Jump to content

Grants talk:PEG/Need DSLR camera and Tele Lens for Discover the Birds of Sulawesi Photographs: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Ijon in topic Discussion / Comments
Content deleted Content added
→‎comments: fix brackets
Line 22: Line 22:
===comments===
===comments===
In general, I strongly oppose individual equipment grants, for reasons I outline [[Grants:Retrospective_2009-2012#Be_cautious_about_equipment-focused_grants|here]]. There is no way I can support a $4000 grant with a stated goal of taking sixty photos. I would suggest approaching WMIN, having them act as custodian for the equpment, and cutting costs substantially. Even then, unless you have a really well laid out plan about how this would generate uniquely valuable content for Wikimedia projects in a cost-effective way, I'm not sure I would support such a grant. [[User:Kevin Gorman|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Kevin Gorman|talk]]) 00:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
In general, I strongly oppose individual equipment grants, for reasons I outline [[Grants:Retrospective_2009-2012#Be_cautious_about_equipment-focused_grants|here]]. There is no way I can support a $4000 grant with a stated goal of taking sixty photos. I would suggest approaching WMIN, having them act as custodian for the equpment, and cutting costs substantially. Even then, unless you have a really well laid out plan about how this would generate uniquely valuable content for Wikimedia projects in a cost-effective way, I'm not sure I would support such a grant. [[User:Kevin Gorman|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Kevin Gorman|talk]]) 00:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
:Note: WMIN is Wikimedia India. You meant WMID -- Wikimedia Indonesia. It would indeed be well to learn what, if anything, has been attempted by way of approaching the chapter with this idea. [[User:Ijon|Asaf Bartov (WMF Grants)]] [[User_talk:Ijon|talk]] 02:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)


=== Post-Evaluation Summary of remaining Comments ===
=== Post-Evaluation Summary of remaining Comments ===

Revision as of 02:16, 14 September 2013

Discussion / Comments

Convince me!

Hey Arief Rahman, I carefully read your proposal.

4000$ is a lot of money, it's a bit sad that the proposal only brief information. What's your involvement in the community, in wild photography? Do you have existing equipment? Your Commons account? Do you have contacts with governmental organisations?

Please try to convince me (us) that you're worth the investment! MADe (talk) 14:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

In general this is considered as microgrant, but we have also to say that Commons needs to have photos in high quality but only for displaying on devices. My feeling is that this equipment costs a lot and it's not a benefit for the community, I have in mind that the budget of WLM in Armenia is more or less the same and Armenia is producing more than 3000 photos. In Wikimedia CH, for instance, this material belongs to the chapter and anyone can use it [1], I would be in opposition to give it only to one person. --Ilario (talk) 08:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Things you can do to improve this request

Hi Arief, I hope the guys above have not scared you off. I had a look at your grant request and I suggest the following enhancements:

  1. Please provide a link to your commons account.
  2. Please tell us more about yourself.
  3. Please tell us of your involvement with your local chapter. ( Have you discussed this request with any local guys?)
  4. Do you have a timeline for this project?
  5. Are you planning to do more than just taking quality pictures? Could you for example use this project to train some local Wikimedians who may be so inclined on photography?
  6. Would you be willing to revise your prospective camera to a lower spec and use a portion of the request to organize an outreach event?

I guess what I am trying to say is, you have a potentially good project. You just need to demonstrate impact and levels of responsibility and accountability. Feel free to mail any of us if you need a sound board.--Thuvack (talk) 19:44, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

comments

In general, I strongly oppose individual equipment grants, for reasons I outline here. There is no way I can support a $4000 grant with a stated goal of taking sixty photos. I would suggest approaching WMIN, having them act as custodian for the equpment, and cutting costs substantially. Even then, unless you have a really well laid out plan about how this would generate uniquely valuable content for Wikimedia projects in a cost-effective way, I'm not sure I would support such a grant. Kevin (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Note: WMIN is Wikimedia India. You meant WMID -- Wikimedia Indonesia. It would indeed be well to learn what, if anything, has been attempted by way of approaching the chapter with this idea. Asaf Bartov (WMF Grants) talk 02:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Post-Evaluation Summary of remaining Comments

Evaluation by the GAC

GAC Members who read the grant request without comments

  1. .

GAC Members who approve this grant request

  1. .

GAC Members who oppose this grant request

  1. .

GAC Members who abstain from voting/comment

  1. .