Proposals for more female editors: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) Proposals by User:James Salsman |
Undo revision 2345180 by Fred Bauder (talk) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
at most 9, probably 6. of these 12 originated with me, and some have been 2nded. But let's keep the one which has been objected to seperateiscussion on the Gendergap mailing list.]}} |
|||
{{Notice|This is here on Meta per [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/date.html discussion on the Gendergap mailing list.]}} |
|||
==Proposals by [[User:James Salsman]]== |
|||
* Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000112.html] |
* Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000112.html] |
||
| Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
* Remove [[w:WP:NOTHOWTO|WP:NOTHOWTO]] because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html] |
* Remove [[w:WP:NOTHOWTO|WP:NOTHOWTO]] because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html] |
||
== Controversial == |
|||
* Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000047.html] |
* Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000047.html] |
||
Revision as of 01:59, 5 February 2011
at most 9, probably 6. of these 12 originated with me, and some have been 2nded. But let's keep the one which has been objected to seperateiscussion on the Gendergap mailing list.]}}
- Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[1]
- Bring all articles on birth control to featured status in all language wikipedias.[2]
- Provide easily accessible contact information for people who are willing and able to mentor new contributors. (And related proposals which the English Wikipedia is upholding to some extent.)
- Demote Wikipe-tan from English Wikipedia mascot to WikiProject Anime mascot, replacing her with Puzzly.[3]
- Support a multilateral tax haven treaty in the US and any other countries that might still be opposing one.[4]
- Less javascript for mobile devices.[5]
- Remove WP:NOTHOWTO because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[11]
Controversial
- Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[12]