IRC/wikipedia-en-admins/Policy ratification: Difference between revisions
support |
kept |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{rfd}} |
|||
<div style="border:1px solid #AAA; padding:10px;"> |
<div style="border:1px solid #AAA; padding:10px;"> |
||
All users who are able to receive (or currently have) admin ''rights'' on the English Wikipedia are entitled to access to the #wikipedia-en-admins channel. (For our purposes, "admin rights" is defined as the ability to delete and protect pages.) |
All users who are able to receive (or currently have) admin ''rights'' on the English Wikipedia are entitled to access to the #wikipedia-en-admins channel. (For our purposes, "admin rights" is defined as the ability to delete and protect pages.) |
Revision as of 02:58, 9 December 2008
All users who are able to receive (or currently have) admin rights on the English Wikipedia are entitled to access to the #wikipedia-en-admins channel. (For our purposes, "admin rights" is defined as the ability to delete and protect pages.)
This includes all users listed at en:Special:ListUsers/sysop, stewards (who have admin rights through the global steward group), staff (who have admin rights through the global staff group), sysadmins (who have admin rights through the global sysadmin group), and any former admin who would (theoretically) be able to go to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and be re-granted the admin bit upon request.
In the case of permanent imposed de-adminnings, the user shall lose access to -en-admins. In the case of temporary de-adminnings, the user shall lose access for the length of the temporary de-adminning.
IRC account | Wiki account | Vote |
---|---|---|
AlisonW | AlisonW | |
Angela | Angela | |
bastique | Bastique | |
BradPatrick | BradPatrick | |
Chairboy | Chairboy | |
DavidGerard | David Gerard | |
delphine | notafish | |
Deskana | Deskana | |
Dmcsleep | Dmcdevit | |
Fennec | Fennec | |
FloNight | FloNight | |
FT2 | FT2 | All options on the table have good rationales; comfortable with all of them, no issue needing intervention. Abstain in favor of wider consensus viewpoint. |
interiot | Interiot | |
jacoplane | Jacoplane | |
James_F | Jdforrester | Abstaining as I'm only an op ex officio. |
JohnReaves | John Reaves | Looks good. |
jwales | Jimbo Wales | |
kibble | Cbrown1023 | Support |
kim_register | Kim Bruning | |
Krimpet | Krimpet | Support |
kylu | Kylu | Support |
lar | Lar | Support |
mackensen | Mackensen | |
Mark_Ryan | Mark | Support. If someone is no longer an admin — temporarily or permanently — they shouldn't be in the channel. Getting channel access back is so simple that I have no problem with shifting the onus of seeking channel access back to them after they regain their adminship (whether automatically or otherwise). |
martinp23 | Martinp23 | support. We do this anyway, don't we? Although I can see that this may be needed as somewhere ot point when dramaz happen. |
Mike_H | Mike Halterman | Support |
mindspillage | Mindspillage | |
mnemonic1 | MGodwin | |
Morven | Morven | |
MZMcBride | MZMcBride | Support |
Nishkid64 | Nishkid64 | |
One_ | One | |
PhilSandifer | Phil Sandifer | |
Rjd0060 | Rjd0060 | Support |
Ryanpostlethwait | Ryan Postlethwaite | Oppose removal of access for temporary desysoppings when the user automatically gets the bit back after their suspension. |
sannse | sannse | |
seanw | Sean Whitton | |
Shanel | Shanel | |
Tawker | Tawker | Oppose removal for when user voluntarily requests desysopping and can auto receive it back upon request |
UninvitedCompany | UninvitedCompany | |
YellowMonkey | Blnguyen |