Jump to content

Proposals for more female editors: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
James Salsman (talk | contribs)
Proposals by User:James Salsman
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Notice|This is here on Meta per [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/date.html discussion on the Gendergap mailing list.]}}
{{Notice|This is here on Meta per [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/date.html discussion on the Gendergap mailing list.]}}


==Proposals by [[User:James Salsman]]==
== Uncontroversial ==


* Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000112.html]
* Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000112.html]
Line 24: Line 24:


* Remove [[w:WP:NOTHOWTO|WP:NOTHOWTO]] because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html]
* Remove [[w:WP:NOTHOWTO|WP:NOTHOWTO]] because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html]

== Controversial ==


* Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000047.html]
* Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000047.html]

Revision as of 23:51, 4 February 2011

Proposals by User:James Salsman

  • Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[1]
  • Bring all articles on birth control to featured status in all language wikipedias.[2]
  • Provide easily accessible contact information for people who are willing and able to mentor new contributors. (And related proposals which the English Wikipedia is upholding to some extent.)
  • Demote Wikipe-tan from English Wikipedia mascot to WikiProject Anime mascot, replacing her with Puzzly.[3]
  • Support a multilateral tax haven treaty in the US and any other countries that might still be opposing one.[4]
  • Less javascript for mobile devices.[5]
  • Remove WP:NOTHOWTO because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[11]
  • Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[12]