Jump to content

User talk:Quentinv57: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Xeno in topic SULinfo
Content deleted Content added
→‎SULinfo: crosspost reply
Line 204: Line 204:
Thank you again for the new and improved SUL tool. Would it be possible to have the default display be sortable? Also - would it be possible to have the default display allow you to re-run the query with the additional options available? –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] 12:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you again for the new and improved SUL tool. Would it be possible to have the default display be sortable? Also - would it be possible to have the default display allow you to re-run the query with the additional options available? –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] 12:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
:Hello xeno. This should now allow to change the options on the same result page. But I did not understand what you mean when you said "Would it be possible to have the default display be sortable?". As far as I know, the default display is already sorted by local wiki name, isn't it ? Best regards, -- [[User:Quentinv57|Quentinv57]] [[User talk:Quentinv57|<small><sup>(talk)</sup></small>]] 13:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
:Hello xeno. This should now allow to change the options on the same result page. But I did not understand what you mean when you said "Would it be possible to have the default display be sortable?". As far as I know, the default display is already sorted by local wiki name, isn't it ? Best regards, -- [[User:Quentinv57|Quentinv57]] [[User talk:Quentinv57|<small><sup>(talk)</sup></small>]] 13:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
::Thanks for the update! The default view is ''sorted'' by local wiki name but not ''sortable'' by clicking the sort buttons that show up in the more advanced displays. When I am evaluating a usurp request I will usually like to look at unattached accounts sorted by edits. –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] 13:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:47, 22 August 2011

Hello !

If you want to tell me :

Global rollback

Hello Quentinv57. Per your request you have been promoted to the global rollback user group. Please take into count the objections raised in your nomination and re-read global rollback. Should you have further questions feel free to ask. Regards, --dferg ☎ talk 09:15, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sure, thank you ! -- Quentinv57 20:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Please, there is an official language on our Wiki. 90.54.18.61

:)

No, it was obviously a mistake, because I intended to mark another article for deletion. And I always put {{delete}} in the article before that. Thanks :) mickit 14:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think I found a source of the problem :) mickit 14:53, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I just removed the item from deletion list. Thanks :) -- Quentinv57 15:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Zbigniew Wąsiel on dsbwp

Hello, Quentin57. Thanks you for your deleting of "Zbigniew Wąsiel" on the Lower Sorbian Wikipedia. Greetings --Tlustulimu 16:44, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome ;-) -- Quentinv57 17:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wikinews

Hi! On this page there are two items:

Sr wikinews got permission from Beta news agency and we can copy their news. So, this is not copyvio. What do you do in such situations? Do you remove these items manualy or something else perhaps? I didn't want anything to do without consultation. mickit 22:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Never mind. I did it myself. Regards mickit 13:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes, simply removing items from on-wiki list is okay. Have a good day. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 12:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | Nederlands | português | Türkçe | русский | العربية | Tiếng Việt | edit

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades... (our budget is smaller than Commons)

Quentinv57, congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Meta. Please take a moment to read the Meta:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat, and Meta:Requests for deletion, but also Talk:Spam blacklist and Talk:Interwiki map), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings, or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

A tip: add this page Meta:Administrators' discussion index to your watchlist, it tracks the latest activity to various sections of many of the important pages.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-admin @ irc.freenode.net. You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading although it doesn't always completely apply here at Meta.

Please also check or add your entry to Meta:Administrators#List_of_administrators and the Template:List of administrators.


-Barras 14:25, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Congrats! --WizardOfOz talk 14:56, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! mickit 12:56, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Temp access

Hey, you've archived this, but it doesn't seem to be expired!--Nick1915 - all you want 11:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oh, sorry, I confused WizardOfOz@bswikisource and WizardOfOz@bswikinews (see edit summary of your diff). Everything is now in order ? -- Quentinv57 (talk) 12:11, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Sysop flag is removed, so everything is ok :D --WizardOfOz talk 12:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fusion des comptes

