Talk:Association of Immoral Wikimedians: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Canadianism in topic What the......
Content deleted Content added
What the...... |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Why the he!! would Jimbo join this association? [[User:Canadianism|Canadianism]] 04:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC) |
Why the he!! would Jimbo join this association? [[User:Canadianism|Canadianism]] 04:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
It's a joke, before Wikipedia he ran an immoral site. |
|||
Revision as of 13:26, 15 July 2006
disdainful sniff
Immoral wikipedians are so shallow compared to the Association of Amoral Wikimedians. - Amgine / talk 05:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- This is true, except replace your lame association with my kickass association. AngryParsley 04:41, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- What? That exclusionist club of "better-project-than-thouers" who would not deign to associate with Wikibookians, let alone Wikiquoters? Okay, it is more kickass. But probably not less shallow! - Amgine / talk 06:31, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- Ah fuck it, I redirected. Let our powers combine and whatnot. AngryParsley 18:33, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
What the......
Why the he!! would Jimbo join this association? Canadianism 04:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
It's a joke, before Wikipedia he ran an immoral site.