and fr.
# google search searches for info on the site on google.
# Veinors pages contain also link-addition information
# domaintools gives info on the domain
# AboutUs.org gives info on the domain
# Yahoo backlinks, search engine results.

I guess it contains pretty much all the tools needed to investigate the link, latest additions and current use. Hope this helps. --[[User:Beetstra|Beetstra]] 12:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

:Looks good - we'll see how it goes as it gets used. Given the nature of it I'll probably semi protect it I think - thanks --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 12:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

::I think it is protected (or did you just do that?). --[[User:Beetstra|Beetstra]] 12:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
::By the way, to keep yourself more or less up to date, you can watchlist [[User:COIBot/LinkReports]], that gets updated when COIBot saves a report (about every 5 minutes). It may get you one step ahead of a spammer (though take care interpreting the report, COIBot sometimes picks up links by mistake). --[[User:Beetstra|Beetstra]] 13:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

:::Protection - yes (when I am around I am not generally slow!). As to watching (& for me) the honest answer at present is "no time" - I would consider myself pretty active on three wikis at least so I tend not be short of work. When I get time I will check it out and see what I can do - thanks for your work & regards --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 13:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:06, 8 June 2024

Shortcut:
WM:SPAM
WM:SBL
The associated page is used by the MediaWiki Spam Blacklist extension, and lists regular expressions which cannot be used in URLs in any page in Wikimedia Foundation projects (as well as many external wikis). Any Meta administrator can edit the spam blacklist; either manually or with SBHandler. For more information on what the spam blacklist is for, and the processes used here, please see Spam blacklist/About.

Proposed additions
Please provide evidence of spamming on several wikis. Spam that only affects a single project should go to that project's local blacklist. Exceptions include malicious domains and URL redirector/shortener services. Please follow this format. Please check back after submitting your report, there could be questions regarding your request.
Proposed removals
Please check our list of requests which repeatedly get declined. Typically, we do not remove domains from the spam blacklist in response to site-owners' requests. Instead, we de-blacklist sites when trusted, high-volume editors request the use of blacklisted links because of their value in support of our projects. Please consider whether requesting whitelisting on a specific wiki for a specific use is more appropriate - that is very often the case.
Other discussion
Troubleshooting and problems - If there is an error in the blacklist (i.e. a regex error) which is causing problems, please raise the issue here.
Discussion - Meta-discussion concerning the operation of the blacklist and related pages, and communication among the spam blacklist team.
#wikimedia-external-linksconnect - Real-time IRC chat for co-ordination of activities related to maintenance of the blacklist.
Whitelists
There is no global whitelist, so if you are seeking a whitelisting of a url at a wiki then please address such matters via use of the respective Mediawiki talk:Spam-whitelist page at that wiki, and you should consider the use of the template {{edit protected}} or its local equivalent to get attention to your edit.

Please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment. This leaves a signature and timestamp so conversations are easier to follow.


Completed requests are marked as {{added}}/{{removed}} or {{declined}}, and are generally archived quickly. Additions and removals are logged · current log 2024/06.

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 3 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 7 days.

Proposed additions[edit]

This section is for proposing that a website be blacklisted; add new entries at the bottom of the section, using the basic URL so that there is no link (example.com, not http://www.example.com). Provide links demonstrating widespread spamming by multiple users on multiple wikis. Completed requests will be marked as {{added}} or {{declined}} and archived.

t.me/antipglazbog_bot[edit]

  • Link/text requested to be blacklisted: t.me/antipglazbog_bot
















Automated spamming/revert warring on Wikidata and cross-wiki spam. see [1], [2] [3]. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 19:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@XXBlackburnXx: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --XXBlackburnXx (talk) 19:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Might need to blacklist the entire t.me domain, i dont really see any good use. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 19:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

uk88[edit]



Regex requested to be blacklisted: \buk88 - gambling spam - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 21:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@XXBlackburnXx: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --XXBlackburnXx (talk) 21:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

connectvending.co.uk[edit]



Crosswiki-Refspam. --Count Count (talk) 06:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Count Count: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --Count Count (talk) 06:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

istanbulevdenevenakliyet.com[edit]



Cross-wiki spam. Main IPv6 got blocked, but continued with VPN. see spamcheck. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@XXBlackburnXx: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --XXBlackburnXx (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

ifuplayer.com[edit]



Just your standard crosswiki casino-spam. Estrellato (talk) 22:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Estrellato: Added Added to Spam blacklist. Long-term spammer confirmed. --XXBlackburnXx (talk) 01:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks @XXBlackburnXx Estrellato (talk) 01:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

jivankishuddhta.in[edit]



