User talk:David Gerard: Difference between revisions
→IRC/wikipedia-en-admins/Policy ratification: new section |
David Gerard (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Can you please clarify your comment? (Which part of this needs an exception?). Thanks. [[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] 22:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
Can you please clarify your comment? (Which part of this needs an exception?). Thanks. [[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] 22:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
:I meant in terms of who should have access ("plus whoever the arbcom deems suitable" on the list of allowed persons) - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 11:03, 19 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:03, 19 December 2008
If you want to contact me, please leave a message at en:User talk:David Gerard, as I'll see it much sooner than I would if you left it here.
You can also email me at wp@davidgerard.co.uk , or with the E-mail this user link.
FIST
Sorry I deleted this, I awfully misread the text. I restored it perhaps one second later. Thanks for creating the page. Regards --Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
stepping on your toes
I did not mean to edit conflict w/you. Please feel free to alter, or remove my addition. :)
NonvocalScream 14:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Wikimedia Blog
says: "WordPress 2.6 is available! Please notify the site administrator" (We're not current?) Kylu 21:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- At least it's not nagging the readers. I moved three blogs on my own site (http://rocknerd.co.uk/ , http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/ and http://redcountess.co.uk/blog/ ) to 2.6 today. The second and third were fine because they were all but unmodified from the standard install; the first has lotsa tweaks and extensions, and I had a marvellously annoying time this afternoon fixing it up and I'm still not finished. Grah. - David Gerard 21:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. On my windows machine, I've got a "Secunia PSI" application which helpfully/annoyingly makes an alert rather akin to a siren when it notes that an installed program is insecure and out-of-date. With any luck, they'll never port the program to *nix. Kylu 23:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Can you please clarify your comment? (Which part of this needs an exception?). Thanks. Rjd0060 22:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- I meant in terms of who should have access ("plus whoever the arbcom deems suitable" on the list of allowed persons) - David Gerard 11:03, 19 December 2008 (UTC)