Proposals for more female editors: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
edit summary field ended up in text--more reason for less Javascript on mobiles. At most 9 of these are mine, some have been 2nded, 1 was objected to |
+1 sorted wrong, but it's easier to add here on my phone. Will ask list to help sort |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* Remove [[w:WP:NOTHOWTO|WP:NOTHOWTO]] because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html] |
* Remove [[w:WP:NOTHOWTO|WP:NOTHOWTO]] because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html] |
||
* Improve articles on interesting women and womens' issues.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000117.html] |
|||
==Controversial== |
==Controversial== |
||
Revision as of 02:10, 5 February 2011
 | This is here on Meta per discussion on the Gendergap mailing list. |
- Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[1]
- Bring all articles on birth control to featured status in all language wikipedias.[2]
- Provide easily accessible contact information for people who are willing and able to mentor new contributors. (And related proposals which the English Wikipedia is upholding to some extent.)
- Demote Wikipe-tan from English Wikipedia mascot to WikiProject Anime mascot, replacing her with Puzzly.[3]
- Support a multilateral tax haven treaty in the US and any other countries that might still be opposing one.[4]
- Less javascript for mobile devices.[5]
- Remove WP:NOTHOWTO because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[11]
- Improve articles on interesting women and womens' issues.[12]
Controversial
- Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[13]