Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warpath (Transformers): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No reason to struck out something; a note saying so would have sufficed (and in addition to that, this was closed long ago and shouldn't be touched.) Remove changes made by Unscintillating for this reason. |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:{{la|Warpath (Transformers)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warpath (Transformers)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 September 16#{{anchorencode:Warpath (Transformers)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warpath (Transformers)}}|2=AfD statistics}}) |
:{{la|Warpath (Transformers)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warpath (Transformers)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 September 16#{{anchorencode:Warpath (Transformers)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warpath (Transformers)}}|2=AfD statistics}}) |
||
:({{Find sources|Warpath (Transformers)}}) |
:({{Find sources|Warpath (Transformers)}}) |
||
Original research, go-bots spamcruft, non notable, fails GNG, fails pretty much all civilised standards. [[User:Donald Schroeder JWH018|Donald Schroeder JWH018]] ([[User talk:Donald Schroeder JWH018|talk]]) 21:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
<small><strike>Original research, go-bots spamcruft, non notable, fails GNG, fails pretty much all civilised standards. [[User:Donald Schroeder JWH018|Donald Schroeder JWH018]] ([[User talk:Donald Schroeder JWH018|talk]]) 21:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)</strike> [Revert AfD nomination of banned user, see [[WP:Banning policy]]. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 07:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC)]</small> |
||
*'''Keep''' - This page isn't about a Gobot, and the nominator seems to be going around nominating articles based on some Gobot-hate spree. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 21:27, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - This page isn't about a Gobot, and the nominator seems to be going around nominating articles based on some Gobot-hate spree. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 21:27, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - So anyone has the temerity to nominate an article to delete is must because of pure hatred of fiction. Nothing to with the fact the article, has a severe lack of reliable third person sources. The only source is [[WP:FANSITE]], and questionable notability. Notability isn't inherent. [[User:Dwanyewest|Dwanyewest]] ([[User talk:Dwanyewest|talk]]) 21:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - So anyone has the temerity to nominate an article to delete is must because of pure hatred of fiction. Nothing to with the fact the article, has a severe lack of reliable third person sources. The only source is [[WP:FANSITE]], and questionable notability. Notability isn't inherent. [[User:Dwanyewest|Dwanyewest]] ([[User talk:Dwanyewest|talk]]) 21:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:14, 4 August 2011
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 April 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |