Jump to content

Proposals for more female editors: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
clarify origin
James Salsman (talk | contribs)
Line 17: Line 17:
==Posted to Gendergap list where objections have been raised==
==Posted to Gendergap list where objections have been raised==


* Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000047.html]
* Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000047.html] -- why is there opposition to reviving these groups?


==Not yet posted to the Gendergap list==
==Not yet posted to the Gendergap list==

Revision as of 03:30, 10 February 2011

Please link to the rationale(s) for and/or against at the end of each proposal.

Posted to the Gendergap list without objections raised there

  • Study other online communities that have sucessfully addressed gender imbalances.[1]
  • Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[2]
  • Improve articles on interesting women and womens' issues.[3]
  • Provide easily accessible contact information for people who are willing and able to mentor new contributors. (And related proposals which the English Wikipedia is upholding to some extent.)
  • Demote Wikipe-tan from English Wikipedia mascot to WikiProject Anime mascot, replacing her with Puzzly.[4]

Posted to Gendergap list where objections have been raised

  • Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring.[5] -- why is there opposition to reviving these groups?

Not yet posted to the Gendergap list