Jump to content

Community Wishlist Survey 2022/Larger suggestions/Aim for workflow equivalence for MediaWiki on desktop and mobile web: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
fix
Line 1: Line 1:
{{cross}} '''Needed more user clarification'''{{Community Wishlist Survey/Proposal header|1=Make more features available for mobile browser}}
{{Community Wishlist Survey/Proposal header|1=Make more features available for mobile browser}}
{{cross}} '''Needed more user clarification'''
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
* '''Problem''': There are many useful features in the web version that are not available in mobile browser. And many others are not so flexible as they are in web version.
* '''Problem''': There are many useful features in the web version that are not available in mobile browser. And many others are not so flexible as they are in web version.

Revision as of 21:47, 26 January 2022

Make more features available for mobile browser

NoN Needed more user clarification

  • Problem: There are many useful features in the web version that are not available in mobile browser. And many others are not so flexible as they are in web version.
  • Who would benefit: Mass readers and contributors
  • Proposed solution: Make useful features available for mobile and make them easy to use
  • More comments:
  • Phabricator tickets:
  • Proposer: Md Maruf Parvez (talk) 21:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Hello @Md Maruf Parvez, would it be possible for you to give examples of those tools? What do you miss in particular? What do you need? Have you used the Advanced mobile contributions? SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for taking the time to write this proposal. We are archiving this wish due to a lack of clarification. We needed clarification so that we could accept this wish and mark it for translation so that it could go into voting. Thanks again! Regards, NRodriguez (WMF) (talk) 17:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]