Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mormon Expression: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs)
Relisting debate
Line 2: Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}


:{{la|Mormon Expression}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mormon Expression|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 January 7#{{anchorencode:Mormon Expression}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:{{la|Mormon Expression}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mormon Expression|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 January 15#{{anchorencode:Mormon Expression}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:({{Find sources|Mormon Expression}})
:({{Find sources|Mormon Expression}})
No [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] given or found to establish [[WP:WEB|notability of a website/podcast/blog]], let alone fulfilling the requirements of [[WP:GNG]]. PROD was removed, sources given are at least an order of magnitude below covering rule 2 on [[WP:WEB#Criteria]]. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 17:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
No [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] given or found to establish [[WP:WEB|notability of a website/podcast/blog]], let alone fulfilling the requirements of [[WP:GNG]]. PROD was removed, sources given are at least an order of magnitude below covering rule 2 on [[WP:WEB#Criteria]]. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 17:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Line 19: Line 19:
*'''Keep''' New article; which needs some more time to grow into a article that will meet WP:WEB. Deleting the page so early only serves as a quasi-censorship act in wikipedia and seems to be religiously motivated since the podcast is generally not friendly to the mormon church.[[User:Wombat24|Wombat24]] ([[User talk:Wombat24|talk]]) 01:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' New article; which needs some more time to grow into a article that will meet WP:WEB. Deleting the page so early only serves as a quasi-censorship act in wikipedia and seems to be religiously motivated since the podcast is generally not friendly to the mormon church.[[User:Wombat24|Wombat24]] ([[User talk:Wombat24|talk]]) 01:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
::Please do explain how this is religiously motivated and how it is censorship. Content that is from a positive or negative point of view still needs to meet the notability guidelines. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 01:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
::Please do explain how this is religiously motivated and how it is censorship. Content that is from a positive or negative point of view still needs to meet the notability guidelines. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 01:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 01:19, 15 January 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]

Revision as of 01:19, 15 January 2011

Mormon Expression

Mormon Expression (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources given or found to establish notability of a website/podcast/blog, let alone fulfilling the requirements of WP:GNG. PROD was removed, sources given are at least an order of magnitude below covering rule 2 on WP:WEB#Criteria. tedder (talk) 17:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Delete - sources from a quick Google search appear similar to the two that are already in the article - blogs and similar non-reliable sources. If some of them turned out to actually be well regarded within their niche, I could be convinced that this should be a weak keep instead. We really need a few editors with a better feel for what can be considered good sources for what effectively amounts to LDS pop culture. I am posting a link to this AfD at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement. VQuakr (talk) 01:53, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Additional source has been added to show relationship to Mormon Stories podcast, which is well-known in the Mormon blogging community.--Nathan T. (talk) 06:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]
Notability is not inherited. tedder (talk) 06:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Point is that sources have been added. Isn't about ITSAWombat24 (talk) 01:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Which sources? They are primary sources and self-published/blogs. They are not reliable sources, they are sources indicating this exists, nothing more. There are zero reliable sources establishing WP:WEB or WP:GNG. tedder (talk) 01:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep New article; which needs some more time to grow into a article that will meet WP:WEB. Deleting the page so early only serves as a quasi-censorship act in wikipedia and seems to be religiously motivated since the podcast is generally not friendly to the mormon church.Wombat24 (talk) 01:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please do explain how this is religiously motivated and how it is censorship. Content that is from a positive or negative point of view still needs to meet the notability guidelines. tedder (talk) 01:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]