Proposals for more female editors: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
James Salsman (talk | contribs)
James Salsman (talk | contribs)
Line 7: Line 7:
* Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000112.html]
* Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000112.html]


* Improve articles on interesting women and womens' issues.[http:// lists.wikimedia.org/ pipermail/gendergap/ 2011-February/ 000117.html
* Improve articles on interesting women and womens' issues.[http:// lists.wikimedia.org/ pipermail/gendergap/ 2011-February/ 000117.html]


* Bring all articles on [[w:Birth control|birth control]] to featured status in all language wikipedias.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html]
* Bring all articles on [[w:Birth control|birth control]] to featured status in all language wikipedias.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html]

Revision as of 07:37, 5 February 2011

Proposals posted to the Gendergap mailing list without objections raised

  • Study other online communities that have sucessfully addressed gender imbalances[1]
  • Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[2]
  • Improve articles on interesting women and womens' issues.[http:// lists.wikimedia.org/ pipermail/gendergap/ 2011-February/ 000117.html]
  • Bring all articles on birth control to featured status in all language wikipedias.[3]
  • Provide easily accessible contact information for people who are willing and able to mentor new contributors. (And related proposals which the English Wikipedia is upholding to some extent.)
  • Demote Wikipe-tan from English Wikipedia mascot to WikiProject Anime mascot, replacing her with Puzzly.[4]
  • Support a multilateral tax haven treaty in the US and any other countries that might still be opposing one.[5]
  • Less javascript for mobile devices.[6]
  • Remove WP:NOTHOWTO because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[12]

Proposals posted to Gendergap mailing list to which objections have been raised

  • Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[13]