Book tool/Feedback: Difference between revisions
→Bug: License in the PDF look strange: new section |
|||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
It looks like the <nowiki><poem/></nowiki>-tag is not supported ([[mw:Extension:Poem|example]]). [[User:He!ko|He!ko]] 16:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC) |
It looks like the <nowiki><poem/></nowiki>-tag is not supported ([[mw:Extension:Poem|example]]). [[User:He!ko|He!ko]] 16:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Bug: License in the PDF |
== Bug: License in the PDF looks strange == |
||
Any PDF created from an article on the French Wikipedia has two weird bits : |
Any PDF created from an article on the French Wikipedia has two weird bits : |
Revision as of 19:47, 19 February 2009
How to report issues |
---|
|
Question: Principal Authors
How is the list of principal authors computed? It looks as if any contributor is listed.
- Currently there is no consensus on "who are the principal authors" in the community. Therefore all contributors are mentioned. --he!ko 19:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposal: Add a table of contents
Did you consider to add a table of contents at the first page of the PDF? I think this might improve usability of larger PDFs. --he!ko 15:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Question: Differences between printed books and downloadable PDFs
I created a book and downloaded the PDF. When I wanted to order a printed book with pediapress and looked at the preview I noticed various differences!?
- The layout of printed books differs, as a technology more suitable for printed books is used to generate the PDFs. Printed books feature a Table of Contents, an Index, have a different size (A5 or 8.5×5.5in) and images and tables are layouted differently. The downloadable PDF looks ok when printed (A4) at home and can be generated within a reasonable amount of time. The PDF of printed books is optimized for print and its generation takes way to long to be a viable alternative for Wikipedia. --he!ko 19:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Bug: <poem/>-tag not supported
It looks like the <poem/>-tag is not supported (example). He!ko 16:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Bug: License in the PDF looks strange
Any PDF created from an article on the French Wikipedia has two weird bits :
- Just before the license, a grey frame saying "Raccourcis [1]ées/Licence&hidetrans=1&hidelinks=1&hideimages=1 +"
- Juste after, the text "[1] http:/ / fr. wikipedia. org/ w/ index. php?title=Special:Pages_li" under the heading "Liens externes".
See for example the page http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Korrigan/bug1, whose PDF is here. (reported by fr:Utilisateur:Korrigan, moved here).--he!ko 19:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)