Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Hersfold: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:18, 10 August 2011

BAG Nomination: Hersfold

Hersfold (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

Per Slakr's recent self-nomination, it looks like the BAG could use a bit more help, especially from active 'crats. I run three bots, two on en.wiki (User:HersfoldBot and User:HersfoldArbClerkBot); I'm an admin and crat; I have a toolserver account; I'm experienced in coding, most particularly in Java, C, and PHP. Anything else you'd like to know, please feel free to ask. :-) Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

How many and which BRfAs have you been involved with other than your own? Searching, I can only find Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DuckBot, are there any others? - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Off the top of my head, that would be it. I've read through a good number when working on my bots, but that's the only other one I've commented on. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 14:51, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

No concerns here. –xeno^talk 18:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. MBisanz ^talk 18:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. Tim1357 ^talk 19:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problems here. /ƒETCH COMMS / 19:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Considering that the main reason you ran for 'crat was to assist with bot stuff, I certainly would think that this makes sense. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a no-brainer support. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 20:29, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. — The Earwig ^(talk) 21:28, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - the offer to assist is appreciated - shoe in/snow in - Off2riorob (talk) 21:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent history with Wikimedia Commons and their bots. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 17:22, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - considering based on the workload you've already taken on and complete well, I've been sure for quite some time that you're a well functioning, self adaptable, well programmed bot - thusI see no problems with this. ;-) ROBERTMFROMLI | ^TK/_CN 06:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 16:18, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 * Excellent history with Wikimedia Commons and their bots. [[User:TeleComNasSprVen|TeleComNasSprVen]] ([[User talk:TeleComNasSprVen|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/TeleComNasSprVen|contribs]]) 17:22, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 *Support - considering based on the workload you've already taken on and complete well, I've been sure for quite some time that you're a well functioning, self adaptable, well programmed bot - thusI see no problems with this. ;-) <span style="border:1px solid #100;padding:1px;"><small>[[User:RobertMfromLI|R<small>OBERT</small>M<small>FROM</small>LI]] </small>&#124;<small> <sup>[[User talk:RobertMfromLI|TK]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RobertMfromLI|CN]]</sub></small></span> 06:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Support''' Why not? -'''[[User:Fastily|<span style='font-family: "Trebuchet MS"; color:#4B0082'><big>F</big><small>ASTILY</small></span>]]''' <sup><small>[[User talk:Fastily|<span style = 'color:#4B0082'>(TALK)</span>]]</small></sup> 16:18, 10 August 2011 (UTC)