Proposals for more female editors: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
remove top-level sections; merge and note objections |
merge the other top level heading; indicate replacement; ask about girl scout badges |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Study other online communities that have successfully addressed gender imbalances.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000118.html] |
* Study other online communities that have successfully addressed gender imbalances.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000118.html] |
||
== |
== Recruiting women directly == |
||
* Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000112.html] |
* Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000112.html] |
||
⚫ | * [[User:Pharos]] of the New York City Chapter is trying to recruit a Girl Scout to a Wikipedian in Residence position and involve the Girl Scouts more directly in other ways. [[Wikimedia meetings/2011-02-05|IRC general meeting Feb. 5 2011, 10:20 Pacific time]] (This has not yet been posted to the Gendergap list -- should we suggest a Girl Scout achievement badge in editing Wikipedia?) |
||
⚫ | * Provide easily accessible contact information for people who are willing and able to mentor new contributors. ([http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000021.html And related proposals] which the English Wikipedia is upholding to some extent.) -- Please see [[w:Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia]], [[w:Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user]], and [[w:Wikipedia:Contribution Team]]; thanks [[User:Ironholds]] for recommending those. |
||
== Making wikis more welcoming to women == |
== Making wikis more welcoming to women == |
||
* Improve articles on interesting women and womens' issues such as [[simple:birth control]] and birth control in developing world language wikipedias.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000117.html][http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html] |
* Improve articles on interesting women and womens' issues such as [[simple:birth control]] and birth control in developing world language wikipedias.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000117.html][http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html] |
||
⚫ | ** Bring more articles about women and womens' issues to featured status in all language wikipedias. (Modified from one of several deleted proposals [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/meta/w/index.php?title=Proposals_for_increasing_female_editors&diff=2346993&oldid=2346201 at this diff].) [[User:Carolmooredc|Carolmooredc]] 18:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | * Provide easily accessible contact information for people who are willing and able to mentor new contributors. ([http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000021.html And related proposals] which the English Wikipedia is upholding to some extent.) -- Please see [[w:Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia]], [[w:Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user]], and [[w:Wikipedia:Contribution Team]]; thanks [[User:Ironholds]] for recommending those. |
||
* Remove [[w:WP:NOTHOWTO|WP:NOTHOWTO]] because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html] (This would also remove a pointless exclusion which overlaps with subjects of traditional interest to women -- e.g. recipes -- and information which is known to be used asymmetrically to disadvantage women economically -- e.g., brake repair.) |
* Remove [[w:WP:NOTHOWTO|WP:NOTHOWTO]] because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html] (This would also remove a pointless exclusion which overlaps with subjects of traditional interest to women -- e.g. recipes -- and information which is known to be used asymmetrically to disadvantage women economically -- e.g., brake repair.) |
||
Line 32: | Line 35: | ||
* [[strategy:Proposal:Record_and_upload_sound_clips_in_web_application|Audio upload with rtmplite and Gnash]].[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html] |
* [[strategy:Proposal:Record_and_upload_sound_clips_in_web_application|Audio upload with rtmplite and Gnash]].[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000057.html] |
||
==Not yet posted to the Gendergap list== |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | * Bring more articles about women and womens' issues to featured status in all language wikipedias. (Modified from one of several deleted proposals [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/meta/w/index.php?title=Proposals_for_increasing_female_editors&diff=2346993&oldid=2346201 at this diff].) [[User:Carolmooredc|Carolmooredc]] 18:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
[[Category:Proposals]] |
[[Category:Proposals]] |
Revision as of 03:49, 10 February 2011
This is here on Meta per discussion on the Gendergap email list. |
- Please link to the rationale(s) for and/or against at the end of each proposal.
Knowledge generation
- Study other online communities that have successfully addressed gender imbalances.[1]
Recruiting women directly
- Ask chapters to compete to nurture the greatest number of female administrators.[2]
- User:Pharos of the New York City Chapter is trying to recruit a Girl Scout to a Wikipedian in Residence position and involve the Girl Scouts more directly in other ways. IRC general meeting Feb. 5 2011, 10:20 Pacific time (This has not yet been posted to the Gendergap list -- should we suggest a Girl Scout achievement badge in editing Wikipedia?)
Making wikis more welcoming to women
- Improve articles on interesting women and womens' issues such as simple:birth control and birth control in developing world language wikipedias.[3][4]
- Bring more articles about women and womens' issues to featured status in all language wikipedias. (Modified from one of several deleted proposals at this diff.) Carolmooredc 18:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Provide easily accessible contact information for people who are willing and able to mentor new contributors. (And related proposals which the English Wikipedia is upholding to some extent.) -- Please see w:Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia, w:Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user, and w:Wikipedia:Contribution Team; thanks User:Ironholds for recommending those.
- Remove WP:NOTHOWTO because it is used to argue against topic notability but is not well respected.[5] (This would also remove a pointless exclusion which overlaps with subjects of traditional interest to women -- e.g. recipes -- and information which is known to be used asymmetrically to disadvantage women economically -- e.g., brake repair.)
Demote Wikipe-tan from English Wikipedia mascot to WikiProject Anime mascot,replacing her with Puzzly.[6] (partly done)
- Revive Esperanza and the Association of Editors' Advocates with a focus on editor mentoring. (This was opposed -- why is there opposition to reviving these groups?)
Supporting women via their economic disadvantages
- Less javascript for mobile devices.[7] (This is potentially in tension with WYSIWYG editing on high-end devices)
- Support a multilateral tax haven treaty in the US and any other countries that might still be opposing one.[8] (there is a detailed discussion of this proposal on the talk page with multiple objections -- note that this might prevent Wikimedia UK from attaining charitable status unless the advocacy could be off-loaded to chapters.)