Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 December 29: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→User:Cyclopia/List of dichotomies: hmm, not comment |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{{user|John Vandenberg}} speedily deleted this subpage of mine with the justification that it met CSD G5 criteria (see discussion at [[User_talk:Cyclopia#userfied_page_deleted|my talk page]]. Problem is, it doesn't meet G5 for the simple reason that it underwent ''substantial'' edits by other users (yours truly). Even if they amounted to trimming and refactoring, fact is that the deleted version of that page was ''no more'' only the work of the banned user. I am ok with the deletion of the revisions of the banned users, but I am much less ok with deletion of my own revisions, especially if they belong to a userfied page that was kept for further work. At the ''very minimum'', I would appreciate if the wikicode can be sent to me by email, so that I can use it as a start for refactoring (being a list, the listed items would be the necessary material). Thanks. [[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 14:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC) |
{{user|John Vandenberg}} speedily deleted this subpage of mine with the justification that it met CSD G5 criteria (see discussion at [[User_talk:Cyclopia#userfied_page_deleted|my talk page]]. Problem is, it doesn't meet G5 for the simple reason that it underwent ''substantial'' edits by other users (yours truly). Even if they amounted to trimming and refactoring, fact is that the deleted version of that page was ''no more'' only the work of the banned user. I am ok with the deletion of the revisions of the banned users, but I am much less ok with deletion of my own revisions, especially if they belong to a userfied page that was kept for further work. At the ''very minimum'', I would appreciate if the wikicode can be sent to me by email, so that I can use it as a start for refactoring (being a list, the listed items would be the necessary material). Thanks. [[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 14:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
*Cyclopia rearranged the content a little, but did not author any content on this page. I have recommended that they talk to Arbcom before initiating this DRV. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 15:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:02, 29 December 2009
29 December 2009
User:Cyclopia/List of dichotomies
John Vandenberg (talk · contribs) speedily deleted this subpage of mine with the justification that it met CSD G5 criteria (see discussion at my talk page. Problem is, it doesn't meet G5 for the simple reason that it underwent substantial edits by other users (yours truly). Even if they amounted to trimming and refactoring, fact is that the deleted version of that page was no more only the work of the banned user. I am ok with the deletion of the revisions of the banned users, but I am much less ok with deletion of my own revisions, especially if they belong to a userfied page that was kept for further work. At the very minimum, I would appreciate if the wikicode can be sent to me by email, so that I can use it as a start for refactoring (being a list, the listed items would be the necessary material). Thanks. Cyclopiatalk 14:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- Cyclopia rearranged the content a little, but did not author any content on this page. I have recommended that they talk to Arbcom before initiating this DRV. John Vandenberg (chat) 15:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)