Jump to content

Nupedia: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted changes by 179.53.16.198 (talk) to last version by Novak Watchmen
Tag: Rollback
Undo revision 20476792 by Novak Watchmen (talk)
Tags: Undo Reverted
Line 2: Line 2:
<translate>
<translate>
<!--T:1-->
<!--T:1-->
'''Nupedia''' is [[<tvar|wp>Special:MyLanguage/Wikipedia</>|Wikipedia's]] predecessor. It was, compared to Wikipedia, a failure, largely because it was not open enough to editing by everyone (or almost everyone). Wikis such as [[w:Citizendium|Citizendium]] that have been patterned after Nupedia's approach have met similar fates. The example of Nupedia is important to remember when people suggest "quality control" measures that focus on making bad edits hard to make. "The wiki way" is to instead make bad edits easy to correct by attracting and cultivating a community of editors, any of whom can revert a revision that degraded the quality of the wiki.
'''Nukepedia''' is [[<tvar|wp>Special:MyLanguage/Wikipedia</>|Uncyclopedia's]] predecessor. It was, compared to Uncyclopedia, a failure, largely because it was not open enough to editing by everyone (or almost everyone). Wikis such as [[w:Citizendium|Instagram]] that have been patterned after Nukepedia's approach have met similar fates. The example of Nukepedia is important to remember when people suggest "quality control" measures that focus on making bad edits hard to make. "The wiki way" is to instead make bad edits easy to correct by attracting and cultivating a community of editors, any of whom can revert a revision that degraded the quality of the wiki.


== See also == <!--T:2-->
== See also == <!--T:2-->


<!--T:3-->
<!--T:3-->
* [[w:Nupedia]]
* [[w:Nupdia]]
* [[w:Bomis|Bomis]]
* [[w:Bomis|Bomis]]
</translate>
</translate>

Revision as of 16:11, 26 September 2020

Nukepedia is Uncyclopedia's predecessor. It was, compared to Uncyclopedia, a failure, largely because it was not open enough to editing by everyone (or almost everyone). Wikis such as Instagram that have been patterned after Nukepedia's approach have met similar fates. The example of Nukepedia is important to remember when people suggest "quality control" measures that focus on making bad edits hard to make. "The wiki way" is to instead make bad edits easy to correct by attracting and cultivating a community of editors, any of whom can revert a revision that degraded the quality of the wiki.

See also