Jump to content

Grants talk:IEG/WikiBrainTools: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 9 years ago by I JethroBT in topic Promoting WikiBrain?
Content deleted Content added
Shilad (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
*If you have any questions at all, feel free to contact [[User:Ocaasi|me]] (IEG committee member) or [[User:Siko (WMF)|Siko]] (IEG program head), or just post a note on this talk page and we'll see it.
*If you have any questions at all, feel free to contact [[User:Ocaasi|me]] (IEG committee member) or [[User:Siko (WMF)|Siko]] (IEG program head), or just post a note on this talk page and we'll see it.
Cheers, [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] ([[User talk:Ocaasi|talk]]) 20:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Cheers, [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] ([[User talk:Ocaasi|talk]]) 20:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

== Promoting WikiBrain? ==

{{ping|Shilad|Brenthecht}} Hey there. Very pleased to read this as someone who reads up on Wikipedia-related research. I'm not surprised to hear many researchers stray away from research in the area due to the interface-related obstacles they face that prevent data extraction. As this is one of the main problems you identify, though, I wanted to ask what this team might consider doing to inform and attract potential researchers to this new treasure trove of algorithms. Presumably (but correct me if I am wrong), many in the WikiTools community are already familiar with extracting data to inform their work. I get that this proposal would make their jobs easier and would open up new research avenues, but how will you be reaching out beyond the WikiTools community? [[User:I JethroBT|I JethroBT]] ([[User talk:I JethroBT|talk]]) 22:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:08, 29 September 2014

Some algorithmically intensive tools that already exist

This is a neat idea! Here are a few tools that already use rich algorithms and might be helpful to look into/talk to their developers:

Useful people to talk to:

Useful places to seek feedback and post notifications:

Looking forward to hearing more about your idea! Cheers, Jake Ocaasi (talk) 17:16, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestions, User:Ocaasi! I've already made some of the content-based changes you suggested (e.g. useful mailing lists to tap). I've also been in touch with User:EpochFail. Once the feedback period is open on Wed, I'll email the remaining people to see what kinds of improvements they'd suggest. Shilad (talk) 19:31, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Finalize your proposal this week!

Hi Shilad and Brenthect. Thanks for drafting this proposal!

  • We're hosting one last IEG proposal help session in Google Hangouts this weekend, so please join us if you'd like to get some last-minute help or feedback as you finalize your submission.
  • Once you're ready to submit it for review, please update its status (in your page's Probox markup) from DRAFT to PROPOSED, as the deadline is September 30th.
  • If you have any questions at all, feel free to contact me (IEG committee member) or Siko (IEG program head), or just post a note on this talk page and we'll see it.

Cheers, Ocaasi (talk) 20:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Promoting WikiBrain?

@Shilad and Brenthecht: Hey there. Very pleased to read this as someone who reads up on Wikipedia-related research. I'm not surprised to hear many researchers stray away from research in the area due to the interface-related obstacles they face that prevent data extraction. As this is one of the main problems you identify, though, I wanted to ask what this team might consider doing to inform and attract potential researchers to this new treasure trove of algorithms. Presumably (but correct me if I am wrong), many in the WikiTools community are already familiar with extracting data to inform their work. I get that this proposal would make their jobs easier and would open up new research avenues, but how will you be reaching out beyond the WikiTools community? I JethroBT (talk) 22:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply