Research talk:Wikimedia Research Best Practices Around Privacy Whitepaper/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
→‎Questions for researchers: added placeholders for responses and a third question
Tag: 2017 source edit
answer question
Line 9: Line 9:


2. What values do you think should be mentioned in [[Research:Wikimedia Research Best Practices Around Privacy Whitepaper/Draft#3.1 Understanding key values of Wikipedians|Section 3.1]] 'Understanding key values of Wikipedians'? What community essays, policies, or guidelines should be referenced in communicating key values of Wikipedians?
2. What values do you think should be mentioned in [[Research:Wikimedia Research Best Practices Around Privacy Whitepaper/Draft#3.1 Understanding key values of Wikipedians|Section 3.1]] 'Understanding key values of Wikipedians'? What community essays, policies, or guidelines should be referenced in communicating key values of Wikipedians?
* The Biographies of Living People (BLP) policy [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons], at least on enwiki our privacy practices are primarily just an application of BLP to active editors (all presumably living people). [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 18:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
* response_1
* response_2
* response_2
* ...
* ...

Revision as of 18:13, 8 April 2024

Questions for the Wikipedia Communities and Arbitration Committees

In particular, from this group we are seeking input on the following questions:

1. Starting with a review of some of the basics we've sketched so far in the white paper draft, what should the recommendations be for Wikipedians (section 4.2)? What is missing?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

2. What values do you think should be mentioned in Section 3.1 'Understanding key values of Wikipedians'? What community essays, policies, or guidelines should be referenced in communicating key values of Wikipedians?

3. What do you see as missing, if anything, as recommendations for researchers?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

4. Where would you like to see future work on this topic? What opportunities should be highlighting for researchers to examine more deeply?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

5. Do you have ideas about how we can address one or more of the "TODO"s we have listed throughout the draft?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

Questions for researchers

In particular, from this group we are seeking input on the following questions:

1. What recommendations are unclear, and maybe therefore unhelpful, for you?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

2. What questions do you still have about privacy on Wikipedia after reading this?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

3. Do you have ideas about how we can address one or more of the "TODO"s we have listed throughout the draft?

  • response_1
  • response_2
  • ...

Additional comments and feedback

To all reviewers and commenters, please try to organize your feedback by either adding it to an existing topic on this talk page, or by adding new topics so we can keep discussions around similar topics organized.

We will be monitoring this page until 30 April 2024, but won't be able to respond directly to comments. However, all comments will be reviewed and considered in the ongoing drafting and revising process.

If you are more comfortable leaving comments in a language other than English, please feel welcome to do so. Please note that we may utilize machine translation in reviewing non-English content. Thanks for your feedback!