User talk:SHB2000: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Billinghurst in topic RFCs
Content deleted Content added
m archive 2 sections: 2 to User talk:SHB2000/Archives/2023 (after section Translation_notification:_Movement_Charter/Content/Preamble) - previous edit: SHB2000, 2024-01-14 00:46 Tag: Manual revert |
Billinghurst (talk | contribs) →RFCs: new section |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{archive box auto|auto=dated}} |
{{archive box auto|auto=dated}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
== RFCs == |
|||
Please do not wikikawyer, or think that you have the position of lead prosecutor or rebutter of commentary. You put forward your proposal, and you need to leave it there and allow people to have their points of view. It is not yours to curate, and you end up feeding the trolls. IMO don't over invest, it doesn't help. — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 00:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:19, 27 January 2024
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} .
|
This page is for discussions related to the User:SHB2000 page. Please remember to:
|
RFCs
Please do not wikikawyer, or think that you have the position of lead prosecutor or rebutter of commentary. You put forward your proposal, and you need to leave it there and allow people to have their points of view. It is not yours to curate, and you end up feeding the trolls. IMO don't over invest, it doesn't help. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)