Jump to content

Proposals for more female editors: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
James Salsman (talk | contribs)
Undo revision 2345180 by Fred Bauder (talk)
James Salsman (talk | contribs)
edit summary field ended up in text--more reason for less Javascript on mobiles. At most 9 of these are mine, some have been 2nded, 1 was objected to
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Notice|This is here on Meta per [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/date.html discussion on the Gendergap mailing list.]}}
at most 9, probably 6. of these 12 originated with me, and some have been 2nded. But let's keep the one which has been objected to seperateiscussion on the Gendergap mailing list.]}}


* Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000112.html]
* Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000112.html]
Line 23: Line 23:
* Remove [[w:WP:NOTHOWTO|WP:NOTHOWTO]] because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html]
* Remove [[w:WP:NOTHOWTO|WP:NOTHOWTO]] because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html]


== Controversial ==
==Controversial==


* Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000047.html]
* Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000047.html]

Revision as of 02:04, 5 February 2011

  • Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[1]
  • Bring all articles on birth control to featured status in all language wikipedias.[2]
  • Provide easily accessible contact information for people who are willing and able to mentor new contributors. (And related proposals which the English Wikipedia is upholding to some extent.)
  • Demote Wikipe-tan from English Wikipedia mascot to WikiProject Anime mascot, replacing her with Puzzly.[3]
  • Support a multilateral tax haven treaty in the US and any other countries that might still be opposing one.[4]
  • Less javascript for mobile devices.[5]
  • Remove WP:NOTHOWTO because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[11]

Controversial

  • Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[12]