Jump to content

Talk:Wikimedians for software freedom: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ainali in topic Name
Content deleted Content added
→‎Name: new section
→‎Name: Reply
Line 16: Line 16:


I find the name of the group bizarre. How can someone calls themselves a wikimedian if they're not for software freedom? [[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 18:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
I find the name of the group bizarre. How can someone calls themselves a wikimedian if they're not for software freedom? [[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 18:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

:You do have a point. But the reality is that this is not a given, but something we need to advocate for. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 18:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:52, 13 August 2022

REQ-3-no-identification

In my opinion, this should be outside the scope of group, since it may implemented even if all software is FLOSS and does not have anything to do with software freedom at all. Ainali talkcontributions 16:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Right. But it could be nice to put it as secondary goal. So, differentiating purposes related to FLOSS (core interest of us as stake holders) and other purposes related to other digital rights (secondary) Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 16:10, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
I am not even sure it is a good goal, though. Ainali talkcontributions 16:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Last year I've seen a Google Form from Wikimedia Foundation where it was asked real name, surname and sexual preferences. I also think that is a bad goal but I think that somebody should say that this is not nice. Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 16:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Well, if this is a goal, the group should probably be renamed to Wikimedians for digital rights or Wikimedians for human rights. Ainali talkcontributions 16:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Is it OK for you under a generic "What should be also nice to have" section? or still too unrelated? Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 08:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikimania 2022 concerns

Hello! We can help in this page: wikimania:2022:Present and future Thank you so much everybody! --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 09:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Name

I find the name of the group bizarre. How can someone calls themselves a wikimedian if they're not for software freedom? Nemo 18:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

You do have a point. But the reality is that this is not a given, but something we need to advocate for. Ainali talkcontributions 18:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply