Stewards/confirm/2009/Lar: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →Comments about Lar: support |
|||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
* {{support|Keep}}. Trustworthy and active (without having any major mistake). [[User:Alefbe|Alefbe]] 19:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC) |
* {{support|Keep}}. Trustworthy and active (without having any major mistake). [[User:Alefbe|Alefbe]] 19:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
* {{support}} - Quite active. [[User:Kylu|Kylu]] 20:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC) |
* {{support}} - Quite active. [[User:Kylu|Kylu]] 20:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
* {{support}} - very helpful and active. [[User:Jayvdb|John Vandenberg]] 23:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:26, 9 February 2009
logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement, template
English:
- Languages: en, de-1
- Personal info: I became a steward after the December 2007 election. I also hold admin rights on en:wp, Commons, and Meta (I gave it up on en:ws), 'crat on commons and meta, CU on en:wp, commons and meta, and oversight on Commons. I am one of the folk that handle access to the CU and Steward mailing lists as well. I think I've been fairly active at the various steward tasks, and I have plans to continue doing so. I welcome your feedback.
português:
- Línguas: en, de-1
- Informações pessoais: Eu me tornei um steward depois da votação de Dezembro de 2007. Eu também tenho direitos de administrador na Wikipédia em inglês, Commons e Meta (Eu abdiquei no Wikinews em inglês), sou burocrata no Commons e no meta, CheckUser na Wikipédia em inglês, commons e meta, e oversight no Commons. Também sou um dos que dão acesso as mailing lists dos CheckUsers e Stewards. Acho que eu tenho sido bastante activo nas diversas actividades dos stewards e tenho planos de continuar a sê-lo. Agradeço vossas sugestões.
русский:
- Языки: en, de-1
- Личная информация: Я стал стюардом после выборов в декабре 2007 года. Также я продолжил быть админом в en:wp, Commons, и на Мете (и сдал флаг в en:ws), бюрократ на Commons и Мете, чекюзер в en:wp, Commons и Мете, ревизор на Commons. Кроме того, я один из тех, кто даёт доступ к списку почтовой рассылки стюардов и чекюзеров. Я думаю, я был достаточно активен в выполнении разных стюардских задач, и планирую продолжать быть таковым. Жду ваших отзывов.
Comments about Lar
- I really trust Lar, he is a nice chap & really trustworthy. All I'd like to see is a bit more activity. --Kanonkas 00:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support He is an excellent steward. — Aitias // discussion 00:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Per Kanonkas really, but I know Lar has lots of other important things to be doing :) so lack of activity is forgiven. Majorly talk 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Doing a good job as a steward, thoughtful user, has my trust, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're always very helpful and always full of good ideas. Thank you. --Thogo (talk) 01:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- in my opinion to much jobs - but as steward OK. Marcus Cyron 01:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Does good work as a steward - keep. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Best. Steward. Ever. :D Prodego talk 03:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- I confirm lar to be an active and helpful lar. Confirm despite evilness and larness. >:(--Shanel 05:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- COI - I'm also up for confirmation. Obvious keep. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 05:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well, all of us stewards are. I'm not sure I'm going to go put COI on all my comments but I guess maybe we should? I hope it goes without saying though. Interested in what people think, maybe take comments to talk? (Talk:Stewards/confirm) I will gladly add that to my comments if people think it necessary. ++Lar: t/c 05:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Not even a second of hesitation about keeping him as a steward. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support It feels great knowing some people do care keeping an eye on certain things within this enormous desert called the internet. Full support from an eternal newbe! Galoubet 13:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Trustworthy, active and helpful... absolutely confirm!--Nick1915 - all you want 13:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Complete trust & confidence. --Herby talk thyme 15:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- I trust him, also he is doing a good job and active stewards are always needed. Please, confirm. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 16:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Mercy (☎|✍) 16:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Obvious keep. Good work so far! Razorflame 21:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Has my respect and trust. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 23:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep certainly --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sadly not so often on IRC but always a nice, hard-working person. Confirm, of course! Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep up the good work, Lar! GlassCobra 15:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Agree with the note above that this steward suffers from an excess of "Larness". Furthermore, the steward seems to be suffering from a constant state of nonasciiemoticonaphobia, which manifests itself in near-panicked reactions to the presence of graphical mood indicators such as or . However, notwithstanding, and despite, such formidable obstacles, this steward slogs forward and braves the frightening chaos of wikispace with steadfast determination. In other words, BooYah! -- Avi 16:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Coimeád - definitely - Alison ❤ 19:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, has all my trust. →Na·gy 19:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep lar around. —Sean Whitton / 18:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- not a moment of hesitation before pressing the Save button. Keep Lar. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --oscar 22:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Confirm. — Dan | talk 00:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support trusted. --Meno25 00:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support absolutely. fantastic steward and person -- Samir 01:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support.--Jusjih 03:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- lucasbfr talk 12:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Avruch 14:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support ---Zyephyrus 22:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Rocksanddirt 22:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Also vote to clone him, if possible. Arimareiji 17:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- He is one of the few people that I could trust with the privilege even though we have never gotten along. Ottava Rima 00:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support, of course. Cheers, Jack Merridew 12:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support per Lar being Lar Finn Rindahl 12:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Absolutely! Garden 18:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support I don't always agree with Lar's wikipolitics. In fact, when we interact it's usually when we disagree. But nothing he's said or done or had said about him has eroded my faith in his integrity, decency and trustworthiness. Not even a bit. --JayHenry 20:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support, have a good job as steward. Alex Pereira falaê 16:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Trustworthy and active (without having any major mistake). Alefbe 19:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Quite active. Kylu 20:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support - very helpful and active. John Vandenberg 23:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)