Grants talk:Project/Giantflightlessbirds/New Zealand Wikipedian at Large: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Note on late addition of MCH support: new section |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{clear}} |
{{clear}} |
||
== Note on late addition of MCH support == |
|||
The Ministry of Culture and Heritage finally confirmed that they would be interested in hosting a Wikipedian, and suggested some potential topics for the residency. I've added their information, although it came through a few days after the deadline for community review had passed, because it's useful for the review committee to know – but feel free to disregard it, of course. —[[User:Giantflightlessbirds|Giantflightlessbirds]] ([[User talk:Giantflightlessbirds|talk]]) 03:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:29, 19 March 2018
Important: Change your proposal status from "draft" to "proposed" to submit by deadline
Please note that you must change your proposal status from "draft" to "proposed" to submit by your proposal for review in the current round. You have until end of day today to make the deadline.
Warm regards,
--Marti (WMF) (talk) 21:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- All sorted; thanks for the reminder. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 10:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Eligibility confirmed, round 1 2018
We've confirmed your proposal is eligible for round 1 2018 review. Please feel free to ask questions and make changes to this proposal as discussions continue during the community comments period, through March 12, 2018.
The committee's formal review for round 1 2018 will occur March 13-March 26, 2018. New grants will be announced April 27, 2018. See the schedule for more details.
Questions? Contact us.--Marti (WMF) (talk) 02:11, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Note on late addition of MCH support
The Ministry of Culture and Heritage finally confirmed that they would be interested in hosting a Wikipedian, and suggested some potential topics for the residency. I've added their information, although it came through a few days after the deadline for community review had passed, because it's useful for the review committee to know – but feel free to disregard it, of course. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 03:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)