Cross-posting from enwiki: see original request: en:Special:Permalink/1226987767#jivankishuddhta.in. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 01:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@XXBlackburnXx: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --XXBlackburnXx (talk) 01:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

duarentacar.pk[edit]



Cross-wiki spam - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 05:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@XXBlackburnXx: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --XXBlackburnXx (talk) 05:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

arasyab.com[edit]



Extensive crosswiki-spam. --Count Count (talk) 09:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Count Count: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --Count Count (talk) 09:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Gambling spam 20240604[edit]



























- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 00:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@XXBlackburnXx: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --XXBlackburnXx (talk) 00:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

grifilm.net[edit]



Cross-wiki spam, see sc. Wutsje (talk) 04:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Wutsje: Added Added to Spam blacklistElton (talk) 04:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

homes247.in[edit]



Cross-wiki spam. --Count Count (talk) 06:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Count Count: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --Count Count (talk) 06:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

neejacs.com[edit]



Cross-wiki spam. --Count Count (talk) 07:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Count Count: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --Count Count (talk) 07:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

bwindiforestgorillatours.com[edit]



Cross-wiki spam. --Count Count (talk) 08:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Count Count: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --Count Count (talk) 08:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

eximtradedata.com[edit]



Cross-wiki spam, see sc (see also User:COIBot/LinkReports/eximtradedata.com). Wutsje (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@COIBot/LinkReports: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --AramilFeraxa (Talk) 16:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

linebetafrica.com[edit]



Cross-wiki gambling spam (m.o.: first add some legit link suggestions, then dump the payload). See sc. Wutsje (talk) 03:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Wutsje: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --XXBlackburnXx (talk) 04:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've changed this to just \blinebet because the official domain appears to have been spammed as well. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 15:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

modapk[edit]



























@XXBlackburnXx: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --XXBlackburnXx (talk) 15:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

gitscodes.com[edit]



spam  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Billinghurst: Added Added to Spam blacklist. -- — billinghurst sDrewth 06:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed removals[edit]

This section is for proposing that a website be unlisted; please add new entries at the bottom of the section. Use a suitable 3rd level heading and display the domain name as per this example {{LinkSummary|targetdomain.com}}. Please do not add the protocol part of domain name, eg. http

Remember to provide the specific domain blacklisted, links to the articles they are used in or useful to, and arguments in favour of unlisting. Completed requests will be marked as {{removed}} or {{declined}} and archived.

See also recurring requests for repeatedly proposed (and refused) removals.

Notes:

  • The addition or removal of a domain from the blacklist is not a vote; please do not bold the first words in statements.
  • This page is for the removal of domains from the global blacklist, not for removal of domains from the blacklists of individual wikis. For those requests please take your discussion to the pertinent wiki, where such requests would be made at Mediawiki talk:Spam-blacklist at that wiki. Search spamlists — remember to enter any relevant language code


xeudeportes.mx[edit]



Tracked in Phabricator:
Task T366985

I wanted to use this article from this newspaper for sourcing an article but was met with resistance. Why is this news publication blacklisted? Seems reliable to me, saw nothing fishy on the city and the article I wanted to refer to was well written, had no copyvio and a clear author. Estrellato (talk) 00:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

You were able to link the site in your removal request (referring to "this article"), so it is not globally blacklisted. Please direct your request to the wiki you are having issues with. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 01:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's not in our local blacklist either (svwiki), but I couldn't link it. So I have no idea what the issue might be. I had to use it as a bookref instead (see sv:Ferrarito)Estrellato (talk) 07:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
There is nothing in the local sbl and abuse filter logs either and I could add the link in my sandbox there. I suggest asking the local svwiki administrators about this with the exact error message. There is nothing we can do for you here. Count Count (talk) 10:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Estrellato: {{Declined}} Count Count (talk) 10:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I tried to add it on svwiki using the visual editor, it said "This source is considered unreliable by our community, and therefore is not allowed. Please choose a different reliable source.". This could be the reason Estrellato couldn't save their edit. Though I don't know what is causing this. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 22:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Apparently it comes from the "Reference Reliability check" from the Edit check project. It supposedly checks the MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist or MediaWiki:BlockedExternalDomains.json but obviously something is wrong with it. Count Count (talk) 05:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I filed a bug report on Phabricator: T366985. Marking as  Declined, as there is nothing further for us to do here. --Count Count (talk) 06:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Troubleshooting and problems[edit]

This section is for comments related to problems with the blacklist (such as incorrect syntax or entries not being blocked), or problems saving a page because of a blacklisted link. This is not the section to request that an entry be unlisted (see Proposed removals above).

Discussion[edit]

This section is for discussion of Spam blacklist issues among other users.