Talk:List of Wikimedia projects by size: Difference between revisions
→The table is broken: new section |
→The table is broken: reply |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Seeing as this is done by a script I don't know how (if it's even possible for me, which I doubt) to fix it. |
Seeing as this is done by a script I don't know how (if it's even possible for me, which I doubt) to fix it. |
||
:The generated text is emitting "background: white", so I think it needs to be fixed by the generator. |
|||
:Thanks for spotting this error. |
|||
:[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] 00:07, 20 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:07, 20 October 2009
Cool! I like. Makes a change from adding up the numbers using pencil and paper. GeorgeStepanek 07:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Nostalgia
"Nostalgia (closed) at http://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/wiki/" <-- I am doing some historical research. If there is anyone who understands how to track the history of Wikipedia articles (example) back to their earliest creation, please contact me. --JWSurf 15:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
IP problem
I have made a big problem. Please forgive me. To sysops, please revert this and update it for me. Thank you! 203.76.212.94 02:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
It is not the size of the wave...
... but the motion in the ocean of data... with how much this thing is growing, how is it possible to manage these pages effectively? It seems a bit clunky to me with large datasets. Dsgncr8or 02:55, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
'Good' / 'Total'
Can someone explain exactly what these mean? 128.250.37.103 06:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Totals Good are actual articles with content; total includes redirects. Koavf 21:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- The totals also include talk pages, project pages, image description pages, templates, and so on. So "good" is supposed to be a better indicator of how developed the project actually is. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 05:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Difference in numbers...
So this table tops off at 725. The CheckUsage tool on Commons comes back with "736 wikis searched". Are there 11 projects that are missing from this table? EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. There are Wikimedia Projects that have Statistics Pages with restricted access to Admins, Sysops and Bureaucrats only. RobiH 06:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
The table is broken
Items of type 'wikiversity' in the table are coloured white instead of the colour shown in the key at the top.
Seeing as this is done by a script I don't know how (if it's even possible for me, which I doubt) to fix it.
- The generated text is emitting "background: white", so I think it needs to be fixed by the generator.
- Thanks for spotting this error.
- John Vandenberg 00:07, 20 October 2009 (UTC)