Jump to content

Grants talk:IEG/WikiBrainTools: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 9 years ago by I JethroBT in topic Promoting WikiBrain?
Content deleted Content added
Shilad (talk | contribs)
Line 29: Line 29:


{{ping|Shilad|Brenthecht}} Hey there. Very pleased to read this as someone who reads up on Wikipedia-related research. I'm not surprised to hear many researchers stray away from research in the area due to the interface-related obstacles they face that prevent data extraction. As this is one of the main problems you identify, though, I wanted to ask what this team might consider doing to inform and attract potential researchers to this new treasure trove of algorithms. Presumably (but correct me if I am wrong), many in the WikiTools community are already familiar with extracting data to inform their work. I get that this proposal would make their jobs easier and would open up new research avenues, but how will you be reaching out beyond the WikiTools community? [[User:I JethroBT|I JethroBT]] ([[User talk:I JethroBT|talk]]) 22:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
{{ping|Shilad|Brenthecht}} Hey there. Very pleased to read this as someone who reads up on Wikipedia-related research. I'm not surprised to hear many researchers stray away from research in the area due to the interface-related obstacles they face that prevent data extraction. As this is one of the main problems you identify, though, I wanted to ask what this team might consider doing to inform and attract potential researchers to this new treasure trove of algorithms. Presumably (but correct me if I am wrong), many in the WikiTools community are already familiar with extracting data to inform their work. I get that this proposal would make their jobs easier and would open up new research avenues, but how will you be reaching out beyond the WikiTools community? [[User:I JethroBT|I JethroBT]] ([[User talk:I JethroBT|talk]]) 22:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
: Good question! We've already taken some first steps to promote WikiBrain to algorithmic researchers. We've published [http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~bhecht/publications/WikiBrain-WikiSym2014.pdf a paper describing WikiBrain], and [http://www.brenthecht.com/ several other] papers that '''use''' WikiBrain and refer algorithmic and community researchers of Wikipedia to WikiBrain. We have begun to make some inroads, and have received algorithmic contributions from some other research groups. In addition, this grant would also support traveling to two major algorithmic conferences (SIGIR and WWW), where we would present demo posters and organize "Birds of a Feather" sessions. I'd also be interested to hear any other ideas you have!

Revision as of 03:18, 30 September 2014

Some algorithmically intensive tools that already exist

This is a neat idea! Here are a few tools that already use rich algorithms and might be helpful to look into/talk to their developers:

Useful people to talk to:

Useful places to seek feedback and post notifications:

Looking forward to hearing more about your idea! Cheers, Jake Ocaasi (talk) 17:16, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestions, User:Ocaasi! I've already made some of the content-based changes you suggested (e.g. useful mailing lists to tap). I've also been in touch with User:EpochFail. Once the feedback period is open on Wed, I'll email the remaining people to see what kinds of improvements they'd suggest. Shilad (talk) 19:31, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Finalize your proposal this week!

Hi Shilad and Brenthect. Thanks for drafting this proposal!

  • We're hosting one last IEG proposal help session in Google Hangouts this weekend, so please join us if you'd like to get some last-minute help or feedback as you finalize your submission.
  • Once you're ready to submit it for review, please update its status (in your page's Probox markup) from DRAFT to PROPOSED, as the deadline is September 30th.
  • If you have any questions at all, feel free to contact me (IEG committee member) or Siko (IEG program head), or just post a note on this talk page and we'll see it.

Cheers, Ocaasi (talk) 20:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Promoting WikiBrain?

@Shilad and Brenthecht: Hey there. Very pleased to read this as someone who reads up on Wikipedia-related research. I'm not surprised to hear many researchers stray away from research in the area due to the interface-related obstacles they face that prevent data extraction. As this is one of the main problems you identify, though, I wanted to ask what this team might consider doing to inform and attract potential researchers to this new treasure trove of algorithms. Presumably (but correct me if I am wrong), many in the WikiTools community are already familiar with extracting data to inform their work. I get that this proposal would make their jobs easier and would open up new research avenues, but how will you be reaching out beyond the WikiTools community? I JethroBT (talk) 22:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good question! We've already taken some first steps to promote WikiBrain to algorithmic researchers. We've published a paper describing WikiBrain, and several other papers that use WikiBrain and refer algorithmic and community researchers of Wikipedia to WikiBrain. We have begun to make some inroads, and have received algorithmic contributions from some other research groups. In addition, this grant would also support traveling to two major algorithmic conferences (SIGIR and WWW), where we would present demo posters and organize "Birds of a Feather" sessions. I'd also be interested to hear any other ideas you have!