Jump to content

Talk:Software Collaboration for Wikidata/Call Submissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Linking BrokenSegue's review here so we can collect everything in one place
Line 13: Line 13:


Personally, I regret a lot to have misunderstood the call opportunity. Now I'm checking the proposals, I see we could have sent the [https://wikimania.eventyay.com/2024/talk/review/38BD8Z7UARM8NXQKA9R9VNJS8SHHARHM Wikimedia LEADS] concept too. That's life. [[User:Olea|—Ismael Olea ]] ([[User talk:Olea|talk]]) 17:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Personally, I regret a lot to have misunderstood the call opportunity. Now I'm checking the proposals, I see we could have sent the [https://wikimania.eventyay.com/2024/talk/review/38BD8Z7UARM8NXQKA9R9VNJS8SHHARHM Wikimedia LEADS] concept too. That's life. [[User:Olea|—Ismael Olea ]] ([[User talk:Olea|talk]]) 17:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

== Review by BrokenSegue ==
Linking it here so we can collect everything in one place: [[d:User:BrokenSegue/ProposalReview|User:BrokenSegue/ProposalReview]]. -<font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#FF0000 0.1em 0.1em 1.5em,#01EE796D -0.1em -0.1em 1.5em;color:#00000F">[[User:Masssly|<font color="#01EE796D"><b>—M@sssly</b></font>]][[User talk:Masssly|<font color="#FFEG0000"><sup>✉</sup></font>]]</font> 11:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:59, 26 April 2024

QuickStatements 3.0

@EPorto I'm glad to see someone take on QuickStatements. We at WBUG originally considered proposing improvements to QS but decided to focus on an in-wiki reimplementation of Cradle-like functionality. Hopefully there'll be funding for both! GreenReaper (talk) 17:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Community Feedback

WMDE is curious to hear your feedback! Share your thoughts on the project proposals below. Maria Lechner (WMDE) (talk) 12:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Expression of support

  • I greatly appreciate the proposal for a new Cradle editor.
  • Also, the OR reconciliation service should be included as an standard feature in the Wikibase product bundles. I don't have an opinion about rewriting or not, but it would be appreciated from the very small GLAM point of view.

Personally, I regret a lot to have misunderstood the call opportunity. Now I'm checking the proposals, I see we could have sent the Wikimedia LEADS concept too. That's life. —Ismael Olea (talk) 17:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Review by BrokenSegue

Linking it here so we can collect everything in one place: User:BrokenSegue/ProposalReview. -—M@sssly 11:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply