Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 March 7

7 March 2010

Michelle Obama's arms

Michelle Obama's arms (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

Ten months ago, when User:Prodego closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Obama's arms and deleted the article, User:Prodego commented, "This is obviously not a topic that is appropriate for an encyclopedia."

I'd like to ask that Michelle Obama's arms be undeleted because:

1) There is no wikipedia policy for what is "obviously" a topic for the encyclopedia.

2) Here in the year 2010, the subject is still being covered by The Chicago Sun Times, The Daily Mail, Oneindia.in, The Australian Broadcastng Corporation, ABC News, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Wall St. Journal, Huffington Post, Fox News, and Fitness Magazine.

3) During the deletion discussion, some of the reasons given for deletion were that the subject was "trivial" and "just plain silly." These are not official wikipedia policies.

4) The subject meets the criteria for Wikipedia:Notability.

5) Wikipedia has a category called Category:Famous body parts which would be appropriate for this subject.

Grundle2600 (talk) 06:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

• Endorse. As pointed out at the top of this page, "this process should not be used simply because you disagree with a deletion debate's outcome for reasons previously presented". Stifle (talk) 09:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)