Talk:Slovene student projects in Wikipedia and Wikisource: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jayvdb in topic Proofread page
Content deleted Content added
m another example |
→Proofread page: reply to Romanm |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: In fact we are using our own tags for the proofread status. For example, "Stopnja obdelave: 4", as in [[:s:sl:Grajski pisar]], means that several people proofread the text and it is considered to be without errors. "Stopnja obdelave: 2" (eg. [[:s:sl:Kloštrski žolnir]]) means that the text was only slightly checked and is likely to contain many errors. IMHO adopting the standard proofreding tags as seen in other Wikisources should be a matter for debate. --[[User:Romanm|romanm]] ([[User talk:romanm|talk]]) 14:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
: In fact we are using our own tags for the proofread status. For example, "Stopnja obdelave: 4", as in [[:s:sl:Grajski pisar]], means that several people proofread the text and it is considered to be without errors. "Stopnja obdelave: 2" (eg. [[:s:sl:Kloštrski žolnir]]) means that the text was only slightly checked and is likely to contain many errors. IMHO adopting the standard proofreding tags as seen in other Wikisources should be a matter for debate. --[[User:Romanm|romanm]] ([[User talk:romanm|talk]]) 14:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
:: The Proofread Page extension is not merely about proofreading status. English Wikisource also has a separate system for proofreading status of normal pages. |
|||
::The most important feature is that it provides the ability for the text to be added beside the image. See [[s:Index:Aristotelous peri psuxes.djvu]]. |
|||
::[[User:Jayvdb|John Vandenberg]] 14:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:31, 2 January 2009
Proofread page
According to Wikisource:ProofreadPage Statistics, the Slovene project only has a single page using proofread page, s:sl:Stran:Kosovel Sivo.jpg, and this is only a test edit. If there is a group of scholarly people wanting to work on Slovene texts, we need to show them how to use this technology. John Vandenberg 20:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I would appreciate your help. I have used an older page (sl:Sivo) on the proofread page -- is this ok? --Mhladnik 13:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- In fact we are using our own tags for the proofread status. For example, "Stopnja obdelave: 4", as in s:sl:Grajski pisar, means that several people proofread the text and it is considered to be without errors. "Stopnja obdelave: 2" (eg. s:sl:Kloštrski žolnir) means that the text was only slightly checked and is likely to contain many errors. IMHO adopting the standard proofreding tags as seen in other Wikisources should be a matter for debate. --romanm (talk) 14:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- The Proofread Page extension is not merely about proofreading status. English Wikisource also has a separate system for proofreading status of normal pages.
- The most important feature is that it provides the ability for the text to be added beside the image. See s:Index:Aristotelous peri psuxes.djvu.
- John Vandenberg 14:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)