Bonjour et merci d avoir repondu a ma demande. Mon ancien compte est sur wiktionnaire: Saint amand. Mon nouveau compte est sur wikipedia et tout le reste : Saint amand. Comme j avais fait un test en 2005 sans faire de contributions supplementaires, je me retrouve avec mon compte wiktionnaire, mais sans le mot de passe (je l ai oublie depuis 2005 et j ai demande de m emvoyer un e mail, mais il a change depuis) que je ne peux pas fusionner. En fait j avais completement oublie que j etais sur wiktionnaire. C est quand j ai voulu contribuer a wiktionnaire que je m en suis rendu compte. J ai du le faire avec ip anonyme (wikt:oie flamande), qui correspond a mon article Oie flamande sur Wikipedia. Il faudrait fusionner mon compte wiktionnaire a mon compte global (attention de bien garder mon mot de passe actuel de wikipedia !), ou bien le supprimer pour que je puisse etendre mon compte wikipedia. Page utilisateur wikipedia : Saint amand.

Merci--80.246.106.4 12:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour Saint amand,
Je viens de recevoir un message (meta.wikimedia.org) déposé par 80.246.106.4 me demandant d'usurper votre compte Saint amand sur le Wiktionnaire.
Je voulais donc m'assurer que le message vient bien de vous (car vous n'étiez pas identifié à ce moment), et vous demander dans ce cas de vous créer un nouveau compte sur le Wiktionnaire dont vous me donnerez le nom, et qui aura le même mot de passe et la même adresse mail que pour Wikipédia.
Cdlt, -- Quentinv57 2 décembre 2010 à 15:06 (CET)
Bonsoir Quentinv57, je vous confirme ma demande soit
  • de supprimer mon ancien compte de wiktionnaire [1]
  • ou bien de remettre le mot de passe à zéro
  • ou de me donner l'ancien mot de passe pour que je le change
  • ou de le modifier directement pour qu'il corresponde à mon mot de passe de wikipédia.
Je pensais que ma signature fonctionnerait vû que mon compte wikimedia est fusionné, mais je viens de me rendre compte que je devais créer ma page. J'espère que j'ai fourni toutes les données nécessaires !
--Saint amand 18:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Bonsoir,
Aucune des possibilités que vous avez énuméré ci-dessus n'est envisageable pour une usurpation de compte : je ne pourrai ni supprimer votre ancien compte, ni réinitialiser, changer ou vous communiquer votre mot de passe. La seule solution dans ce cas est comme je vous l'ai indiqué ci-dessus de vous créer un nouveau compte sur le Wiktionnaire avec la même adresse email et le même mot de passe que votre compte sur Wikipédia. Appelez-le Saint Amand 2 par exemple.
Cdlt, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 18:52, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Merci pour la réponse, mais elle ne rime à rien. Pourquoi aurais-je fait appel à vous si c'est pour créer un nouveau compte qui ne demande pas l'assistance d'un administrateur. Mon compte wiktionnaire est en carafe depuis 5 ans. Va-t'il rester sur wiktionnaire pour les siècles des siècles ? En consultant Droit de disparaitre, il apparait que le plus simple, vu qu'il n'est pas possible de supprimer l'ancien compte serait de changer mon ancien nom d'utilisateur. Je vous demande donc de modifier Saint amand en ce que vous voulez (comme Saint amand 2, mais peu importe), ce qui liberera la place pour le nouveau. Merci. --Saint amand 19:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Combien de fois devrais-je vous répéter la procédure ? Créez un compte, je le renommerai ensuite. Pour vous, cela revient exactement au même de vous créer un compte appelé Saint amand ou Saint amand 2. L'unification viendra ensuite, vous pouvez me faire confiance ;) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Bonsoir Quentin, excusez-moi si je vous avais mal compris. J'ai créé un compte sur Wiktionnaire Saint Amand2. Merci.--Amiteusement - Saint amand (d) 6 décembre 2010 à 20:56 (CET)
Le compte a été renommé. En allant sur cette page, votre compte Wiktionnaire devrait se rattacher à votre compte unifié.
Bonne continuation. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 21:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Milles Mercis !! Ça a fonctionné parfaitement !

--85.201.209.163 21:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC) C'est mieux comme ça : --Saint amand 21:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

gd:Sioman

Thanks for the notice. I set it back to the version where the interwiki links are still correct. The mistake seems to start here, so best if you contact the bot owner to clean up the mess his bot created. Kind regards --Sionnach 10:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

So "Sioman" is not a river but really means "cable" ? The picture don't really reference to a cable... -- Quentinv57 (talk) 10:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

KinyaRwanda

I want to be admin. But, I know very little KinyaRwanda. Best regards. --Kmoksy 15:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're a sysop for three months now. If you need some help to work with the new tools or if you have any other problem, feel free to contact me on my talk page. Good luck and thanks for your help ! -- Quentinv57 (talk) 17:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Michelet sur le Wiktionnaire

Salut Micheletb,

Il paraît que Michelet@frwiktionary est un compte qui t'appartient. Nous pouvons le renommer en User:Micheletb si tu le souhaites. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 12:32, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merci pour cette proposition, mais mon compte de base est Michelet plutôt que Micheletb, je préférerai que le renommage fût possible dans l'autre sens sur Commons... Michelet-密是力 (talk) 14:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Je voudrais savoir si tu as encore l'intention d'utiliser ce compte (Michelet) sur le Wiktionnaire. Cela a suscité de nombreux débats la-haut : on se demande s'il faut ou non lui donner le statut autopatrolled. Merci de ta réponse. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 18:38, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Désolé de susciter de l'agitation, ce n'était pas mon intention ! Ma signature de base sur le wictionnaire était "Michelet" ; je n'utilise "Micheletb" que parce que je suis en train de faire des éditions à cheval entre Commons (où mon compte est imposé à "micheletb") et le wictionnaire, comme là où je fais de la maintenance ; mais a priori si je fais des éditions ciblées sur le wictionnaire je peux repasser sur "Michelet" - sauf si ça pose problème, bien sûr. Donc = oui, je suis susceptible de réutiliser ce compte, et le mettre en "autopatrolled" peut être une bonne chose. Cordialement, Micheletb 18:55, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Mais non, tu n'es responsable d'aucune agitation. L'autopatrol sera donné à ton second compte alors, pas de soucis. Bonne soirée ! -- Quentinv57 (talk) 20:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

(re)bonjour, y a-t-il eu une action sur le compte Michelet? je n'arrive plus à obtenir une connexion stable sous cette identification, et le vérificateur des électeurs ne trouve plus aucune de mes contributions ... Cdlt, Micheletb 22:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Non, il n'y a pas eu d'opérations sur ce compte depuis le Wiktionnaire [2]. Qu'appelles-tu avoir une connexion stable sous cette identification ? -- Quentinv57 (talk) 13:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks...

... for the translation! --WizardOfOz talk 16:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

w:User:Paradise Project

I don't know what the meta deletion policy says but on the English Wikipedia admins can't speedy delete pages just because the user is using them as a personal web page. The only way to get pages deleted for that reason is w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. Hut 8.5 21:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please check your part

Hi, I've added you name here. Please check your details there (the babel, IRC nick, and active from section), and include if any of the information is not included yet or added wrongfully. Thanks for your help. — Tanvir | Talk ] 08:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nice to you, thanks. Hope that in some days you'll be able to add youself to the list ;) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 19:44, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

Thanks for telling that, I will take care of it. I am already a sysop on sa wiki and I mainly request deletions here. Thanks again. :) Vibhijain 07:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome ;) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 16:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Concerning Interwicket

Hi Quentinv57,

I've removed Interwicket's bot status even though it hurt a little.

I kind of suspected that something was wrong with Mr. Ullmann; may his soul rest in peace.

Best Regards,

--Robbie SWE 20:17, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

idem in it.wikt--Wim b 22:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Anwer of Removal of Interwicket's status

Roommate: I have removed the bot flag to Interwicket. And if you want to carry out petitions to the bureaucrats, you can make them here. Receive a greeting. --Vubo 07:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your RfB

Hi there. Since your request met the requirements for success, I've closed your RfB as successful. Congrats and best of luck in your new role! –Juliancolton | Talk 18:58, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Congrats. --WizardOfOz talk 19:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 21:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
RfB is closed with 100% support after requested 24 hours. Your flag is valid so feel free to use. Congrats once more. --WizardOfOz talk 05:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Happy to see this discussion resolved. Thanks again ! -- Quentinv57 (talk) 11:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Translator, We need you!

