Talk:Wikimedians for software freedom: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Valerio Bozzolan in topic REQ-3-no-identification
Content deleted Content added
→REQ-3-no-identification: Reply |
→REQ-3-no-identification: Reply |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Last year I've seen a Google Form from Wikimedia Foundation where it was asked real name, surname and sexual preferences. I also think that is a bad goal but I think that somebody should say that this is not nice. [[User:Valerio Bozzolan|Valerio Bozzolan]] ([[User talk:Valerio Bozzolan|talk]]) 16:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC) |
:::Last year I've seen a Google Form from Wikimedia Foundation where it was asked real name, surname and sexual preferences. I also think that is a bad goal but I think that somebody should say that this is not nice. [[User:Valerio Bozzolan|Valerio Bozzolan]] ([[User talk:Valerio Bozzolan|talk]]) 16:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
::::Well, if this is a goal, the group should probably be renamed to Wikimedians for digital rights or Wikimedians for human rights. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 16:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC) |
::::Well, if this is a goal, the group should probably be renamed to Wikimedians for digital rights or Wikimedians for human rights. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 16:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
:::::Is it OK for you under a generic "What should be also nice to have" section? or still too unrelated? [[User:Valerio Bozzolan|Valerio Bozzolan]] ([[User talk:Valerio Bozzolan|talk]]) 08:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:20, 29 July 2022
REQ-3-no-identification
In my opinion, this should be outside the scope of group, since it may implemented even if all software is FLOSS and does not have anything to do with software freedom at all. ♥Ainali talkcontributions 16:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Right. But it could be nice to put it as secondary goal. So, differentiating purposes related to FLOSS (core interest of us as stake holders) and other purposes related to other digital rights (secondary) Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 16:10, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- I am not even sure it is a good goal, though. ♥Ainali talkcontributions 16:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Last year I've seen a Google Form from Wikimedia Foundation where it was asked real name, surname and sexual preferences. I also think that is a bad goal but I think that somebody should say that this is not nice. Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 16:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Well, if this is a goal, the group should probably be renamed to Wikimedians for digital rights or Wikimedians for human rights. ♥Ainali talkcontributions 16:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Is it OK for you under a generic "What should be also nice to have" section? or still too unrelated? Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 08:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Well, if this is a goal, the group should probably be renamed to Wikimedians for digital rights or Wikimedians for human rights. ♥Ainali talkcontributions 16:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Last year I've seen a Google Form from Wikimedia Foundation where it was asked real name, surname and sexual preferences. I also think that is a bad goal but I think that somebody should say that this is not nice. Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 16:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- I am not even sure it is a good goal, though. ♥Ainali talkcontributions 16:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC)