User talk:SHB2000: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 4 months ago by SHB2000 in topic RFCs
Content deleted Content added
→RFCs: Reply |
→RFCs: I don't think there is anything more to discuss here. I agreed to step back from the RfC and continuing further will only go in circles and serve no one. Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::::I am talking about your commentary on everyone's opinion (and just from looking at the history of the page, without burying myself within it). IMO it is a really poor practice and very combative. You are entitled to raise the RFC, and to have your opinion. What gives you the right to think that you can comment or challenge other's opinions? How would you feel if the roles were reversed? Others don't have independent minds and points of views? — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 12:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |
::::I am talking about your commentary on everyone's opinion (and just from looking at the history of the page, without burying myself within it). IMO it is a really poor practice and very combative. You are entitled to raise the RFC, and to have your opinion. What gives you the right to think that you can comment or challenge other's opinions? How would you feel if the roles were reversed? Others don't have independent minds and points of views? — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 12:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::::I never claimed I had the right to "challenge" other's opinions. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont">[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000#top|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|contribs]])</small></span> 21:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |
:::::I never claimed I had the right to "challenge" other's opinions. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont">[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000#top|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|contribs]])</small></span> 21:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
{{Section resolved|1=<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont">[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000#top|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|contribs]])</small></span> 01:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
Revision as of 01:20, 29 January 2024
 |
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} .
|
This page is for discussions related to the User:SHB2000 page. Please remember to:
|  |
RFCs
Please do not wikikawyer, or think that you have the position of lead prosecutor or rebutter of commentary. You put forward your proposal, and you need to leave it there and allow people to have their points of view. It is not yours to curate, and you end up feeding the trolls. IMO don't over invest, it doesn't help. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Are you talking about Special:Diff/26142880? That was removed by Steinbach, not me (an action which I do support but wouldn't do myself). It's a bit of a reach to call something wikilawyering for something I did not do. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- But if you're considering my reply to other oppose voters, I think it's more than reasonable to rebut something. It is an RfC, which is for discussing things. It isn't a discussion if the proposer can't rebut, especially if it's directed at them. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- In saying that, I will step back from the RfC for my own wellbeing. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am talking about your commentary on everyone's opinion (and just from looking at the history of the page, without burying myself within it). IMO it is a really poor practice and very combative. You are entitled to raise the RFC, and to have your opinion. What gives you the right to think that you can comment or challenge other's opinions? How would you feel if the roles were reversed? Others don't have independent minds and points of views? — billinghurst sDrewth 12:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- I never claimed I had the right to "challenge" other's opinions. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 21:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am talking about your commentary on everyone's opinion (and just from looking at the history of the page, without burying myself within it). IMO it is a really poor practice and very combative. You are entitled to raise the RFC, and to have your opinion. What gives you the right to think that you can comment or challenge other's opinions? How would you feel if the roles were reversed? Others don't have independent minds and points of views? — billinghurst sDrewth 12:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- In saying that, I will step back from the RfC for my own wellbeing. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- But if you're considering my reply to other oppose voters, I think it's more than reasonable to rebut something. It is an RfC, which is for discussing things. It isn't a discussion if the proposer can't rebut, especially if it's directed at them. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 01:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC)