Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lempi Rothovius: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 07:09, 4 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 09:16, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lempi Rothovius[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable supercentenarian without reliable sources. See WT:WOP#Common deletion outcomes. More as needed. JJB 23:49, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Being the nation's oldest verified person ever is notable Longevitydude (talk) 19:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This one doesn't even pretend to have any reliable sources. WP:SNOW? David in DC (talk) 21:58, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I did find one source, a report about her death [1], but only one. As I have argued above, simply being the oldest person in a given country does not grant automatic notability. The usual Wikipedia guidelines for sourcing must be met, and they are not met for this subject. (There is no justification to call for a Snow Keep, however, since discussion here is divided.) --MelanieN (talk) 21:44, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 * '''Delete''' This one doesn't even pretend to have any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. [[WP:SNOW]]? [[User:David in DC|David in DC]] ([[User talk:David in DC|talk]]) 21:58, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' I did find one source, a report about her death [http://www.french.xinhuanet.com/french/2006-01/02/content_201035.htm], but only one. As I have argued above, simply being the oldest person in a given country does not grant automatic notability. The usual Wikipedia guidelines for [[WP:RS|sourcing]] must be met, and they are not met for this subject. (There is no justification to call for a Snow Keep,  however, since discussion here is divided.)  --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 21:44, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>