Dear Quentinv57,

You have helped us in previous years with translations and for that we are most grateful. Now we turn towards the 2011/12 fundraiser. It may seem forever away, but work has already begun getting everything ready to go. This year we want to have landing pages covering as many countries in as many languages as possible.

Right now, we want to figure out who is interested in translating for the fundraiser. This year we're hoping to have more of a solidified "core" group of translators that we can count on to have work done by a few key dates, but we'd also welcome help from people who are willing to just help out when they can.

If you would be interested please take a look at this little sign-up survey and fill it out http://survey.wikimedia.org/index.php?sid=13638&newtest=Y&lang=en. With that we can start building a list of people and filling any gaps in the languages we serve.

Many Thanks

Joseph Seddon (User:Jseddon (WMF))

Production Coordinator
Wikimedia Foundation
Jseddon (WMF) 00:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks about your archiving on the spam blacklist talk page

[3][4]. Thanks. Those had been open a very long time. --Abd 02:05, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. Today I'm archiving steward requests' pages with an automatic script that runs every morning at 8 am. I plan to do it with a bot account, but I have not found the time to do it. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 11:07, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Renaming

Hi, [5]--محمد الجداوي 10:32, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for replying. can you please send me a specified link to request renaming in? I couldn't understand your reply!--محمد الجداوي 11:46, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Links will depend on the projects you will request it. I advise you to begin by Index of pages where renaming can be requested, and if the wiki is not on the list, you can try International names for Village Pump. If the wiki is still absent, the only possibility I see there is to choose a local bureaucrat (the best is too chose the more active) by clicking on the stewardry link next to the project.
If you have more questions or need some help again, feel free to ask. Cordially, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:01, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

There is requests waiting you!--محمد الجداوي 04:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I'm not a steward, I'm a global sysop, which means I cannot perform operations such as giving bot access. I just try to help them with the requests as they're really understaffed at the moment. But your request seems to be okay, just wait that somebody handles it. Cordially, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 10:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ok, Thanks anyway my friend.--محمد الجداوي 12:54, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

:D

No I´m not. Was just around at the moment :D But thx. --WizardOfOz talk 21:58, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please explain

This!! Béria Lima msg 10:23, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Reply

I've replied on my talk page. Have a nice Sunday, Quentinv57. Thank you. :) Ruy Pugliesi 14:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Revert

[6] hmmm... that was the Sandbox... -- Quentinv57 (talk) 08:27, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Quentinv57! Yes, was the Sandbox, but I thought that this wasn't a constructive change, The sandbox is a page where users can do any change, but it should be constructive. That change looked like a vandalism more than a test. Regards. --Reder 08:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
In fact, the user has just done a test with <nowiki>, <small> and <big> tags. I'm not saying that to bore you, but just to make you aware that you should revert only if it's really a necessity, if it's an evident case of vandalism. This one is not. It is important when you patrol on local wikis, but even more when you do cross-wiki patrolling. Regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 08:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I understood. Thanks for the explanation. Have a great day. --Reder 09:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
No problems. Have a good day too -- Quentinv57 (talk) 09:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

SULinfo

Thank you again for the new and improved SUL tool. Would it be possible to have the default display be sortable? Also - would it be possible to have the default display allow you to re-run the query with the additional options available? –xeno 12:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello xeno. This should now allow to change the options on the same result page. But I did not understand what you mean when you said "Would it be possible to have the default display be sortable?". As far as I know, the default display is already sorted by local wiki name, isn't it ? Best regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 13:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the update! The default view is sorted by local wiki name but not sortable by clicking the sort buttons that show up in the more advanced displays. When I am evaluating a usurp request I will usually like to look at unattached accounts sorted by edits. –xeno 13:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply