User talk:Duncancumming: Difference between revisions
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
The only things that should be bolded in Wikipedia articles are the '''first''' instance of the title and any other related terms in the first paragraph or so.--[[User:Coblin|coblin]] 09:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC) |
The only things that should be bolded in Wikipedia articles are the '''first''' instance of the title and any other related terms in the first paragraph or so.--[[User:Coblin|coblin]] 09:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
: I believe the complexity classes are all meant to be in bold, all the time, based on [[Wikipedia:Bounty_board#Complexity_classes_2|this]], but I'm quite possibly wrong, so feel free to unboldify all but the first instance. [[User:Creidieki]] should be able to confirm/deny if you're correct. |
Revision as of 11:45, 21 June 2006
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate reversion of vandalism, as you did at Texas Ranger Division. Unfortunately, you did not notice that the vandal had not only added nonsense, but also deleted a large section of text. When reverting vandalism, it's always a good idea to click the "diff" in the page history to see exactly what the vandal has done, and to restore the pre-vandalism version, rather than simply deleting nonsense the vandal has added. But still, thanks for helping us fight vandalism! --Angr (tɔk) 10:26, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
DYK
--Gurubrahma 11:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Rotten Tomatoes
Please join us in discussing a topic concerning a Rotten Tomatoes % in the Wikifilm infobox. It would be appreciated.
Template_talk:Infobox_Film#Rottentomato_meter_rating--P-Chan 23:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:37, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
The Road to Guantanamo
What exactly happened to the image when the IMDB-rating was added and apparently broke the image according to you. Just wondering since it didn't break anything to me and I can't figure out how it could. Martin Ulfvik 16:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- When I looked at it, the image didn't appear, although this may have been due to temperamental Wikipedia servers. Looking at your change, it looked like:
caption = [[Internet Movie Database|IMDB]] [[Image:3hv out of 5.png]] 7.4/10 (381 votes)</small>
Which doesn't seem quite right to me; what's that </small> bit doing? I assumed that was what broke it, and reverted your edit rather than try and fix it. Also I partly decided to do this due to the discussion currently happening on the infobox_film talk page, where the general consensus seems to be to do away with having the rating at all, and just link to the site. --duncan 18:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Ok. Was not aware of that discussion, thanks for the reply. Martin Ulfvik 07:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Regarding mass bolding in NP articles
I don't believe you're meant to bold every instance of the title.
The only things that should be bolded in Wikipedia articles are the first instance of the title and any other related terms in the first paragraph or so.--coblin 09:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- I believe the complexity classes are all meant to be in bold, all the time, based on this, but I'm quite possibly wrong, so feel free to unboldify all but the first instance. User:Creidieki should be able to confirm/deny if you're correct.