User talk:SHB2000: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 4 months ago by SHB2000 in topic RFCs
Content deleted Content added
→RFCs: re |
→RFCs: re |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Are you talking about [[Special:Diff/26142880]]? That was removed by {{u|Steinbach}}, not me (an action which I do support but wouldn't do myself). It's a bit of a reach to call something wikilawyering for something I did not do. <span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont">[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000#top|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|contribs]])</small></span> 00:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC) |
:Are you talking about [[Special:Diff/26142880]]? That was removed by {{u|Steinbach}}, not me (an action which I do support but wouldn't do myself). It's a bit of a reach to call something wikilawyering for something I did not do. <span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont">[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000#top|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|contribs]])</small></span> 00:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
::But if you're considering my reply to other oppose voters, I think it's more than reasonable to rebut something. It is an RfC, which is for discussing things. It isn't a discussion if the proposer can't rebut, especially if it's directed at them. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont">[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000#top|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|contribs]])</small></span> 00:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC) |
::But if you're considering my reply to other oppose voters, I think it's more than reasonable to rebut something. It is an RfC, which is for discussing things. It isn't a discussion if the proposer can't rebut, especially if it's directed at them. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont">[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000#top|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|contribs]])</small></span> 00:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::In saying that, I will step back from the RfC for my own wellbeing. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont">[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000#top|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|contribs]])</small></span> 00:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:58, 27 January 2024
 |
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} .
|
This page is for discussions related to the User:SHB2000 page. Please remember to:
|  |
RFCs
Please do not wikikawyer, or think that you have the position of lead prosecutor or rebutter of commentary. You put forward your proposal, and you need to leave it there and allow people to have their points of view. It is not yours to curate, and you end up feeding the trolls. IMO don't over invest, it doesn't help. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Are you talking about Special:Diff/26142880? That was removed by Steinbach, not me (an action which I do support but wouldn't do myself). It's a bit of a reach to call something wikilawyering for something I did not do. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- But if you're considering my reply to other oppose voters, I think it's more than reasonable to rebut something. It is an RfC, which is for discussing things. It isn't a discussion if the proposer can't rebut, especially if it's directed at them. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- In saying that, I will step back from the RfC for my own wellbeing. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- But if you're considering my reply to other oppose voters, I think it's more than reasonable to rebut something. It is an RfC, which is for discussing things. It isn't a discussion if the proposer can't rebut, especially if it's directed at them. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)