Meta:Requests for adminship/Trijnstel: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
PeterSymonds (talk | contribs) →Trijnstel: absolutely not! |
→Trijnstel: + support |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*{{support}} Sure. [[User:Theo10011|Theo10011]] 15:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
*{{support}} Sure. [[User:Theo10011|Theo10011]] 15:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support'''. [[User:PeterSymonds|PeterSymonds]] ([[User talk:PeterSymonds|talk]]) 16:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Support'''. [[User:PeterSymonds|PeterSymonds]] ([[User talk:PeterSymonds|talk]]) 16:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
*{{Support}}, of course - [[user:Hoo man|Hoo man]] <small>([[user talk:Hoo man|talk]])</small> 16:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:26, 24 March 2011
Trijnstel
- Trijnstel (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
- End date: 14:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello all! I'm here today to nominate Trijnstel for adminship here on meta. She's tagged many pages for deletion here and also reverted lots of vandalism. As a sysop on nlwiki, she also fulfils the requirements. Trijnstel furthermore is already a global rollbacker. I think she has shown some need for the mop here and is also trusted enough to be an admin. I hope you agree with me. Good luck! -Barras 14:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for nominating me and of course I accept it. With love, Trijnstel 14:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support - as nom... -Barras 14:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Active cross-wiki user, sysop on nlwiki and judging by the deleted contributions could make use of the tools here as well. Jafeluv 14:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support Sure mickit 14:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support --WizardOfOz talk 14:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support Sure. Theo10011 15:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support, of course - Hoo man (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)