Grants talk:PEG/Need DSLR camera and Tele Lens for Discover the Birds of Sulawesi Photographs: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Please try to convince me (us) that you're worth the investment! [[User:MADe|MADe]] ([[User talk:MADe|talk]]) 14:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC) |
Please try to convince me (us) that you're worth the investment! [[User:MADe|MADe]] ([[User talk:MADe|talk]]) 14:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
In general this is considered as microgrant, but we have also to say that Commons needs to have photos in high quality but only for displaying on devices. My feeling is that this equipment costs a lot and it's not a benefit for the community, I have in mind that the budget of WLM in Armenia is more or less the same and Armenia is producing more than 3000 photos. In Wikimedia CH, for instance, this material belongs to the chapter and anyone can use it https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_CH/Lending_equipment], I would be in opposition to give it only to one person. --[[User:Ilario|Ilario]] ([[User talk:Ilario|talk]]) 08:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC) |
In general this is considered as microgrant, but we have also to say that Commons needs to have photos in high quality but only for displaying on devices. My feeling is that this equipment costs a lot and it's not a benefit for the community, I have in mind that the budget of WLM in Armenia is more or less the same and Armenia is producing more than 3000 photos. In Wikimedia CH, for instance, this material belongs to the chapter and anyone can use it [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_CH/Lending_equipment], I would be in opposition to give it only to one person. --[[User:Ilario|Ilario]] ([[User talk:Ilario|talk]]) 08:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
=== Post-Evaluation Summary of remaining Comments === |
=== Post-Evaluation Summary of remaining Comments === |
||
Revision as of 08:58, 12 September 2013
Discussion / Comments
Convince me!
Hey Arief Rahman, I carefully read your proposal.
4000$ is a lot of money, it's a bit sad that the proposal only brief information. What's your involvement in the community, in wild photography? Do you have existing equipment? Your Commons account? Do you have contacts with governmental organisations?
Please try to convince me (us) that you're worth the investment! MADe (talk) 14:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
In general this is considered as microgrant, but we have also to say that Commons needs to have photos in high quality but only for displaying on devices. My feeling is that this equipment costs a lot and it's not a benefit for the community, I have in mind that the budget of WLM in Armenia is more or less the same and Armenia is producing more than 3000 photos. In Wikimedia CH, for instance, this material belongs to the chapter and anyone can use it [1], I would be in opposition to give it only to one person. --Ilario (talk) 08:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Post-Evaluation Summary of remaining Comments
Evaluation by the GAC
GAC Members who read the grant request without comments
- .
GAC Members who approve this grant request
- .
GAC Members who oppose this grant request
- .
GAC Members who abstain from voting/comment
- .